What Brings You in Today? Sex, Race, Substance Type, and Other Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics Predict if Substance Use is the Main Reason for a Clinical Encounter.

Background: Substance-related diagnoses (SRDs) are a common healthcare presentation. This study identified sociodemographic and health-related characteristics associated with having an SRD as the primary reason for a clinical encounter compared to those with an SRD who are treated for other reasons. Methods: Electronic health record (EHR) data on patients with an SRD (n=12,358, ages 18-90) were used to assess if an SRD was the primary reason for a clinical encounter from January 1, 2012-January 1, 2018. Patients were matched on key demographic characteristics at a 1:1 ratio. Adjusting for covariates, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: In the matched cohort of 8,630, most reported male sex (65.8%), White race (70.0%), and single marital status (62.7%) with a mean age of 47.2 (SD=14.6). Patient reported female sex, Black race, age 70+, married status, and low-income (<$50,000) were associated with a lower likelihood of presenting to care for an SRD as the primary reason for a clinical encounter. A nicotine-, alcohol-, opioid-, or stimulant-related diagnosis was associated with a higher likelihood of presenting to care for an SRD as the primary reason for the clinical visit. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate whether sociodemographic and health-related characteristics were associated with having an SRD as the primary reason for a clinical encounter. Using rigorous methods, we investigated a unique clinical question adding new knowledge to predictors of patients seeking clinical care. Understanding these predictors can help us better align service provision with population needs and inform new approaches to tailoring care.

Association of alcohol and other substance-related diagnoses with severe maternal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis, such as an alcohol use disorder, are a vulnerable population that may experience higher rates of severe maternal morbidity, such as hemorrhage and eclampsia, than pregnant women with no substance-related diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed electronic health record data on women (aged 18-44 years) who delivered a single live birth or stillbirth at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation from March 1, 2016, to August 30, 2019. Women with and without a substance-related diagnosis were matched on key demographic characteristics, such as age, at a 1:1 ratio. Adjusting for these covariates, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 10,125 deliveries met the eligibility criteria for this study. In the matched cohort of 1,346 deliveries, 673 (50.0%) had a substance-related diagnosis, and 94 (7.0%) had severe maternal morbidity. The most common indicators in women with a substance-related diagnosis included hysterectomy (17.7%), eclampsia (15.8%), air and thrombotic embolism (11.1%), and conversion of cardiac rhythm (11.1%). Having a substance-related diagnosis was associated with severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio = 1.81 [95% CI, 1.14-2.88], p-value = 0.0126). In the independent matched cohorts by substance type, an alcohol-related diagnosis was significantly associated with severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio = 3.07 [95% CI, 1.58-5.95], p-value = 0.0009), while the patterns for stimulant- and nicotine-related diagnoses were not as well resolved with severe maternal morbidity and opioid- and cannabis-related diagnoses were not associated with severe maternal morbidity. CONCLUSION: We found that an alcohol-related diagnosis, although lowest in prevalence of the substance-related diagnoses, had the highest odds of severe maternal morbidity of any substance-related diagnosis assessed in this study. These findings reinforce the need to identify alcohol-related diagnoses in pregnant women early to minimize potential harm through intervention and treatment.

Physician and Pharmacist: Attitudes, Facilitators, and Barriers to Prescribing Naloxone for Home Rescue.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We implemented a naloxone education and distribution program in our academic health system. Despite the program, naloxone prescribing was not fully realized. This study aimed to identify the barriers to prescribing. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of naloxone prescribers. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding their prescribing practices, attitudes, facilitators, and barriers to prescribing naloxone. Participants were then invited for an interview to further explore these topics and elicit more in-depth explanations. RESULTS: Sixty-four physicians and eight pharmacists completed the questionnaire (n = 72). The most commonly reported barrier to prescribing naloxone was time constraints (33%). During the interviews, 14 subthemes emerged within four themes: provider competency, provider beliefs, health care system, and patient factors/social climate. DISCUSSION: Prescribers identified barriers to naloxone prescribing despite implementation of an institutional overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) program. The results were similar to those previously reported prior to initiation of such programs. CONCLUSION: In this study, we examined barriers and facilitators to naloxone prescribing. Although previous studies have shown that health care providers endorsed similar barriers, our study indicates that some of those barriers persist despite a concerted effort to educate and promote prescribing via an OEND. While our study is limited by a small, selective sample size the results indicate that improvements to our OEND program are warranted. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Our study addressed an unexplored area of OEND research and may inform future program development. (Am J Addict 2019;00:00-00).

Betel quid chewing alters functional connectivity in frontal and default networks: A resting-state fMRI study.

PURPOSE: To explore the acute effect of betel quid (BQ) use on functional network connectivity by comparing the global functional brain networks and their subsets before and immediately after BQ chewing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed in 27 healthy male participants before and just after chewing BQ on a 3.0T scanner with a gradient-echo echo planar imaging sequence. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to determine components that represent the brain's functional networks and their spatial aspects of functional connectivity. A paired t-test was used for exploring the connectivity differences in each network before and after BQ chewing. RESULTS: Sixteen networks were identified by ICA. Nine of them showed connectivity differences before and after BQ chewing (P < 0.05 false discovery rate corrected): (A) orbitofrontal, (B) left frontoparietal, (C) visual, (D) right frontoparietal, (E) anterior default mode, (F) medial frontal/anterior cingulate (G) frontotemporal, (H) occipital/parietal, (I) occipital/temporal/cerebellum. Moreover, networks A, B, C, D, G, H, and I showed increased connectivity, while networks E and F showed decreased connectivity in participants after BQ chewing compared to before chewing. CONCLUSION: The acute effects of BQ use appear to actively alter functional connectivity of frontal and default networks that are known to play a key role in addictive behavior. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:157-166.

An Innovative Use of Case Conference to Teach Future Educators in Addiction Psychiatry.

Objective An innovative course was developed for fellows enrolled in the Yale School of Medicine Addiction Psychiatry program to educate them in key principles of adult learning, apply these principles in a case conference presentation, and to improve skills in providing and receiving feedback. Methods An initial training module on educational skills was followed by individual mentorship to prepare a case presentation. A feedback module provided space to learn and practice skills in feedback delivery. Results The program showed positive results and improved confidence levels of the participants in presenting and providing/receiving feedback. Conclusions Implementing a course designed to improve teaching and feedback skills is feasible in a 1-year Addiction Psychiatry fellowship.

Global Mental Health: Five Areas for Value-Driven Training Innovation.

OBJECTIVE: In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training. METHODS: Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation. RESULTS: Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and "deep accountability" when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.

Psychiatric services and prescription fills among veterans with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity and co-prescription patterns of people with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance may complicate their treatment and have not been studied. The goal of this study was to examine the care and characteristics of people with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance treatment nationally in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: Using national VHA data from FY2012, bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to compare veterans in methadone maintenance treatment wo had a serious mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major affective disorder) to patients in methadone maintenance treatment without serious mental illness and patients with serious mental illness who were not in methadone maintenance treatment. RESULTS: Only a small fraction of patients with serious mental illness were receiving methadone maintenance treatment (0.65%), but a relatively large proportion in methadone maintenance treatment had a serious mental illness (33.2%). Compared to patients without serious mental illness, patients with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance treatment were more likely to have been homeless, to have had a recent psychiatric hospitalization, to be over 50% disabled, and to have had more fills for more classes of psychotropic drugs. Compared to other patients with serious mental illness, patients with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance treatment were more likely to have a drug abuse diagnosis and to reside in large urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients in methadone maintenance treatment have serious mental illness and more frequent psychiatric comorbidity, and they are more likely to use psychiatric and general health services and fill more types of psychiatric prescriptions. Further study and clinical awareness of potential drug-drug interactions in this high medication and service using population are needed.

Attitudes toward mental illness and changes associated with a brief educational intervention for medical and nursing students in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed beliefs about mental disorders and changes in those beliefs following an educational intervention for a convenience sample of Nigerian medical and nursing students. METHODS: A 43-item questionnaire was used to assess perceptions regarding mental disorders and attitudes toward people with mental illness before and after a 4-day educational intervention. RESULTS: Factor analysis identified four domains: (1) socializing with people with mental illness, (2) belief in witchcraft or curses as causes of mental illness, (3) favorable attitudes toward normalization of the lives of people with mental illness, and (4) biopsychosocial approaches to mental illness. The greatest changes were in attitudes favoring normalization of the lives of people with mental illness (p = 0.0002), socializing with the mentally ill (p = 0.01), and biopsychosocial perspectives on mental illness (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Brief educational interventions may alter some stigmatizing negative attitudes toward mental illness in healthcare trainees in low- and middle-income countries.

Opioid tapering in older cancer survivors does not increase psychiatric or drug hospitalization rates.

BACKGROUND: Opioid tapering in the general population is linked to increases in hospitalizations or emergency department visits related to psychiatric or drug-related diagnoses. Cancer survivors represent a unique population with different opioid indications, prescription patterns, and more frequent follow-up care. This study sought to describe patterns of opioid tapering among older cancer survivors and to test the hypothesis of whether older cancer survivors face increased risks of adverse events with opioid tapering. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare-linked database, we identified 15 002 Medicare-beneficiary cancer survivors diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 prescribed opioids consistently for at least 6 months after their cancer diagnosis. Tapering was defined as a binary time-varying event occurring with any monthly oral morphine equivalent reduction of 15% or more from the previous month. Primary diagnostic billing codes associated with emergency room or hospital admissions were used for the composite endpoint of psychiatric- or drug-related event(s). RESULTS: There were 3.86 events per 100 patient-months, with 97.8% events being mental health emergencies, 1.91% events being overdose emergencies, and 0.25% involving both. Using a generalized estimating equation for repeated measure time-based analysis, opioid tapering was not statistically associated with acute events in the 3-month posttaper period (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; P = .62) or at any point in the future (OR = 0.96; P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid tapering in older cancer survivors does not appear to be linked to a higher risk of acute psychiatric- or drug-related events, in contrast to prior research in the general population.

Adverse Childhood Experiences Are Associated With History of Overdose Among Patients Presenting for Outpatient Addiction Care.

OBJECTIVES: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with mental health issues and substance use. Having a substance use disorder increases the risk of overdose (OD). Research on ACEs and risk of OD is limited. This study examined the relationship between ACE scores and a self-reported history of OD among patients in an addiction and mental health outpatient setting. METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional design included adults in a dual-diagnosis addiction and mental health outpatient recovery and treatment program from November 2017 to August 2020. Patients (N = 115) were assessed with self-report questionnaires, which included ACEs and history of OD. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with self-reported OD history. We assessed the reliability and validity of the ACEs scale. RESULTS: Of the 115 participants, 26 (22.6%) reported a past OD at intake. The mean ACE score for participants with an OD history, as compared with those with no history of OD, was 4.0 (standard deviation, 2.7) vs 2.3 (standard deviation, 2.2). In the multivariable regression, a higher ACE score was associated with history of OD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.50; P = 0.0456). CONCLUSIONS: Given the observed association between OD and higher ACE scores, patients presenting for treatment in outpatient dual-diagnosis clinics should be screened for ACEs and OD history, providing the opportunity for treatment with trauma-informed care and/or referral to appropriate services.

Craving among patients seeking treatment for substance use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Craving has been implicated as a central feature of addiction and a predictor of relapse. However, a complete understanding of how craving varies across patient populations is lacking. This study aimed to better inform the effective and accurate use of craving as a clinical prognostic tool for patients with substance use disorders (SUD). METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized information gathered on patients (n = 112) entering specialty treatment for a SUD. Craving in the prior 30 days was assessed with a single item with other intake questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients who reported substance use in the last 30 days were more likely to report craving compared to patients who did not report substance use in the last 30 days (AOR = 6.86 [95% CI 2.17-21.7], p-value = 0.001). Patients who reported Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity were less likely to report craving compared to patients who did not report Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (AOR = 0.28 [95% CI 0.08-0.95], p-value = 0.04). There was no association between craving and Adverse Childhood Events (OR = 1.03 [95% CI 0.84-1.25], p-value = 0.81). CONCLUSION: The association between recent substance use and craving supports previous findings. The observed variation in craving among patients who report Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity is novel and suggests socio-cultural influences and possibly genetic factors influencing reported craving amongst patients. Additional research is needed to further understand the underlying factors leading to this finding, in order for better utilization of craving as a clinical indicator across patient populations.

Substance-related diagnosis type predicts the likelihood and co-occurrence of preterm and cesarean delivery.

This article aimed to evaluate whether a substance-related diagnosis (SRD; i.e., alcohol, opioids, cannabis, stimulants, nicotine) predicts the likelihood and co-occurrence of preterm (20-37 weeks' gestation) and cesarean delivery.This study reviewed electronic health record data on women (aged 18-44 years) who delivered a single live or stillbirth at ≥ 20 weeks of gestation from 2012 to 2019. Women with and without an SRD were matched on key demographic characteristics at a 1:1 ratio. Adjusting for covariates, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.Of the 19,346 deliveries, a matched cohort of 2,158 deliveries was identified. Of these, 1,079 (50%) had an SRD, 280 (13%) had a preterm delivery, 833 (39%) had a cesarean delivery, and 166 (8%) had a co-occurring preterm and cesarean delivery. An SRD was significantly associated with preterm and cesarean delivery (AOR = 1.84 [95% CI, 1.41-2.39], p-value= <0.0001; AOR = 1.51 [95% CI, 1.23-1.85], p-value= <0.0001). An alcohol-related diagnosis (AOR = 1.82 [95% CI, 1.01-3.28], p-value= 0.0471), opioid-related diagnosis (AOR = 1.94 [95% CI, 1.26-2.98], p-value= 0.0027), stimulant-related diagnosis (AOR = 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.45], p-value= 0.0142), and nicotine-related diagnosis (AOR = 1.54 [95% CI, 1.05-2.26], p-value= 0.0278) were associated with co-occurring preterm and cesarean delivery.Pregnant women with an SRD experienced disproportionally higher odds of preterm and cesarean delivery compared to pregnant women without an SRD. Substance-type predicts the type of delivery outcome. An SRD in pregnant women should be identified early to reduce potential harm through intervention and treatment.

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes and Postpartum Suicidal Behavior in California, 2013-2018.

Background: The objectives of this study were to describe trends in the prevalence of postpartum suicidal behaviors in California, 2013-2018, and to estimate associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and suicidal behaviors. Materials and Methods: We used data from a population-based cohort derived from all birth and fetal death certificates. Records were individually linked to maternal hospital discharge records for the years before and after delivery. We estimated the prevalence of postpartum suicidal ideation and attempt by year. Then, we estimated crude and adjusted associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and these suicidal behaviors. The sample included 2,563,288 records. Results: The prevalence of postpartum suicidal ideation and attempt increased from 2013 to 2018. People with postpartum suicidal behavior were younger, had less education, and were more likely to live in rural areas. A greater proportion of those with postpartum suicidal behavior were Black and publicly insured. Severe maternal morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and fetal death were associated with greater risk of ideation and attempt. Major structural malformation was not associated with either outcome. Conclusions: The burden of postpartum suicidal behavior has increased over time and is unequally distributed across population subgroups. Adverse perinatal outcomes may help identify individuals that could benefit from additional care during the postpartum period.

Psychiatrist decision-making towards prescribing benzodiazepines: the dilemma with substance abusers.

Psychiatrists' decision making about prescribing benzodiazepines (BZD) was evaluated in a community mental health center. An anonymous survey of outpatient psychiatrists in an academic-affiliated public mental health center was conducted using a 45-item questionnaire developed based on the results of a previous study. Sixty-six percent of responses indicate that, at times, psychiatrists experienced requests for behaviors suspicious for abuse, including 'lost/missing prescriptions' and 'use of BZD by others'. Patient characteristics such as 'history of abuse', 'unknown patient', and 'patient use of illicit substances' were occasional or common reasons for NOT prescribing BZDs (75%). The most common contexts in which the majority of our sample was uncomfortable prescribing BZDs involved a patient history of substance abuse, fear of initiation of dependence, diversion, and feeling manipulated by the patient. Time limitations were a dilemma for 20%. Psychiatrist self-reported dilemma and behavior in prescribing BZDs largely reflected concerns with substance abuse and less frequently workload or time issues.

Differences in outpatient, emergency, and inpatient use among pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: As a vulnerable population, pregnant women with a substance-related diagnosis (ie, substance use, misuse, or dependence) may use healthcare disproportionately. OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the differences in the use of outpatient clinical visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient days in the hospital among women with and without a substance-related diagnosis during the antepartum period. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study retrieved electronic health record data on women (age, 18-44 years) who delivered a single live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation from April 1, 2012, to September 30, 2019. Imbalance in measured maternal sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics between women with and without a substance-related diagnosis was attenuated using propensity score matching on key demographic characteristics (eg, age), yielding a matched 1:1 sample. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regressions models were used to determine the association between a substance-related diagnosis and outpatient visits, emergency visits, and inpatient days. RESULTS: From the total sample (n=16,770), the matched cohort consisted of 1986 deliveries. Of these, most were White (51.0%), or mixed or of some other race (31.1%). The mean age was 29.8 (standard deviation, 5.6). A substance-related diagnosis was identified in 993 women (50%) because of matching. Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≤10 outpatient visits than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.81 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.28]; P<.0001). Alcohol-, opioid-, and stimulant-related diagnoses were independently associated with ≤10 outpatient visits (adjusted odds ratio, 3.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.67-6.04]; P=.0005; adjusted odds ratio, 3.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.79-5.09]; P<.0001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.18 [95% confidence interval, 1.39-3.41]; P=.0007, respectively). Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≥1 emergency visit than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.85]; P<.0001). Opioid-, stimulant-, and nicotine-related diagnoses were independently associated with ≥1 emergency visit (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.77]; P=.0287; adjusted odds ratio, 2.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.78]; P=.0301; adjusted odds ratio, 3.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.90-6.02]; P<.0001, respectively). Women with a substance-related diagnosis were more likely to have ≥3 inpatient days than women without a substance-related diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.69 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.67]; P=.0256). Opioid-, stimulant-, and nicotine-related diagnosis were independently associated with ≥3 inpatient days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.52 [95% confidence interval, 1.42-8.75]; P=.0067; adjusted odds ratio, 3.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.34]; P=.0123; adjusted odds ratio, 2.74 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-6.73]; P=.0285, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with a substance-related diagnosis during the antepartum period who delivered a single live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation were experiencing fewer outpatient visits, more emergency department visits, and more inpatient days than women without a substance-related diagnosis. The type of substance-related diagnosis (eg, alcohol, opioids, stimulants, or nicotine) was associated with different patterns of healthcare use. The results from this study have reinforced the need to identify substance-related diagnoses in pregnant women early to minimize disproportionate healthcare service utilization through intervention and treatment.

Cannabis-related diagnosis in pregnancy and adverse maternal and infant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use and cannabis use disorders are increasing in prevalence, including among pregnant women. The objective was to evaluate the association of a cannabis-related diagnosis (CRD) in pregnancy and adverse maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: We queried an administrative birth cohort of singleton deliveries in California between 2011-2017 linked to maternal and infant hospital discharge records. We classified pregnancies with CRD from International Classification of Disease codes. We identified nicotine and other substance-related diagnoses (SRD) in the same manner. Outcomes of interest included maternal (hypertensive disorders) and infant (prematurity, small for gestational age, NICU admission, major structural malformations) adverse outcomes. RESULTS: From 3,067,069 pregnancies resulting in live births, 29,112 (1.0 %) had a CRD. CRD was associated with an increased risk of all outcomes studied; the strongest risks observed were for very preterm birth (aRR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.3, 1.6) and small for gestational age (aRR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.3, 1.4). When analyzed with or without co-exposure diagnoses, CRD alone conferred increased risk for all outcomes compared to no use. The strongest effects were seen for CRD with other SRD (preterm birth aRR 2.3, 95 % CI 2.2, 2.5; very preterm birth aRR 2.6, 95 % CI 2.3, 3.0; gastrointestinal malformations aRR 2.0, 95 % CI 1.6, 2.6). The findings were generally robust to unmeasured confounding and misclassification analyses. CONCLUSIONS: CRD in pregnancy was associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Providing education and effective treatment for women with a CRD during prenatal care may improve maternal and infant health.