Nonrestorative sleep and its association with insomnia severity, sleep debt, and social jetlag in adults: Variations in relevant factors among age groups.

OBJECTIVE: Nonrestorative sleep (NRS) is unrefreshing sleep that is harmful to mental and physical health. Although few studies have reported the relationship between NRS and sleep problems, none have evaluated this relationship by age group. This study aimed to determine whether NRS could be associated with insomnia severity, sleep debt, and social jetlag and whether this relationship would vary with age. METHODS: The 1592 participants were allocated into age groups: 18-25 years (n = 317), 26-40 years (n = 405), 41-65 years (n = 454), and >65 years (n = 416). The study used Restorative Sleep Questionnaire to assess NRS, Athens Insomnia Scale to assess insomnia severity, Sleep Debt Index to assess sleep debt, and the absolute difference in midpoints of sleep between weekdays and days off to assess social jetlag. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between NRS and sleep problems. In the 18-25-year group, insomnia severity, sleep debt of ≥2 h, and social jetlag of ≥2 h; in the 26-40-year group, insomnia severity and sleep debt of ≥2 h; in the 41-65-year group, insomnia severity and sleep debt of ≥2 h; and in the >65-year group, insomnia severity were significantly associated with NRS. CONCLUSION: NRS was associated with insomnia severity in all age groups, with sleep debt in the young and working-age groups and social jetlag in the young age group. Different approaches to improving the NRS are required for different age groups.

Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Insomnia Catastrophizing Scale and relationship of insomnia severity with catastrophic thoughts, safety behaviors, and dysfunctional beliefs.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Insomnia Catastrophizing Scale (ICS) and to examine the relationship between insomnia severity and insomnia-related cognitive factors. METHODS: A total of 786 participants were recruited via an online survey and classified into the insomnia group (n = 342) and healthy group (n = 444). The insomnia group comprised individuals who self-reported meeting the diagnostic criteria for chronic insomnia disorder in the third edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders. RESULTS: The ICS is used to independently assess nighttime (ICS-N) and daytime (ICS-D) catastrophic thoughts, and item response theory revealed that each ICS-N and ICS-D item can adequately assess catastrophic thoughts during the night and day, respectively. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ICS-N and ICS-D were good. Further, the ICS-N and ICS-D had a significant positive correlation with insomnia severity, hyperarousal, sleep-related safety behaviors, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, and anxiety symptoms. Multiple regression analyses with insomnia severity as the dependent variable in the insomnia group demonstrated that catastrophic thoughts were more strongly associated with insomnia severity than sleep-related safety behaviors and dysfunctional beliefs about sleep. The interaction between nighttime catastrophic thoughts and sleep-related safety behaviors increased insomnia severity. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese versions of ICS-N and ICS-D were found to be superior in measuring insomnia-related catastrophic thoughts and to have high reliability and validity. Furthermore, these findings more clearly demonstrate that the catastrophic thoughts may be an important associated factor of insomnia.

Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as a first-line treatment, its efficacy for workers with insomnia remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of CBT-I in the management of insomnia symptoms in workers. We searched the literature in three electronic databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase, and included 21 studies in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, CBT-I overall resulted in significant improvements in terms of severity of insomnia (g = -0.91), sleep onset latency (g = -0.62), wakefulness after sleep onset (g = -0.60), early morning awakening (g = -0.58), and sleep efficiency (g = 0.71). However, there was no improvement in the total sleep time relative to that in the control group. Furthermore, CBT-I significantly alleviated depressive (g = -0.37) and anxiety (g = -0.35) symptoms and fatigue (g = -0.47) compared with the control group. Our study findings suggest that both web-based and face-to-face CBT-I are effective interventions for managing insomnia symptoms in daytime workers, although it is important to note that only face-to-face CBT-I achieved clinically meaningful changes. The effectiveness of CBT-I for shift workers could not be determined.

Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Restorative Sleep Questionnaire in community samples.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the Japanese version of the Restorative Sleep Questionnaire Weekly version (RSQ-W-J) and estimate the RSQ-W-J cut-off score to identify the degree of non-restorative sleep (NRS) that interferes with daytime function. METHODS: An online survey was conducted, and 513 participants (241 men, 272 women; mean age, 47.88 ± 16.66 years) completed the questionnaires. The RSQ-W-J, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Athens Insomnia Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Sleep Debt Index, NRS and the degree of daytime dysfunction, and the diagnostic criteria for chronic insomnia were used as implementation scales. RESULTS: The RSQ-W-J was confirmed to have a single-factor structure. Both the Cronbach α coefficient and test-retest reliability of RSQ-W-J were high (α = 0.91; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]agreement = 0.85). The RSQ-W-J was significantly negatively correlated with the scales of fatigue, insomnia, depressive symptoms, daytime sleepiness, and sleep debt. In addition, the RSQ-W-J scores of the insomnia group, in which participants met the diagnostic criteria for chronic insomnia, NRS group, in which participants had NRS only, and sleep debt group, in which participants had sleep debt, were significantly lower than those in the normal sleep group. Furthermore, the insomnia group scored significantly lower than the sleep debt group. The RSQ-W-J cut-off score, which indicates whether or not NRS interferes with daytime function, was estimated to be 45.8 points. CONCLUSIONS: The RSQ-W-J was shown to be useful for comprehensively measuring the degree of restorative sleep.