Mind the Difference: Characterizing the Impact of Behavioral Health Disorders on Facial Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psychiatric diagnoses are at greater risk for traumatic injury than the general population. Current literature fails to characterize how premorbid behavioral health disorders (BHDs) complicate craniofacial trauma. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with premorbid BHD sustaining facial fractures. METHODS: All adults in the 2013-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets with facial fractures were identified. Demographics, injury characteristics, fracture patterns, and in-hospital outcomes were compared in patients with and without premorbid BHDs. BHDs included major psychiatric illnesses, alcohol or drug use disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or dementia. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the 240,104 subjects with facial fractures had at least one premorbid BHD. Assault (29.9% versus 23.9%, P< 0.001), self-inflicted injury (2.9% versus 1.2%, P< 0.001), and multiple facial fractures (40.2% versus 38.7%, P< 0.001) were more common among the BHD group. The BHD group displayed significantly higher rates of nearly all in-hospital complications, including pneumonia (4.3% versus 3.3%, P< 0.001), substance withdrawal (3.9% versus 0.3%, P< 0.001), unplanned intubation (1.5% versus 0.9%, P< 0.001) and unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU, 1.3% versus 0.8%, P< 0.001). BHD was strongly predictive of pneumonia, unplanned intubation, and unplanned ICU admission in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BHD represent a subset of facial trauma characterized by different mechanisms and patterns of injury and premorbid health status. BHDs are associated with higher in-hospital complication rates and resource utilization. Understanding the relationship between craniofacial trauma and premorbid BHD creates opportunities to improve morbidity and resource utilization in this group.

Incidental Pathologic Findings in Young Men with Gynecomastia.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic examination of young adult gynecomastia tissue is controversial given the low incidence of breast carcinoma in this population. The authors examined the pathologic findings in a large cohort of adolescents with gynecomastia to evaluate the need for routine tissue analysis in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review of men who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for gynecomastia at a single institution between February of 2007 and November of 2019 identified demographics, medical history, surgical characteristics, and pathologic findings. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: A total of 268 male patients were included. Mean age was 16.6 years. Mean body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2, and 42.5 percent of the sample was obese. The majority (83.2 percent) underwent bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. There were no abnormal histopathologic findings in 95.1 percent. Among the 13 patients with abnormalities, eight (3 percent) had nonproliferative changes, two (0.8 percent) had proliferative changes without atypia, two (0.8 percent) had atypical ductal hyperplasia, and one (0.4 percent) had both bilateral atypical ductal hyperplasia and unilateral ductal carcinoma in situ. No patients had invasive carcinoma. The three patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia and/or ductal carcinoma in situ were obese but had no other breast cancer or gynecomastia risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings conferring potentially increased risk of developing breast cancer were identified in three male adolescents (1.2 percent). Incidence of these findings is similar between male adolescents and similarly aged female adolescents undergoing breast reduction surgery. Although worrisome pathology results are rare, too little is known about the natural history of atypical proliferation and ductal carcinoma in situ in young men to recommend against routine analysis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.

Incidental Pathologic Findings in Young Adult Reduction Mammaplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to characterize incidental microscopic findings in this population to determine whether there is a benefit to routine histopathologic examination of breast tissue in young women. METHODS: A retrospective review of young women who underwent reduction mammaplasty between June of 2010 and May of 2018 was performed at a single institution to identify demographics, age at the time of surgery, breast cancer risk factors, and pathologic data. Histologic reevaluation was performed when diagnostic clarification was needed. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariable statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 798 young women were included. At the time of surgery, the mean patient age was 17.5 ± 2.0 years, the mean body mass index was 28.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2, and the mean resection weight was 685 ± 339 g/breast. The majority of patients were reported to have pathologically normal tissue [n = 704 (88.2 percent)]. Of the 94 patients (11.8 percent) with abnormal findings, 21 (2.6 percent) had benign nonproliferative changes, 64 (8.0 percent) had proliferative lesions without atypia, nine (1.1 percent) had proliferative lesions with atypia, and a single patient (0.1 percent) had a borderline phyllodes tumor. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age at menarche younger than 12 years was significantly associated with increased incidence of proliferative lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Over 10 percent of young women with reduction mammaplasty have histopathologic findings. Although this study demonstrated an overall low incidence of atypical lesions, because early identification offers potential for improved surveillance, the authors continue to advocate for routine pathologic evaluation, particularly for women with early menarche. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Ultrasound-guided Hydro-dissection Facilitates Tissue Expander Placement and Components Separation in Complex Ventral Hernia Repair.

Tissue expanders are known adjuncts in ventral hernia repair, used in a staged approach where tissue closure or coverage of the defect is preferred but inadequate. Placement of tissue expanders in the correct tissue plane can be difficult, especially in thin patients or with loss of domain. This case series describes a technique in which tissue expander placement is facilitated by ultrasound-guided hydro-dissection, following the placement of a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. In short, after induction of anesthesia, the same needle used for the ultrasound-guided TAP block can be repositioned by the anesthesiologist to instill tumescent solution into the fascial plane between the internal and external oblique muscles. This allows for identification of the fascial planes in the ensuing operation. Our technique may prove to be an alternative tool in the placement of tissue expanders for ventral hernia repair, or in other procedures requiring device placement.