Dental students' knowledge regarding the indications for antibiotics in the management of endodontic infections.

AIM: To determine the knowledge of undergraduate Spanish dental students regarding the indications of systemic antibiotics in the management of endodontic infections. METHODOLOGY: The final year dental students from four Spanish dental schools were requested to answer a one-page questionnaire on the indications for systemic antibiotics in the treatment of endodontic infections. One hundred and seventy-five students were asked to participate in this research. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test. RESULTS: One hundred and four students (93.7%) completed satisfactorily the survey and were included in the study. The average duration of antibiotic therapy was 7.0 ± 2.0 days. All respondents chose amoxicillin as the first-choice antibiotic in patients with no medical allergies, alone (47%) or associated with clavulanic acid (53%). The first drug of choice for patients with an allergy to penicillin was clindamycin 300 mg (99%). For cases of irreversible pulpitis, up to 63% of students would prescribe antibiotics. For the scenario of a necrotic pulp, symptomatic apical periodontitis and no swelling, 44% would prescribe antibiotics. Almost 40% of students would prescribe antibiotics for necrotic pulps with asymptomatic apical periodontitis and a sinus tract. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary for the Spanish schools of dentistry to improve students' knowledge about antibiotics and their indications in endodontics. Interactive education analysing real endodontic cases using problem-based learning would help students acquire better skills in prescribing antibiotics in pulp-periapical pathosis.

Overview of virus and cancer relationships. Position paper.

The role of certain viruses in the etiology of some tumors is today indisputable, but there is a lack, however, of annoverview of the relationship between viruses and cancer with amultidisciplinary approach. For this reason, the Health Sciences Foundation has convened a group of professionals from different areas of knowledge to discuss the relationship between viruses and cancer, and the present document is the result of these deliberations. Although viruses cause only 10-15% of cancers, advances in oncology research are largely due to the work done during the last century on tumor viruses. The clearest cancer-inducing viruses are: HPV, HBV, HCV, EBV and, depending on the geographical area, HHV-8, HTLV-1 and HIV. HPVs, for example, are considered to be the causative agents of cervical carcinomas and, more recently, of a proportion of other cancers. Among the Herpes viruses, the association with the development of neoplasms is well established for EBV and HHV-8. Viruses can also be therapeutic agents in certain neoplasms and, thus, some oncolytic viruses with selective tropism for tumor cells have been approved for clinical use in humans. It is estimated that the prophylaxis or treatment of viral infections could prevent at least 1.5 million cancer deaths per year.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer according to oncogenic status.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the role of KRAS mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Moreover, the role of other biomarkers such as NRAS or BRAF has not been studied. PURPOSE: To analyze the incidence of VTE in a cohort of patients with CRC based on KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF status. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with unresectable locally advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC) and known KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, attended in the Medical Oncology Department of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain). The primary outcome was VTE defined as any venous thromboembolic event that occurred either 6 months before or at any time after the diagnosis of CRC. The biomarker status (KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF) and other predictors of thrombosis were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-four patients were identified and included in the analysis. Forty-one patients (21.1%) experienced VTE. The incidence was 19.1% in RAS-mutated patients, 28.6% in BRAF-mutated patients and 21% in triple wild-type patients (p = NS). In multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥ 2 was the only independent predictor of VTE (OR 8.73; CI 95% 1.32-57.82; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, biomarkers have not been associated with an increased risk of VTE in CRC patients. A high incidence of VTE in BRAF-mutated patients has been observed and should be explored in further studies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of docetaxel (Taxotere) vs. 5-fluorouracil in combined therapy in the initial phases of breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The randomised controlled trial BCIRG001 has recently demonstrated that docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has better efficacy than the standard treatment (FAC, i.e., 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer. The cost-effectiveness of TAC vs. FAC in the Spanish setting is analysed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes from trial BCIRG001 were combined with Spanish costs and longterm efficacy of FAC and TAC extrapolated up to 5 years by means of a Markov model. Results are shown as cost per life year gained (C/LYG) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (C/QALY). Costs and effects were discounted at a rate of 3%. RESULTS: Mean survival was 17.8 and 16.5 years for TAC and FAC, with total costs of euro14,611 and euro11,586, respectively. The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis showed that TAC achieves a C/LYG and a C/QALY of only euro2345 and euro2631, respectively. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy based on docetaxel (TAC) is not only an effective option, but also presents a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio, clearly below the Spanish efficiency threshold in all the scenarios considered.

New clinical trials regulation in Spain: analysis of royal decree 1090/2015.

The coming into force of Directive 2001/20/EC represented a step forward in harmonising clinical trial regulation in European countries, guaranteeing a uniform protection of subjects participating in clinical research across Europe. However, it led to a disproportionate increase in the bureaucratization, and thus, it became evident that procedures needed to be simplified without detriment to patient's safety. Thus, Regulation 536/2014, that repealed Directive 2001/20/EC, with the aim of decreasing the growing bureaucratization and stimulating clinical research in Europe, established simplified procedures, such as regulating a common procedure for authorising trials in Europe, the institution of strict assessment timelines, or the definition of new concepts, such as "low-intervention clinical trial". The legal form of a Regulation allowed the norm to be directly applied to Member States without the need for transposition. By means of the new Royal Decree, the national legislation is adapted to make the application of the regulation feasible and it allows the development of the aspects that the Regulation leaves to national legislation. Both documents seek to stimulate clinical research with medicinal products to foster knowledge, facilitate transparency, and reinforce subjects' safety. This will surely be the case, but with this revision, we will look at the novelties and key aspects that are most relevant to investigators and we will analyse the consequences for all parties involved in clinical research.

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous blockade of the dopamine D-2, histamine H-1, and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis: results of a controlled trial.

Twenty-six patients being treated with 5-fluorouracil-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide (FAC), or vincristine-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide (VAC) chemotherapy completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in which the antiemetic activity of thiethylperazine (6.5 mg p.o. every 8 h X 5 days) was compared with that of the combination of thiethylperazine (same dosage) plus amitriptyline (25 mg p.o. every 8 h X 5 days). This combination was designed to obtain a simultaneous blockade of the dopamine D-2, histamine H-1, and muscarinic cholinergic receptors of the central structures responsible for emesis (chemoreceptor trigger zone and vomiting center). The combination significantly decreased both the number of emetic episodes (P less than 0.05) and the duration of emesis (P less than 0.01) compared with thiethylperazine alone. The combination was also preferred by a significantly higher number of the patients (P less than 0.001) who were exposed to both the types of antiemetic treatment under trial. The combination of thiethylperazine plus amitriptyline was shown to have a satisfactory antiemetic activity against vomiting induced by VAC chemotherapy in males; it afforded major protection (two emetic episodes or fewer) in 83% of the cases. Nonetheless, it cannot be considered a satisfactory treatment for the control of vomiting induced by FAC chemotherapy in female patients, only 43% of whom achieved major antiemetic protection.

Results of two controlled studies on antiemetic combination against vomiting induced by 5-fluorouracil.

A group of 132 patients with different disseminated solid tumors entered two consecutive antiemetic trials in which 5-fluorouracil given in a 120-h continuous infusion was the emetogenic stimulus. The purpose of the trials was to investigate the validity of Peroutka and Snyder's hypothesis. These authors suggested that CNS receptors other than the classical dopamine D-2 (e.g., histamine H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic receptors) were involved in emetic response. Hence, a combination of a phenothiazine (an antidopaminergic drug) with an antihistaminic or a tricyclic antidepressant (H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic blockers) was suggested to be possibly superior to phenothiazine alone against antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced vomiting. The first study showed the antiemetic superiority of a phenothiazine (thiethylperazine) over placebo but failed to show a superiority of the combination of thiethylperazine and an antihistaminic (diphenhydramine) over thiethylperazine alone. In contrast, the second study proved the superiority of the combination of thiethylperazine and a tricyclic antidepressant (amitriptyline) over thiethylperazine alone. In conclusion, tricyclic antidepressants - but not antihistaminics - potentiate the antiemetic activity of thiethylperazine against 5-fluorouracil-induced vomiting.

Antiemetic combination for cisplatin-induced emesis. Results from a controlled study.

Thirty-six patients suffering from disseminated epithelial tumors under treatment with Cisplatin alone or in combination with Vindesine entered a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study comparing the antiemetic activity of low-dose IV Metoclopramide (total dose: 0.8 mg/kg) with that of a combination of Metoclopramide (same schedule) plus Nortriptyline (2 X 50 mg PO) plus Thiethylperazine (3 X 10 mg IV). This combination was designed in an attempt to act simultaneously on gastrointestinal motility and neuroreceptors at central emetic pathways (Dopamine D-2, Histamine H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic). The antiemetic combination significantly reduces the median number of emetic episodes (p less than 0.01), the median volume of vomiting (p less than 0.01) and the median time of emesis (p less than 0.01) when compared with Metoclopramide alone and was also preferred by a significant number of patients (p = 0.0001) after passing through both antiemetic treatment arms being compared.

Antiemetic combination for PAC (cisplatin-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy-induced emesis in ovarian cancer.

Twenty-six patients suffering from disseminated epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO stages III and IV) under treatment with Cisplatin (80-100 mg/m2 in 8 hours) in combination on the same day with Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 IV) and Adriamycin (50 mg/m2), a severely emetogenic regimen, entered a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial comparing the antiemetic activity of high-dose IV Metoclopramide (1 mg/kg/dose X 5 doses) with that of a combination of Metoclopramide (same schedule) plus Nortriptyline (50 mg PO X 2 doses) plus Thiethylperazine (10 mg IV X 3 doses). The antiemetic combination was designed in an attempt to act simultaneously on gastrointestinal motility and neuroreceptors at the central emetic pathways (dopamine D-2, histamine H-1 and muscarinic cholinergic). This combination significantly reduced the emesis due to chemotherapy when compared with Metoclopramide alone and was also preferred by a significant number of patients after passing through both the antiemetic arms being compared.

Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with cisplatin, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (PAC).

Forty two ovarian cancer patients with residual disease after the first laparotomy were treated with the combination of cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1), adriamycin (50 mg/m2 i.v. day 2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 i.v. day 2) (PAC). Forty women were considered evaluable for analysis, with an overall response rate (partial, plus complete responses) of 62.5%. Twelve patients (30%) obtained a complete response (histologically confirmed after second look surgery in 6 cases, surgical complete response, residual tumor completely resected in the second look-in 5 cases and maintained complete clinical remission without second look confirmation in 1 case). Main side effects were nausea and vomiting (90%), leukopenia (70%), mucositis (45%), and anemia (37%). Seventeen percent of the patients were free of disease at 60 months, after a median follow-up of 48 months. The prognostic factors that showed significant influence on survival were the Karnofski index (90-100 vs 80 or less), stage of the disease (II + III vs IV) and the volume of residual tumor after the first surgical procedure (less than or equal to 2 cms vs greater than 2 cms). Patients who achieved a complete remission have not reached the median 5 years survival, which was 10 months for the remaining patients. These results confirm the activity of PAC in ovarian cancer, mainly in those patients with residual tumor of less than 2 cms and good performance status.

Clinical guide SEOM on venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common event in cancer patients and one of the major causes of cancer-associated mortality and a leading cause of morbidity. In recent years, the incidence rates of VTE have notably increased; however, VTE is still commonly underestimated by oncologists. VTE is considered an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients in all settings. In 2011 the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) first published a clinical guideline of prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients. In an effort to incorporate evidence obtained since the original publication, SEOM presents an update of the guideline for thrombosis and cancer in order to improve the prevention and management of VTE.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and analysis of Khorana's predictive model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory pancreas cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and analyze Khorana's predictive model of chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. METHODS/PATIENTS: We performed a retrospective review to determine the incidence of VTE in the gastrointestinal cancer unit of our center. Between 2008 and 2011, 84 consecutives patients diagnosed with pancreas adenocarcinoma were identified and included in the analysis. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty patients experienced VTE (35.7 %) and 66 % of the events were diagnosed during the first 6 months after diagnosis. Khorana's score: 33.3 % of the intermediate category patients developed a venous thromboembolic event and 37.5 % in the high-risk category. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of VTE observed in this study is consistent with prior reports. Specific predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis in pancreatic cancer must be investigated.

Laparotomic eventration or colonic prolapse after chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Four cases of patients suffering from abdominal scar injuries (laparotomic eventration and colonic prolapse through the site of previous colostomy) associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced emesis are presented. The hypothesis of emetic strain as the main cause of eventration of prolapse is discussed. The authors suggest the need of a routine prophylactic antiemetic treatment in patients submitted to abdominal surgery and subsequent antineoplastic chemotherapy in order to avoid these accidents.

[Cardiotoxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil. Review of the literature]. / Cardiotoxicidad inducida por 5-fluorouracilo. Revisión de la literatura.

5-fluorouracil is potentially cardiotoxic to man. To date, 47 patients have been reported with undesired heart disorders after the administration of this cytotoxic drug. The incidence of cardiotoxicity due to 5-FU is 1.6%. Angina-type precordial pain with electrocardiographic changes suggesting myocardial ischemia is the common clinical feature. Generally it disappears spontaneously or after the use of coronary vasodilators. Acute left ventricular failure, pericarditis and rythm disorders are not often found. The pathogenesis is unknown however, cardiac spasm as well as the direct or indirect effect of the drug on myocardium, are possible responsible mechanisms.