Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 186(12): 687-92, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21136028

RESUMO

PURPOSE: to report acute and late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated by high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with daily image-guidance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: from 06/2004-03/2008, 102 men were treated with 80 Gy IMRT with daily image-guidance. The risk groups were as follows: low, intermediate, and high risk in 21%, 27%, and 52% of patients, respectively. Hormone therapy was given to 65% of patients. Toxicity was scored according to the CTC scale version 3.0. RESULTS: median age was 69 years and median follow-up was 39 months (range, 16-61 months). Acute and late grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 2% and 5% of patients, respectively, while acute and late grade 3 GI toxicity was absent. Grade 2 and 3 pretreatment genitourinary (GU) morbidity (PGUM) were 15% and 2%, respectively. Acute grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity were 43% and 5% and late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity were 21% and 1%, respectively. After multiple Cox regression analysis, PGUM was an independent predictor of decreased late ≥ grade 2 GU toxicity-free survival (hazard ratio = 9.4 (95% confidence interval: 4.1, 22.0), p < 0.001). At the end of follow-up, the incidence of late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity decreased to 7% and 1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: GI toxicity rates after IMRT with daily image-guidance were excellent. GU toxicity rates were acceptable and strongly related to PGUM.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Sistema Urogenital/efeitos da radiação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 185(11): 731-5, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19899006

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In order to use a single implant with one treatment plan in fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B), applicator position shifts must be corrected prior to each fraction. The authors investigated the use of gold markers for X-ray-based setup and position control between the single fractions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Caudad-cephalad movement of the applicators prior to each HDR-B fraction was determined on radiographs using two to three gold markers, which had been inserted into the prostate as intraprostatic reference, and one to two radiopaque-labeled reference applicators. 35 prostate cancer patients, treated by HDR-B as a monotherapy between 10/2003 and 06/2006 with four fractions of 9.5 Gy each, were analyzed. Toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE Score, version 3.0. Median follow-up was 3 years. RESULTS: The mean change of applicators positions compared to baseline varied substantially between HDR-B fractions, being 1.4 mm before fraction 1 (range, -4 to 2 mm), -13.1 mm before fraction 2 (range, -36 to 0 mm), -4.1 mm before fraction 3 (range, -21 to 9 mm), and -2.6 mm at fraction 4 (range, -16 to 9 mm). The original position of the applicators could be readjusted easily prior to each fraction in every patient. In 18 patients (51%), the applicators were at least once readjusted > 10 mm, however, acute or late grade > or = 2 genitourinary toxicity was not increased (p = 1.0) in these patients. CONCLUSION: Caudad position shifts up to 36 mm were observed. Gold markers represent a valuable tool to ensure setup accuracy and precise dose delivery in fractionated HDR-B monotherapy of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Ouro , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Próteses e Implantes , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Sistema Urogenital/efeitos da radiação
4.
Radiat Oncol ; 3: 35, 2008 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18937833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To report acute and late toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated by dose escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and organ tracking. METHODS: From 06/2004 to 12/2005 39 men were treated by 80 Gy IMRT along with organ tracking. Median age was 69 years, risk of recurrence was low 18%, intermediate 21% and high in 61% patients. Hormone therapy (HT) was received by 74% of patients. Toxicity was scored according to the CTC scale version 3.0. Median follow-up (FU) was 29 months. RESULTS: Acute and maximal late grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was 3% and 8%, late grade 2 GI toxicity dropped to 0% at the end of FU. No acute or late grade 3 GI toxicity was observed. Grade 2 and 3 pre-treatment genitourinary (GU) morbidity (PGUM) was 20% and 5%. Acute and maximal late grade 2 GU toxicity was 56% and 28% and late grade 2 GU toxicity decreased to 15% of patients at the end of FU. Acute and maximal late grade 3 GU toxicity was 8% and 3%, respectively. Decreased late > or = grade 2 GU toxicity free survival was associated with higher age (P = .025), absence of HT (P = .016) and higher PGUM (P < .001). DISCUSSION: GI toxicity rates after IMRT and organ tracking are excellent, GU toxicity rates are strongly related to PGUM.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Recidiva , Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA