RESUMO
Shoulder pain following thoracotomy is a common postoperative complaint and can be difficult to treat. This article explores how to select patients who would benefit from a suprascapular nerve block for post-thoracotomy shoulder pain. A retrospective case review of 178 patients who underwent thoracotomy at our institution was performed. Only patients with elicitable local signs of musculoskeletal shoulder pain were offered a suprascapular nerve block with 10 cc of 0.25% bupivicaine. Of 178 patients, 92 (51.7%) complained of post-thoracotomy shoulder pain. Of these patients, 34 (37.0%) had localizing signs of musculoskeletal shoulder pain and underwent suprascapular nerve block. Twenty-nine of 34 (85.3%) patients obtained satisfactory pain relief. We estimate a true-positive rate of 85.3% with a 95% confidence interval of (68.9%, 95.0%) for those patients who received relief from suprascapular nerve block after localizing signs on physical examination of the shoulder. Patients post-thoracotomy with local signs of shoulder pain on physical examination may benefit from suprascapular nerve blocks in the immediate postoperative period.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Bupivacaína , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Dor de Ombro/terapia , Toracotomia , Humanos , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escápula , Dor de Ombro/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after total knee replacement is common but remains poorly understood. Management options for patients with this condition are traditionally limited to pharmacological approaches. OBJECTIVE: This article presents a case of using spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic knee pain following total knee replacement. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Pain management clinic METHODS: A 68-year old patient presented with a 3-year history of persistent knee pain following total knee replacement. After failing to respond to medications and nerve blocks, a trial of spinal cord stimulation and subsequent permanent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) were performed. The Oxford knee score (OKS) was used to assess her pain and functionality before and after SCS implantation. RESULTS: The patient reported improvement in her pain and function. Her baseline OKS was 39 and fell to 26 one year post implantation of an SCS representing a reduction of pain and disability from severe to moderate. LIMITATIONS: A case report. CONCLUSION: Spinal cord stimulation might be an option in the management of refractory knee pain following total knee replacement.