Reproducibility of the Oxford classification of immunoglobulin A nephropathy, impact of biopsy scoring on treatment allocation and clinical relevance of disagreements: evidence from the VALidation of IGA study cohort.

BACKGROUND: The VALidation of IGA (VALIGA) study investigated the utility of the Oxford Classification of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) in 1147 patients from 13 European countries. Methods. Biopsies were scored by local pathologists followed by central review in Oxford. We had two distinct objectives: to assess how closely pathology findings were associated with the decision to give corticosteroid/immunosuppressive (CS/IS) treatments, and to determine the impact of differences in MEST-C scoring between central and local pathologists on the clinical value of the Oxford Classification. We tested for each lesion the associations between the type of agreement (local and central pathologists scoring absent, local present and central absent, local absent and central present, both scoring present) with the initial clinical assessment, as well as long-term outcomes in those patients who did not receive CS/IS. RESULTS: All glomerular lesions (M, E, C and S) assessed by local pathologists were independently associated with the decision to administer CS/IS therapy, while the severity of tubulointerstitial lesions was not. Reproducibility between local and central pathologists was moderate for S (segmental sclerosis) and T (tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis), and poor for M (mesangial hypercellularity), E (endocapillary hypercellularity) and C (crescents). Local pathologists found statistically more of each lesion, except for the S lesion, which was more frequent with central review. Disagreements were more likely to occur when the proportion of glomeruli affected was low. The M lesion, assessed by central pathologists, correlated better with the severity of the disease at presentation and discriminated better with outcomes. In contrast, the E lesion, evaluated by local pathologists, correlated better with the clinical presentation and outcomes when compared with central review. Both C and S lesions, when discordant between local and central pathologists, had a clinical phenotype intermediate to double absent lesions (milder disease) and double present (more severe). CONCLUSION: We conclude that differences in the scoring of MEST-C criteria between local pathologists and a central reviewer have a significant impact on the prognostic value of the Oxford Classification. Since the decision to offer immunosuppressive therapy in this cohort was intimately associated with the MEST-C score, this study indicates a need for a more detailed guidance for pathologists in the scoring of IgAN biopsies.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma after liver and kidney transplantation in children. Experience from one center.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a complication of organ transplantation and a life-threatening condition. Children who underwent organ transplantation are at risk of developing lymphoproliferative disorders and, among them, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the most serious. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical course of NHL after liver and kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of children who underwent liver/kidney transplantation and developed NHL. RESULTS: Nine children were identified, all girls, 6 after liver and 3 after kidney transplantations. Age at transplantation ranged from 1 year to 13 years (median: 4 years), while age at lymphoma diagnosis from 4 to 17 years (median: 12 years). Time from transplantation to lymphoma diagnosis ranged from 7 months to 12 years (median: 9 years). All but 1 patient developed mature B-cell lymphoma, 4 children - diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 2 children - Burkitt's lymphoma, 1 child - mature B-cell leukemia, 1 child - Burkitt-like lymphoma, while 1 patient was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. High levels of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were found in blood of 3 patients, and EBV in tissue samples was detected in 4 patients. Six patients presented with stage III and 2 with stage IV disease. Two patients had graft involvement. Three children received chemotherapy according to R-CHOP, 3 LMB protocol (2 with addition of rituximab), while 1 received CHOP and 5 courses of COP. T-cell lymphoma patient was treated with Euro-LB protocol. Six out of 8 treated patients are alive with a median follow-up of 6 years. Two children died from disease progression during treatment and 1 from cerebral herniation before starting therapy. All patients experienced at least 1 toxic episode of grade 3 and 4 according to Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event (CTCAE). Complications of chemotherapy were manageable and there were no transplanted organ failures. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further data on the treatment and outcome of monomorphic PTLD and indicates that it is feasible to treat solid organ recipients with multiagent chemotherapy.