[Influence of the lockdown due to COVID-19 on weight-loss results during the first year after sleeve gastrectomy]. / Influencia del confinamiento por COVID-19 en los resultados ponderales durante el primer año tras la gastrectomía vertical.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has lead to lockdown of population in many countries. In Spain, the state of alarm was established from March 15 to June 20, 2020. Usually this fact decreased people's mobility and physical activity, in addition to producing or exacerbating psychological disorders. Our aim was to determine the influence that this condition had over the short-term ponderal results of patients undergoing laparoscopic vertical gastrectomy from May 2019 to May 2020. METHODS: Case-control study for comparing the percentage of excess weight lost (%EWL) and the percentage of total weight lost (%TWL) of patients that underwent a VG during the last year, so they were affected by lockdown in April and part of March 2020 (group 1), to the %EWL and %TWL of a control group (group 2), obtained from our previous series. RESULTS: The mean %EWL in group 1 is 47,37 ± 18,59 and in group 2 is 51,13 ± 17,59, being p = 0,438. Meanwhile, the mean %TWL in group 1 is 21,14 ± 8,17 and in group 2 is 24,67 ± 8,01, with p = 0,115. CONCLUSIONS: Population lockdown by COVID-19 did not get worse short-term results of vertical gastrectomy. More studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to draw firm conclusions.

Barrett's esophagus is a controversial condition.

We wish to respond to the comments provided by José Miguel Esteban López-Jamar and Ravishankar Asokkumar (1) about our report in this Journal (2). Some of the comments were perhaps prompted by inadequately explained or understood concepts, since they mention aspects that we never even considered or stated.

Is prophylactic gastrectomy indicated for healthy carriers of CDH1 gene mutations associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer?

INTRODUCTION: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a recently reported hereditary cancer syndrome. Patients with suspected HDGC must be under surveillance via endoscopy and multiple biopsies. As an alternative, some studies suggest prophylactic gastrectomy (PG) for disease carriers. The goal of this article was to report our experience with a CDH1 mutation positive family who underwent PG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: the index case was a 34-year-old female diagnosed with diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma and massive carcinomatosis. There was a family history of gastric adenocarcinoma in seven family members. A genetic study identified the c.1577G>A mutation, in exon 11 of the CDH1 gene via sequencing analysis. RESULTS: this mutation was also present in other six family members, who subsequently underwent prophylactic gastrectomy. The pathology study of resected gastric segments revealed multiple microscopic foci of adenocarcinoma in five of these individuals. These foci were not detected in the multiple endoscopies performed before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: we recommend prophylactic gastrectomy for CDH1 mutation carriers even in the absence of lesions during endoscopic screening.

Communication between the obese patient and bariatric surgeon.

Communication between the bariatric surgeon and the obese patient is very important as it influences the expectations of patients with regard to surgery, aim of the surgery and the understanding of the mechanisms of failure of surgery. Furthermore, the incidence of certain psychopathology in these patients makes it necessary for the surgeon to have the ability to communicate to the patient the need for motivation and the maintenance of healthy life habits. Although the topic is subjective, in this article we review several useful recommendations to optimize communication before and after surgery. Finally, we emphasize the need to create workshops to train the bariatric surgeon in these issues that we consider so important.

Long-term follow-up of malignancy biomarkers in patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing medical or surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare some validated biomarkers of malignancy (Ki-67, p53, and apoptosis) between 2 groups of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) undergoing randomly medical or surgical treatment. BACKGROUND: The treatment of choice to prevent the malignant progression of BE remains controversial. Translational studies using biomarkers associated with the metaplasia-tumor pathway could be useful to provide some information in this regard. METHODS: The study group consisted of 45 patients: 20 under medical treatment with 40 mg/day of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and 25 after Nissen fundoplication (NFP). After a median follow-up of 8 years (range, 5-10 years), the values of Ki-67, p53, and apoptosis were analyzed in all patients before treatment (n = 45) and then 1 year (n = 45), 3 years (n = 45), 5 years (n = 45), and 10 years (n = 25) afterwards in both groups of treatment. These values were also analyzed in 2 subgroups of patients with successful medical and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Both Ki-67 and p53 remained stable after NFP, whereas they increased progressively in patients under PPIs with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Conversely, the apoptotic index increased progressively after NFP and decreased in the patients under PPIs with significant differences at 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. On comparing the subgroups of successful treatment the same differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Barrett's epithelium remains more stable after a long-term follow-up in patients with BE treated surgically than in those under PPIs even in the absence of abnormal rates of acid reflux.

Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) Analysis.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is currently considered the most effective and durable treatment option for morbid obesity. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular technique and may currently be the most frequently practiced surgical operation to treat obesity. However, no objective analyses of its learning curve have been reported. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the learning curve for LSG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all LSGs performed in our hospital (University Hospital, Spain; Public Practice) from April 2013 to February 2016. The learning curve for LSG was evaluated using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. All variables among the learning curve phases were compared. RESULTS: According to the CUSUM analysis, the learning curve was divided into three unique phases: early learning (the initial 26 patients), acquisition of skills (the middle 30 patients), and mastery of technique (the final 56 patients). The operative time and gastric stenosis significantly decreased with progression of the learning curve without differences in the 30-day postoperative complication rate, postoperative stay, or weight loss. CONCLUSION: According to this study, the learning curve for LSG can be divided into 3 distinct phases, and about 25 patients are needed to demonstrate an improvement in surgical skill.

[Evaluation of the aesthetic results perceived by patients after 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy]. / Valoración del resultado estético percibido por los pacientes apendicectomizados vía laparoscópica mediante tres incisiones.

INTRODUCTION: The aesthetic result has lately been used in General Surgery as an argument for the development of new approaches. On numerous occasions attempts have been made to evaluate the perception that the patients themselves have after their operation by whatever approach, with the aim of finding where we differ and if there is a real option for improvement. The objective of this study was to analyse, using a simple questionnaire, the assessment of the aesthetic results as perceived by patients after appendectomy, and to attempt to determine what are the variables involved in an aspect so subjective as this. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The variables collected were: age, sex, time since operation, infection of surgical wound, and presence of a drainage, as well as the responses on the aesthetic result of 70 patients who had a 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: Infection of the surgical wound, as well as the age of the patients and the time since the operation determined statistically significant differences in their opinions as regards the number, size and overall aesthetic result of the laparoscopic appendectomy. The median overall satisfaction of the aesthetic result was 9 on a scale from 0 to 10. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the aesthetic result by patients after a 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy is good and is difficult to improve. It is recommended to prevent infection of the three ports after the intervention to obtain better results.

Influence of the lockdown due to COVID-19 on weight-loss results during the first year after sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has lead to lockdown of population in many countries. In Spain, the state of alarm was established from March 15 to June 20, 2020. Usually this fact decreased people's mobility and physical activity, in addition to producing or exacerbating psychological disorders. Our aim was to determine the influence that this condition had over the short-term ponderal results of patients undergoing laparoscopic vertical gastrectomy from May 2019 to May 2020. METHODS: Case-control study for comparing the percentage of excess weight lost (%EWL) and the percentage of total weight lost (%TWL) of patients that underwent a VG during the last year, so they were affected by lockdown in April and part of March 2020 (group 1), to the %EWL and %TWL of a control group (group 2), obtained from our previous series. RESULTS: The mean %EWL in group 1 is 47.37±18.59 and in group 2 is 51.13±17.59, being P=.438. Meanwhile, the mean %TWL in group 1 is 21.14±8.17 and in group 2 is 24.67±8.01, with P=.115. CONCLUSIONS: Population lockdown by COVID-19 did not get worse short-term results of vertical gastrectomy. More studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to draw firm conclusions.

High risk of malignancy in familial Barrett's esophagus: presentation of one family.

Barrett's esophagus is an acquired condition fundamentally related to the presence of severe and prolonged pathologic acid and biliary gastro-esophageal reflux. However, genetic factors may also play a role in some cases. The aim of this study is to present 3 generations of a Spanish family with the largest number of members so far reported with Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Of the 24 members of this family studied over 3 generations, 6 patients developed esophageal adenocarcinoma, 4 Barrett's esophagus, 6 clinical symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without Barrett's esophagus, and 8 were asymptomatic. In conclusion, patients with familial Barrett's esophagus get the disease more severely with a high rate of malignancy and, therefore, the endoscopic surveillance should be closer than in cases of nonfamilial Barrett's esophagus.

[Epiphrenic diverticula: when and how to operate?]. / Divertículos epifrénicos: ¿cuándo y cómo operar?

The majority of epiphrenic diverticula arise due to a peristaltic mechanism caused by an oesophageal motor disturbance that establishes a barrier effect and causes mucosal and submucosal herniation through a weak point in the muscular layer. Intraluminal oesophageal manometry and video-radiology are important in assessing these patients, since they define the characteristics of the functional disorder, as well as the true relationship between the symptoms of the patient and the diverticulum. Surgical treatment is indicated in symptomatic patients, more so if there are respiratory complications. Left posterolateral thoracotomy followed by diverticulotomy, oesophageal cardiomyotomy and anti-reflux have been considered the surgery technique of choice. Oesophageal myotomy must go beyond, in a proximal direction, the neck of the diverticulum, and, in a distal direction, must progress 1-2 cm into the gastric wall. The laparoscopic approach has won many followers since it has been shown to be both safe and effective as open surgery, adding to the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

[Outpatient monitoring of oesophageal pH with a catheter-free pH-meter (Bravo System). A Study of tolerance, safety and efficacy]. / Monitorización ambulatoria del pH esofágico con pH-metría sin sonda (sistema Bravo(R)). Estudio de tolerancia, seguridad y eficacia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A new catheter-free outpatient oesophageal pH-meter system (Bravo) has recently been developed. The objective of this study is to test the tolerance, safety and efficacy of the system in the measurement of gastric-oesophageal reflux by comparing it with a conventional pH system. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study was performed on a control group consisting of 10 healthy volunteers (group 1) and in a group of 40 patients with symptoms of gastric-oesophageal reflux disease (groups 2 and 3). An upper digestive system endoscopy, oesophageal manometry and oesophageal pH measurements with a conventional system and/or with the Bravo catheter-free system, was performed on all patients. All patients who had both tests done (groups 1 and 2) filled in a questionnaire on any physical problems and changes in their daily activity. RESULTS: The test tolerance was higher with the Bravo system in the 9 parameters studied. In the group of healthy volunteers (group 1), the median (range) of the total percentage of pH < 4 was 1.1% (0.5-3.1) with the conventional pH and 1.7% (0-3.4) with the Bravo. When comparing the patients with symptoms of gastric-oesophageal reflux disease (group 2) with those who had only one type of pH measurement made, the acid reflux was significantly higher in patients with Barrett's oesophagus than in the rest of the groups, with conventional pH as well as with the Bravo. If we analyse the patient group with disease due to gastric-oesophageal reflux with those on whom both techniques were used (group 3), 7 of the 10 patients had a pathological reflux that only showed up on measuring pH with the Bravo system. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-free pH measurements (Bravo) is better tolerated and with better satisfaction for the healthy volunteers and patients than with conventional PH, even, on occasions being more efficient for studying acid reflux due to the lower incidence of negative results.

[Surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus]. / Tratamiento quirúrgico de la displasia de alto grado en el esófago de Barrett.

INTRODUCTION: Barrett's esophagus undergoes malignant transformation in 0.5-1% of patients per year following the sequence of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to present our experience in the surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Of a group of 128 patients with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus, 8 (6.2%) developed high-grade dysplasia during a median follow-up of 7 years (2-25). A further 5 patients with high-grade dysplaing out side the study were referred for evaluation and surgical treatment. Eight patients were under medical treatment with omeprazole (40 mg daily) while the remaining 5 patients had undergone open Nissen fundoplication, with a diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia at a median of 5 years (1-16) after treatment initiation. After confirmation of the diagnosis by a second pathologist and tumoral staging, transthoracic esophagectomy with anastomosis at the apex of the thorax was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was nil. Morbidity was 36% (5 patients). Definitive histological analysis of the surgical specimen revealed high-grade dysplasia in 7 patients (54%) and adenocarcinoma in 6 (46%). All patients remain alive after a median follow-up of 4.7 years (1-14). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, the best therapeutic option is surgical resection, which can be performed with nil mortality in experienced centers. In almost half of surgical patients, the surgical specimen shows adenocarcinoma. Five-year survival is higher than 90%.

Standard antireflux operations in patients who have Barrett's esophagus. Current results.

Several therapeutic options exist for patients who have BE, and treatment should be individualized (Fig. 1). The best option in patients who have a high surgical risk or who reject surgery is lifelong conservative treatment, adjusting the PPI dosage with pH-metric controls. In patients who have a low surgical risk the best option is Nissen fundoplication. Only in cases in which esophageal shortening prevents a tension-free fundoplication from being done is a Collis gastroplasty associated with a fundoplication indicated. Other options may be indicated only in exceptional circumstances: (a) duodenal switch, when, after multiple failures with previous surgery, the approach to the esophagogastric junction is extremely difficult; and (b) esophageal resection, when there is a nondilatable esophageal stenosis and in cases in which the histologic study reveals the presence of high-grade dysplasia. Whatever treatment is used, an endoscopic surveillance program is mandatory, since, with the exception of total esophagectomy, no therapeutic option completely eliminates the risk for progression to adenocarcinoma.

Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of medical treatment and antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of choice in BE is still controversial. Some clinical studies suggest that surgery could be more effective than medical treatment in preventing BE from progressing to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. However, data from prospective comparative studies are necessary to answer this question. METHODS: One hundred one patients were included in a randomized prospective study, 43 with medical treatment and 58 with antireflux surgery. All patients underwent clinical, endoscopic, and histologic assessment. Functional studies were performed in all the operated patients and in a subgroup of patients receiving medical treatment. The median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-18) in the medical treatment group and 6 years (range 1-18) in the surgical treatment group. RESULTS: Satisfactory clinical results (excellent to good) were achieved in 39 of the 43 patients (91%) undergoing medical treatment and in 53 of the 58 patients (91%) following antireflux surgery. The persistence of added inflammatory lesions was significantly higher in the medical treatment group. The metaplastic segment did not disappear in any case. Postoperative functional studies showed a significant decrease in the median percentage of total time with pH below 4, although 9 of the 58 patients (15%) showed pathologic rates of acid reflux. High-grade dysplasia appeared in 2 of the 43 patients (5%) in the medical treatment group and in 2 of the 58 patients (3%) in the surgical treatment group. In the latter, both patients presented with clinical and pH-metric recurrence. There was no case of malignancy after successful antireflux surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that there are no differences between the two types of treatment with respect to preventing BE from progressing to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. However, successful antireflux surgery proved to be more efficient than medical treatment in this sense, perhaps because it completely controls acid and biliopancreatic reflux to the esophagus.

Barrett's esophagus without esophageal stricture does not increase the rate of failure of Nissen fundoplication.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the presence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) modifies the results of Nissen fundoplication. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Some authors consider that BE, whether or not there is associated stricture, significantly increases the failure rate of standard antireflux surgery; they recommend using different and more aggressive surgical procedures in all patients with BE. METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, without esophageal stricture, were included in a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: those with BE (n = 57) and those without BE (n = 120). Nissen fundoplication was performed in all patients by the same surgical team. Clinical, endoscopic, and functional (manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring) results in the two study groups were compared. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5 years (range 1-18) in the BE group and 6 years (range 1-18) in the non-BE group, the rate of clinical recurrence was 8% in the BE group and 10% in the non-BE group, with no statistically significant difference. The rate of pH-metric recurrence was the same in both groups (15%). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BE without esophageal stricture does not increase the rate of failure of Nissen fundoplication.