[Amputations of fingers and the hand]. / Amputationen an den Fingern und der Hand.

Revision amputation, ray amputation and narrowing of the hand can be indicated for pathological alterations of fingers and thumbs due to traumatic, inflammatory or vascular causes but also for functional deficits regarding mobility, sensibility, perfusion, and/or pain. Surgical amputation is considered if reconstructive options are no longer possible, not desired and are no longer meaningful with respect to effort and risks. Patients need to be informed about the expected deficits in function and esthetic appearance due to the amputation in advance. On the other hand, surgical amputations represent a good treatment option, for which the duration of treatment and scope are well estimated. Therefore, they are good options for patients with comorbidities, with concerns about extensive reconstructive surgery and with limited compliance. It is essential to respect anatomical and functional aspects to guarantee favorable surgical results and avoid complications, which might compromise the function of the hand beyond that which is unavoidable. The most frequent complications after creating a stump or ray resection are persistent pain, unstable skin and soft tissue conditions, mobility disorders, disturbing stumps without function, uncontrolled growth of nail remnants and recurrent inflammation.

Outcome of proximal interphalangeal joint replacement with pyrocarbon implants: a long-term longitudinal follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the short-, mid-, and long-term results of pyrocarbon PIPJ arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients (9 males, 18 females) had arthroplasty for 32 pyrocarbon PIPJ prostheses. Two patients (two joints) were lost for follow-up. Four implants were removed during follow-up. Fifteen patients (18 implants) were available for a long-term follow-up assessment on average 9.7 (9-10.8) years postoperatively and seven patients with eight implants had telephone interviews to calculate the implant survival and complications. Of the 15 patients who came to the latest follow-up, 12 (14 implants) passed each of the three follow-up visits for short-term (ø 19 months), mid-term (ø 54 months), and long-term follow-up (ø 9.8 years) to compare functional and radiological parameters longitudinally. RESULTS: In total, seven of the 30 joints (23%) required a revision surgery, all within the first 2 years postoperatively, including three arthrodesis due to early infection or dislocation, and one distal component removal due to primary loosening. Three patients required soft tissue revisions. The implant survival after 9 years was 87%. There was minimal pain at rest throughout the 9-year follow-up analysis; pain with activity was rated 1.9 at the short-term assessment, 1.5 at mid-term, and 1.6 at long-term. The average active range of motion was at short-, mid-, and long-term examination 49°, 50°, and 48° and grip strength averaged 24, 24, and 21 kg, respectively. The DASH score was stable with 35, 36, and 33 points. At the long-term follow-up, all evaluated implants showed radiological signs of implant loosening or migration. According to the PIP joint outcome score, 57% resulted finally in a "good" outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrocarbon PIPJ arthroplasty has a risk of early complications necessitating revision surgeries. In spite of radiological implant migration, good pain relief, grip strength, and high quality-of-life ratings are stable for a long time.

Parameters influencing hand grip strength measured with the manugraphy system.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether sex, hand length and the individual training status affect hand strength and whether these measurements differ if they are recorded using the Jamar dynamometer or a new cylindrical measuring system. METHODS: For this purpose, 152 healthy adults were examined using a new manugraphy measuring system (novel, Munich, Germany) comprising two measuring cylinders of different sizes and a Jamar electronic dynamometer with two grip positions corresponding approximately to the sizes of the cylinders. A descriptive analysis was performed as well as a correlation analysis using the Pearson correlation coefficient. To prepare predictive models, multiple linear regression analyses were carried out to determine factors that influence the force and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A significant difference in the maximum and mean strength was observed that is dependent on sex, with men stronger than women, in line with expectations, and hand length, with small hands able to exert less force than large hands. No consistent increase in strength could be attributed to repetitive manual loads applied either at work or in leisure activities. CONCLUSIONS: Both measurement techniques yielded similar results, suggesting that manugraphy is well suited for clinical research purposes because it not only takes measurements that are just as reproducible and valid as the conventional measurement technique but in doing so measures not just the total strength of a hand but also enables more precise comparisons of isolated hand regions applying dynamic measurements.

Influence of Maximal or Submaximal Effort on the Load Distribution of the Hand Analyzed by Manugraphy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate if the hands' load-distribution pattern differs during maximal and submaximal grip. METHODS: Fifty-four healthy subjects used the 200-mm Manugraphy cylinder to assess the load-distribution pattern of both hands. On 2 testing days, the subjects performed grip-force testing: 1 hand with maximal effort and the other with submaximal effort. Sides changed for the second testing day. The whole contact area of the hand was sectioned into 7 anatomical areas, and the percent contribution of each area, in relation to the total load applied, was calculated. Maximal and submaximal efforts were compared across the 7 areas in terms of load contributions. RESULTS: Comparing maximum effort of the left and right hand, the load distribution was very similar without statistically significant differences between the corresponding areas. Comparing the maximal and the submaximal effort for each hand, 4 (left) and 5 (right) of the 7 corresponding areas showed statistically significant differences. Comparing the right hand, performing with maximal effort, with the left hand, performing with submaximal effort, 5 areas varied significantly. With the right hand performing submaximal effort, all 7 anatomical areas were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The load distribution of a healthy hand is different when performing with submaximal effort compared with maximal effort. To analyze a hand's load-distribution pattern, the opposite hand can be used as a reference. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The hand's load-distribution pattern may be a useful indication of submaximal effort during grip-force testing.

Load distribution of the hand during cylinder grip analyzed by Manugraphy.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement and basic research. INTRODUCTION: Manugraphy allows assessing dynamically all forces applied perpendicular to a cylinder surface by the whole contact area of the hand with a high spatial resolution. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To identify the physiological load distribution of the whole contact area of the hand during cylinder grip. METHODS: A sample of 152 healthy volunteers performed grip force tests with 3 cylinder sizes of the Manugraphy system (novel, Munich, Germany) on 3 different days. The whole contact area of the hand was sectioned into 7 anatomic areas, and the percent contribution of each area in relation to the total load applied was calculated. The load distribution of the dominant and nondominant hands and with different cylinder sizes was compared. Furthermore, the load distribution between the finger phalanges of each finger was analyzed. RESULTS: The results for the dominant and nondominant hands were in all 7 areas of the hand similar with the percent contribution differing within a range of 1%-4% (P > .138). Load distribution changed significantly with different cylinder sizes: all 7 areas differed between 1% and 7% with P < .001, most pronounced for the thumb. The load distribution of the phalanges showed that the contribution of the distal phalanges increased with ascending cylinder size, whereas the contribution of the proximal phalanges decreased. The interindividual variability of the load distribution pattern was noticeable. DISCUSSION: For the clinical practice, Manugraphy might be a useful supplement to traditional grip force measurement for identifying the individual characteristics of a patient's dysfunction and monitoring the progress of hand rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: There is no universal or typical load distribution pattern of the hand but only an individual pattern. To evaluate a compromised hand, it is permissible to compare it with the healthy opposite hand as a reference. Several cylinder sizes should be used for load distribution testing. Using smaller handles in the daily life can help to compensate impairment of the thumb and fingertips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

The Effect of Midcarpal Versus Total Wrist Fusion on the Hand's Load Distribution During Gripping.

PURPOSE: To analyze the total grip force and load distribution of the hand with midcarpal fusion (MCF) and total wrist fusion (TWF). METHODS: Twelve patients with unilateral TWF and 12 patients with unilateral MCF were assessed at an average 64 months (range, 19-100 months) postoperatively. The total grip force and load distribution of both hands were measured by the Manugraphy system using 3 cylinder sizes. The load applied to 7 anatomical areas of the hand during cylinder grip was analyzed, comparing the operated and the nonsurgical hands. RESULTS: For the 100 mm and 150 mm cylinders, a significantly lower total grip force was found in hands operated with either TWF or MCF. For the 200 mm cylinder, there was a significant difference between nonsurgical hands and those with MCF but not between nonsurgical hands and those with TWF. For the 100 mm cylinder, the difference between nonsurgical and operated hands was greater in hands with TWF than those with MCF. For the load distribution of the hand, no differences between the operated and the nonsurgical hand were found for either MCF or TWF. CONCLUSIONS: MFC and TWF resulted in a reduced cylinder grip force. With respect to the load distribution, neither procedure influenced the relative contribution that each area of the hand produced during cylinder grip. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Update TFCC: histology and pathology, classification, examination and diagnostics.

The TFCC is a crucial stabilizer of the DRUJ. Based on its superficial and deep fibers, the TFCC guarantees unrestricted pronation and supination which is essential for performing sophisticated tasks. The ability to perform complex movements is of uppermost importance for hand function. Therefore, a functional intact TFCC is a prerequisite in this context. The articular disc of the TFCC is a fibrocartilaginous extension of the superficial zone of hyaline articular cartilage which arises from the radius. The peripheral 10-40 % of the TFC is vascularized. Degeneration of the articular disc is common with increasing age. Even though the central part of the articular disc is avascular, potential regeneration of lesions could be detected. The Palmer and Atzei classifications of TFCC lesions are complementary. TFCC innervation is based on different nerves. There is a high variability. A diligent clinical examination facilitates specific tests which help to allocate symptoms to the pathology. Therefore, a thorough clinical examination is not dispensable. Wrist arthroscopy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosing TFCC pathologies despite technical progress in imaging modalities. MR arthrography may have the potential to become a real alternative to wrist arthroscopy for diagnosing TFCC pathologies with technical progress in the future.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunited distal radius fractures: results of a 7-year follow-up with special regard to the grade of radial displacement and post-operative ulnar variance.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of ulnar-sided wrist pain after malunited distal radius fractures remains controversial. Radial corrective osteotomy can restore congruity in the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as adequate length of the radius. Ulnar shortening osteotomies leave the radius' angular deformities unchanged, risking secondary DRUJ osteoarthritis. We supposed that, even within the widely accepted limit of 20°, a greater angulation of the radius in the sagittal plane correlates with a higher rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis. Furthermore, we suspected worse results from an ulna shortened to a negative rather than a neutral or positive ulnar variance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, we reviewed 23 patients a mean 7.2 (range 5.6-8.5) years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures. We compared 14 patients with up to 10° dorsal or palmar displacement from the normal palmar tilt of 10° to 9 patients with more than 10° displacement, and 15 patients whose post-operative ulnar variance was neutral or positive to 8 who had a negative one. RESULTS: Ulnar-sided wrist pain decreased enough to satisfy 21 of the 23 patients. Clinical results tended to be better when radial displacement was minor and when post-operative ulnar variance was positive or neutral. A shorter ulna significantly increased the rate of DRUJ osteoarthritis, whereas a greater degree of radial displacement only increased the rate slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Radial corrective osteotomy should be discussed as alternative when displacement of the radius in the sagittal plane exceeds 10°. The ulna should be shortened moderately to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis in the distal radioulnar joint.

Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.

INTRODUCTION: For clinical grip force assessment, the Jamar dynamometer is a wide accepted tool. Users have to be aware that this method does not represent all grip efforts applied. The Manugraphy system is a tool that measure total grip force as well as identify load distribution patterns of the hand while gripping cylinders wrapped with calibrated capacitive matrix sensor mats. The aim of this study was to validate an assessment setting of the Manugraphy system for clinical use. Further, the relationship and difference between the Manugraphy system and the Jamar dynamometer were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At two study centers, 152 healthy volunteers performed grip force tests with a digital Jamar dynamometer using handle positions 3 and 4 and the novel(®) Manugraphy system using two cylinders with circumferences of 150 and 200 mm. The subjects performed grip force testing with both devices on three different days. The intra- and inter-day variability for both methods was evaluated. To compare the values of both systems, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: The force values, as measured by the sensor matrix, were higher than those of the Jamar dynamometer. Analyses showed significant positive correlations between values obtained by the two measurement methods (p < 0.001). There was no significant inter-day variation for the 200-mm cylinder of the Manugraphy system. For the 150-mm cylinder, a significant variation was observed at center B, but not at A. Nevertheless, the fluctuation of the grip force values obtained with the Manugraphy system was equal or better than those obtained with the Jamar dynamometer. CONCLUSIONS: The force values, obtained using the two systems, have a high correlation but are not directly comparable. Both systems allow valid and constant grip force measurement. As the sensor mat detects all forces applied perpendicularly to the cylinder surface, it characterizes grip force better than the Jamar dynamometer. In addition, information about load distribution of the hand is gained.

Force loss and distribution of load in the hands of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome.

Manugraphy with three different cylinder sizes was used to quantify the contribution of fingers, thumb and palm to grip force in patients with unilateral cubital tunnel syndrome. Forces in the affected and contralateral hands differed by up to 29%. Although grip force is usually maximal when gripping small handles, ulnar nerve palsy resulted in similar absolute grip forces using the 100-mm and 200-mm cylinders. The contact area between the affected hand and the cylinders was reduced by 5%-9%. We noted a high correlation between the contact area and grip force, visible atrophy and permanently impaired sensibility. The load distribution differed significantly between both hands for all cylinder sizes. When gripping large objects, the main functional impairment in cubital tunnel syndrome is weakness in positioning and stabilizing the thumb. Weak intrinsic finger muscles are responsible for loss of force when gripping small objects. Level of evidence: III.

[Current Trends in the Implantation of the Touch Prosthesis at the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint: Results of the 1st German-Speaking User Meeting]. / Aktuelle Trends bei der Implantation der Touch-Prothese am Daumensattelgelenk: Ergebnisse des 1. deutschsprachigen Anwendertreffens.

The introduction of the new generation of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) joint implants for the treatment of CMC I osteoarthritis has significantly broadened the scope of hand surgery in recent years. However, the technical demands of the procedure and the many details that need to be considered require appropriate training and a learning curve. To share experiences with the Touch CMC I prosthesis, we held the first German-speaking CMC I joint prosthetics user meeting in Zurich. After some basic introductory lectures on biomechanics and the principles of prosthetic fitting of the CMC I joint, the various challenges associated with CMC I joint prosthetics were discussed in interactive expert panels. Subsequently, cases were discussed in small groups under expert guidance and the respective conclusions were discussed in plenary. The main results of this symposium are summarised in this manuscript.

[Our preferred Approaches to the distal Radius]. / Unsere bevorzugten Zugänge zum distalen Radius.

This article describes our preferred approaches to the distal radius treating acute fractures and malunion by plating.

Comparing Statistics and Machine Learning to Detect Insincere Grip Force Testing Using Manugraphy.

Background Currently, there are no tests that have been proven to be capable of rating an individual's grip force measurement as sincere or insincere. However, different parameters have been found to vary in grip force testing for maximal versus submaximal effort. A novel data analysis and processing approach might be key to improving these measurements. This study explores the use of a machine learning (ML) algorithm as a means to more accurately determine the sincerity or insincerity of grip force testing. The ML algorithm compares the hand's load distribution pattern with the information generated using conventional statistical methods. Methodology This study uses manugraphy data collected as part of a previous investigation that analyzed load distribution patterns of the right and left hands of 54 healthy subjects. The subjects underwent grip force testing using maximal or submaximal effort, and the percentage contributions of each of the seven defined anatomical areas of the hand were calculated with respect to the total load applied. The predictions based on the load distribution and its use for rating individual grip force measurements as sincere or insincere were compared with the results of conventional statistical methods (thresholds for a bi-manual area-to-area comparison) and an ML algorithm. Results Based on an area-to-area comparison, our method achieved a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 78% to detect insincere effort. A predictive ML model developed using these data was capable of recognizing submaximal effort based on the hand's load distribution pattern, determining a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 99%. Conclusions Compared to conventional methods, the use of an ML algorithm considerably improved the validity of manugraphy results in discerning the sincerity or insincerity of grip effort.

Load analysis of hands and feet while using different types of crutches with various leg's weight bearing.

The study aimed to define the load on hands using various commonly used types of crutches while walking with a full load on both legs (FL), with 20 kg partial load (PL), or with the left leg wholly unloaded (UL). Twenty-six healthy subjects used crutches with ergonomic handles, with anatomic handles (wider and softer bearing surface), and arthritis crutches (horizontal supporting area for the forearm). Sensor mats between hand and handles continuously measured the load transmitted, while sensor soles in the shoes recorded the ground reaction forces simultaneously. The load on the palm and separately the radial and ulnar halves of the palm were analyzed. With arthritis crutches, significantly lower load was transferred to the hands compared to forearm crutches (FL 3% vs. 25% of body weight, PL 8% vs. 87%, UL 12% vs. 103%). The load on hands increased significantly from FL to PL and UL for both types of crutches. The ipsilateral left hand had to bear significantly more load than the right hand. However, the feet's time-ground reaction curves showed more irregularities, and PL on the left leg was significantly higher with arthritis crutches. Anatomic handles reduced the load on the ulnar half of the palm (FL 3% vs. 5%, PL 13% vs. 18%, UL 17% vs. 23%); the radial half of the palm had a similar load to bear with both types of handles (11/11%, 31/32%, 34/35%). Arthritis crutches allow unburdening hands at the expense of gait stability. Anatomic handles reduce the load on the Guyon's canal.

[The complexity of hand-surgical procedures in the context of cross-sector care concepts: a consensus recommendation of the German Society of Hand Surgery] / Die Komplexität handchirurgischer Therapien im Kontext sektorenübergreifender Versorgungskonzepte: Konsensusempfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie.

Overboarding politcal influence in Germany concerning medical issues has come to a new peak. The report by the IGES Institute published in 2022 made an important contribution in this regard. Unfortunately, only that part of the recommendations of this report were implemented in a new version of the contract for outpatient surgery according to Section 115b SGB V (AOP contract), that called for an expansion of outpatient surgery. In particular, those aspects that are important from a medical point of view for a patient-specific adjustment of outpatient surgery (e. g. old age, frailty, comorbidities) as well as the important structural requirements for outpatient postoperative care were included in the new AOP contract at best in a rudimentary manner. For this reason, the German Society for Hand Surgery felt compelled to give its members a recommendation as to which medical aspects must be taken into account, especially when performing hand surgery operations, in order to ensure the highest level of safety for the patients entrusted to us while performing outpatient surgery. An expert group of experienced hand surgeons and hand therapists who work in hospitals of all levels of care as well as resident surgeons was formed in order to formulate mutually agreed recommendations for action.

Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using an ulnar head prosthesis: long-term results.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for painful instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) following resection of the ulnar head. METHODS: Twenty-three patients were treated with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis in 3 international hand centers. One patient was excluded from the study because a septic prosthesis had to be removed after 3 months. Sixteen of the remaining 22 patients could be assessed at 2 follow-up times, 28 months (range, 10-43 mo) and 11 years and 2 months (range, 97-158 mo) after surgery, for DRUJ stability, forearm rotation, grip strength, pain level (0-10), and satisfaction (0-10). Standardized radiographs of the wrist were evaluated for displacement of the ulnar head and loosening or bony reactions at the sigmoid notch or the ulna shaft. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated a clinically stable DRUJ at the latest examination, and no patient required further surgery at the DRUJ since the short-term evaluation in 1999. Average pain measured 3.7 before surgery, 1.7 at the short-term follow-up, and 1.7 at the long-term follow-up; patients' satisfaction, 2.2, 8.2, and 8.9; pronation, 73°, 86°, and 83°; supination, 52°, 77°, and 81°; and grip strength, 42%, 72%, and 81% of the unaffected side. All clinical parameters improved significantly from before surgery to the short-term follow-up, with no further statistically significant change between the short-term and long-term follow-up. Radiographs demonstrated no signs of stem loosening or incongruity of the DRUJ. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported short-term results with the Herbert prosthesis did not deteriorate in the long term. Reconstruction of the DRUJ with this prosthesis in painful radioulnar impingement following ulnar head resection is a reliable and reproducible procedure with lasting results.

Results after radioscapholunate arthrodesis with or without resection of the distal scaphoid pole.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences between radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis alone versus RSL arthrodesis with additional distal scaphoidectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 61 patients who were treated with RSL arthrodesis for painful posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Thirty patients had an RSL arthrodesis with additional resection of the distal scaphoid pole (group A), and 31 had RSL arthrodesis alone (group B). Six patients in group A and 8 in group B had the RSL arthrodesis converted to a complete wrist arthrodesis during follow-up. Those patients were excluded from the survey. Of the remaining 47 patients, 35 (20 from group A, 15 from group B) returned for a clinical and radiological examination at an average of 28 (range, 10-47) months after the index surgery. The results were rated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and the modified Mayo Wrist Score. The patients' outcomes after RSL arthrodesis with or without distal scaphoidectomy were compared for pain, wrist motion, grip strength, nonunion rate, osteoarthritis of the adjacent joints, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and the modified Mayo Wrist Score. RESULTS: Three patients with RSL arthrodesis alone showed a radioscaphoid nonunion. All arthrodeses in group A healed. In the clinical evaluation, there was no significant difference between groups A and B in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, the modified Mayo Wrist Score, grip strength, pain, or wrist motion. Assuming that wrist motion might be better in patients with a nonunion, the average wrist motion was recalculated after eliminating 3 patients with a radioscaphoid nonunion from group B. Radial deviation was then found to be significantly better in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Additional distal scaphoidectomy with RSL arthrodesis seems to improve postoperative radial deviation of the wrist. The radioscaphoid nonunion rate is high with RSL arthrodesis alone. Distal scaphoidectomy appeared to increase the successful fusion rate of RSL arthrodeses. No significant effect on wrist extension, flexion, ulnar deviation, pain level, restriction in activities of daily living, or grip strength was noted.

The effect of labeling photo documents in wrist arthroscopies on intra- and interobserver reliability.

INTRODUCTION: The reproducibility of diagnoses based on photo documents in wrist arthroscopies is limited and is expected to improve if the photos are labeled with illustrated structures. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of labeling photo documents on intra- and interobserver agreement and reliability of standard photo documentation in wrist arthroscopies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital photographs of 50 arthroscopies were re-evaluated by the surgeon as well as by two independent hand surgeons. First the photos were presented unlabeled in a random order, then the labeled photos in a uniform order. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed, and expressed by kappa coefficients. RESULTS: Overall, labeling the photos resulted in a slight improvement in intra- and interobserver reliability (0.573/0.444/0.420 vs. 0.518/0.412/0.212). The time needed to conceive the photo documents, however, was shortened when the photos were labeled. The cartilage status was assessed considerably more accurately if the photos were labeled (0.556/0.560/0.422 vs. 0.459/0.326/0.240; t test: P = 0.094). Whereas the SL ligament was assessed more accurately according to labeled photos (P = 0.100), the agreement rates for the assessment of other ligament structures (TFCC, LT and radiopalmar ligaments) were not substantially affected by labeling the photos. On re-evaluation of the unlabeled as well as the labeled photos, intraobserver reliability was better than interobserver reliability (0.518 vs. 0.412/0.212 and 0.573 vs. 0.444/0.420). CONCLUSION: Labeling simplifies but does not necessarily improve the reproducibility of photo documents in wrist arthroscopies. To display the cartilage status and the integrity of the SL ligament, digital photo documents should be labeled with the illustrated structure or joint surface.

STT arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy for Lichtman stage IIIB Kienböck's disease: first results of an ongoing observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Scapho-trapezial-trapezoidal (STT) arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) are used for the treatment of Lichtman stage IIIB Kienböck's disease. This study prospectively compares 1-year results of STT arthrodesis and PRC in Lichtman stage IIIB Kienböck's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were operated: eight with STT arthrodesis and 11 with PRC. Preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively, mobility and grip strength were examined. Both DASH and Mayo Wrist Scores were obtained from the patients. RESULTS: In the STT arthrodesis group, mean extension/flexion worsened from 54 to 39 % of the opposite hand. Grip strength improved from 52.9 to 62.1 %. The DASH Score improved from 32.6 to 21.4, and the Mayo Wrist Score from 50.6 to 57.9. In the PRC group, extension/flexion decreased from 62.5 to 57.0 % of the opposite hand. Grip strength improved from 38.6 to 69.0 %, the DASH Score from 36.7 to 18.9, and the Mayo Wrist Score from 54.6 to 66.0. CONCLUSION: One year after operation, slightly better results were observed in patients with PRC compared to STT arthrodesis.

[Differented Aproaches for Fracture Treatment in the Hand - when doing what?] / Differentialtherapeutische Zugänge zur Frakturversorgung an der Hand ­ Wann macht man was?

Treatment of finger fractures is demanding twice. Malunion and incongruence of the joints frequently result in severe functional restriction and should not be tolerated. On the other hand surgical access to the fracture site is frequently limited by the proximity of vulnerable structures like nerves, vessels, ligaments, and tendons.This article presents a selection of treatment options, that in the opinion of the authors have been proven beyond the background of a large institution with reference to alternative procedures and the management of special situations.