Patient Perceptions of the Use of Medical Marijuana in the Treatment of Pain After Musculoskeletal Trauma: A Survey of Patients at 2 Trauma Centers in Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate musculoskeletal trauma patients' beliefs regarding the usefulness of marijuana as a valid medical treatment for postinjury and postoperative pain and anxiety. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred patients in an orthopedic outpatient clinic. INTERVENTION: Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: (1) Do patients believe that marijuana can be used as medicine? (2) Do patients believe that marijuana can help treat postinjury pain? (3) Are patients comfortable speaking with their health care providers about medical marijuana? RESULTS: The majority of patients felt that marijuana could be used to treat pain (78%, 390) and anxiety (62%, 309). Most patients (60%, 302) had used marijuana at least once previously, whereas only 14% reported using marijuana after their injury. Of those who used marijuana during their recovery, 90% (63/70) believed that it reduced symptoms of pain, and 81% (57/70) believed that it reduced the amount of opioid pain medication they used. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in this study believed that medical marijuana is a valid treatment and that it does have a role in reducing postinjury and postoperative pain. Those patients who used marijuana during their recovery felt that it alleviated symptoms of pain and reduced their opioid intake. Our results help inform clinicians regarding the perceptions of patients with trauma regarding the usefulness of marijuana in treating pain and support further study into the utility of medical marijuana in this population.

Foot fractures in polytrauma patients: Injury characteristics and timing of diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Due to prioritizing care and concomitant injuries, foot fractures in polytrauma patients often receive limited attention initially. However, as foot function is important, treatment and diagnosis of these fractures should be accurate. The aims of this study were to assess the incidence and distribution of foot fractures in polytrauma patients and to examine possible risk factors for delayed diagnosis of foot fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on all adult (≥18 years) polytrauma (ISS ≥16) patients admitted to a single level 1 trauma center between 2006 and 2016. Patients with foot fractures were identified by diagnosis codes. Data on demographics and trauma characteristics were collected from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP®) database. Data on foot fractures were gathered from electronic patient documentation. RESULTS: Out of 4409 polytrauma patients, 221 (5.0%) sustained a total of 511 foot fractures. Metatarsal fractures were most common (41%), followed by calcaneal (17%), and talar (16%) fractures. Thirty percent of the fractures in 33% of all patients were diagnosed in a delayed fashion. This had treatment consequences in 8%. Delayed diagnosed fractures were more common in older patients (p 0.025), patients with a higher ISS (p 0.012), ICU admission (p 0.015), and concomitant head injury (p 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: As one in twenty polytrauma patients sustains at least one foot fracture and a substantial amount of these fractures are diagnosed in a delayed fashion, physicians, regardless of their specialty, should have a high index of suspicion for injuries of the feet in polytrauma patients.

Posterior Facet Settling and Changes in Bohler's Angle in Operatively and Nonoperatively Treated Calcaneus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Patients with calcaneus fractures often exhibit settling of the posterior facet with a corresponding decrease in Bohler's angle (BA) following either operative or nonoperative treatment. Both injury BA and postoperative BA have been shown to be prognostic for outcomes; however, the demographic and surgeon-specific factors that may contribute to settling have not been critically examined in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify these causative factors. METHODS: 234 patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures were analyzed. All patients had preoperative plain radiographs, at least 5 months of orthopedic follow-up, and computed tomography scanning performed. BA was measured on the injury radiographs for all patients. For operatively treated patients, BA was measured on the immediate postoperative radiographs and compared with the last available radiograph. For nonoperatively treated patients, BA was measured on the last available radiograph. All patients were fully weightbearing at the time of final follow-up but not on initial radiographs due to their recent injury. Demographic data including age, gender, energy of injury mechanism, tobacco use, diabetes, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and substance/alcohol abuse were retrospectively collected. Fractures were classified using the Essex-Lopresti and Sanders classifications. Time to full weightbearing was documented, as were any reports of noncompliance with weightbearing restrictions. For patients treated operatively, type of fixation (calcaneal-specific perimeter plate, nonperimeter plate, screw fixation), use of locking screws, use of bone graft or graft substitutes, and the number of screws supporting the posterior facet were documented. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant amount of settling within the operative and nonoperative groups, but there was no statistically significant difference in settling of BA between the groups. The average settling of BA for the operative and nonoperative group was 8 degrees. Age greater than 50 years, diabetes, and alcohol abuse were all statistically significant and independent predictors of BA settling irrespective of treatment. CONCLUSION: The amount of BA settling between the operative and nonoperative group was not significant and showed an average decrease of 8 degrees in each group. However, the amount of settling that we found, irrespective of treatment, increased with patient age, alcohol abuse, and diabetes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.