Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 133(3): 313-8, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16143172

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine current patterns of use of facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery by otolaryngologists in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A questionnaire encompassing surgeon training background, practice setting, patterns of facial nerve monitor usage during parotid gland surgery, and history of permanent facial nerve injury or legal action resulting from parotid surgery was mailed to 3139 otolaryngologists in the United States. Associations between facial nerve monitor usage and dependent variables were examined by using the chi(2) test. Magnitudes of the associations were determined from odds ratios calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A 49.3% questionnaire response rate was achieved. Sixty percent of respondents who perform parotidectomy employed facial nerve monitoring some or all of the time. Respondents were 5.6 times more likely to use the monitor in practice if they used it in training and 79% more likely to use it if they performed more than 10 parotidectomies per year. Respondents were 35% less likely to have a history of inadvertent nerve injury if they performed more than 10 parotidectomies per year. Surgeons who employed monitoring in their practice were 20.8% less likely to have a history of a parotid surgery-associated lawsuit. Additional information regarding surgeon demographics, types of nerve monitors used, and reasons for and against monitor usage are discussed. CONCLUSION: Permanent facial nerve paralysis after parotidectomy occurs in 0-7% of cases. Currently, a majority of otolaryngologists in the United States are employing facial nerve monitoring during parotid surgery some or all of the time, even though no studies to date have demonstrated improved outcomes with its use. Physician training background and surgery caseload were significant factors influencing usage of facial nerve monitoring in this study.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/etiologia , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/prevenção & controle , Nervo Facial/fisiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Glândula Parótida/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica , Contraindicações , Humanos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 82(3): 198-9, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12696240

RESUMO

Isolated unilateral temporal muscle hypertrophy is a rarely reported clinical entity with an unclear etiology. Consideration of a broad differential diagnosis combined with a detailed histologic and radiologic work-up will help the physician diagnose the underlying pathology. We report a new case of this uncommon entity, and we review the pertinent literature.


Assuntos
Músculo Temporal/patologia , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
12.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 88(2): 790-2, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19224480

RESUMO

Electrocautery tonsillectomy is a common method of tonsil removal, and electrocautery devices are widely available. Although these devices are relatively safe, inadvertent patient injury may occur with their use, such as oral cavity burns. We describe a simple surgical technique that reduces the risk of oral burns during electrocautery tonsillectomy and review additional safety considerations.


Assuntos
Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica/prevenção & controle , Eletrocoagulação/efeitos adversos , Boca/lesões , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica/etiologia , Eletrocoagulação/métodos , Humanos , Tonsilectomia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA