Relationship of Psychological Characteristics to Daily Life Ischemia: An Analysis From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Psychophysiological Investigations in Myocardial Ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac ischemia during daily life is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Mental stress is known to provoke cardiac ischemia and is related to psychological variables. In this multicenter cohort study, we assessed whether psychological characteristics were associated with ischemia in daily life. METHODS: This study examined patients with clinically stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with documented cardiac ischemia during treadmill exercise (n = 196, mean [standard deviation] age = 62.64 [8.31] years; 13% women). Daily life ischemia (DLI) was assessed by 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiophic monitoring. Psychological characteristics were assessed using validated instruments to identify characteristics associated with ischemia occurring in daily life stress. RESULTS: High scores on anger and hostility were common in this sample of patients with CAD, and DLI was documented in 83 (42%) patients. However, the presence of DLI was associated with lower anger scores (odds ratio [OR] = 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-3.69), reduced anger expressiveness (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.10-3.75), and increased ratio of anger control to total anger (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.27-4.17). Increased risk of DLI was also associated with lower hostile attribution (OR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.21-4.09), hostile affect (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.03-3.58), and aggressive responding (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.25-4.08). We observed weak inverse correlations between DLI episode frequency and anger expressiveness, total anger, and hostility scores. DLI was not associated with depression or anxiety measures. The combination of the constructs low anger expressiveness and low hostile attribution was independently associated with DLI (OR = = 2.59; 95% CI = 1.42-4.72). CONCLUSIONS: In clinically stable patients with CAD, the tendency to suppress angry and hostile feelings, particularly openly aggressive behavior, was associated with DLI. These findings warrant a study in larger cohorts, and intervention studies are needed to ascertain whether management strategies that modify these psychological characteristics improve outcomes.

National trends of utilization and readmission rates with intravascular ultrasound use for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have confirmed that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) improves long-term clinical outcomes. However, data on real-world utilization of IVUS in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and the impact on short to mid-term outcomes are scarce. We sought to evaluate the utilization and the readmission rates for IVUS-guided PCI in the setting of STEMI. METHODS: Hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of STEMI undergoing PCI were included from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) during 2012-2017. RESULTS: Among 809,601 hospitalizations with STEMI undergoing PCI, 33,644 (4.2%) underwent IVUS-guided PCI. IVUS use increased from 4.2% in 2012 to 5.6% in 2017 (p < .0001). After matching, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower with IVUS use (3.9% vs. 4.6%, p < .0001). The overall readmission rates were similar in both groups. We found that readmission rates due to acute MI at 6 months (5.7% vs. 6%, p = .045) and 11 months (5.1% vs. 6.5%, p = .005) as well as the PCI and mortality rates during readmission at 11 months (2.1% vs. 3%, p = .008, and 0.7% vs. 1.4%, p = .002, respectively) were significantly lower in the IVUS group. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of IVUS in STEMI appears to be slowly increasing. Although overall readmission rates were similar, IVUS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, lower rates of readmission due to acute MI at 6 and 11 months, as well as lower PCI and mortality at 11 months. Randomized trials evaluating long-term benefits of IVUS in STEMI are needed.

Temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors of mortality after pericardiocentesis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors of in-hospital mortality after pericardiocentesis are limited. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract hospitalizations of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis from January 2007 to September 2015. We examined the rates of in-hospital mortality, its predictors, and the temporal trends of pericardiocentesis utilization in the United States during the study period. We also examined trends and outcomes of pericardiocentesis associated with different cardiovascular procedures. RESULTS: A total of 96,377 hospitalizations with pericardiocentesis were examined. The number of pericardiocentesis procedures performed trended up significantly between 2007 and 2015 (p trend <.001), and this increase was observed predominantly in patients with unstable conditions. In-hospital mortality after pericardiocentesis decreased over time (14.6% in 2007 vs. 12.0% in 2015, p trend <.001), but remained higher than that after surgical pericardial intervention (13.1 vs. 8.9%, p value <.0001), predominantly attributable to a higher patient risk profile. Rates of in-hospital mortality were not statistically different between the procedural cohort and the nonprocedural cohort, 13.5 versus 13.0%, p value = .051. After multivariable adjustment, structural heart interventions (odds ratio [OR] 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.35-3.49), bacterial and/or infective endocarditis (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.72-2.54) and active neoplasms (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.6-1.85) were independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in pericardiocentesis patients. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide analysis, the number of pericardiocentesis procedures increased significantly over time. Structural interventions, endocarditis, and active neoplasms were associated with increased in-hospital mortality after pericardiocentesis.

Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The role of aspirin in the primary prevention setting is continuously evolving. Recent randomized trials have challenged the role of aspirin in the primary prevention setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared aspirin vs. placebo (or control) in subjects without established atherosclerotic disease. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality, while the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Summary estimates were reported using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. A total of 11 trials with 157 248 subjects were included. At a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, aspirin was not associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.02; P = 0.30]; however, aspirin was associated with an increased incidence of major bleeding (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31-1.65; P < 0.0001) and intracranial haemorrhage (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.58; P = 0.001). A similar effect on all-cause mortality and major bleeding was demonstrated in diabetic and high cardiovascular risk patients (i.e. 10-year risk >7.5%). Aspirin was associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94; P = 0.006); however, this outcome was characterized by considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 67%), and this effect was no longer evident upon limiting the analysis to the more recent trials. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the lack of benefit of aspirin for all-cause mortality up to a relative risk reduction of 5%. CONCLUSION: Among adults without established cardiovascular disease, aspirin was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality; however, it was associated with an increased incidence of major bleeding. The routine use of aspirin for primary prevention needs to be reconsidered.

In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for nonagenarians.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in nonagenarians. BACKGROUND: Data comparing the outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in nonagenarians are limited. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample years 2012-2014, hospitalization data were retrieved for subjects aged ≥90 years who underwent TAVR or SAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The incidence of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural outcomes were compared using unadjusted, multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score matched analyses. RESULTS: The final cohort included 6,680 records of nonagenarians undergoing aortic valve replacement, among which 5,840 (87.4%) underwent TAVR. There was no difference in the incidence of in-hospital mortality between both groups in the unadjusted (5.8% versus 6.0% P = 0.95), multivariate (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.74), and propensity score matched (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.75-1.51) analyses. In the propensity-matched analysis, TAVR was associated with a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), post-operative blood transfusion (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43-0.61), a higher likelihood of discharge to home (OR 4.71, 95% 3.44-5.06), and a similar incidence of pacemaker placement (OR 1.16, 95% 0.89-1.53) and stroke (OR 1.34, 0.90-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide analysis, TAVR was associated with an overall similar incidence of in-hospital mortality and less morbidity compared with SAVR. These findings suggest that TAVR is effective and safe in nonagenarians.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guidance Is Associated With Lower Cardiovascular Mortality and Myocardial Infarction for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation　- Insights From an Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have been underpowered to determine an effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on hard outcomes for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.Methods and Results:Randomized trials that compared IVUS guidance vs. angiographic guidance for DES implantation were included; 10 trials with 5,060 patients. IVUS guidance was associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular death (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75), and myocardial infarction (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guidance is associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in the era of DES. These findings should encourage operators to use IVUS more often.

Is There a Safety Concern for Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Arterial Disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug-coated balloons (DEB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) emerged as a tool to aid in lowering the rates of neointimal hyperplasia and target lesion restenosis following endovascular peripheral arterial disease (PAD) interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the initial trials comparing these devices with non-drug balloons and stents showed favorable results, more recent data raised concerns regarding the mid to long-term safety of these devices. In this review, we will discuss the evolution of endovascular therapy for PAD, with highlights regarding the recent debates on the long-term safety of the drug-coated devices for treatment of PAD.

Deferred or immediate stent implantation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a deferred versus immediate stenting strategy for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Deferred stent implantation has emerged as a potential strategy aiming to reduce the thrombus burden and improve micro-vascular reperfusion during primary PCI. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared a deferred stent implantation versus immediate stent implantation strategy in patients undergoing primary PCI. Random effects risk ratios (RR) were estimated for the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Four trials with 1,570 patients were included. A deferred stent implantation strategy was associated with a lower incidence of no-/slow reflow (RR 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.96), and improved myocardial blush grade 3 (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.77). At a mean follow up of 34 ± 15 months, both strategies were associated with a similar risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58-1.24), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.48-1.45), reinfarction (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.43-5.49), and stent thrombosis (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.04-3.35, P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing primary PCI, deferred stent implantation is associated with improvement in surrogate outcomes, but does not appear to improve clinical outcomes. Future randomized trials are encouraged to identify the patient population who might benefit from a deferred stent implantation strategy (e.g., high thrombus burden).

Left ventricular aneurysms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with midventricular obstruction: A systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with or without left ventricular apical aneurysm (LVA) had been studied in the past. Midventricular obstruction associated with HCM and LVA is a unique entity that has not been distinguished previously as a separate phenotypic disease in HCM patients. METHODS: A systematic review of Pubmed and Google Scholar was conducted from inception until September 2017 for all observational studies conducted on HCM with midventricular obstruction and LVA. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients from 39 studies were included in our analysis. The mean age of the patients was 58.05 ± 11.76 years with 59.6% being males. The most common electrocardiographic finding was T wave inversion occurring in 13.8% of the cases followed by ST elevation (9.5%). Maximal left ventricle (LV) wall thickness was reported 18.89 ± 5.19 mm on transthoracic echocardiography and paradoxical jet flow was detected in 29.8% of patients. Beta-blockers (58.5%) were the most common drug therapy at baseline and amiodarone (10.6%) was the most common antiarrhythmic used for ventricular tachycardia (VT). The most common complication, VT, occurred in 39.3% of cases and the incidence of all-cause mortality was 13.8 % over 16 ± 20.1 months follow-up. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was used in 37.2% of patients; 25.7% of patients with ICD received appropriate shock therapy. CONCLUSION: HCM with LVA and midventricular obstruction is a unique entity that appears to be associated with high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Thus, early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention is recommended for management of this condition.

Ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Although some studies have shown potential benefit for ischemic postconditioning (IPoC) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in improving surrogate markers of reperfusion and infarction size, the benefit of this approach on clinical outcomes remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared IPoC versus conventional treatment during primary PCI. Random effects DerSimonian-Laird risk ratios (RR) were calculated for different clinical and surrogate outcomes. The main outcome of this analysis was all-cause mortality. A total of 25 trials involving 3,619 patients were included in the analysis. At a mean follow up of 14 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.6-19.4 months), the incidence of all-cause mortality was 4.9% [95% CI 3.8-6.0%] in the IPoC group versus 3.8% [95% CI 1.9-5.7%] in the control group (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24, P = 0.74). The risk of reinfarction (2.7% [95% CI 1.1-4.3%] vs. 2.3% [0.6-4.0%]; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.62-2.68, P = 0.72), heart failure (3.6% [95% CI 2.0-5.1%] vs. 5.7% [95% CI 3.3-8.2%]; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.06, P = 0.24), target vessel revascularization (3.2% [95% CI 1.7-4.7%] vs. 2.4% [95% CI 1.4-3.3%]; RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.90-2.20, P = 0.20), and stent thrombosis (2.4% [95% CI 1.1-3.8%] vs. 1.8% [95% CI 0.5-3.2%]); RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.60-3.70, P = 0.40) was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: IPoC does not appear to reduce the risk of clinical adverse events in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials comparing PCI with CABG for unprotected left main disease yielded discrepant evidence. OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing PCI versus CABG for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease were included. Summary estimates risk ratios (RRs) were performed with a DerSimonian and Laird model at short-term, intermediate and long-term follow-up periods (i.e., 30-days, 1-year, and >1-year). Outcomes evaluated were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization and stent thrombosis or symptomatic graft occlusion. RESULTS: Six trials with 4,700 patients and a mean SYNTAX score of 23 were included. At short-term follow-up, the risk of MACCE was lower with PCI (RR 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.76) driven by the lower risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99), and stroke (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.90). The risk of MACCE was similar at the intermediate follow-up (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.97-1.51). At long-term follow-up, PCI was associated with a higher risk of MACCE (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41), due to a higher risk of revascularization (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.34-1.94), while the risk of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unprotected left main coronary disease and low to intermediate SYNTAX score, PCI might be an acceptable alternative to CABG. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Staged versus index procedure complete revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease reduces adverse events compared to infarct-related artery only revascularization. Whether complete revascularization should be done as multivessel intervention during index procedure or as a staged procedure remains controversial. METHOD: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of multivessel intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease as staged procedure versus at the time of index procedure. Composite of death or myocardial infarction was the primary outcome. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios were calculated using random effect model. RESULTS: Six randomized studies with a total of 1126 patients met our selection criteria. At a mean follow-up of 13 months, composite of myocardial infarction or death (7.2% vs 11.7%, RR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.09-2.52, P = 0.02), all cause mortality (RR: 2.55, 95%CI: 1.42-4.58, P < 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.33-5.86, P = 0.01), and short-term (<30 days) mortality (RR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.51-8.29, P < 0.01) occurred less often in staged versus index procedure multivessel revascularization. There was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (RR: 1.14, 95%CI: 0.88-1.49, P = 0.33), repeat myocardial infarction (RR: 1.14, 95%CI: 0.68-1.92, P = 0.61), and repeat revascularization (RR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.66-1.28, P = 0.62). CONCLUSION: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease, a strategy of complete revascularization as a staged procedure compared to index procedure revascularization results in reduced mortality without an increase in repeat myocardial infarction or need for repeat revascularization.

Routine invasive versus selective invasive strategies for Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: An Updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated systematic review comparing a routine invasive strategy with a selective invasive strategy for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in the era of stents and antiplatelet therapy. BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses comparing both strategies have shown conflicting results. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared a routine invasive strategy (i.e., routine coronary angiography +/- revascularization) versus a selective invasive strategy (i.e., medical stabilization and coronary angiography +/- revascularization if objective evidence of ischemia or refractory ischemia) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Summary odds ratios (OR) were primarily constructed using Peto's model. RESULTS: Twelve trials with 9,650 patients were included. Compared with a selective invasive strategy, a routine invasive strategy was associated with a reduction in the composite of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) [OR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.96] at a mean follow-up of 39 months, primarily due to a reduction in the risk of MI (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.88). The risk of all-cause mortality was non-significantly reduced with a routine invasive strategy (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.01). The risk of recurrent angina was reduced with a routine invasive strategy (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.49-0.62), as well as the risk of future revascularization procedures (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.30-0.39). CONCLUSION: In patients with NSTE-ACS, a routine invasive strategy reduced the risk of ischemic events, including the risk of mortality or MI. Routine invasive therapy reduced the risk of recurrent angina and future revascularization procedures. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients <60 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative therapeutic modality to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). In the current analysis, we compare the characteristics and outcomes of AVR procedures in patients <60 years of age. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database for all AVR hospitalizations in patients 18-59 years of age between January 2012 and December 2017. We performed a propensity score matching analysis (1:1) and compared baseline characteristics, procedural complications, and outcomes between TAVR and SAVR patients. RESULTS: A total of 72,356 hospitalizations for AVR were identified in patients <60 years of age. Compared to their SAVR counterparts, TAVR patients were older (52.5 ± 7.6) vs. 48.8 ± 9.6, p < 0.001), more likely to be women (37.9% vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001), and have history of prior radiation (8.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, TAVR patients had lower procedural complications, but a similar mortality rate compared to SAVR patients (2.9% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.77). TAVR was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay [4 [2-9] vs. 6 [5-11], p < 0.001), but no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rate was noted (16.2% vs. 16.8%, p-value = 0.49). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes in younger patients undergoing TAVR, which improved over time. Further investigation of long-term outcomes in TAVR performed younger patients is warranted to draw a comprehensive picture of TAVR safety and efficacy in low-risk patients.

A novel technique for invasive aortic valve pressure gradient measurement using a 6 Fr Swan-Ganz catheter: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous left ventricular (LV) and aortic (Ao) pressure gradient assessment has been rendered challenging since the recall of the Langston catheter. Here we describe a simple method for simultaneous LV and Ao pressure gradient assessment using a Swan-Ganz catheter. CASE SUMMARY: We describe two cases where assessment of simultaneous left ventricle and Ao valve gradients was done using a Swan-Ganz catheter to assess the degree of Ao stenosis and dynamic LV outflow obstruction. DISCUSSION: Using Swan-Ganz catheter assessment of simultaneous left ventricle and Ao valve gradients can simplify the procedure with reduced cost and increased patient safety.

Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among Pregnant and Post-Partum Women.

Background The incidence of cardiovascular disease among pregnant women is rising in the United States. Data on racial disparities for the major cardiovascular events during pregnancy are limited. Methods and Results Pregnant and post-partum women hospitalized from January 2007 to December 2017 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The outcomes of interest included: in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the independent association between race and in-hospital outcomes. Among 46 700 637 pregnancy-related hospitalizations, 21 663 575 (46.4%) were White, 6 302 089 (13.5%) were Black, and 8 914 065 (19.1%) were Hispanic. The trends of mortality and stroke declined significantly in Black women, but however, were mostly unchanged among White women. The incidence of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity was highest among Black women followed by White women, then Hispanic women. The majority of Blacks (62.3%) were insured by Medicaid while the majority of White patients had private insurance (61.9%). Most of Black women were below-median income (71.2%) while over half of the White patients were above the median income (52.7%). Compared with White women, Black women had the highest mortality with adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.45, 95% CI (1.21-1.73); myocardial infarction with aOR of 1.23, 95% CI (1.06-1.42); stroke with aOR of 1.57, 95% CI (1.41-1.74); pulmonary embolism with aOR of 1.42, 95% CI (1.30-1.56); and peripartum cardiomyopathy with aOR of 1.71, 95 % CI (1.66-1.76). Conclusions Significant racial disparities exist in major cardiovascular events among pregnant and post-partum women. Further efforts are needed to minimize these differences.

Coronary artery calcium score and risk of cardiovascular events without established coronary artery disease: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an indicator of atherosclerosis, and the CAC score is a useful noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CAC > 0 versus CAC = 0 in asymptomatic and symptomatic population in patients without an established diagnosis of coronary artery disease. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted until January 2018 for any cohort study reporting cardiovascular events in patients with CAC > 0 compared with absence of CAC. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included with 192 080 asymptomatic 32 477 symptomatic patients. At mean follow-up of 11 years, CAC > 0 was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACE) compared to a CAC = 0 in asymptomatic arm [pooled risk ratio (RR) 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.91-5.63, P < 0.00001, I2 = 80%] and symptomatic arm (pooled RR 6.06, 95% CI 4.23-8.68, P < 0.00001, I2 = 69%). CAC > 0 was also associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in symptomatic population (pooled RR 7.94, 95% CI 2.61-24.17, P < 0.00001, I2 = 85%) and in asymptomatic population CAC > 0 was associated with higher all-cause mortality (pooled RR 3.23, 95% CI 2.12-4.93, P < 0.00001, I2 = 94%). In symptomatic population, revascularization in CAC > 0 was higher (pooled RR 15, 95% CI 6.66-33.80, P < 0.00001, I2 = 72) compared with CAC = 0. Additionally, CAC > 0 was associated with more revascularization in asymptomatic population (pooled RR 5.34, 95% CI 2.06-13.85, P = 0.0006, I2 = 93). In subgroup analysis of asymptomatic population by gender, CAC > 0 was associated with higher MACE (RR 6.39, 95% CI 3.39-12.84, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Absence of CAC is associated with low risk of cardiovascular events compared with any CAC > 0 in both asymptomatic and symptomatic population without coronary artery disease.