Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 38(4): 753-9, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453896

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A short-term comparison of AO type B (shearing) and type C (compression) articular fractures of the distal radius found no significant differences in functional outcome, but long-term studies would provide important information. We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in arm-specific disability between patients with type B and C fractures in long-term follow-up. METHODS: We evaluated 46 patients (17 with type B fractures and 29 patients with 31 type C fractures of the distal radius) with a mean age of 39 years at the time of injury at a mean of 20 years after operative treatment. We used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and 2 physician-based rating systems, the modified Mayo wrist score and the modified Gartland and Werley score. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify the factors that contributed most to the variation in these scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between patients with type B and C fractures on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, modified Mayo wrist, or Gartland and Werley scores, or with respect to range of motion, grip strength, and arthrosis. The only statistical difference was in volar tilt of the articular surface on lateral radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: On average, patients undergoing operative treatment of type B and type C articular fractures of the distal radius have similar impairment, symptoms, and disability in the long-term. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiografia , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Traumatismos do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Punho/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Foot Ankle Int ; 35(11): 1116-21, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25116132

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Talar and calcaneal fractures and their treatment can cause severe postoperative pain. We hypothesized that a continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) would reduce pain scores more effectively than systemic analgesics, improve recovery, and lead to reduced length of stay (LOS). METHODS: Over a 3-year period patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a talar or calcaneal fracture were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received a CPNB catheter preoperatively or intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) postoperatively. Primary endpoint was Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores on postoperative day 1. Secondary endpoints were NRS scores up to day 3, opioid requirement, analgesia-related side effects, intraoperative blood loss, infection, and LOS. Eighty-seven patients were analyzed; 70 with calcaneal fracture, 21 with talar fracture, 4 with both. In all, 40 patients received CPNB, 47 patients PCA. RESULTS: Median NRS scores on day 1 were 1.0 (IQR 3) in the CPNB group and 2.0 (IQR 3) in the PCA group (ns). Median LOS for patients with CPNB was 5 days (IQR3) and PCA 4 days (IQR 2 ns). Blood loss and incidence of local infections were comparable in both groups. Opioid requirement was significantly increased in the PCA group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Significant advantages or disadvantages were not seen in either group. However, the PCA group required about 30-fold more opioids compared to the CPNB group on day 1, although that did not lead to an increased number of side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.


Assuntos
Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Calcâneo/lesões , Traumatismos do Pé/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Tálus/lesões , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA