Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Haematol ; 146(1): 1-13, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36108594

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab is the first approved treatment for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), a rare hematologic disorder caused by uncontrolled terminal complement activation. Approximately 50% of patients with aplastic anemia (AA) have PNH cells. Limited data are available for patients with AA-PNH taking concomitant immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and eculizumab. METHODS: Data from the International PNH Registry (NCT01374360) were used to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of eculizumab and IST in patients taking IST followed by concomitant eculizumab (IST + c-Ecu) or eculizumab followed by concomitant IST (Ecu + c-IST). RESULTS: As of January 1, 2018, 181 Registry-enrolled patients were included in the eculizumab effectiveness analyses (n = 138, IST + c-Ecu; n = 43, Ecu + c-IST); 87 additional patients received IST alone. Reductions from baseline with eculizumab were observed in the least squares mean lactate dehydrogenase ratio (IST + c-Ecu, -3.4; Ecu + c-IST, -3.5); thrombotic event incidence rates were similar between groups (IST + c-Ecu, 1.3; Ecu + c-IST, 0.7). Red blood cell transfusion rate ratios decreased from baseline for IST + c-Ecu (0.7) and increased for Ecu + c-IST (1.2); there were none for IST alone. Hematological parameters generally improved for IST + c-Ecu and IST alone, and changed minimally or worsened for Ecu + c-IST. Safety signals were generally consistent with those previously described for the respective therapies. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Although some intergroup differences were seen, concomitant eculizumab and IST were safe and effective regardless of treatment sequence.


Assuntos
Anemia Aplástica , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística , Humanos , Anemia Aplástica/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/complicações , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Sistema de Registros
2.
Eur J Haematol ; 109(3): 197-204, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35390189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effects of eculizumab treatment in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) patients with or without high-disease activity (HDA), defined by LDH ≥ 1.5 × ULN and history of major adverse vascular events (MAVEs; including thrombotic events [TEs]); anemia; and/or physician-reported abdominal pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, erectile dysfunction, fatigue, and/or hemoglobinuria, in the International PNH Registry were evaluated. METHODS: Registry patients were stratified by baseline HDA and eculizumab-treatment status. Longitudinal changes in laboratory and clinical PNH-related endpoints were evaluated using linear mixed models (continuous variables) or Poisson regression (incidence rates). RESULTS: As of May 1, 2017, 3009 patients (HDA/eculizumab-treated, n = 913; HDA/never-treated, n = 651; no-HDA/eculizumab-treated, n = 173; no-HDA/never-treated, n = 1272) were analyzed. Higher proportions of eculizumab-treated patients had HDA and history of MAVEs. In patients with and without HDA, respectively, eculizumab treatment resulted in reductions from baseline for (1) LDH ratio (mean [SD]: -5.3 [4.0] and -2.3 [3.8]); (2) incidence rate ratio (IRR) for MAVEs (-80% and -70%); (3) IRR for TEs (-80% for both); and (4) units of red blood cell transfusions per year (from 6.8 to 2.8 and 3.6 to 2.5 units). CONCLUSIONS: Eculizumab treatment in a real-world setting improved outcomes, including substantial decreases in hemolysis, MAVE rates, TEs, and transfusions in PNH patients regardless of HDA.


Assuntos
Hemoglobinúria Paroxística , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/complicações , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/diagnóstico , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/tratamento farmacológico , Hemólise , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros
3.
Br J Haematol ; 185(2): 297-310, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30768680

RESUMO

Eculizumab is the first and only medication approved for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) and atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) treatment. However, eculizumab safety based on long-term pharmacovigilance is unknown. This analysis summarises safety data collected from spontaneous and solicited sources from 16 March 2007 through 1 October 2016. Cumulative exposure to eculizumab was 28 518 patient-years (PY) (PNH, 21 016 PY; aHUS, 7502 PY). Seventy-six cases of meningococcal infection were reported (0·25/100 PY), including eight fatal PNH cases (0·03/100 PY). Susceptibility to meningococcal infections remained the key risk in patients receiving eculizumab. The meningococcal infection rate decreased over time; related mortality remained steady. The most commonly reported serious nonmeningococcal infections were pneumonia (11·8%); bacteraemia, sepsis and septic shock (11·1%); urinary tract infection (4·1%); staphylococcal infection (2·6%); and viral infection (2·5%). There were 434 reported cases of eculizumab exposure in pregnant women; of 260 cases with known outcomes, 70% resulted in live births. Reporting rates for solid tumours (≈0·6/100 PY) and haematological malignancies (≈0·74/100 PY) remained stable over time. No new safety signals affecting the eculizumab benefit-risk profile were identified. Continued awareness and implementation of risk mitigation protocols are essential to minimise risk of meningococcal and other Neisseria infections in patients receiving eculizumab.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica Atípica/tratamento farmacológico , Inativadores do Complemento/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inativadores do Complemento/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Hemoglobinas/deficiência , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Infecções Meningocócicas/induzido quimicamente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/induzido quimicamente , Farmacovigilância , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
5.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 10(5): 289-300, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519928

RESUMO

Aim: Examine safety and pharmacodynamics of patisiran alone or with concomitant transthyretin stabilizers from the Phase II open-label extension study and safety and efficacy of patisiran in patients with prior transthyretin stabilizer use from the Phase III APOLLO study. Patients & methods:Post hoc analyses in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Results: Patisiran safety was consistent regardless of concomitant or prior transthyretin stabilizers. In the Phase II open-label extension (n = 27), transthyretin reduction was similar over 24 months, regardless of concomitant transthyretin stabilizers. In APOLLO (n = 225), patisiran-treated groups showed stabilization or improvements in neurological function (modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7) and quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire) at 18 months, regardless of prior transthyretin stabilizers. Conclusion: Patients benefit from patisiran regardless of transthyretin stabilizer use.


Assuntos
Neuropatias Amiloides Familiares/tratamento farmacológico , Benzoxazóis/uso terapêutico , Diflunisal/uso terapêutico , RNA Interferente Pequeno/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Neurol Ther ; 6(2): 175-187, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28770420

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinical course and treatment response may vary according to race/ethnicity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) demonstrated significant efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in the 2-year phase III DEFINE/CONFIRM studies. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of integrated data from DEFINE/CONFIRM, we assessed clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients treated with DMF 240 mg twice daily (approved dosage) or placebo. Eligible patients were 18-55 years of age with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0-5.0. In the integrated intention-to-treat population, 769 and 771 patients were treated with DMF or placebo, respectively, of whom 10 and 19 were black, 31 and 23 were Hispanic, and 66 and 70 were Asian. RESULTS: In the black, Hispanic, and Asian subgroups, DMF was associated with lower annualized relapse rates at 2 years compared with placebo [rate ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)), 0.05 (0.00-1.07); 0.31 (0.10-0.95); and 0.64 (0.30-1.34), respectively]. The percentage of black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression was lower with DMF (43%, 8%, and 20%, respectively) compared with placebo [57%, 30%, and 25%, respectively; hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.53 (0.02-1.39); 0.17 (0.00-0.60); and 0.71 (0.32-1.58), respectively]. The safety/tolerability profile of DMF was generally consistent with that in the overall population of DEFINE/CONFIRM. The incidence of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients was 2/10, 2/31, and 3/66, respectively, with DMF, and 2/19, 1/23, and 8/70, respectively, with placebo. CONCLUSION: DMF may be an efficacious treatment with a favorable benefit-risk profile in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with RRMS. Further clinical studies are needed to characterize differences in MS presentation and treatment outcomes across ethnic and racial groups. FUNDING: Biogen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DEFINE: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00420212; CONFIRM ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00451451.

7.
Clin Ther ; 39(8): 1671-1679, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751099

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In Phase III studies (DEFINE [Determination of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting MS]/CONFIRM [Comparator and an Oral Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis]), delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) demonstrated significant efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Post hoc analyses of integrated data from DEFINE/CONFIRM were conducted to evaluate the effect of DMF in patients previously treated with interferon (IFN) beta. METHODS: Patients (age 18-55 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale score, 0-5.0) were randomized to receive DMF 240 mg BID or TID, placebo, or glatiramer acetate (CONFIRM only) for up to 2 years. Previous IFN users received at least 1 IFN treatment >3 months before randomization. Data for DMF 240 mg BID (approved dosing regimen) are reported. FINDINGS: In the integrated intention-to-treat population, 172 and 169 patients receiving DMF or placebo, respectively, had received ≥1 prior IFN. In this subgroup, significant reductions with DMF versus placebo were observed for the annualized relapse rate (rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.40-0.77]), new/newly enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions (lesion mean ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.09-0.29]), odds of having more gadolinium-enhancing lesions (odds ratio, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.07-0.44]), and new T1-hypointense lesions (lesion mean ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]). Median Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained stable during the study period. Adverse events associated with DMF included flushing and gastrointestinal events. IMPLICATIONS: In this post hoc analysis in patients with previous IFN treatment, DMF demonstrated significant efficacy over 2 years versus placebo and an adverse event profile consistent with the overall population of DEFINE/CONFIRM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: DEFINE, NCT00420212; and CONFIRM, NCT00451451.


Assuntos
Fumarato de Dimetilo/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Preparações de Ação Retardada/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Dimetilo/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Acetato de Glatiramer/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Interferon beta/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 33(2): 175-183, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27733070

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) and fingolimod are approved oral disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In phase 3 trials, DMF (DEFINE/CONFIRM) and fingolimod (FREEDOMS/FREEDOMS II) resulted in significant reductions in clinical and magnetic resonance imaging activity, with acceptable safety profiles. Direct comparisons of these treatments are not possible due to a lack of head-to-head trials. We compared 2 year efficacy of DMF versus fingolimod at the approved dosage using a matching-adjusted indirect approach. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Individual patient data from DEFINE and CONFIRM, and aggregate data from FREEDOMS and FREEDOMS II, were pooled and compared using the matching-adjusted in-direct method. To account for cross-trial differences, data from trials with available individual patient data were adjusted to match aggregate data (i.e. average patient characteristics) from trials without patient-level data. Data from DMF-treated patients were weighted such that average baseline characteristics matched those of fingolimod-treated patients. After matching, weighted treatment outcomes for DMF-treated patients (240 mg twice daily) were compared with summary outcomes for fingolimod-treated patients (0.5 mg once daily). All comparison results of DMF versus fingolimod used fingolimod as the reference. RESULTS: After matching, baseline characteristics were balanced between DMF and fingolimod. At year 2, the efficacy of DMF was similar to that of fingolimod for annualized relapse rate (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.11 [0.88, 1.40]), 12 week confirmed disability progression (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.90 [0.63, 1.29]), and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.04 [-0.05, 0.13]). For patient-reported outcomes (EuroQoL 5-Dimensions questionnaire), the mean differences (95% CI) were 0.05 (0.01, 0.08) for utility score and 3.22 (0.58, 5.86) for visual analog scale score, significantly favoring DMF. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for DMF versus fingolimod among matching-adjusted patients with complete NEDA data: rate ratio (95% CI): 0.92 (0.51, 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Using the matching-adjusted indirect comparison approach, the efficacy of DMF and fingolimod were similar on all clinical outcomes, while patient-reported outcomes showed greater benefit with DMF. Study limitations include possible confounding from unobserved/unknown differences between trials, and trial length may have been insufficient to detect significant differences on disability progression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00420212 (DEFINE); NCT00451451 (CONFIRM); NCT00289978 (FREEDOMS); NCT00355134 (FREEDOMS II).


Assuntos
Fumarato de Dimetilo/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Fingolimode/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Neurol Ther ; 5(1): 45-57, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26932146

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) demonstrated clinical and neuroradiologic efficacy and safety in the Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM trials, and in the extension study (ENDORSE), in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This post hoc analysis assessed DMF efficacy in newly diagnosed patients with RRMS with 6-year minimum follow-up. METHODS: Patients randomized in DEFINE/CONFIRM to DMF 240 mg twice (BID) or thrice daily (TID) continued on same dosage in ENDORSE. Patients randomized to placebo (PBO) or glatiramer acetate (CONFIRM only) were re-randomized to DMF BID or TID. Results for DMF BID (approved dosage) are reported. Newly diagnosed patients were diagnosed within 1 year prior to DEFINE/CONFIRM entry and either treatment-naive or previously treated with corticosteroids alone. RESULTS: The newly diagnosed population included 144 patients continuously treated with DMF BID in DEFINE/CONFIRM and ENDORSE (DMF/DMF) and 85 treated with PBO for 2 years in DEFINE/CONFIRM followed by 4 years of DMF BID in ENDORSE (PBO/DMF). At 6 years (ENDORSE Year 4), the annualized relapse rates [ARR; 95% confidence interval (CI)] were 0.137 (0.101, 0.186) and 0.168 (0.113, 0.252) for DMF/DMF and PBO/DMF, respectively; representing 19% risk reduction (P = 0.3988). PBO/DMF patients demonstrated improvements in ARR after switching to DMF in ENDORSE: 0.260 (0.182, 0.372) for Years 0-2 (DEFINE/CONFIRM) and 0.102 (0.064, 0.163) for Years 3-6 (ENDORSE), representing 61% risk reduction for Years 3-6 versus Years 1-2 (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with 24-week confirmed disability progression (95% CI) at 6 years was 15.7% (10.3%, 23.7%) in DMF/DMF and 24.3% (15.9%, 36.2%) in PBO/DMF, representing 49% risk reduction versus PBO/DMF (P = 0.0397). CONCLUSION: Long-term DMF treatment demonstrated strong and sustained efficacy in newly diagnosed patients. Results suggest greater clinical benefits with earlier initiation of treatment in this patient population. FUNDING: Biogen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00835770 (ENDORSE); NCT00420212 (DEFINE); NCT00451451 (CONFIRM).

10.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 6(3): 220-229, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27347439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), is a disease-modifying therapy with potential immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects. In clinical trials, DMF was associated with reduced white blood cell and absolute lymphocyte counts. Current US prescribing information recommends obtaining a complete blood count, including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), before initiating and during DMF treatment. METHODS: We conducted an integrated analysis of phase 2b/3/long-term extension studies of DMF in MS (N = 2,470) to characterize ALC profiles. RESULTS: Mean ALCs decreased by 30% during the first year and then plateaued, remaining above the lower limit of normal (LLN). Among patients treated ≥6 months (N = 2,099), 2.2% experienced ALCs <500 mm3 persisting ≥6 months. ALCs remained ≥LLN in 84% and 76% of patients during the first 6 and 12 months, respectively; of these, 0.1% and 0%, respectively, developed ALCs <500 mm3 persisting ≥6 months at any time. Evidence of ALC improvement following DMF discontinuation was observed. DMF efficacy was not substantially different in patients with and without lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte monitoring provides effective means for early identification of patients at risk for developing severe, prolonged lymphopenia.

11.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin ; 2: 2055217316634111, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28607719

RESUMO

The effect of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) was assessed using integrated Phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM data. Patients treated with DMF (n = 769) demonstrated significant superiority on the MSFC, and each component, compared with placebo (n = 771) over two years: mean change for DMF vs placebo was 0.054 vs -0.053 on MSFC; -0.088 vs -0.286 on Timed 25-Foot Walk, 0.047 vs 0.003 on 9-Hole Peg Test and 0.178 vs 0.123 on Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. DMF was an efficacious treatment for patients with MS.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA