Characterizing the risk of human leukocyte antigen-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in older recipients.

Older compatible living donor kidney transplant (CLDKT) recipients have higher mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) compared to younger recipients. These risks may be amplified in older incompatible living donor kidney transplant (ILDKT) recipients who undergo desensitization and intense immunosuppression. In a 25-center cohort of ILDKT recipients transplanted between September 24, 1997, and December 15, 2016, we compared mortality, DCGF, delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and length of stay (LOS) between 234 older (age ≥60 years) and 1172 younger (age 18-59 years) recipients. To investigate whether the impact of age was different for ILDKT recipients compared to 17 542 CLDKT recipients, we used an interaction term to determine whether the relationship between posttransplant outcomes and transplant type (ILDKT vs CLDKT) was modified by age. Overall, older recipients had higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.632.072.65, P < .001), lower DCGF (hazard ratio: 0.360.530.77, P = .001), and AR (odds ratio: 0.390.540.74, P < .001), and similar DGF (odds ratio: 0.461.032.33, P = .9) and LOS (incidence rate ratio: 0.880.981.10, P = 0.8) compared to younger recipients. The impact of age on mortality (interaction P = .052), DCGF (interaction P = .7), AR interaction P = .2), DGF (interaction P = .9), and LOS (interaction P = .5) were similar in ILDKT and CLDKT recipients. Age alone should not preclude eligibility for ILDKT.

Digital imaging software versus the "eyeball" method in quantifying steatosis in a liver biopsy.

Steatotic livers represent a potentially underutilized resource to increase the donor graft pool; however, 1 barrier to the increased utilization of such grafts is the heterogeneity in the definition and the measurement of macrovesicular steatosis (MaS). Digital imaging software (DIS) may better standardize definitions to study posttransplant outcomes. Using HALO, a DIS, we analyzed 63 liver biopsies, from 3 transplant centers, transplanted between 2016 and 2018, and compared macrovesicular steatosis percentage (%MaS) as estimated by transplant center, donor hospital, and DIS. We also quantified the relationship between DIS characteristics and posttransplant outcomes using log-linear regression for peak aspartate aminotransferase, peak alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin on postoperative day 7, as well as logistic regression for early allograft dysfunction. Transplant centers and donor hospitals overestimated %MaS compared with DIS, with better agreement at lower %MaS and less agreement for higher %MaS. No DIS analyzed liver biopsies were calculated to be >20% %MaS; however, 40% of liver biopsies read by transplant center pathologists were read to be >30%. Percent MaS read by HALO was positively associated with peak aspartate aminotransferase (regression coefficient= 1.04 1.08 1.12 , p <0.001), peak alanine aminotransferase (regression coefficient = 1.04 1.08 1.12 , p <0.001), and early allograft dysfunction (OR= 1.10 1.40 1.78 , p =0.006). There was no association between HALO %MaS and total bilirubin on postoperative day 7 (regression coefficient = 0.99 1.01 1.04 , p =0.3). DIS provides reproducible quantification of steatosis that could standardize MaS definitions and identify phenotypes associated with good clinical outcomes to increase the utilization of steatite livers.

Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR = 1.03 1.682.72 ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF = 1.45 2.093.02 ; PFNC = 1.67 2.403.46 ; PCC = 1.48 2.243.37 ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR = 1.34 1.621.95 ) than CLDKT (aHR = 1.96 2.292.67 ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.

Mitigation of radiation exposure during surgical hepatectomy after yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma can present safety challenges when transplanting recently treated Y-90 patients. To reduce surgeons' contact with radioactive tissue and remain within occupational dose limits, current guidelines recommend delaying transplants at least 14 days, if possible. We wanted to determine the level of radiation exposure to the transplant surgeon when explanting an irradiated liver before the recommended decay period. Anex-vivoradiation exposure analysis was conducted on the explanted liver of a patient who received Y-90 therapy 46 h prior to orthotopic liver transplant. To estimate exposure to the surgeon's hands, radiation dosimeter rings were placed inside three different surgical glove configurations and exposed to the explanted liver. Estimated radiation doses corrected for Y-90 decay were calculated. Radiation safety gloves performed best, with an average radiation exposure rate of 5.36 mSV h-1in the static hand position, an 83% reduction in exposure over controls with no glove (31.31 mSv h-1). Interestingly, non-radiation safety gloves also demonstrated reduced exposure rates, well below occupational regulation limits. Handling of Y-90 radiated organs within the immediate post-treatment period can be done safely and does not exceed federal occupational dose limits if appropriate gloves and necessary precautions are exercised.

Systems biology approaches in solid organ transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Organ transplantation research has led to the discovery of several interesting individual mechanistic pathways, molecules and potential drug targets but there are still no comprehensive studies that have addressed how these varied mechanisms work in unison to regulate the posttransplant immune response that drives kidney rejection and dysfunction. RECENT FINDINGS: Systems biology is a rapidly expanding field that aims to integrate existing knowledge of molecular concepts and large-scale genomic and clinical datasets into networks that can be used in cutting edge computational models to define disease mechanisms in a holistic manner. Systems biology approaches have brought a paradigm shift from a reductionist view of biology to a wider agnostic assessment of disease from several lines of evidence. Although the complex nature of the posttransplant immune response makes it difficult to pinpoint mechanisms, systems biology is enabling discovery of unknown biological interactions using the cumulative power of genomic data sets, clinical data and endpoints, and improved computational methods for the systematic deconvolution of this response. SUMMARY: An integrative systems biology approach that leverages genomic data from varied technologies, such as DNA sequencing, copy number variation, RNA sequencing, and methylation profiles along with long-term clinical follow-up data has the potential to define a framework that can be mined to provide novel insights for developing therapeutic interventions in organ transplantation.

Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors.

BACKGROUND: A report from a high-volume single center indicated a survival benefit of receiving a kidney transplant from an HLA-incompatible live donor as compared with remaining on the waiting list, whether or not a kidney from a deceased donor was received. The generalizability of that finding is unclear. METHODS: In a 22-center study, we estimated the survival benefit for 1025 recipients of kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors who were matched with controls who remained on the waiting list or received a transplant from a deceased donor (waiting-list-or-transplant control group) and controls who remained on the waiting list but did not receive a transplant (waiting-list-only control group). We analyzed the data with and without patients from the highest-volume center in the study. RESULTS: Recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors had a higher survival rate than either control group at 1 year (95.0%, vs. 94.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 89.6% for the waiting-list-only control group), 3 years (91.7% vs. 83.6% and 72.7%, respectively), 5 years (86.0% vs. 74.4% and 59.2%), and 8 years (76.5% vs. 62.9% and 43.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with the two control groups). The survival benefit was significant at 8 years across all levels of donor-specific antibody: 89.2% for recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors who had a positive Luminex assay for anti-HLA antibody but a negative flow-cytometric cross-match versus 65.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 47.1% for the waiting-list-only control group; 76.3% for recipients with a positive flow-cytometric cross-match but a negative cytotoxic cross-match versus 63.3% and 43.0% in the two control groups, respectively; and 71.0% for recipients with a positive cytotoxic cross-match versus 61.5% and 43.7%, respectively. The findings did not change when patients from the highest-volume center were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study validated single-center evidence that patients who received kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors had a substantial survival benefit as compared with patients who did not undergo transplantation and those who waited for transplants from deceased donors. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).

Hospital readmissions following HLA-incompatible live donor kidney transplantation: A multi-center study.

Thirty percent of kidney transplant recipients are readmitted in the first month posttransplantation. Those with donor-specific antibody requiring desensitization and incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) constitute a unique subpopulation that might be at higher readmission risk. Drawing on a 22-center cohort, 379 ILDKTs with Medicare primary insurance were matched to compatible transplant-matched controls and to waitlist-only matched controls on panel reactive antibody, age, blood group, renal replacement time, prior kidney transplantation, race, gender, diabetes, and transplant date/waitlisting date. Readmission risk was determined using multilevel, mixed-effects Poisson regression. In the first month, ILDKTs had a 1.28-fold higher readmission risk than compatible controls (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.46; P < .001). Risk peaked at 6-12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.49-1.87; P < .001), attenuating by 24-36 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.40; P < .001). ILDKTs had a 5.86-fold higher readmission risk (95% CI 4.96-6.92; P < .001) in the first month compared to waitlist-only controls. At 12-24 (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95; P = .002) and 24-36 months (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84; P < .001), ILDKTs had a lower risk than waitlist-only controls. These findings of ILDKTs having a higher readmission risk than compatible controls, but a lower readmission risk after the first year than waitlist-only controls should be considered in regulatory/payment schemas and planning clinical care.

Gene-mediated cytotoxic immunotherapy as adjuvant to surgery or chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma provides the only chance of cure, long-term survival remains poor. Immunotherapy may improve outcomes, especially as adjuvant to local therapies. Gene-mediated cytotoxic immunotherapy (GMCI) generates a systemic anti-tumor response through local delivery of an adenoviral vector expressing the HSV-tk gene (aglatimagene besadenovec, AdV-tk) followed by anti-herpetic prodrug. GMCI has demonstrated synergy with standard of care (SOC) in other tumor types. This is the first application in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Four dose levels (3 × 10(10) to 1 × 10(12) vector particles) were evaluated as adjuvant to surgery for resectable disease (Arm A) or to 5-FU chemoradiation for locally advanced disease (Arm B). Each patient received two cycles of AdV-tk + prodrug. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients completed therapy, 12 per arm, with no dose-limiting toxicities. All Arm A patients were explored, eight were resected, one was locally advanced and three had distant metastases. CD8(+) T cell infiltration increased an average of 22-fold (range sixfold to 75-fold) compared with baseline (p = 0.0021). PD-L1 expression increased in 5/7 samples analyzed. One node-positive resected patient is alive >66 months without recurrence. Arm B RECIST response rate was 25 % with a median OS of 12 months and 1-year survival of 50 %. Patient-reported quality of life showed no evidence of deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: AdV-tk can be safely combined with pancreatic cancer SOC without added toxicity. Response and survival compare favorably to expected outcomes and immune activity increased. These results support further evaluation of GMCI with more modern chemoradiation and surgery as well as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in pancreatic cancer.

Renal Function at Discharge Among Kidney Recipients Experiencing Delayed Graft Function and Its Associations With Long-term Outcomes.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with higher rates of acute rejection and poor graft survival and outcomes. Current DGF definitions based on posttransplant need for dialysis are not standardized and there are no objective methodologies for quantifying DGF severity. Methods: Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, we examined DGF, and used recipient serum creatinine at discharge as a correlate of renal function and DGF severity (mild: <2.5 mg/dL; severe: ≥2.5 mg/dL). The associations between donor and recipient factors and DGF severity were quantified using logistic regression. We also examined the associations between DGF severity and long-term recipient outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A predictive model using donor and recipient factors had a reasonably good ability to discriminate mild (low creatinine) versus severe (high creatinine) DGF (c-statistic of 0.70). In Cox regression, DGF and creatinine at discharge were both independently associated with long-term outcomes, yet their effects differed depending on the outcome (graft function, death-censored graft function, recipient mortality). Our findings suggest that having DGF, but with relatively good renal function (creatinine <2.5) at discharge, may be less deleterious on graft and recipient survival compared with severe, prolonged DGF, which was associated with a decreased median graft survival of ~2.6 y compared with no DGF with low creatinine at discharge. Conclusions: Our novel DGF severity stratification identified unique factors associated with DGF severity, along with DGF's association with long-term graft and patient survival. The adverse cost and outcome implications of severe DGF warrant additional investigation to improve kidney transplantation practice.

Impact of Portable Normothermic Blood-Based Machine Perfusion on Outcomes of Liver Transplant: The OCS Liver PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Ischemic cold storage (ICS) of livers for transplant is associated with serious posttransplant complications and underuse of liver allografts. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether portable normothermic machine perfusion preservation of livers obtained from deceased donors using the Organ Care System (OCS) Liver ameliorates early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and ischemic biliary complications (IBCs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter randomized clinical trial (International Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Portable Organ Care System Liver for Preserving and Assessing Donor Livers for Transplantation) was conducted between November 2016 and October 2019 at 20 US liver transplant programs. The trial compared outcomes for 300 recipients of livers preserved using either OCS (n = 153) or ICS (n = 147). Participants were actively listed for liver transplant on the United Network of Organ Sharing national waiting list. INTERVENTIONS: Transplants were performed for recipients randomly assigned to receive donor livers preserved by either conventional ICS or the OCS Liver initiated at the donor hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary effectiveness end point was incidence of EAD. Secondary end points included OCS Liver ex vivo assessment capability of donor allografts, extent of reperfusion syndrome, incidence of IBC at 6 and 12 months, and overall recipient survival after transplant. The primary safety end point was the number of liver graft-related severe adverse events within 30 days after transplant. RESULTS: Of 293 patients in the per-protocol population, the primary analysis population for effectiveness, 151 were in the OCS Liver group (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [10.3] years; 102 [67%] men), and 142 were in the ICS group (mean SD age, 58.6 [10.0] years; 100 [68%] men). The primary effectiveness end point was met by a significant decrease in EAD (27 of 150 [18%] vs 44 of 141 [31%]; P = .01). The OCS Liver preserved livers had significant reduction in histopathologic evidence of ischemia-reperfusion injury after reperfusion (eg, less moderate to severe lobular inflammation: 9 of 150 [6%] for OCS Liver vs 18 of 141 [13%] for ICS; P = .004). The OCS Liver resulted in significantly higher use of livers from donors after cardiac death (28 of 55 [51%] for the OCS Liver vs 13 of 51 [26%] for ICS; P = .007). The OCS Liver was also associated with significant reduction in incidence of IBC 6 months (1.3% vs 8.5%; P = .02) and 12 months (2.6% vs 9.9%; P = .02) after transplant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This multicenter randomized clinical trial provides the first indication, to our knowledge, that normothermic machine perfusion preservation of deceased donor livers reduces both posttransplant EAD and IBC. Use of the OCS Liver also resulted in increased use of livers from donors after cardiac death. Together these findings indicate that OCS Liver preservation is associated with superior posttransplant outcomes and increased donor liver use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02522871.

Molecular mechanisms of chronic kidney transplant rejection via large-scale proteogenomic analysis of tissue biopsies.

The most common cause of kidney transplant failure is the poorly characterized histopathologic entity interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). There are no known unifying mechanisms, no effective therapy, and no proven preventive strategies. Possible mechanisms include chronic immune rejection, inflammation, drug toxicity, and chronic kidney injury from secondary factors. To gain further mechanistic insight, we conducted a large-scale proteogenomic study of kidney transplant biopsies with IFTA of varying severity. We acquired proteomic data using tandem mass spectrometry with subsequent quantification, analysis of differential protein expression, validation, and functional annotations to known molecular networks. We performed genome-wide expression profiling in parallel. More than 1400 proteins with unique expression profiles traced the progression from normal transplant biopsies to biopsies with mild to moderate and severe disease. Multiple sets of proteins were mapped to different functional pathways, many increasing with histologic severity, including immune responses, inflammatory cell activation, and apoptosis consistent with the chronic rejection hypothesis. Two examples include the extensive population of the alternative rather than the classical complement pathway, previously not appreciated for IFTA, and a comprehensive control network for the actin cytoskeleton and cell signaling of the acute-phase response. In summary, this proteomic effort using kidney tissue contributes mechanistic insight into several biologic processes associated with IFTA.

UNOS/OPTN Data-guided Assessment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation and Evaluation of Immunosuppressive Protocols in a Steroid-free Center.

BACKGROUND: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a common recurrent glomerulopathy associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT). However, its natural history, clinical predictors, and treatment response are still poorly understood. Steroid withdrawal regimens in KT have been associated with improvements in cardiovascular risk and patient outcomes. The Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) uses a rapid low-dose steroid withdrawal immunosuppression (IS) protocol for KT maintenance. METHODS: We assessed the impact of our protocol on FSGS disease recurrence over a 10-y period to reassess our steroid and IS protocols and to evaluate if our patient outcomes diverge from published data. We compared 4 groups: steroids always, steroid free, steroid switch on, and steroid weaned off. We used IS and induction-matched retrospective data from United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to investigate patient and graft survival for FSGS at SCOT. RESULTS: Our analysis results differ from earlier studies showing that FSGS was associated with a higher risk of graft loss, perhaps because of selection of a UNOS data set filtered to match the SCOT IS protocol for making direct comparisons. Overall outcomes of graft failure and recipient death did not differ between SCOT patients and steroid-free transplant patient data from the UNOS data for FSGS. SCOT recurrence rate for FSGS was 7.5%, which was lower than in most published single-center studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we believe that it is safe to continue the steroid avoidance protocols at SCOT and the steroid-free protocol may not be detrimental when the adverse effects and toxicities associated with steroid use are considered.

The Advantage of Multiple Listing Continues in the Kidney Allocation System Era.

BACKGROUND: Transplant candidates can be listed at multiple transplant centers to increase the probability of receiving an organ. We evaluated the association between multilisting (ML) status and access to a deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) to determine if ML provides a long-term advantage regarding wait-list mortality and recipient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Candidates between January 2010 and October 2017 were identified as either singly or multiply listed using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data and cohorts before and after implementation of the Kidney Allocation System (KAS). Cross-sectional logistic regression was used to assess relationships between candidate factors and ML prevalence (5.4%). RESULTS: Factors associated with ML pre-KAS included having blood type B (reference, type O; odds ratio [OR], 1.20; P < .001), having private insurance (OR, 1.5; P < .001), wait time (OR, 1.28; P < .001), and increasing calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) (reference, cPRA 0-100; OR for cPRA 80-98, 2.83; OR for cPRA 99, 3.47; OR for cPRA 100, 5.18; P < .001). Transplant rates were double for multilisted vs singly listed recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.16; P < .001). Extra-donor service area ML candidates received transplants 2.5 years quicker than single-listing (SL) candidates, conferring a 42% wait-list advantage. Recipient death (aHR, 0.94; P = .122) and graft failure (aHR, 0.91; P = .006) rates were also lower for ML recipients. CONCLUSIONS: In the KAS era, ML continues to increase the likelihood of receiving a DDKT and lower the incidence of wait-list mortality, and it confers a survival advantages over SL.

Combining Blood Gene Expression and Cellfree DNA to Diagnose Subclinical Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Subclinical acute rejection is associated with poor outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. As an alternative to surveillance biopsies, noninvasive screening has been established with a blood gene expression profile. Donor-derived cellfree DNA (cfDNA) has been used to detect rejection in patients with allograft dysfunction but not tested extensively in stable patients. We hypothesized that we could complement noninvasive diagnostic performance for subclinical rejection by combining a donor-derived cfDNA and a gene expression profile assay. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We performed a post hoc analysis of simultaneous blood gene expression profile and donor-derived cfDNA assays in 428 samples paired with surveillance biopsies from 208 subjects enrolled in an observational clinical trial (Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-08). Assay results were analyzed as binary variables, and then, their continuous scores were combined using logistic regression. The performance of each assay alone and in combination was compared. RESULTS: For diagnosing subclinical rejection, the gene expression profile demonstrated a negative predictive value of 82%, a positive predictive value of 47%, a balanced accuracy of 64%, and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.75. The donor-derived cfDNA assay showed similar negative predictive value (84%), positive predictive value (56%), balanced accuracy (68%), and area under the receiver operating curve (0.72). When both assays were negative, negative predictive value increased to 88%. When both assays were positive, positive predictive value increased to 81%. Combining assays using multivariable logistic regression, area under the receiver operating curve was 0.81, significantly higher than the gene expression profile (P<0.001) or donor-derived cfDNA alone (P=0.006). Notably, when cases were separated on the basis of rejection type, the gene expression profile was significantly better at detecting cellular rejection (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.80 versus 0.62; P=0.001), whereas the donor-derived cfDNA was significantly better at detecting antibody-mediated rejection (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.84 versus 0.71; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of blood-based biomarkers can improve detection and provide less invasive monitoring for subclinical rejection. In this study, the gene expression profile detected more cellular rejection, whereas donor-derived cfDNA detected more antibody-mediated rejection.

Safety and Efficacy of a Steroid Avoidance Immunosuppression Regimen in Renal Transplant Patients With De Novo or Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Single-Center Study.

Although interest in the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in kidney transplant rejection, graft survival, and histopathological outcomes is increasing, their impact on steroid avoidance or minimization in renal transplant populations is poorly understood. Primary outcomes of graft survival, rejection, and histopathological findings were assessed in 188 patients who received transplants between 2012 and 2015 at the Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation, which follows a steroid avoidance protocol. Analyses were performed using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Cohorts included kidney transplant recipients with de novo DSAs (dnDSAs; n = 27), preformed DSAs (pfDSAs; n = 15), and no DSAs (nDSAs; n = 146). Median time to dnDSA development (classes I and II) was shorter (102 days) than in previous studies. Rejection of any type was associated with DSAs to class I HLA (P < .05) and class II HLA (P < .01) but not with graft loss. Although mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) independently showed no association with rejection, an MFI >5000 showed a trend toward more antibody-mediated rejection (P < .06), though graft loss was not independently associated. Banff chronic allograft nephropathy scores and a modified chronic injury score were increased in the dnDSA cohort at 6 months, but not at 2 years (P < .001 and P < .08, respectively). Our data suggest that dnDSAs and pfDSAs impact short-term rejection rates but do not negatively impact graft survival or histopathological outcomes at 2 years. Periodic protocol post-transplant DSA monitoring may preemptively identify patients who develop dnDSAs who are at a higher risk for rejection.

Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.

Feasibility and Comparison Study of Fecal Sample Collection Methods in Healthy Volunteers and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Using 16S rRNA and Metagenomics Approaches.

The human microbiome encompasses a variety of microorganisms that change dynamically and are in close contact with the body. The microbiome influences health and homeostasis, as well as the immune system, and any significant change in this equilibrium (dysbiosis) triggers both acute and chronic health conditions. Microbiome research has surged, in part, due to advanced sequencing technologies enabling rapid, accurate, and cost-effective identification of the microbiome. A major prerequisite for stool sample collection to study the gut microbiome in longitudinal prospective studies requires standardized protocols that can be easily replicated. However, there are still significant bottlenecks to stool specimen collection that contribute to low patient retention rates in microbiome studies. These barriers are further exacerbated in solid organ transplant recipients where diarrhea is estimated to occur in up to half the patient population. We sought to test two relatively easy sample collection methods (fecal swab and wipes) and compare them to the more cumbersome "gold" standard collection method (scoop) using two different sequencing technologies (16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics). Our comparison of the collection methods shows that both the swabs and the wipes are comparable to the scoop method in terms of bacterial abundance and diversity. The swabs, however, were closer in representation to the scoop and were easier to collect and process compared to the wipes. Potential contamination of the swab and the wipe samples by abundant skin commensals was low in our analysis. Comparison of the two sequencing technologies showed that they were complementary, and that 16S sequencing provided enough coverage to detect and differentiate between bacterial species identified in the collected samples. Our pilot study demonstrates that alternative collection methods for stool sampling are a viable option in clinical applications, such as organ transplant studies. The use of these methods may result in better patient retention recruitment rates in serial microbiome studies.

Complete Chain of the First Global Kidney Exchange Transplant and 3-yr Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Global Kidney Exchange (GKE) offers an opportunity to expand living renal transplantation internationally to patients without financial means. These international pairs are entered into a US kidney exchange program that provides long-term financial support in an effort to identify opportunities for suitable exchanges for both these international pairs and US citizens. OBJECTIVE: While the promise of GKE is significant, it has been met with ethical criticism since its inception in 2015. This paper aims to demonstrate the selection process and provide >3 yr of follow-up on the first GKE donor and recipient from the Philippines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The first GKE transplant occurred with a young Filipino husband and wife who were immunologically compatible, but lacked the financial means to continue hemodialysis or undergo a kidney transplant in their home country. The pair was enrolled in the Alliance for Paired Donation matching system, several alternative kidney exchanges were identified, and the pair subsequently underwent renal transplantation and donation in the USA financed by philanthropy. The resulting nonsimultaneous extended altruistic chain provided transplantation for the Filipino husband and 11 US patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Filipino donor and recipient were followed by transplant professionals in both the Philippines and the USA. Follow-up data were maintained as required by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the USA. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The Filipino donor has normal blood pressure and renal function, and the Filipino recipient is doing well 3.5 yr after their donation and transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: While criticisms of GKE highlight concerns for possible exploitation of financially disadvantaged groups, these results demonstrate that these concerns did not come to fruition, and the outcome experienced by the GKE donor and recipient (and other US participants) was successful. PATIENT SUMMARY: The first Filipino Global Kidney Exchange (GKE) donor-recipient pair continues to be followed by both US and Filipino transplant centers. Both are in good health, support the GKE program, and advocate for its expansion.