Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 80
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Birth ; 49(3): 559-568, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35218065

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anecdotal and emerging evidence suggested that the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic may have influenced women's attitudes toward community birth. Our purpose was to examine trends in community births from 2019 to 2020, and the risk profile of these births. METHODS: Recently released 2020 birth certificate data were compared with prior years' data to analyze trends in community births by socio-demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS: In 2020, there were 71 870 community births in the United States, including 45 646 home births and 21 884 birth center births. Community births increased by 19.5% from 2019 to 2020. Planned home births increased by 23.3%, while birth center births increased by 13.2%. Increases occurred in every US state, and for all racial and ethnic groups, particularly non-Hispanic Black mothers (29.7%), although not all increases were statistically significant. In 2020, 1 of every 50 births in the United States was a community birth (2.0%). Women with planned home and birth center births were less likely than women with hospital births to have several characteristics associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, including teen births, smoking during pregnancy, obesity, and preterm, low birthweight, and multiple births. More than two-thirds of planned home births were self-paid, compared with one-third of birth center and just 3% of hospital births. CONCLUSIONS: It is to the great credit of United States midwives working in home and birth center settings that they were able to substantially expand their services during a worldwide pandemic without compromising standards in triaging women to optimal settings for safe birth.


Assuntos
Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto , COVID-19 , Parto Domiciliar , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pandemias , Parto , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Public Health ; 111(9): 1673-1681, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383557

RESUMO

Objectives. To better understand racial and ethnic disparities in US maternal mortality. Methods. We analyzed 2016-2017 vital statistics mortality data with cause-of-death literals (actual words written on the death certificate) added. We created a subset of confirmed maternal deaths that had pregnancy mentions in the cause-of-death literals. Primary cause of death was identified and recoded using cause-of-death literals. We examined racial and ethnic disparities both overall and by primary cause. Results. The maternal mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black women was 3.55 times that for non-Hispanic White women. Leading causes of maternal death for non-Hispanic Black women were eclampsia and preeclampsia and postpartum cardiomyopathy with rates 5 times those for non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic Black maternal mortality rates from obstetric embolism and obstetric hemorrhage were 2.3 to 2.6 times those for non-Hispanic White women. Together, these 4 causes accounted for 59% of the non-Hispanic Black‒non-Hispanic White maternal mortality disparity. Conclusions. The prominence of cardiovascular-related conditions among the leading causes of confirmed maternal death, particularly for non-Hispanic Black women, necessitates increased vigilance for cardiovascular problems during the pregnant and postpartum period. Many of these deaths are preventable.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Morte Materna/etiologia , Mortalidade Materna/etnologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
3.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 33(1): O60-O72, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30320453

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies use birth certificate data to examine the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and maternal and perinatal health outcomes. Substantive changes from the latest birth certificate revision have implications for examining this relationship. METHODS: We provide an overview of the National Vital Statistics System and recent changes to the national birth certificate data file, which have implications for assessing IPI and perinatal health outcomes. We describe the calculation of IPI using birth certificate information and related measurement issues. Missing IPI values by maternal age, race and education using 2016 birth certificate data were also compared. Finally, we review and summarise data quality studies of select covariate and outcome variables (sociodemographic, maternal health and health behaviours, and infant health) conducted after the most recent 2003 birth certificate revision. RESULTS: Substantive changes to data collection, dissemination and quality have occurred since the 2003 revision. These changes impact IPI measurement, trends and associations with perinatal health outcomes. Missing values of IPI were highest for older ages, lower education and non-Hispanic black women. Minimal differences were found when comparing IPI using different gestational age measures. Recent data quality studies pointed to substantial variation in data quality by item and across states. CONCLUSION: Future studies examining the association of IPI with maternal and perinatal data using vital records should consider these aspects of the data in their research plan, sensitivity analyses and interpretation of findings.


Assuntos
Declaração de Nascimento , Intervalo entre Nascimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Confiabilidade dos Dados , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Saúde do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Recém-Nascido , Idade Materna , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Birth ; 46(2): 279-288, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30537156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital births have been increasing in the United States, although past studies have found wide variations between states. Our purpose was to examine trends in out-of-hospital births, the risk profile of these births, and state differences in women's access to these births. METHODS: National birth certificate data from 2004 to 2017 were analyzed. Newly available national data on method of payment for the delivery (private insurance, Medicaid, self-pay) were used to measure access to out-of-hospital birth options. RESULTS: After a gradual decline from 1990 to 2004, the number of out-of-hospital births increased from 35 578 in 2004 to 62 228 in 2017. In 2017, 1 of every 62 births in the United States was an out-of-hospital birth (1.61%). Home births increased by 77% from 2004 to 2017, whereas birth center births more than doubled. Out-of-hospital births were more common in the Pacific Northwest and less common in the southeastern states such as Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Women with planned home and birth center births were less likely to have a number of population characteristics associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, including teen births, smoking during pregnancy, obesity, and preterm, low birthweight, and multiple births. More than 2/3 of planned home births were self-paid, compared with 1/3 of birth center and just 3% of hospital births, with large variations by state. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of insurance or Medicaid coverage is an important limiting factor for women desiring out-of-hospital birth in most states. Recent increases in out-of-hospital births despite important limiting factors highlight the strong motivation of some women to choose out-of-hospital birth.


Assuntos
Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/tendências , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Domiciliar/tendências , Medicaid/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Declaração de Nascimento , Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/economia , Feminino , Parto Domiciliar/economia , Parto Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Distribuição de Poisson , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Birth ; 45(2): 169-177, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29314209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality is a sentinel indicator of health care quality. Our purpose was to analyze trends in Texas maternal mortality by demographic characteristics and cause of death, and to evaluate data quality. METHODS: Maternal mortality data were initially analyzed by single years, but then were grouped into 5-year averages (2006-2010 and 2011-2015) for more detailed analyses. Rates were computed per 100 000 live births. A two-proportion z test or Poisson regression for numerators <30 was used to evaluate differences. RESULTS: The Texas maternal mortality rate increased from 18.6 in 2010 to 38.7 in 2012, and then declined nonsignificantly to 32.5 in 2015. The 2011-2015 rate (34.2) was 87% higher than the 2006-2010 rate (18.3). In 2011-2015, the maternal mortality rate for women ≥40 years (558.8) was 27 times higher than for women <40 years (20.7). From 2006-2010 to 2011-2015, the maternal mortality rate increased by 121% for women ≥40 years and by 55% for women <40 years. The rate increased by 132% for nonspecific causes of death, and by 54% for specific causes. Rates for women <40 years for specific causes increased by 36%. CONCLUSIONS: The observed increase in maternal mortality in Texas from 2006-2010 to 2011-2015 is likely a result of both a true increase in rates and increased overreporting of maternal deaths, as indicated by implausibly high and increasing rates for women aged ≥40 years and among nonspecific causes of death. Efforts are needed to strengthen reporting of death certificate data, and to improve access to quality maternal health care services.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Materna , Mortalidade Materna/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Análise de Regressão , Texas/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 216(1): 73.e1-73.e8, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27687216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The US infant mortality rate has been steadily decreasing in recent years as has the preterm birth rate; preterm birth is a major factor associated with death during the first year of life. The degree to which changes in gestational age-specific mortality and changes in the distribution of births by gestational age have contributed to the decrease in the infant mortality rate requires clarification. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to better understand the major contributors to the 2007-2013 infant mortality decline for the total population and for infants born to non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and Hispanic women. STUDY DESIGN: We identified births and infant deaths from 2007 and 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Vital Statistics System's period linked birth and infant death files. We included all deaths and births for which there was a reported gestational age at birth on the birth certificate of 22 weeks or greater. The decrease in the infant mortality rate was disaggregated such that all of the change could be attributed to improvements in gestational age-specific infant mortality rates and changes in the distribution of gestational age, by week of gestation, using the Kitagawa method. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for records in which the obstetric estimate of gestational age was missing and for deaths and births less than 22 weeks' gestation. Maternal race and ethnicity information was obtained from the birth certificate. RESULTS: The infant mortality rates after exclusions were 5.72 and 4.92 per 1000 live births for 2007 and 2013, respectively, with an absolute difference of -0.80 (14% decrease). Infant mortality rates declined by 11% for non-Hispanic whites, by 19% for non-Hispanic blacks, and by 14% for Hispanics during the period. Compared with 2007, the proportion of births in each gestational age category was lower in 2013 with the exception of 39 weeks during which there was an increase in the proportion of births from 30.1% in 2007 to 37.5% in 2013. Gestational age-specific mortality decreased for each gestational age category between 2007 and 2013 except 33 weeks and >42 weeks. About 31% of the decrease in the US infant mortality rate from 2007 through 2013 was due to changes in the gestational age distribution, and 69% was due to improvements in gestational age-specific survival. Improvements in the gestational age distribution from 2007 through 2013 benefited infants of non-Hispanic white women (48%) the most, followed by infants of non-Hispanic black (31%) and Hispanic (14%) women. CONCLUSION: Infant mortality improved between 2007 and 2013 as a result of both improvements in the distribution of gestational age at birth and improvements in survival after birth. The differential contribution of improvements in the gestational age distribution at birth by race and ethnicity suggests that preconception and antenatal health and health care aimed at preventing or delaying preterm birth may not be reaching all populations.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idade Gestacional , Hispânico ou Latino , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , População Branca , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil/etnologia , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação , Estados Unidos
7.
Birth ; 43(2): 116-24, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991514

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital births are increasing in the United States. Our purpose was to examine trends in out-of-hospital births from 2004 to 2014, and to analyze newly available data on risk status and access to care. METHODS: Newly available data from the revised birth certificate for 47 states and Washington, DC, were used to examine out-of-hospital births by characteristics and to compare them with hospital births. Trends from 2004 to 2014 were also examined. RESULTS: Out-of-hospital births increased by 72 percent, from 0.87 percent of United States births in 2004 to 1.50 percent in 2014. Compared with mothers who had hospital births, those with out-of-hospital births had lower prepregnancy obesity (12.5% vs 25.0%) and smoking (2.8% vs 8.5%) rates, and higher college graduation (39.3% vs 30.0%) and breastfeeding initiation (94.3% vs 80.8%) rates. Among planned home births, 67.1 percent were self-paid, compared with 31.9 percent of birth center and 3.4 percent of hospital births. Vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs) comprised 4.6 percent of planned home births and 1.6 percent of hospital and birth center births. Sociodemographic and medical risk status of out-of-hospital births improved substantially from 2004 to 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in risk status of out-of-hospital births from 2004 to 2014 suggest that appropriate selection of low-risk women is improving. High rates of self-pay for the costs of out-of-hospital birth suggest serious gaps in insurance coverage, whereas higher-than-average rates of VBAC could reflect lack of access to hospital VBACs. Mandating private insurance and Medicaid coverage could substantially improve access to out-of-hospital births. Improving access to hospital VBACs might reduce the number of out-of-hospital VBACs.


Assuntos
Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/tendências , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Domiciliar/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Declaração de Nascimento , Centros de Assistência à Gravidez e ao Parto/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/economia , Feminino , Parto Domiciliar/economia , Parto Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Classe Social , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Am J Public Health ; 104 Suppl 3: S320-8, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24754619

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We described American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) infant and pediatric death rates and leading causes of death. METHODS: We adjusted National Vital Statistics System mortality data for AI/AN racial misclassification by linkage with Indian Health Service (IHS) registration records. We determined average annual death rates and leading causes of death for 1999 to 2009 for AI/AN versus White infants and children. We limited the analysis to IHS Contract Health Service Delivery Area counties. RESULTS: The AI/AN infant death rate was 914 (rate ratio [RR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55, 1.67). Sudden infant death syndrome, unintentional injuries, and influenza or pneumonia were more common in AI/AN versus White infants. The overall AI/AN pediatric death rates were 69.6 for ages 1 to 4 years (RR = 2.56; 95% CI = 2.38, 2.75), 28.9 for ages 5 to 9 years (RR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.92, 2.34), 37.3 for ages 10 to 14 years (RR = 2.22; 95% CI = 2.04, 2.40), and 158.4 for ages 15 to 19 years (RR = 2.71; 95% CI = 2.60, 2.82). Unintentional injuries and suicide occurred at higher rates among AI/AN youths versus White youths. CONCLUSIONS: Death rates for AI/AN infants and children were higher than for Whites, with regional disparities. Several leading causes of death in the AI/AN pediatric population are potentially preventable.


Assuntos
Mortalidade da Criança/etnologia , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Infantil/etnologia , Inuíte/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Alaska/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0265146, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35353843

RESUMO

We examined the relationship between obstetrical intervention and preterm birth in the United States between 2014 and 2019. This observational study analyzed 2014-2019 US birth data to assess changes in preterm birth, cesarean delivery, induction of labor, and associated risks. Logistic regression modeled the odds of preterm obstetrical intervention (no labor cesarean or induction) after risk adjustment. The percentage of singleton preterm births in the United States increased by 9.4% from 2014-2019. The percent of singleton, preterm births delivered by cesarean increased by 6.0%, while the percent with induction of labor increased by 39.1%. The percentage of singleton preterm births where obstetrical intervention (no labor cesarean or induction) potentially impacted the gestational age at delivery increased from 47.6% in 2014 to 54.9% in 2019. Preterm interventions were 13% more likely overall in 2019 compared to 2014 and 17% more likely among late preterm births, after controlling for demographic and medical risk factors. Compared to non-Hispanic White women, Non-Hispanic Black women had a higher risk of preterm obstetric interventions. Preterm infants have higher morbidity and mortality rates than term infants, thus any increase in the preterm birth rate is concerning. A renewed effort to understand the trends in preterm interventions is needed to ensure that obstetrical interventions are evidence-based and are limited to those cases where they optimize outcomes for both mothers and babies.


Assuntos
Nascimento Prematuro , Coeficiente de Natalidade , Cesárea , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Birth ; 38(1): 17-23, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21332770

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After a gradual decline from 1990 to 2004, the percentage of births occurring at home in the United States increased by 5 percent in 2005 and that increase was sustained in 2006. The purpose of the study was to analyze trends and characteristics in home births in United States by race and ethnicity from 1990 to 2006. METHODS: U.S. birth certificate data on home births were analyzed and compared with hospital births for a variety of demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2006, both the number and percentage of home births increased for non-Hispanic white women, but declined for all other race and ethnic groups. In 2006, non-Hispanic white women were three to four times more likely to have a home birth than women of other race and ethnic groups. Home births were more likely than hospital births to occur to older, married women with singleton pregnancies and several previous children. For non-Hispanic white women, fewer home births than hospital births were born preterm, whereas for other race and ethnic groups a higher percentage of home births than hospital births were born preterm. For non-Hispanic white women, two-thirds of home births were delivered by midwives. In contrast, for other race and ethnic groups, most home births were delivered by either physicians or "other" attendants, suggesting that a higher proportion of these births may be unplanned home births because of emergency situations. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the risk profile of home births by race and ethnicity are consistent with previous research, suggesting that, compared with non-Hispanic white women, a larger proportion of non-Hispanic black and Hispanic home births represent unplanned, emergency situations.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde/etnologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Domiciliar/tendências , Resultado da Gravidez/etnologia , Saúde da Mulher/etnologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Coeficiente de Natalidade/etnologia , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Birth ; 38(3): 185-90, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21884226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After a gradual decline from 1990 to 2004, the percentage of births occurring at home increased from 2004 to 2008 in the United States. The objective of this report was to examine the recent increase in home births and the factors associated with this increase from 2004 to 2008. METHODS: United States birth certificate data on home births were analyzed by maternal demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS: In 2008, there were 28,357 home births in the United States. From 2004 to 2008, the percentage of births occurring at home increased by 20 percent from 0.56 percent to 0.67 percent of United States births. This rise was largely driven by a 28 percent increase in the percentage of home births for non-Hispanic white women, for whom more than 1 percent of births occur at home. At the same time, the risk profile for home births has been lowered, with substantial drops in the percentage of home births of infants who are born preterm or at low birthweight, and declines in the percentage of home births that occur to teen and unmarried mothers. Twenty-seven states had statistically significant increases in the percentage of home births from 2004 to 2008; only four states had declines. CONCLUSION: The 20 percent increase in United States home births from 2004 to 2008 is a notable development that will be of interest to practitioners and policymakers. (BIRTH 38:3 September 2011).


Assuntos
Parto Domiciliar/tendências , Adulto , Declaração de Nascimento , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Risco , Estados Unidos
14.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253920, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185810

RESUMO

To better understand age-related disparities in US maternal mortality, we analyzed 2016-2017 vital statistics mortality data with cause-of-death literal text (actual words written on the death certificate) added. We created a subset of confirmed maternal deaths which had pregnancy mentions in the cause-of-death literals. Primary cause of death was identified and recoded using cause-of-death literals. Age-related disparities were examined both overall and by primary cause. Compared to women <35, the 2016-2017 US maternal mortality rate was twice as high for women aged 35-39, four times higher for women aged 40-44, and 11 times higher for women aged 45-54 years. Obstetric hemorrhage was the leading cause of death for women aged 35+ with rates 4 times higher than for women <35, followed by postpartum cardiomyopathy with a 3-fold greater risk. Obstetric embolism, eclampsia/preeclampsia, and Other complications of obstetric surgery and procedures each had a two-fold greater risk of death for women aged 35+. Together these 5 causes of death accounted for 70.9% of the elevated maternal mortality risk for women aged 35+. The excess maternal mortality risk for women aged 35+ was focused among a few causes of death and much of this excess mortality is preventable. Early detection and treatment, as well as continued care during the postpartum year is critical to preventing these deaths. The Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health has promulgated patient safety bundles with specific interventions that health care systems can adopt in an effort to prevent these deaths.


Assuntos
Eclampsia/mortalidade , Morte Materna , Mortalidade Materna , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Adulto , Causas de Morte , Eclampsia/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/efeitos adversos , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/patologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Am J Public Health ; 100(11): 2241-7, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20864720

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship between obstetrical intervention and preterm birth in the United States between 1991 and 2006. METHODS: We assessed changes in preterm birth, cesarean delivery, labor induction, and associated risks. Logistic regression modeled the odds of preterm obstetrical intervention after risk adjustment. RESULTS: From 1991 to 2006, the percentage of singleton preterm births increased 13%. The cesarean delivery rate for singleton preterm births increased 47%, and the rate of induced labor doubled. In 2006, 51% of singleton preterm births were spontaneous vaginal deliveries, compared with 69% in 1991. After adjustment for demographic and medical risks, the mother of a preterm infant was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.87, 1.90) more likely to have an obstetrical intervention in 2006 than in 1991. Using new birth certificate data from 19 states, we estimated that 42% of singleton preterm infants were delivered via induction or cesarean birth without spontaneous onset of labor. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetrical interventions were related to the increase in the US preterm birth rate between 1991 and 2006. The public health community can play a central role in reducing medically unnecessary interventions.


Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Matern Child Health J ; 14(2): 147-54, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20044789

RESUMO

To examine trends in repeat cesarean delivery, the characteristics of women who have repeat cesareans, and the risk of neonatal mortality for repeat cesarean birth compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Trends and characteristics of repeat cesareans were examined for: the period 1998-2002 for [1] all births, [2] low-risk births (singleton, term, vertex births) and [3] "no indicated risk" (NIR) births (singleton, term, vertex presentation births with no reported medical risks or complications). For low-risk and NIR births, neonatal mortality rates for repeat cesareans and VBACs were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the risk of neonatal mortality for repeat cesareans and VBACs, after controlling for demographic and health factors. In 2002 the repeat cesarean rate was 87.4%, and varied little by maternal risk status or by demographic and health characteristics. From 1998-2002 rates increased by 20% for low risk and by 21% for NIR births, respectively. For low-risk women for the 1998-2002 birth cohorts, the adjusted odds ratio for neonatal mortality associated with repeat cesarean delivery (compared with VBAC) was 1.36 (95% C.I. 1.20-1.55). For NIR women, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.24 (0.99-1.55). The experience of a prior cesarean has apparently become a major indication for a repeat cesarean. Regardless of maternal risk status, almost 90% of women with a prior cesarean have a subsequent (i.e., repeat) cesarean delivery. This is the case even if there was no other reported medical indication. Our findings do not support the widely-held belief that neonatal mortality risk is significantly lower for repeat cesarean compared to VBAC delivery.


Assuntos
Recesariana/tendências , Mortalidade Infantil , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/tendências , Adulto , Declaração de Nascimento , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
Int J Health Serv ; 40(4): 577-88, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21058532

RESUMO

In 2005, the United States ranked 30th in the world in infant mortality. Infant mortality rates for preterm (<37 weeks of gestation) infants are lower in the United States than in most European countries; however, infant mortality rates for infants born at 37 or more weeks of gestation are higher in the United States than in most European countries. One in 8 births in the United States were preterm in 2005, compared with 1 in 18 births in Ireland and Finland, and 1 in 16 in France and Sweden. If the United States had Sweden's distribution of births by gestational age, nearly 8,000 infant deaths in the United States would be averted each year, and the U.S. infant mortality rate would be one-third lower. The main cause of the United States' high infant mortality rate when compared with Europe is the very high percentage of preterm births in the United States, the period when infant mortality is greatest.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Infantil , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Peso Extremamente Baixo ao Nascer , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
PLoS One ; 15(10): e0240701, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112910

RESUMO

Changes in data collection and processing of US maternal mortality data across states over time have led to inconsistencies in maternal death reporting. Our purpose was to identify possible misclassification of maternal deaths and to apply alternative coding methods to improve specificity of maternal causes. We analyzed 2016-2017 US vital statistics mortality data with cause-of-death literals (actual words written on the death certificate) added. We developed an alternative coding strategy to code the "primary cause of death" defined as the most likely cause that led to death. We recoded deaths with or without literal pregnancy mentions to maternal and non-maternal causes, respectively. Originally coded and recoded data were compared for overall maternal deaths and for a subset of deaths originally coded to ill-defined causes. Among 1691 originally coded maternal deaths, 597 (35.3%) remained a maternal death upon recoding and 1094 (64.7%) were recoded to non-maternal causes. The most common maternal causes were eclampsia and preeclampsia, obstetric embolism, postpartum cardiomyopathy, and obstetric hemorrhage. The most common non-maternal causes were diseases of the circulatory system and cancer, similar to the leading causes of death among all reproductive-age women (excluding injuries). Among 735 records originally coded to ill-defined causes, 94% were recoded to more specific, informative causes from literal text. Eighteen deaths originally coded as non-maternal mentioned pregnancy in the literals and were recoded as maternal deaths. Literal text provides more detailed information on cause of death which is often lost during coding. We found evidence of both underreporting and overreporting of maternal deaths, with possible overreporting predominant. Accurate data is essential for measuring the effectiveness of maternal mortality reduction programs.


Assuntos
Atestado de Óbito , Mortalidade Materna , Relatório de Pesquisa , Adulto , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
Public Health Rep ; 124(5): 670-81, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19753945

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Infant mortality is a major indicator of the health of a nation. We analyzed recent patterns and trends in U.S. infant mortality, with an emphasis on two of the greatest challenges: (1) persistent racial and ethnic disparities and (2) the impact of preterm and low birthweight delivery. METHODS: Data from the national linked birth/infant death datasets were used to compute infant mortality rates per 100,000 live births by cause of death (COD), and per 1,000 live births for all other variables. Infant mortality rates and other measures of infant health were analyzed and compared. Leading and preterm-related CODs, and international comparisons of infant mortality rates were also examined. RESULTS: Despite the rapid decline in infant mortality during the 20th century, the U.S. infant mortality rate did not decline from 2000 to 2005, and declined only marginally in 2006. Racial and ethnic disparities in infant mortality have persisted and increased, as have the percentages of preterm and low birthweight deliveries. After decades of improvement, the infant mortality rate for very low birthweight infants remained unchanged from 2000 to 2005. Infant mortality rates from congenital malformations and sudden infant death syndrome declined; however, rates for preterm-related CODs increased. The U.S. international ranking in infant mortality fell from 12th place in 1960 to 30th place in 2005. CONCLUSIONS: Infant mortality is a complex and multifactorial problem that has proved resistant to intervention efforts. Continued increases in preterm and low birthweight delivery present major challenges to further improvement in the infant mortality rate.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Causas de Morte/tendências , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil/etnologia , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Birth ; 35(1): 3-8, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18307481

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The percentage of United States births delivered by cesarean section continues to increase, even for women considered to be at low risk for the procedure. The purpose of this study was to use an "intention-to-treat" methodology, as recommended by a National Institutes of Health conference, to examine neonatal mortality risk by method of delivery for low-risk women. METHODS: Low-risk births were singleton, term (37-41 weeks' gestation), vertex births, with no reported medical risk factors or placenta previa and with no prior cesarean section. All U.S. live births and infant deaths for the 1999 to 2002 birth cohorts (8,026,415 births and 17,412 infant deaths) were examined. Using the intention-to-treat methodology, a "planned vaginal delivery" category was formed by combining vaginal births and cesareans with labor complications or procedures since the original intention in both cases was presumably a vaginal delivery. This group was compared with cesareans with no labor complications or procedures, which is the closest approximation to a "planned cesarean delivery" category possible, given data limitations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model neonatal mortality as a function of delivery method, adjusting for sociodemographic and medical risk factors. RESULTS: The unadjusted neonatal mortality rate for cesarean deliveries with no labor complications or procedures was 2.4 times that for planned vaginal deliveries. In the most conservative model, the adjusted odds ratio for neonatal mortality was 1.69 (95% CI 1.35-2.11) for cesareans with no labor complications or procedures, compared with planned vaginal deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that cesarean deliveries with no labor complications or procedures remained at a 69 percent higher risk of neonatal mortality than planned vaginal deliveries is important, given the rapid increase in the number of primary cesarean deliveries without a reported medical indication.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Infantil , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA