The impact of estrogen receptor and L1 cell adhesion molecule expression on endometrial cancer outcome correlates with clinicopathological risk group and molecular subgroup.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk stratification of clinicopathologically and molecularly classified endometrial cancer based on estrogen receptor (ER) and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent primary treatment at a single tertiary center. Carcinomas were classified into 5 clinicopathological risk groups, as per European guidelines. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase-ϵ sequencing were conducted for molecular classification and determination of ER and L1CAM expression. RESULTS: Data from 1044 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 67.5 months. In univariable analyses, ER expression correlated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) in the "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) (P < 0.001) and mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) (P = 0.002) subgroups. Negative L1CAM expression was associated with enhanced DSS in the NSMP subgroup alone (P < 0.001). ER (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18), but not L1CAM, exhibited prognostic significance within NSMP when controlling for parameters available at the time of diagnosis (tumor histotype, grade, age). ER and L1CAM were not independently associated with DSS within NSMP when controlling for parameters available after surgery (clinicopathological risk groups, age, adjuvant therapy). However, in high-risk-advanced-metastatic cases, both ER (HR 0.26) and L1CAM (HR 3.9) independently correlated with DSS. Similarly, within MMRd, ER was associated with improved DSS in high-risk-advanced-metastatic carcinomas (HR 0.42). CONCLUSION: The prognostic significance of ER and L1CAM varies across clinicopathological risk groups and molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Notably, risk assessment for high-risk-advanced-metastatic NSMP and MMRd subtype carcinomas can be refined by ER status.

Drug response profiles in patient-derived cancer cells across histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: real-time therapy tailoring for a patient with low-grade serous carcinoma.

Many efforts are underway to develop novel therapies against the aggressive high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs), while our understanding of treatment options for low-grade (LGSOC) or mucinous (MUCOC) of ovarian malignancies is not developing as well. We describe here a functional precision oncology (fPO) strategy in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), which involves high-throughput drug testing of patient-derived ovarian cancer cells (PDCs) with a library of 526 oncology drugs, combined with genomic and transcriptomic profiling. HGSOC, LGSOC and MUCOC PDCs had statistically different overall drug response profiles, with LGSOCs responding better to targeted inhibitors than HGSOCs. We identified several subtype-specific drug responses, such as LGSOC PDCs showing high sensitivity to MDM2, ERBB2/EGFR inhibitors, MUCOC PDCs to MEK inhibitors, whereas HGSOCs showed strongest effects with CHK1 inhibitors and SMAC mimetics. We also explored several drug combinations and found that the dual inhibition of MEK and SHP2 was synergistic in MAPK-driven EOCs. We describe a clinical case study, where real-time fPO analysis of samples from a patient with metastatic, chemorefractory LGSOC with a CLU-NRG1 fusion guided clinical therapy selection. fPO-tailored therapy with afatinib, followed by trastuzumab and pertuzumab, successfully reduced tumour burden and blocked disease progression over a five-year period. In summary, fPO is a powerful approach for the identification of systematic drug response differences across EOC subtypes, as well as to highlight patient-specific drug regimens that could help to optimise therapies to individual patients in the future.

PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma (PETREC): study design and methods of a prospective Finnish multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinomas can be classified into four molecular subgroups - mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal (p53abn), polymerase-ϵ (POLE) ultramutated, and 'no specific molecular profile' (NSMP). Retrospective data imply that the response to adjuvant therapies may depend on the molecular subgroup. These findings emphasize the need for adjuvant therapy trials where patients are randomized to treatment arms separately within each molecular subgroup. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The PErsonalized TReatment for Endometrial Carcinoma (PETREC) trial clarifies the value of molecular classification in the determination of adjuvant therapies of high-intermediate risk and early-stage high-risk endometrial carcinoma. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Compared with vaginal brachytherapy, the utilization of whole pelvic radiotherapy may result in improved outcomes for either MMRd or NSMP high-intermediate risk carcinomas. Early-stage high-risk p53abn and nonendometrioid carcinomas are postulated to gain benefits from chemoradiotherapy, as opposed to chemotherapy alone. POLE ultramutated carcinomas harboring high-intermediate or high-risk clinicopathologic features are speculated to have favorable prognosis without any adjuvant therapy. TRIAL DESIGN: This prospective, multicenter, phase 3 trial compares the efficacy of vaginal brachytherapy vs whole pelvic radiotherapy in high-intermediate risk MMRd and NSMP molecular subgroups, and chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in early-stage high-risk p53abn subtype and nonendometrioid carcinomas. Eligible women who consent to participation in the trial are randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment arms. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Women with stages I-II molecular integrated high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial carcinoma will be included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint is the 5 year cumulative incidence of disease recurrence. SAMPLE SIZE: A total sample size of 294 patients (49 subjects in each treatment arm of the three subgroups intended for randomization) was estimated to be sufficient. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Patient recruitment will be completed in 2025, and follow-up will be completed in 2030. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05655260.

Stillbirth aftercare in a tertiary obstetric center - parents' experiences.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with received care and support when experiencing stillbirth. METHODS: This was a questionnaire survey conducted at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2016-2020. Separate questionnaires were sent to mothers and partners who had experienced an antepartum singleton stillbirth at or after 22 gestational weeks during 2016-2019. The questionnaire covered five major topics: stillbirth diagnosis, delivery, information on postmortem examinations, aftercare at the ward, and follow-up appointment. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen letters were sent and 57 (47.9%) of the mothers and 46 (38.7%) of their partners responded. Both mothers and their partners felt well supported during delivery. They were also satisfied with the time holding their newborn. Partners reported even higher satisfaction in this aspect with a significant within-dyad difference (p=0.049). Parents were generally pleased with the support at the ward. However, both groups were less satisfied with social worker counseling (mothers 53.7%, partners 61.0%). The majority felt that the follow-up visit was helpful. Nonetheless, a remarkable proportion felt that the follow-up visit increased their anxiousness (25.9%, 14.0%, p=0.018). Partners rated their mood higher than mothers (p=0.001). Open feedback revealed that the support received after discharge from hospital was often insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the parents who experience stillbirth in our institution receive mostly adequate care and support during their hospital stay. However, there is room for further training of healthcare professionals and other professionals contributing in stillbirth aftercare.

Delivery characteristics in pregnancies with stillbirth: a retrospective case-control study from a tertiary teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVES: We compared delivery characteristics and outcome of women with stillbirth to those with live birth. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study from Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. The study population comprised 214 antepartum singleton stillbirths during 2003-2015. Two age-adjusted controls giving live birth in the same year at the same institution were chosen for each case from the Finnish Medical Birth Register. Delivery characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between the cases and controls, adjusted for gestational age. RESULTS: Labor induction was more common (86.0 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001, gestational age adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 35.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.37-100.45) and cesarean sections less frequent (9.3 vs. 28.7%, p<0.001, aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.47) among women with stillbirth. Duration of labor was significantly shorter among the cases (first stage 240.0 min [115.0-365.0 min] vs. 412.5 min [251.0-574.0 min], p<0.001; second stage 8.0 min [0.0-16.0 min] vs. 15.0 min [4.0-26.0 min], p<0.001). Placental abruption was more common in pregnancies with stillbirth (15.0 vs. 0.9%, p<0.001, aOR 8.52, 95% CI 2.51-28.94) and blood transfusion was needed more often (10.7 vs. 4.4%, p=0.002, aOR 6.5, 95% CI 2.10-20.13). The rates of serious maternal complications were low. CONCLUSIONS: Most women with stillbirth delivered vaginally without obstetric complications. The duration of labor was shorter in pregnancies with stillbirth but the risk for postpartum interventions and bleeding complications was higher compared to those with live birth.

Altered glycosylation of glycodelin in endometrial carcinoma.

Glycodelin is a major glycoprotein expressed in reproductive tissues, like secretory and decidualized endometrium. It has several reproduction related functions that are dependent on specific glycosylation, but it has also been found to drive differentiation of endometrial carcinoma cells toward a less malignant phenotype. Here we aimed to elucidate whether the glycosylation and function of glycodelin is altered in endometrial carcinoma as compared with a normal endometrium. We carried out glycan structure analysis of glycodelin expressed in HEC-1B human endometrial carcinoma cells (HEC-1B Gd) by mass spectrometry glycomics strategies. Glycans of HEC-1B Gd were found to comprise a typical mixture of high-mannose, hybrid, and complex-type N-glycans, often containing undecorated LacNAc (Galß1-4GlcNAc) antennae. However, several differences, as compared with previously reported glycan structures of normal human decidualized endometrium-derived glycodelin isoform, glycodelin-A (GdA), were also found. These included a lower level of sialylation and more abundant poly-LacNAc antennae, some of which are fucosylated. This allowed us to select lectins that showed different binding to these classes of glycodelin. Despite the differences in glycosylation between HEC-1B Gd and GdA, both showed similar inhibitory activity on trophoblast cell invasion and peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation. For the detection of cancer associated glycodelin, we established a novel in situ proximity-ligation based histochemical staining method using a specific glycodelin antibody and UEAI lectin. We found that the UEAI reactive glycodelin was abundant in endometrial carcinoma, but virtually absent in normal endometrial tissue even when glycodelin was strongly expressed. In conclusion, we established a histochemical staining method for the detection of endometrial carcinoma-associated glycodelin and showed that this specific glycodelin is exclusively expressed in cancer, not in normal endometrium. Similar methods can be used for studies of other glycoproteins.

Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

The pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by inactivating methylation or less frequently mutation of an MMR gene (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6). This study evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathologic differences between methylation-linked and nonmethylated MMR-deficient endometrioid ECs. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and classified 682 unselected endometrioid ECs as MMR proficient (MMRp, n = 438) and MMR deficient (MMRd, n = 244), with the latter subcategorized as methylated (MMRd Met) and nonmethylated tumors. Loss of MMR protein expression was detected in 35.8% of the tumors as follows: MLH1 + PMS2 in 29.8%, PMS2 in 0.9%, MSH2 + MSH6 in 1.3%, MSH6 in 2.8%, and multiple abnormalities in 0.9%. Of the 244 MMRd cases, 76% were methylation-linked. MMR deficiency was associated with older age, high grade of differentiation (G3), advanced stage (II-IV), larger tumor size, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 positivity in immune cells and combined positive score, wild-type p53, negative L1CAM, ARID1A loss, and type of adjuvant therapy. MMRd-Met phenotype correlated with older age and larger tumor size, and predicted diminished disease-specific survival in the whole cohort. In the MMRd subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated an association between disease-specific survival and disease stage II-IV, high grade (G3), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ER negativity, and L1CAM positivity. In conclusion, MMR methylation profile correlates with clinicopathologic characteristics of endometrioid EC, and MMRd-Met phenotype predicts lower disease-specific survival. MMR deficiency, but not MLH1 methylation status, correlates with T-cell inflammation and PD-L1 expression.

Postmortem examination protocol and systematic re-evaluation reduce the proportion of unexplained stillbirths.

Background Stillbirth often remains unexplained, mostly due to a lack of any postmortem examination or one that is incomplete and misinterpreted. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, and comprised 214 antepartum singleton stillbirths from 2003 to 2015. Maternal and fetal characteristics and the results of the systematic postmortem examination protocol were collected from medical records. Causes of death were divided into 10 specific categories. Re-evaluation of the postmortem examination results followed. Results Based on our systematic protocol, the cause of death was originally defined and reported as such to parents in 133 (62.1%) cases. Re-evaluation of the postmortem examination results revealed the cause of death in an additional 43 (20.1%) cases, with only 23 (10.7%) cases remaining truly unexplained. The most common cause of stillbirth was placental insufficiency in 56 (26.2%) cases. A higher proportion of stillbirths that occurred at ≥39 gestational weeks remained unexplained compared to those that occurred earlier (24.1% vs. 8.6%) (P = 0.02). Conclusion A standardized postmortem examination and a re-evaluation of the results reduced the rate of unexplained stillbirth. Better knowledge of causes of death may have a major impact on the follow-up and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Also, closer examination and better interpretation of postmortem findings is time-consuming but well worth the effort in order to provide better counseling for the grieving parents.

American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as a predictor of long-term outcome in women with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score with long-term outcome in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Overall, disease-specific and non-cancer-related survival were estimated using simple and multivariable Cox regression analyses and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 1166 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up time was 76 (range 1-136) months. All-cause and non-cancer-related mortality were increased in patients whose ASA physical status score was III (HRs 2.5 and 8.0, respectively) or IV (HRs 5.7 and 25, respectively), and cancer-related mortality was increased in patients whose score was IV (HR 2.7). Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated a worse overall, disease-specific and non-cancer-related survival for patients whose score was ≥III (p<0.0001 for all). Disease-specific survival was also separately analyzed for patients with stage I and stage II-IV cancer. Compared with patients whose score was ≤II, the survival was worse for patients whose score was ≥III in both subgroups of stages (p=0.003 and p=0.017 for stage I and stages II-IV, respectively). ASA physical status score remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 2.2 for scores ≥III), cancer-related mortality (HRs 1.7 and 2.2 for scores ≥III and IV, respectively) and non-cancer related mortality (HR 3.1 for scores ≥III) after adjustment for prognostically relevant clinicopathologic and blood-based covariates. ASA physical status score also remained an independent predictor of cancer-related mortality after exclusion of patients who were at risk for nodal involvement based on features of the primary tumor but who did not undergo lymphadenectomy, and patients with advanced disease who received suboptimal chemotherapy (HRs 1.6 and 2.5 for scores ≥III and IV, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ASA physical status score independently predicts overall survival, disease-specific survival, and non-cancer-related survival in endometrial cancer.

Prediction of lymphatic dissemination in endometrioid endometrial cancer: Comparison of three risk-stratification models in a single-institution cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance characteristics of 3 risk-stratification models, referred to as Mayo, Helsinki and Milwaukee models, in predicting lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer. METHODS: A total of 1052 patients with stage I-III endometrioid endometrial cancer were included in the study. The areas under curve were compared with the receiver operating characteristic curve area comparison test. Chi-square and Fisher exact test were used for comparing categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models were used for survival analyses. The median follow-up time was 55months (range 1-108). RESULTS: Areas under curve were 0.781, 0.830 and 0.829 for the Mayo, Helsinki (P=0.285 vs. Mayo) and Milwaukee (P=0.292 vs. Mayo) models, respectively, in predicting lymphatic dissemination. The rates of false negatives and false positives were similar for all models. The lymphadenectomy rate decreased in the order of Mayo model (71.5%)>Helsinki model (62.4%)>Milwaukee model (48.8%). In patients with stage I cancer, disease specific survival was better for those who satisfied low-risk criteria according to any of the models. In patients with stage II-III cancer, this difference in survival was significant only for the Milwaukee model. Both lymphatic dissemination and high-risk tumor features as per the risk models were independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The studied models had a similar accuracy in predicting lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer. Lymphadenectomy rate was lowest for the Milwaukee model. Survival analyses suggest that variables included in the models predict patient outcome independently of tumor stage.

Prediction of Site-Specific Tumor Relapses in Patients With Stage I-II Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association of predictors of an advanced disease and/or poor outcome with the occurrence of tumor relapses in different anatomical sites in patients with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer. METHODS: A total of 929 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 57 months (range, 1-108 months). The studied variables were: poor tumor differentiation, myometrial invasion 50% or greater, tumor size 3 cm or greater, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical stromal invasion, positive peritoneal cytology, old age (>77 years), obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m), and diabetes. RESULTS: A relapse was diagnosed in 98 patients (10.5%) (vaginal in 15, pelvic in 27, intra-abdominal beyond the pelvis in 27, extra-abdominal in 29). None of the variables were associated with an altered risk of vaginal or pelvic relapses in univariate analyses. Poor differentiation, myometrial invasion 50% or greater, tumor size 3 cm or greater, and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis (odds ratios [ORs] between 2.2 and 9.6). With the exception of obesity and diabetes, all variables were associated with an increased risk of extra-abdominal relapses (ORs between 2.3 and 13). Tumor size 3 cm or greater (OR, 3.1) and positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 16) predicted intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis in multivariate analysis, whereas poor differentiation (OR, 2.9), myometrial invasion 50% or greater (OR, 4.0), and positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 27) predicted extra-abdominal relapses. Compared with vaginal relapses, intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis and extra-abdominal relapses were associated with a worse disease-specific survival. Survival of patients with a pelvic relapse did not differ from that of patients with a vaginal relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Risk variables of endometrial cancer are differently associated with relapses in different locations. Our findings may promote studies that explore the most efficient adjuvant therapy in high-risk early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Preoperative Risk Stratification of Endometrial Carcinoma: L1CAM as a Biomarker.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative or intraoperative risk assessment models are used to stratify patients with endometrial carcinoma to lymphadenectomy. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative analysis of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) can improve risk assessment. METHODS: Immunohistochemical L1CAM staining was performed on endometrial biopsies of 241 patients and paired hysterectomy samples of 75 patients. Risk assessment models based on preoperative histologic type and grade, myometrial invasion, and/or tumor diameter and alternative models incorporating preoperative L1CAM were compared with regard to their capability of predicting lymph nodal or distant metastasis. Soluble L1 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum samples of 40 patients with endometrial carcinoma. RESULTS: The concordance rate between L1CAM staining results of preoperative and hysterectomy samples was moderate (κ = 0.586, P < 0.0001). Preoperative L1CAM expression was associated with nonendometrioid histology, lymph node involvement, advanced stage, and positive peritoneal cytology. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that L1CAM did not significantly improve risk stratification algorithms based on traditional risk factors. Intraoperative tumor diameter was an effective surrogate for myometrial invasion. There was no statistical difference between L1 serum levels of patients with an L1CAM-positive or L1CAM-negative endometrial carcinoma (P = 0.786). CONCLUSIONS: L1 cell adhesion molecule expression in endometrial biopsy correlates with high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma but does not significantly improve risk stratification algorithms based on traditional factors. Soluble L1 detected in the serum of patients with endometrial carcinoma does not correlate with tumoral L1CAM expression.

L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule as a Predictor of Disease-Specific Survival and Patterns of Relapse in Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the association of L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression with the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer, especially with regard to conventional risk variables, and to compare the patterns of relapse in L1CAM-positive and -negative cancers. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 805 women. The Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were applied for survival analyses. Missing data were replaced using multiple imputation. The median follow-up time was 51 months (range, 1-98). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one (15.0%) cases were L1CAM positive. L1CAM positivity was associated with high stage (I vs II-IV) (odds ratio [OR], 2.3), lymph node involvement (OR, 2.9), poor differentiation (OR, 6.1), non-endometrioid histology (OR, 9.9), lymphovascular space invasion (OR, 2.8), cervical stromal invasion (OR, 1.8), positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 4.1), and age older than 65 years (OR, 2.8). The frequencies of deep myometrial invasion (50% or deeper), tumor size 2 cm or greater, and body mass index 30 kg/m or greater were not significantly different between L1CAM-positive and -negative cases. L1CAM predicted poor disease-specific survival in endometrioid (P < 0.0001) but not in non-endometrioid carcinomas (P = 0.934). The negative impact of L1CAM on outcome was confirmed in a Cox multivariate disease-specific survival analysis. Univariate survival analyses in the different ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO endometrial cancer risk groups showed an association between L1CAM positivity and poor outcome in intermediate (hazard ratio, 12) and high-risk advanced metastatic (hazard ratio, 2.0) groups. Extra-abdominal relapses were more frequent in L1CAM-positive (13.2%) than L1CAM-negative (1.9%) stage I endometrioid carcinomas (P < 0.0001), whereas other site-specific relapses in local cancers were L1CAM independent. CONCLUSIONS: L1CAM is associated with the occurrence of poor prognostic variables and predicts advanced disease in endometrial cancer. L1CAM predicts extra-abdominal relapses and poor survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer, but seems not to be a prognostic factor in non-endometrioid carcinomas.

Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infections in women undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, surgical site infections in a contemporary cohort of women with endometrial carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 1164 women treated for endometrial carcinoma by hysterectomy at a single institution in 2007-2013. In all, 912 women (78.4%) had minimally invasive hysterectomy. Data on surgical site infections were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for incisional and organ/space infections. RESULTS: Ninety-four women (8.1%) were diagnosed with a surgical site infection. Twenty women (1.7%) had an incisional infection and 74 (6.4%) had an organ/space infection. The associations of 17 clinico-pathologic and surgical variables were tested by univariate analyses. Those variables that were identified as potential risk factors in univariate analyses (p < 0.15) were used in logistic regression models with incisional and organ/space infections as dependent variables. Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2)), diabetes, and long operative time (>80th centile) were independently associated with a higher risk of incisional infection, whereas minimally invasive surgery was associated with a smaller risk. Smoking, conversion to laparotomy, and lymphadenectomy were associated with a higher risk of organ/space infection. CONCLUSIONS: Organ/space infections comprised the majority of surgical site infections. Risk factors for incisional and organ/space infections differed. Minimally invasive hysterectomy was associated with a smaller risk of incisional infections but not of organ/space infections.

Risk-stratification of endometrial carcinomas revisited: a combined preoperative and intraoperative scoring system for a reliable prediction of an advanced disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to develop a risk-scoring system for predicting lymph node and distant metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 1166 patients, treated at a single institution between 1-2007 and 12-2013, were included in the study. The association of stage IIIC-IV disease with demographic factors (age, body mass index), biochemical factors (complete blood count, serum CA125), preoperative histology and tumor size was examined in unadjusted analyses. Logistic regression analysis was used for the identification of variables that independently predict an advanced disease. RESULTS: Thrombocytosis, serum CA125>35 U/mL, preoperative high-risk histology (nonendometrioid or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma) and tumor size≥3 cm were independently associated with an advanced disease. These predictors were internally validated by a bootstrapping method with statistical significance. A risk-scoring system with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852 (95% confidence interval, 0.821-0.883) was developed. Total risk score points ranged from 0 to 8 for individual patients. With a cut-off of 1 point, stratifying 66.3% of patients to surgical staging, the model predicted stage IIIC-IV carcinomas with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 38.0%, positive predictive value of 17.1%, and negative predictive value of 100%. With the same cut-off, the corresponding values were 100%, 34.7%, 16.5% and 100% in predicting stage IIIC carcinomas in a subgroup that underwent lymphadenectomy and had a stage I-IIIC disease. CONCLUSIONS: This risk-scoring system is highly sensitive in predicting an advanced stage endometrial carcinoma at a cut-off of risk score points that is associated with an acceptable lymphadenectomy rate.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the available literature on the reliability of contemporary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma, that is, deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal involvement, and lymph node metastasis. METHODS: The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies published before March 2014. Studies on plain MRI were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-two eligible studies were identified. For the assessment of deep (≥ 50%) myometrial invasion (50 studies, 3720 patients), the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80.7%, 88.5%, 77.6%, and 89.5%, respectively, by random-effects analysis. For predicting cervical stromal involvement (12 studies, 1153 patients), the pooled values were 57.0%, 94.8%, 68.7%, and 90.5%, respectively. For lymph node metastasis on a per-patient basis (10 studies, 862 patients), they were 43.5%, 95.9%, 66.3%, and 92.2%, respectively. In a meta-regression analysis, dynamic imaging was associated with a higher sensitivity in detecting deep myometrial invasion, as compared with contrast-enhanced imaging (P = 0.021). The improvement by diffusion-weighted imaging was of a borderline significance (P = 0.057). Significant small-study effects were found for the sensitivity of MRI in detecting deep myometrial invasion (P < 0.0001) and cervical stromal involvement (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the poor-to-moderate sensitivity of MRI in detecting high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma, patients with negative findings on MRI may not safely forgo surgical staging unless the findings are confirmed by a backup method. The high specificities allow the targeting of staging procedures by MRI alone in patients with positive findings. Compared with contrast-enhanced imaging, dynamic and diffusion-weighted imaging may be more reliable in the radiological staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Combined use of endometrial sample and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative risk-stratification of endometrial carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two treatment strategies in women undergoing surgery for endometrial carcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. POPULATION: 1166 patients. Uterine biopsy/curettage was obtained in 1140 women, of whom 229 also had pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We compared two strategies: (i) routine pelvic lymphadenectomy and (ii) selective pelvic lymphadenectomy for women with high-risk carcinomas as determined from preoperative histology and MRI. High-risk carcinomas included grade 1-2 endometrioid carcinomas with ≥50% myometrial invasion, grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas, and nonendometrioid carcinomas. Others were considered low-risk carcinomas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic indices, treatment algorithms. RESULTS: Of the women who underwent lymphadenectomy, positive pelvic nodes were found in 2.3% of low-risk carcinomas and 18.3% of high-risk carcinomas. The combination of preoperative histology and MRI detected high-risk carcinomas with a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 75.0%, a positive predictive value of 74.4%, and a negative predictive value of 86.1%. Area under curve was 0.804. In the routine lymphadenectomy algorithm, 54.1% of lymphadenectomies were performed for low-risk carcinomas. In the selective lymphadenectomy algorithm, 14.3% of women with high-risk carcinomas did not receive lymphadenectomy. Missed positive pelvic nodes were estimated to occur in 2.1% of patients in the selective strategy. Similarly, the estimated risk for isolated para-aortic metastasis was 2.1%, regardless of treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preoperative histology and MRI is moderately sensitive and specific in detecting high-risk endometrial carcinomas. The clinical utility of the method is hampered by the relatively high proportion of high-risk cases that remain unrecognized preoperatively.

Prediction of para-aortic spread by gross pelvic lymph node findings in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases are rare in patients with endometrial carcinoma. We wanted to determine the reliability of macroscopic pelvic lymph node findings at surgery in predicting para-aortic space involvement in these patients. METHODS: We identified all women with surgically treated endometrial carcinoma at our institution between January 2008 and February 2013 (n = 854). One hundred seventeen patients received pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymph nodes were considered grossly positive based on size and morphology. RESULTS: In patients who underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy, grossly positive pelvic nodes predicted para-aortic metastasis with a sensitivity of 52.4% and specificity of 93.8%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.4 and 0.51, respectively. The predictive power of grossly positive pelvic nodes remained significant (odds ratio, 18; 95% confidence interval, 4.1-78; P < 0.0001) after correcting for deep myometrial invasion, poor tumor differentiation, and nonendometrioid histology as confounders. The whole sample of 854 patients was used for Bayesian calculations. The cutoff for a clinically useful test was set at the negative predictive value of 98.0%. The negative predictive value of the test (ie, grossly positive pelvic nodes at surgery in predicting the likelihood of para-aortic metastasis) was 99.7% for patients with superficial grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 98.0% for patients with deeply invasive grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas. For patients with grade 3 endometrioid and nonendometrioid carcinomas, the negative predictive values were 97.3% and 92.2%, respectively. For the whole study population, the value was 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS: When uterine factors are used for risk stratification of endometrial carcinomas, selective para-aortic lymphadenectomy, based on gross findings of pelvic nodes, is feasible for patients with grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas, regardless of the depth of myometrial invasion. Similarly, gross findings of pelvic nodes can be used to evaluate the need for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the strategy of routine pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Pelvic arterial embolization in severe obstetric hemorrhage.

Massive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major life-threatening complication. When conventional management fails, pelvic arterial embolization (PAE) can be used. The aim of our study was to find out the success rate of PAE in cases of acute PPH, and to study the safety of this procedure in a retrospective case series from a tertiary teaching hospital. Forty-five women with acute PPH were managed by PAE. Hospital charts were reviewed. The most common causes of PPH in cases treated with PAE were lower genital tract injury (40%), placental retention (36%) and uterine atony (13%). The overall success rate was 89%. Five of the 45 women needed additional procedures. The overall complication rate was 9%. We conclude that PAE is a safe and effective procedure for PPH and may prevent hysterectomy.