Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal mesothelioma: Canadian practices and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare malignancy originating from the peritoneal lining. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard-of-care for patients with isolated PM. Due to a paucity of prospective data there are several different HIPEC protocols. The aims of this study are to describe the CRS and HIPEC protocols for PM and patient outcomes across Canada. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed and treated for PM with CRS and HIPEC in four major peritoneal disease centers in Canada between 2000 and 2021. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and survival were collected. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified. Mean age was 52 years (17-75) and 37.5% were male. Epithelioid (70.1%) and multicystic (13%) mesothelioma were the most common subtypes. Twenty-one patients (30%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CRS and HIPEC was performed in 64 patients (91.4%). Of these, the mean PCI was 22 (2-39) and cisplatin+doxorubicin was the most common HIPEC regimen (n = 33, 51.6%). A semi-closed coliseum technique was used in 68.8% of HIPECs and the mean duration of surgery was 486 min (90-1052). Clavien-Dindo III or IV complications occurred in 12 patients (16.9%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (0.2-104.4), we found a 5-year overall survival of 61% and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 35%. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC is a safe and effective treatment modality for well-selected patients with PM, with some achieving prolonged survival.

Yield of routine staging laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines recommending diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with gastric cancer, implementation is low. We aimed to explore trends in the use of laparoscopy for staging of gastric cancer in Alberta, Canada, determine the rate of positive findings and identify factors predictive of positive staging laparoscopy (SL) findings in this patient population. METHODS: In August 2018, we sent a survey to all general surgeons in Alberta who were members of the Alberta Association of General Surgeons to identify those treating gastric cancer. The survey inquired about type of practice (academic or community), gastric cancer case volume, routine versus selective use of SL and, if selective use of SL, criteria used to select cases. Participants were also asked to provide data from their SL cases from July 2007 to February 2019. We double-checked surgeon records with chart review. The primary outcome was evidence of metastatic disease on SL or cytologic examination or both. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify factors predictive of positive laparoscopy findings. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 41 of 127 surgeons (response rate 32.3%). We reviewed 116 cases from 5 surgeons at 4 centres. Gross metastatic disease or positive findings on cytologic examination or both were identified in 37 patients (31.9%). On univariate analysis, the following were associated with an increased risk of identification of metastatic disease at laparoscopy: visualization of the primary tumour on computed tomography (CT) (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-76.5), presence of abdominal lymphadenopathy greater than 1 cm (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.4) and presence of ascites (OR 19.1, 95% CI 2.2-161.8). Visualization of the primary tumour on CT (OR 8.4, 95% CI 1.0-68.3) and the presence of ascites (OR 15.9, 95% CI 1.8-137.0) remained statistically significant predictors on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Metastatic disease was identified at SL in almost one-third of cases, which suggests that SL should still be used routinely in gastric cancer staging in Canadian centres. Our study identified several preoperative imaging findings associated with evidence of metastatic disease on laparoscopy; however, further studies are needed to establish robust predictors of positive findings before advocating for a selective SL approach.

Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) on appendectomy specimens and correlations with pseudomyxoma peritonei development risk.

Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is the primary source of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). PMP may develop after seemingly complete resection of primary tumor by appendectomy, which is unpredictable due to lack of reliable prognostic indicators. We retrospectively reviewed 154 surgically resected LAMNs to explore if any of the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics may be associated with increasing risk of PMP development. Our major findings include: (1) As compared to those without PMP, the cases that developed PMP were more frequent to have (a) smaller luminal diameter (<1 cm) and thicker wall, separate mucin aggregations, and microscopic perforation/rupture, all suggestive of luminal mucin leakage; (b) microscopic acellular mucin presenting on serosal surface and not being confined to mucosa; and (c) neoplastic epithelium dissecting outward beyond mucosa, however, with similar frequency of neoplastic cells being present in muscularis propria. (2) Involvement of neoplastic cells or/and acellular mucin at surgical margin did not necessarily lead to tumor recurrence or subsequent PMP, and clear margin did not absolutely prevent PMP development. (3) Coexisting diverticulum, resulted from neoplastic or non-neoplastic mucosa being herniated through muscle-lacking vascular hiatus of appendiceal wall, was seen in a quarter of LAMN cases, regardless of PMP. The diverticular portion of tumor involvement was often the weakest point where rupture occurred. In conclusion, proper evaluation of surgical specimens with search for mucin and neoplastic cells on serosa and for microscopic perforation, which are of prognostic significance, should be emphasized.

Evaluation of repeat cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal and colorectal cancers: a multicentre Canadian study

Background: Peritoneal recurrences after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancers are frequent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and perioperative and long-term outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal and appendiceal origin. Methods: Data were collected from patients treated from 2000 to 2016 for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal or colorectal cancer with CRS/HIPEC at 2 specialist centres. Data on demographics, procedure details, morbidity and survival were recorded. Analyses compared the iterations of CRS/HIPEC to assess the safety and effectiveness of repeat surgery. Results: Of all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC in the 2 centres, 37 patients underwent a repeat procedure. Operative time was similar for the first and second surgeries (412.1 v. 412.5 min, p = 0.74) but patients had a significantly lower peritoneal carcinoma index score with the second surgery (21.8 in the first iteration v. 9.53 in the second iteration, p < 0.001) and significantly less blood loss (1762 mL in the first iteration v. 790 mL in the second iteration, p = 0.001). There was a nonsignificant decrease in grade III­IV complications and there was no 30-day mortality associated with repeat procedures. For patients with colorectal cancer, median disease-free survival was 9.6 months and median overall survival was 40 months. For patients with appendiceal cancer, median disease-free survival was 15 months and overall survival was 64.4 months. Conclusion: Repeat CRS/HIPEC procedures for recurrent appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis are safe in well-selected patients, without increased morbidity or mortality, and they are associated with significant long-term survival, particularly for patients with appendiceal cancers. These results support the use of repeat CRS/HIPEC in these patients.

Contexte: Les récurrences péritonéales après une chirurgie cytoréductrice (CCR) et une chimiothérapie hyperthermique intrapéritonéale (CHIP) pour les cancers de l'appendice et colorectaux sont fréquentes. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'innocuité, la faisabilité technique et les résultats périopératoires et à long terme d'une reprise de CCR/CHIP chez les patients qui présentent une récurrence de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant son origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice. Méthodes: Des données ont été recueillies sur des patients traités entre 2000 et 2016 pour une récurrence de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant son origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice par CCR/CHIP dans 2 centres spécialisés. On a tenu compte des données démographiques, des détails des interventions, ainsi que de la morbidité et de la survie. Des analyses ont permis de comparer les premières et deuxièmes CCR/CHIP pour évaluer l'innocuité et l'efficacité des chirurgies répétées. Résultats: De tous les patients soumis à des CCR/CHIP dans les 2 centres, 37 ont subi l'intervention de nouveau. Le temps opératoire a été similaire pour les premières et les deuxièmes chirurgies (412,1 c. 412,5 min, p = 0,74), mais les patients présentaient un score de carcinomatose péritonéale beaucoup plus bas lors de la deuxième chirurgie (21,8 pour la première intervention c. 9,53 pour la seconde, p < 0,001) et des pertes sanguines significativement moindres (1762 mL pour la première intervention c. 790 mL pour la seconde, p = 0,001). On a noté une diminution non significative des complications de grades III­IV et on n'a déploré aucune mortalité à 30 jours en lien avec la reprise de l'intervention. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer colorectal, la survie médiane sans maladie a été de 9,6 mois et la survie médiane globale a été de 40 mois. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer de l'appendice, la survie médiane sans maladie a été de 15 mois et la survie médiane globale a été de 64,4 mois. Conclusion: La reprise des CCR/CHIP pour les récurrences de carcinomatose péritonéale ayant leur origine au niveau colorectal ou de l'appendice est sécuritaire chez les patients soigneusement sélectionnés, sans accroissement de la morbidité ou de la mortalité, et elles sont associées à une survie à long terme significative, particulièrement chez les patients ayant un cancer de l'appendice. Ces résultats appuient la reprise des CCR/CHIP chez ces patients.

Setting Performance Standards for Technical and Nontechnical Competence in General Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to (1) create a technical and nontechnical performance standard for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) assess the classification accuracy and (3) credibility of these standards, (4) determine a trainees' ability to meet both standards concurrently, and (5) delineate factors that predict standard acquisition. BACKGROUND: Scores on performance assessments are difficult to interpret in the absence of established standards. METHODS: Trained raters observed General Surgery residents performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and the Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skills (OSANTS) instruments, while as also providing a global competent/noncompetent decision for each performance. The global decision was used to divide the trainees into 2 contrasting groups and the OSATS or OSANTS scores were graphed per group to determine the performance standard. Parametric statistics were used to determine classification accuracy and concurrent standard acquisition, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to delineate predictive factors. RESULTS: Thirty-six trainees were observed 101 times. The technical standard was an OSATS of 21.04/35.00 and the nontechnical standard an OSANTS of 22.49/35.00. Applying these standards, competent/noncompetent trainees could be discriminated in 94% of technical and 95% of nontechnical performances (P < 0.001). A 21% discordance between technically and nontechnically competent trainees was identified (P < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated case experience and trainee level were both able to predict achieving the standards with an area under the curve (AUC) between 0.83 and 0.96 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study presents defensible standards for technical and nontechnical performance. Such standards are imperative to implementing summative assessments into surgical training.

Coagulation after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) benefit patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Nevertheless, this therapy is associated with considerable postoperative pain due to the extensive abdominal incision. While epidural analgesia offers efficacious pain control, CRS and HIPEC therapy is associated with perioperative coagulopathy that may impact its use. The purpose of this retrospective study is to characterize the postoperative coagulopathy in this patient subset and to develop a model that will help predict those at risk. METHODS: Our database of patients treated with CRS and HIPEC (n = 171) was reviewed to assess perioperative changes in platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). Abnormal coagulation was defined by platelet count < 100 × 10-9·L-1, INR ≥ 1.5, or PTT ≥ 45 sec. Severe abnormality in coagulation was defined by platelet count < 50 ×10-9·L-1, INR > 2.0, and/or PTT > 60 sec. A logistic regression model was developed to determine if patient, disease, and/or surgical factor(s) were associated with the development of postoperative coagulopathy. Epidural catheter management in this patient population was also reviewed. RESULTS: Significant differences (adjusted P < 0.007) were noted between median preoperative and postoperative platelet and INR values on postoperative days (POD) 0 through 6 and days 0 through 3, respectively. Highest observed median differences between preoperative and postoperative values showed a decrease in platelet count of 94 × 10-9·L-1 (POD 2 and POD 3), an increase in INR of 0.2 (POD 0 to POD 2), and a decrease in PTT of 3.1 sec (POD 5). Coagulopathy and severe coagulopathy occurred in 38% and 4.7% of patients, respectively. Predictors of coagulopathy included intraoperative transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and perhaps the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI). Epidural catheters were inserted in 26 patients for a median [IQR] duration of 7.0 [5.0-7.0] days without complication. At the time of their removal, no blood products were required to correct abnormal coagulation values. CONCLUSIONS: Altered coagulation may appear during the postoperative period in approximately 40% of our patients treated with CRS and HIPEC. Intraoperative transfusion of RBCs and possibly increased PCI are associated with abnormal postoperative coagulation. Close monitoring of coagulation parameters is required to help ensure safe removal of an epidural catheter.

Outcomes of surgical treatment alone in patients with superficial soft tissue sarcoma regardless of size or grade.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, standard treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is wide local excision and adjuvant radiation, but radiation may be unnecessary in superficial STS. The primary objective is to assess local recurrence rates in patients treated with surgical management alone for superficial STS. METHODS: A retrospective cancer registry review of patients treated with surgery alone for superficial STS at the Tom Baker Cancer Center (TBCC) was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as recurrence data were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients met study criteria. Local and overall recurrence rates were 7/61 (11.5%) and 12/61 (19.7%), respectively. The proportion with a T2 tumor was 38.8% versus 33.3% (P = 0.69), with Grade 2 or 3 tumors was 59.2% versus 83.3% (P = 0.14), and with resection margins <1 cm was 28.6% versus 75.0% (P = 0.008) for patients without and with recurrence, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 1.7 (0.4-5.2) years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection alone appears to be a viable option for superficial STS that can save patients from potential side effects of radiation. The association between recurrence and inadequate margins (<1 cm) requires additional treatment be offered to this subset of patients.

Quality of life, functional outcomes, and wound complications in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative chemoradiation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative irradiation reduces local recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), but major wound complication rates approach 25-35 %. Using a novel neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocol, we prospectively documented functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) and hypothesized a lower major wound complication rate. METHODS: Patients with STS deep to muscular fascia were treated with 3 days of doxorubicin (30 mg/day) and 10 days of irradiation (300 cGy/day) followed by limb-sparing surgery. Wound complications were assessed, and functional assessment and QOL were followed prospectively using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), and Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaires preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Altogether, 52 consecutive patients were accrued during 2006-2011. Overall, 80.8 % of STSs were >5 cm, and 67.3 % involved the lower extremity. Seven (13.5 %) major wound complications occurred, all requiring reoperation. Preoperative scores for TESS, MSTS, and SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health components were 83.3, 86.7, 40.6, and 49.4, respectively. There were no differences seen 6 months postoperatively. By 12 months, however, patients showed improved functional scores (TESS 93.0, p = 0.02; MSTS 93.3, p < 0.01) and QOL scores (PCS 45.1, p = 0.02; MCS = 52.9, p = 0.05). No differences in scores were seen between patients with or without wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with our neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocol had stable QOL and functional scores 6 months postoperatively and showed improvement by 12 months. Importantly, the major wound complication rate was low.

Predictors of treatment with mastectomy, use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and upstaging to invasive cancer in patients diagnosed with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy.

BACKGROUND: There are few established indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study examines factors contributing to the high rate of SLNB in DCIS in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Patients who underwent definitive surgery from January 2009 to July 2011 for DCIS diagnosed on preoperative core-needle biopsy were identified using a provincial synoptic operative report database (WebSMR). The relationship between baseline patient and tumor characteristics and treatment with total mastectomy (TM), use of SLNB, and upstaging were examined. RESULTS: There were 394 patients identified in the study cohort. Mean age was 57 years, and average preoperative tumor size was 3 cm. Overall, 148 patients (37.6 %) underwent TM; predictors were preoperative tumor size [odds ratio (OR), 1.92 per 1-cm increase in size; 95 % CI 1.65-2.24] and surgeon. Upstaging to invasive cancer at surgery occurred in 23 %, predicted only by preoperative tumor size (OR 1.14 per 1 cm; 95 % CI 1.03-1.27). SLNB was performed in 306 patients overall (77 %) and 140 of those treated with BCS (61 %). Predictors of SLNB were larger preoperative tumor size (OR 1.55 per 1 cm; 95 % CI 1.18-2.04) and the surgeon. In patients treated with BCS, 3 patients who were upstaged had positive SLNs (>0.2 mm), and no patients with DCIS had a positive SLN. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB use is high in patients undergoing BCS for DCIS. Tumor size and the operating surgeon predicted SLNB use. Despite a 23 % upstaging rate, the rate of clinically significant positive SLNs in patients treated with BCS is low, supporting omission of upfront SLNB.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an emerging treatment option for advanced goblet cell tumors of the appendix.

BACKGROUND: The debate remains whether appendiceal goblet cell cancers behave as classical carcinoid or adenocarcinoma. Treatment options are unclear and reports of outcomes are scarce. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) is considered optimal treatment for peritoneal involvement of other epithelial appendiceal tumors. METHODS: Prospective cohorts of patients treated for advanced appendiceal tumors from three peritoneal malignancy centres were collected (1994-2011). All patients underwent complete CRS+HIPEC, when possible, or tumor debulking. Demographic and outcome data for patients with goblet cell cancers were compared to patients with low- or high-grade epithelial appendiceal tumors treated during the same time period. RESULTS: Details on 45 goblet cell cancer patients were compared to 708 patients with epithelial appendix lesions. In the goblet cell group, 57.8 % were female, median age was 53 years, median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 24, and CRS+HIPEC was achieved in 71.1 %. These details were similar in patients with low- or high-grade epithelial tumors. Lymph nodes were involved in 52 % of goblet cell patients, similar to rates in high-grade cancers, but significantly higher than in low-grade lesions (6.4 %; p < 0.001). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 63.4 % for goblet cell patients, intermediate between that for high-grade (40.4-52.2 %) and low-grade (80.6 %) tumors. On multivariate analysis, tumor histology, PCI, and achievement of CRS+HIPEC were independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: This data supports the concept that appendiceal goblet cell cancers behave more as high-grade adenocarcinomas than as low-grade lesions. These patients have reasonable long-term survival when treated using CRS+HIPEC, and this strategy should be considered.

Cytoreduction and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: are we excluding patients who may benefit?

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are increasingly used to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. It is still relatively unknown which poor prognostic factors to avoid in order to optimize patient selection for CRS + HIPEC. METHODS: Between February 2003 and October 2011, 68 consecutive colorectal cancer patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC with a complete cytoreduction were identified from a prospective database. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with log rank testing of differences between groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 30.3 (range, 2-88) months amongst survivors. Patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 10 or less showed improved survival over those with a PCI of 11 or higher (P = 0.03). No difference in survival was seen for the other potentially poor prognostic variables including lymph node status, synchronous peritoneal disease, peri-operative systemic chemotherapy, and rectal cancer primary. CONCLUSIONS: A low PCI was associated with improved survival. Complete CRS + HIPEC appears to result in similar survival outcomes regardless of delivery of peri-operative systemic chemotherapy. Rectal origin, lymph node status, and synchronous peritoneal disease should not be used as an absolute exclusion criteria for CRS + HIPEC based on current data.

Appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid and mucinous neoplasms are closely associated tumors: lessons from their coexistence in primary tumors and concurrence in peritoneal dissemination.

BACKGROUND: Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) and appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are considered as different appendiceal tumors. Coexistence of both tumors was occasionally noted. We further observed the concurrence in both primary tumors and their peritoneal dissemination, that is, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) including pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). METHODS: Review of our 10-year file identified two subgroups of cases with such concurrence. Group 1 is 14 cases of PC/PMP treated by surgical cytoreduction. Morphologic components of GCC, low-grade mucinous neoplasm (LMN), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MCA), and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMCA) were identified separately in different organs/tissues. Group 2 is eight cases of localized primary tumors of appendix and ileocecal junction. RESULTS: In Group 1, primary tumors (11 GCC, 1 GCC + LMN, 1 MCA, 1 NMCA) were identified in appendix (13) and in rectum (1). Further review identified mixed morphologic components in 7/12 GCC cases, including GCC + LMN (2), GCC + MCA (2), GCC + NMCA (1), and GCC + MCA + NMCA (2). Over peritoneal dissemination, GCC and/or other components were coexistent at different sites and in variable combinations. In Group 2, primary tumors were initially diagnosed as GCC (7) and MCA (1). Further review identified mixed components in all cases, including GCC + LMN (3), GCC + LMN + MCA (3), GCC + MCA + NMCA (2). CONCLUSIONS: GCC may present as a component mixed with AMNs and even with conventional adenocarcinoma in both primary tumors and metastatic lesions. AMN in any given single case may show a wide morphologic spectrum. GCC and AMN may share a common tumor stem cell with potential of multiple lineage differentiations.

Quality of Life Following the Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Surgical management of gastric adenocarcinoma can have a drastic impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL). There is high variability among surgeons' preferences for the type of resection and reconstructive method. Peri-operative and cancer-specific outcomes remain equivalent between the different approaches. Therefore, postoperative quality of life can be viewed as a deciding factor for the surgical approach. The goal of this study was to interrogate patient QoL using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: This systematic review was registered at Prospero and followed PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Scopus were used to perform a literature search on 18 January 2020. A set of selection criteria and the data extraction sheet were predefined. Covidence (Melbourne, Australia) software was used; two reviewers (P.C.V. and E.J.) independently reviewed the articles, and a third resolved conflicts (A.B.F.). Results: The search yielded 1446 studies; 308 articles underwent full-text review. Ultimately, 28 studies were included for qualitative analysis, including 4630 patients. Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies. Geography was predominately East Asian (22/28 articles). While all aspects of quality of life were found to be affected by a gastrectomy, most functional or symptom-specific measures reached baseline by 6-12 months. The most significant ongoing symptoms were reflux, diarrhoea, and nausea/vomiting. Discussion: Generally, patients who undergo a gastrectomy return to baseline QoL by one year, regardless of the type of surgery or reconstruction. A subtotal distal gastrectomy is preferred when proper oncologic margins can be obtained. Additionally, no one form of reconstruction following gastrectomy is statistically preferred over another. However, for subtotal distal gastrectomy, there was a trend toward Roux-en-Y reconstruction as superior to abating reflux.

Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, a Canadian federally sponsored organisation, initiated a national multijurisdictional quality improvement (QI) initiative to maximise the use of synoptic data to drive cancer system improvements, known as the Evidence for Surgical Synoptic Quality Improvement Programme. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes, determinants and learning of this nationally led initiative across six jurisdictions in Canada, integrating a mix of cancer surgery disease sites and clinicians. METHODS: A mixed-methods evaluation (surveys, semistructured interviews and focus groups) of this initiative was focused on the ability of each jurisdiction to use synoptic reporting data to successfully implement and sustain QI projects to beyond the completion of the initiative and the lessons learnt in the process. Resources provided to the jurisdictions included operational funding, training in QI methodology, national forums, expert coaches, and ad hoc monitoring and support. The programme emphasised foundational concepts of the QI process including data literacy, audit and feedback reports, communities of practice (CoP) and positive deviance methodology. RESULTS: 101 CoP meetings were held and 337 clinicians received feedback reports. There were 23 projects, and 22 of 23 (95%) showed improvements with 15 of 23 (65%) achieving the proposed targets. Enablers of effective data utilisation/feedback reports for QI included the need for clinicians to trust the data, have comparative data for feedback, and the engagement of both data scientists and clinicians in designing feedback reports. Enablers of sustainability of QI within each jurisdiction included QI training for clinicians, the ability to continue CoP meetings, executive and broad stakeholder engagement, and the ability to use pre-existing organisational infrastructures and processes. Barriers to continue QI work included lack of funding for core team members, lack of automated data collection processes and lack of clinician incentives (financial and other). CONCLUSION: Success and sustainability in data-driven QI in cancer surgery require skills in QI methodology, data literacy and feedback, dedicated supportive personnel and an environment that promotes the process of collective learning and shared accountability. Building these capabilities in jurisdictional teams, tailoring interventions to facility contexts and strong leadership engagement will create the capacity for continued success in QI for cancer surgery.

HIPEC + EPIC versus HIPEC-alone: differences in major complications following cytoreduction surgery for peritoneal malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal metastases (PM) can be treated with cytoreduction surgery (CRS) with intraoperative heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus or minus early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). HIPEC + EPIC may be associated with more complications than HIPEC alone. METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC ± EPIC at the University of Calgary between February 2000 and May 2011 was reviewed. Patient, tumor, and perioperative variables included peritoneal cancer index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) score, HIPEC ± EPIC type, and grade III/IV complications. RESULTS: 198 patients had a CCR score of 0/1 and received: (1) HIPEC mitomycin C + EPIC 5-fluorouracil for 5 days (n = 85; February 2000-January 2008); or (2) HIPEC oxaliplatin with IV 5-fluorouracil + no EPIC (n = 113; February 2008-May 2011). Clinicodemographics were similar except PCI was higher in the HIPEC-alone group (mean PCI 22 vs. 17; P = 0.02). The rate of grade III/IV complications was higher in the HIPEC + EPIC group (44.7% vs. 31.0%; P = 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression only HIPEC + EPIC and PCI > 26 were associated with an increased rate of complications. CONCLUSION: In patients with PM, the use of EPIC, in combination with CRS and HIPEC, is associated with an increased rate of complications. Surgeons should consider using HIPEC only (without EPIC).

Quality indicators for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: development using a multidisciplinary delphi process and its use in monitoring population-based treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the management of DCIS poses challenges, as standard breast cancer outcome measures such as mortality do not apply. We have developed quality indicators (QIs) to measure the quality of DCIS treatment in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was used to determine QIs in the treatment of DCIS after review of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Patients diagnosed with DCIS from 2000 to 2001 (cohort 1) and 2009-2010 (cohort 2) were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry and QIs were retrospectively abstracted. RESULTS: The expert panel developed eight QIs to assess the overall quality of care for DCIS patients. Five hundred eighty eligible patients were identified in the two cohorts. There was significant improvement in radiation oncology referral, radiation post lumpectomy and complete pathology reporting. Axillary staging significantly increased from 20% (axillary dissection in cohort 1) to 60% (sentinel node biopsy in cohort 2). Other QIs did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: By developing QIs, performance measures for DCIS may assessed and compared over time. Although there have been significant improvements with pathology reporting and radiation oncology assessment and treatment, axillary staging rates are unexpectedly high, necessitating further investigation.