Intradialytic acid-base changes and organic anion production during high versus low bicarbonate hemodialysis.

The use of high dialysate bicarbonate for hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease is associated with increased mortality, but potential physiological mediators are poorly understood. Alkalinization due to high dialysate bicarbonate may stimulate organic acid generation, which could lead to poor outcomes. Using measurements of ß-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and lactate, we quantified organic anion (OA) balance in two single-arm studies comparing high and low bicarbonate prescriptions. In study 1 (n = 10), patients became alkalemic using 37 meq/L dialysate bicarbonate; in contrast, with the use of 27 meq/L dialysate, net bicarbonate loss occurred and blood bicarbonate decreased. Total OA losses were not higher with 37 meq/L dialysate bicarbonate (50.9 vs. 49.1 meq using 27 meq/L, P = 0.66); serum BHB increased in both treatments similarly (P = 0.27); and blood lactate was only slightly higher with the use of 37 meq/L dialysate (P = 0.048), differing by 0.2 meq/L at the end of hemodialysis. In study 2 (n = 7), patients achieved steady state on two bicarbonate prescriptions: they were significantly more acidemic when dialyzed against a 30 meq/L bicarbonate dialysate compared with 35 meq/L and, as in study 1, became alkalemic when dialyzed against the higher bicarbonate dialysate. OA losses were similar to those in study 1 and again did not differ between treatments (38.9 vs. 43.5 meq, P = 0.42). Finally, free fatty acid levels increased throughout hemodialysis and correlated with the change in serum BHB (r = 0.81, P < 0.001), implicating upregulation of lipolysis as the mechanism for increased ketone production. In conclusion, lowering dialysate bicarbonate does not meaningfully reduce organic acid generation during hemodialysis or modify organic anion losses into dialysate.

Safety and Efficacy of Tenapanor for Long-term Serum Phosphate Control in Maintenance Dialysis: A 52-Week Randomized Phase 3 Trial (PHREEDOM).

Background: Treating hyperphosphatemia is a tenet of dialysis care. This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of tenapanor for the management of hyperphosphatemia. Methods: In this 52-week phase 3 study (NCT03427125), participants receiving maintenance dialysis with both hyperphosphatemia (serum phosphate 6.0-10.0 mg/dl) and a 1.5 mg/dl increase after phosphate binder washout were randomized (3:1) to tenapanor 30 mg twice daily for 26 weeks (randomized treatment period) or sevelamer carbonate (52-week safety control). Participants completing 26 weeks of treatment with tenapanor were rerandomized (1:1) to tenapanor or placebo for 12 weeks (randomized withdrawal period), and were eligible to enter the 14-week safety extension period. With input from the US Food and Drug Administration, the primary efficacy end point was the difference in the change in serum phosphate from the end of the randomized treatment period to the end of the randomized withdrawal period, among participants who achieved ≥1.2 mg/dl decrease in serum phosphate during the randomized treatment period (efficacy analysis set). Efficacy was also evaluated in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. Results: Of 564 eligible participants randomized to receive tenapanor (n=423) or sevelamer carbonate (n=141) during the randomized treatment period, 255 (60%) in the tenapanor group subsequently were rerandomized to tenapanor (n=128) or placebo (n=127) during the randomized withdrawal period. In the efficacy analysis set (n=131), the difference in estimated mean change in serum phosphate level between tenapanor and placebo from the beginning to the end of the randomized withdrawal period was -1.4 mg/dl (P<0.0001); in the ITT analysis set (n=243), the estimated mean difference was -0.7 mg/dl (P=0.002). Loosened stools were the most frequently reported adverse event (53% during the randomized treatment period). Serious adverse events were reported more frequently for participants treated with sevelamer carbonate (16%-23% across the three study periods) compared with tenapanor (11%-17%). Conclusions: Tenapanor reduced serum phosphate concentrations and maintained control of serum phosphate in participants receiving maintenance dialysis, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

The effect of a change in epoetin alfa reimbursement policy on anemia outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

In 1997, the Health Care Financing Administration Hematocrit Measurement Audit (HMA) program initiated use of a 3-month rolling average hematocrit (Hct) level for reimbursement of epoetin claims in hemodialysis patients, with denial of payment when this value exceeded 36.5%. This study evaluated the impact of the HMA program on anemia-related outcomes in hemodialysis patients. An observational, retrospective study of 987 hemodialysis patients from 11 dialysis centers in the United States was performed, collecting data between October 1996 and December 1997. Centers were selected from a pool of nearly all facilities in the United States, which during May 1997 satisfied one of two criteria: greater than 75% of patients at the facility had mean Hct level of > or =33% (Group A) or fewer than 50% of patients at the facility had mean Hct level of > or =33% (Group B). Each facility maintained its own anemia management practices without specific anemia management interventions as part of this study. Hct level, hemoglobin (Hb) level, and epoetin dose were analyzed to compare the pre-HMA period (October 1996 to May 1997) to the HMA period (June to December 1997) and/or for each of the five quarters of the study period. The primary study endpoint was the percentage of patients with Hct levels of > or =33% during each study quarter. The mean Hct level at baseline was 34% in Group A and 33.4% in Group B (p = 0.01). Hct levels, which were increasing before implementation of the HMA program, decreased during the HMA period (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013 in Groups A and B, respectively). The percentage of patients in Groups A and B with mean quarterly Hct levels of > or =33% decreased during the last quarter of the HMA implementation period compared to the quarter immediately preceding the start of the HMA program (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Changes in Hb levels were similar to those seen in Hct levels. The mean epoetin dose administered decreased from 13,090 U/week at the start of the study to 11,884 U/week immediately before the HMA program took effect (p < 0.05). The HMA program adversely affected anemia treatment outcomes, regardless of whether dialysis units before HMA implementation had <50% of patients with a Hct level of > or =33% or had >75% of patients with a Hct level of > or =33%. The decline in mean weekly dose of epoetin was likely a result of withholding doses out of concern among providers about risk of reimbursement denial.

Hemoglobin variability in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the clinical variability of hemoglobin measurements in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients is important, particularly when this therapy is aimed at maintaining patient hemoglobin levels within a narrow range, such as the 11 to 12 g/dL range recommended in National Kidney Foundation Kidney Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-K/DOQI) guidelines. This study examines hemoglobin variability under conditions of standard clinical practice in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We studied 987 hemodialysis patients participating in an observational retrospective study that evaluated anemia management practices from October 1, 1996 to December 31, 1997 at 11 United States dialysis centers that were randomly selected from a pool of nearly all United States dialysis facilities. Each participating facility maintained its own anemia management protocols without specific anemia management recommendations or interventions made as part of this study. Hemoglobin variability was determined by calculating the 1-month and 2- to 6-month rolling average hemoglobin for each patient. The range of mean hemoglobin values that included the middle 50% (25th to 75th percentile), 80% (10th to 90th percentile), and 90% (5th to 95th percentile) of values were determined. The hemoglobin ranges that included 1 standard deviation (SD) (67%) of the study values and 2 SD (95%) of the study values for each time period were calculated. RESULTS: The mean hemoglobin was between 10.9 and 11.2 g/dL throughout the study. The hemoglobin range encompassing 50%, 80%, and 90% of values from a single month was 1.7, 3.3, and 4.4 g/dL, respectively. A progressive narrowing in the range of hemoglobin values encompassed by each percentile grouping (i.e., hemoglobin variability) was observed as longer rolling intervals were averaged. The hemoglobin range within the 25th to 75th percentile was 1.7 g/dL using single-month hemoglobin values and 1.1 g/dL using a 6-month rolling average. The range of hemoglobin values that encompassed 90% of patients was 4.4 g/dL using single-month values, 3.7 g/dL using 3-month rolling averages, and 3.2 g/dL using 6-month rolling averages. Fewer than 50% of patients had hemoglobin values within the 1.0 g/dL NKF-K/DOQI recommended range, even when a 6-month rolling average was applied. When hemoglobin values were measured for 1 month, 1 SD was 1.4 g/dL; for the 3-month rolling average, 1 SD was 1.1 g/dL; and for the 4-, 5-, and 6-month rolling averages, 1 SD was 1.0 g/dL. Greater hemoglobin variability correlated with higher mean corpuscular hemoglobin (P = 0.003) and serum ferritin (P = 0.047), and inversely correlated with age (P = 0.006) and serum albumin (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Substantial variability occurs in hemoglobin values in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients. The NKF-K/DOQI recommended hemoglobin range appears to be too narrow in clinical practice. Expanding the target range and use of rolling average hemoglobin intervals of 3 to 6 months as a clinical and quality assurance measure avoids clinical variability inherent with the use of isolated hemoglobin values or single-month hemoglobin averages.