Thyroid diagnostic modalities (fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy) with histology correlation: a tertiary centre experience.

AIMS: To determine the proportion of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) cases reported at a single institute into each UK Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Thy1-5 and local T category, respectively. Where subsequent histology was available, malignancy rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were compared for both procedures. METHODS: 1591 FNAs (2010-2018) and 514 CNBs (2013-2018) cases were identified, together with paired histology excision specimens. RESULTS: The FNA samples were classified as: Thy1: 45.3%, Thy2/Thy2c: 22.1%, Thy3a/Thy3f: 28%, Thy4: 1.6% and Thy5: 3%; while the CNB were classified as: T1: 7.2%, T2: 22.4%, T3 59.3%, T4: 1% and T5: 10.1%. Comparison of FNA and CNB classified as Thy5/T5 showed a 100% risk of malignancy (ROM), sensitivity (98% vs 100%), specificity (14.1% vs 12.1%), PPV (29.4% vs 29.4%), NPV (94.9% vs 100%) and accuracy (36.5% vs 35.6%), respectively, for a diagnosis of malignancy. ROMs for other categories were: Thy1/T1 (9% vs 6.7%), Thy2/T2 (5.1% vs 0%), Thy3/T3 (17.5% vs 18.4%) and Thy4/T4 (73.3% vs 100%). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of cases in each RCPath Thy category has remained relatively stable during the 9-year study period, with the exception of the Thy3a category, which has increased over time. This finding is in line with other more recent reports in the literature and the proportion of T3 cases in the CNB group. The proportion of Thy2/Thy2c cases has also reduced over time, reflecting a local change in the triaging protocol for probable benign lesions. Both FNA and CNB showed comparable performance in our study.

Familial Adrenocortical Carcinoma in Association With Lynch Syndrome.

CONTEXT: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although the majority of childhood ACC arises in the context of inherited cancer susceptibility syndromes, it remains less clear whether a hereditary tumor predisposition exists for the development of ACC in adults. Here, we report the first occurrence of familial ACC in a kindred with Lynch syndrome resulting from a pathogenic germline MSH2 mutation. CASE: A 54-year-old female with a history of ovarian and colorectal malignancy was found to have an ACC. A detailed family history revealed her mother had died of ACC and her sister had previously been diagnosed with endometrial and colorectal cancers. A unifying diagnosis of Lynch syndrome was considered, and immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression in both AACs (proband and her mother) and in the endometrial carcinoma of her sister. Subsequent genetic screening confirmed the presence of a germline MSH2 mutation (resulting in deletions of exons 1-3) in the proband and her sister. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide strong support for the recent proposal that ACC should be considered a Lynch syndrome-associated tumor and included in the Amsterdam II clinical diagnostic criteria. We also suggest that screening for ACC should be considered in cancer surveillance strategies directed at individuals with germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.