Conceptualising interventions to enhance spread in complex systems: a multisite comprehensive medication review case study.

BACKGROUND: Advancing the description and conceptualisation of interventions in complex systems is necessary to support spread, evaluation, attribution and reproducibility. Improvement teams can provide unique insight into how interventions are operationalised in practice. Capturing this 'insider knowledge' has the potential to enhance intervention descriptions. OBJECTIVES: This exploratory study investigated the spread of a comprehensive medication review (CMR) intervention to (1) describe the work required from the improvement team perspective, (2) identify what stays the same and what changes between the different sites and why, and (3) critically appraise the 'hard core' and 'soft periphery' (HC/SP) construct as a way of conceptualising interventions. DESIGN: A prospective case study of a CMR initiative across five sites. Data collection included: observations, document analysis and semistructured interviews. A facilitated workshop triangulated findings and measured perceived effort invested in activities. A qualitative database was developed to conduct thematic analysis. RESULTS: Sites identified 16 intervention components. All were considered essential due to their interdependency. The function of components remained the same, but adaptations were made between and within sites. Components were categorised under four 'spheres of operation': Accessibility of evidence base; Process of enactment; Dependent processes and Dependent sociocultural issues. Participants reported most effort was invested on 'dependent sociocultural issues'. None of the existing HC/SP definitions fit well with the empirical data, with inconsistent classifications of components as HC or SP. CONCLUSIONS: This study advances the conceptualisation of interventions by explicitly considering how evidence-based practices are operationalised in complex systems. We propose a new conceptualisation of 'interventions-in-systems' which describes intervention components in relation to their: proximity to the evidence base; component interdependence; component function; component adaptation and effort.

Phone calls to a hospital medicines information helpline: analysis of queries from members of the public and assessment of potential for harm from their medicines.

OBJECTIVE: To find out what questions the public ask of pharmacists on a hospital medicines information helpline, and to assess the potential for improving individuals' management of medicines through telephone helpline support. METHODS: We analysed consecutive phone calls made by members of the public over 6 months to a hospital pharmacy medicines information helpline. Calls were coded for type of medicine, reason for phoning and any error revealed in the call. We also looked at which medicines were associated with harm and/or potential for harm had the caller not enquired about appropriate action to take. KEY FINDINGS: Five hundred of the 923 consecutive calls to the helpline were from members of the public (including discharged hospital patients). Antimicrobial agents, analgesics and cardiovascular medicines accounted for approximately half of all calls. The reason for phoning was most often to ask about interactions (22%), directions for use (21%) or advice on adverse effects (15%). In a third of calls it is possible an error had occurred (including patient error and directions missing from a dispensed item). Forty-eight per cent of calls were concerned with harm or judged to have potential for harm had professional information not been available. Four of these cases (0.8%), one of which was patient error and three of which were adverse effects reported by the caller, were categorised as Harm Index category F, defined as requiring intervention and referral. CONCLUSIONS: Our medicines information helpline appears to be a valuable resource for discharged patients and public and the advice given may be expected to improve safety with medicines and reduce harm. Our results reveal gaps in patient education about their medicines, some of which could be addressed by dispensing staff or the pharmacist at discharge. The data provide a baseline for measuring improvements in medicines management and will be useful in identifying patients who may benefit from follow-up call support from pharmacists.

Improving Pharmacists' Targeting of Patients for Medication Review and Deprescription.

Background: In an acute hospital setting, a multi-disciplinary approach to medication review can improve prescribing and medicine selection in patients with frailty. There is a need for a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists to ensure that interventions have the greatest impact on patient care. Aim: To use a consensus building process to produce guidance for pharmacists to support the identification of patients at risk from their medicines, and to articulate expected actions and escalation processes. Methods: A literature search was conducted and evidence used to establish a set of ten scenarios often encountered in hospitalised patients, with six or more possible actions. Four consultant physicians and four senior pharmacists ranked their levels of agreement with the listed actions. The process was redrafted and repeated until consensus was reached and interventions were defined. Outcome: Generalised guidance for reviewing older adults' medicines was developed, alongside escalation processes that should be followed in a specific set of clinical situations. The panel agreed that both pharmacists and physicians have an active role to play in medication review, and face-to-face communication is always preferable to facilitate informed decision making. Only prescribers should deprescribe, however pharmacists who are not also trained as prescribers may temporarily "hold" medications in the best interests of the patient with appropriate documentation and a follow up discussion with the prescribing team. The consensus was that a combination of age, problematic polypharmacy, and the presence of medication-related problems, were the most important factors in the identification of patients who would benefit most from a comprehensive medication review. Conclusions: Guidance on the identification of patients on inappropriate medicines, and subsequent pharmacist-led intervention to prompt and promote deprescribing, has been developed for implementation in an acute hospital.

Deprescribing medicines in the acute setting to reduce the risk of falls.

BACKGROUND: Falls are a common cause of morbidity and hospitalisation in older people. Inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy contribute to falls risk in elderly patients. This study's aim was to quantify the problem and find out if medication review in the hospital setting led to deprescribing of medicines associated with falls risk. METHODS: Admissions records for elderly patients were examined to identify those whose presenting complaint included a fall. Inpatient medication charts, pharmaceutical care notes, medical notes and discharge summaries were examined to identify any falls-risk medicines from admission histories and to determine if any medication review took place, and whether or not changes were made as a result. In particular deprescribing and dose reduction details were analysed. RESULTS: 100 patients over 70 years old were admitted following a fall during the 2 months study period. The mean number of medicines on admission was 6.8 per patient with polypharmacy found in 62/100 (62%). One or more falls-risk medicine was found in 65/100 (65%) patients. Medicines review was carried out in 86/100 (86%) of patients, and 59/697 (8.5%) medicines were deprescribed. Pharmacist involvement in medication review led to a significant reduction in the number of falls-risk medicines per patient (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy are found frequently in elderly patients at admission following a fall. Comprehensive medicines reviews should be carried out in all such patients with the objective of deprescribing or reducing doses to minimise risk of harm. Involvement of a pharmacist improves the rate of reduction of falls-risk medicines.

Applying quality improvement methods to address gaps in medicines reconciliation at transfers of care from an acute UK hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Reliable reconciliation of medicines at admission and discharge from hospital is key to reducing unintentional prescribing discrepancies at transitions of healthcare. We introduced a team approach to the reconciliation process at an acute hospital with the aim of improving the provision of information and documentation of reliable medication lists to enable clear, timely communications on discharge. SETTING: An acute 400-bedded teaching hospital in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: The effects of change were measured in a simple random sample of 10 adult patients a week on the acute admissions unit over 18 months. INTERVENTIONS: Quality improvement methods were used throughout. Interventions included education and training of staff involved at ward level and in the pharmacy department, introduction of medication documentation templates for electronic prescribing and for communicating information on medicines in discharge summaries co-designed with patient representatives. RESULTS: Statistical process control analysis showed reliable documentation (complete, verified and intentional changes clarified) of current medication on 49.2% of patients' discharge summaries. This appears to have improved (to 85.2%) according to a poststudy audit the year after the project end. Pharmacist involvement in discharge reconciliation increased significantly, and improvements in the numbers of medicines prescribed in error, or omitted from the discharge prescription, are demonstrated. Variation in weekly measures is seen throughout but particularly at periods of changeover of new doctors and introduction of new systems. CONCLUSIONS: New processes led to a sustained increase in reconciled medications and, thereby, an improvement in the number of patients discharged from hospital with unintentional discrepancies (errors or omissions) on their discharge prescription. The initiatives were pharmacist-led but involved close working and shared understanding about roles and responsibilities between doctors, nurses, therapists, patients and their carers.

Antiretroviral treatment regimens and immune parameters in the prevention of systemic AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Immunosuppression induced by HIV-1 increases the risk of developing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We measured the influence of immunologic factors and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on this risk. As there are no data demonstrating that specific antiretroviral regimens are effective at protecting from NHL, we compared different HAART regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The protective effect of HAART regimens, containing protease inhibitors (PI) and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) on the development of NHL was examined in a prospectively recorded cohort of 9,621 HIV-infected individuals. Lymphocyte and natural killer subset data were also entered in univariate and multivariate analyses to establish and stratify the risk of NHL. RESULTS: From this cohort of 9,621 patients, 102 have been diagnosed with systemic AIDS-related NHL since 1996, when HAART became freely available here. By univariate analysis, increased age, higher nadir CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, CD19 B-cell count, CD16/56 natural killer count and exposure to NNRTI or PI containing HAART conferred significant protection against NHL (P <.05). In a multivariate analysis, age, nadir CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, and exposure to HAART were independent predictors of risk of NHL (P <.02). NNRTI-based HAART (adjusted rate ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.5) was as protective as PI-based HAART, and these were significantly more protective than nucleoside analogues alone (rate ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.7) or no antiretrovirals (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Effective HAART-induced maintenance of CD4 and CD8 counts protects from systemic AIDS-related NHL.

A pilot survey of junior doctors' attitudes and awareness around medication review: time to change our educational approach?

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to explore junior doctors' attitudes and awareness around concepts related to medication review, in order to find ways to change the culture for reviewing, altering and stopping inappropriate or unnecessary medicines. Having already demonstrated the value of team working with senior doctors and pharmacists and the use of a medication review tool, we are now looking to engage first year clinicians and undergraduates in the process. METHOD: An online survey about medication review was distributed among all 42 foundation year one (FY1) doctors at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in November 2014. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty doctors completed the survey (48%). Of those, 17 believed that it was the pharmacist's duty to review medicines; and 15 of 20 stated the general practitioner (GP). Sixteen of 20 stated that they would consult a senior doctor first before stopping medication. Eighteen of 20 considered the GP and consultant to be responsible for alterations, rather than themselves. Sixteen of 20 respondents were not aware of the availability of a medication review tool. Seventeen of 20 felt that more support from senior staff would help them become involved with medication review. CONCLUSIONS: Junior doctors report feeling uncomfortable altering mediations without consulting a senior first. They appear to be building confidence with prescribing in their first year but not about the medication review process or questioning the drugs already prescribed. Consideration should be given to what we have termed a 'bottom-up' educational approach to provide early experience of and change the culture around medication review, to include the education of undergraduate and foundation doctors and pharmacists.

The evidence-based treatment of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

As we enter the third decade of the AIDS epidemic, it is apparent that a large number of cancers are more common in people with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV). Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains the second most common tumour in such patients. At the onset of the epidemic, dose-intense combination regimens were used but these were quickly abandoned in favour of dose-modified strategies because of difficulties in tolerating aggressive chemotherapy in the presence of underlying immunosuppression. With the improvements in supportive care including more effective anti-retroviral therapies, colony-stimulating factors and prophylaxis against opportunistic infections, we are returning to the traditional chemotherapeutic approaches similar to those utilised in the non-HIV infected individual including infusional regimens. In this review, we discuss the evidence for choosing particular therapies in patients with AIDS-related NHL.

Failure to gain weight on long-term parenteral nutrition attributed to tri-iodothyronine thyrotoxicosis.

We describe the case of a 49-y-old female patient on long-term parenteral nutrition after abdominal surgery who failed to gain weight despite nutritional provision in excess of theoretical requirements. On investigation, she was found to have a negative nitrogen balance (-5.9 g) and to have a tri-iodothyronine thyrotoxicosis but without many of the typical clinical features of hyperthyroidism. The patient also had mild hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, which resolved fully after mobilization and treatment of the thyrotoxicosis. A derangement of the liver function tests was observed, which worsened progressively during parenteral nutrition but resolved promptly at its discontinuation. This case illustrates the importance of carrying out appropriate investigations including all thyroid function tests on patients who fail to gain weight on nutritional support.

Vitamin A deficiency presenting as night blindness during pregnancy.

We describe a patient with a 6-year history of pancreatic malabsorption following surgical subtotal pancreatectomy. She presented at 33 weeks of pregnancy with night blindness as a result of vitamin A deficiency. She had had two successful pregnancies 9 and 8 years previously, giving birth to a healthy baby boy on each occasion. We suggest that patients with long-term malabsorption due to intestinal or pancreatic disease should have vitamin A status checked prior to and during pregnancy so that prompt supplementation can be commenced if necessary. The possibility that vitamin A deficiency may be contributing to anaemia present in pregnancy should also be considered.

Evaluation of My Medication Passport: a patient-completed aide-memoire designed by patients, for patients, to help towards medicines optimisation.

OBJECTIVES: A passport-sized booklet, designed by patients for patients to record details about their medicines, has been developed as part of a wider project focusing on improving prescribing in the elderly ('ImPE'). We undertook an evaluation of 'My Medication Passport' to gain an understanding of its value to patients and how it may be used in communications about medicines. SETTING: The Passport was launched in secondary care with the initial users being older people discharged home after an admission to one of the four North West London participating Trusts. The uptake subsequently spread to other (community) locations and other age groups. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited more than 200 patients from a cohort who had been given a passport as part of the improvement projects at one of four sites. Of them, 63% (133) completed the structured telephone questionnaire including 27% for whom English was not their first language. Approximately half of the respondents were male and 40% were over 70 years of age. RESULTS: More than half of the respondents had found their medication passport useful or helpful in some way; 42% through sharing details from it with others (most frequently family, carer or doctor) or using it as a platform for conversations with healthcare professionals. One-third of those questioned carried the passport with them at all times. CONCLUSIONS: My Medication Passport has been positively evaluated; we have a better understanding of how it is used by patients, what they are recording and how it can be an aid to dialogue about medicines with family, carers and healthcare professionals. Further development and spread is underway including an App for smartphones that will be subject to wider evaluation to include feedback from clinicians.

Factors contributing to the development of hypophosphataemia when refeeding using parenteral nutrition.

AIM: To identify individual attributes or risk factors which predispose to the development of refeeding hypophosphataemia in patients on parenteral nutrition (PN). SETTING: The Royal Surrey County Hospital (RSCH) a 530 bed, non-teaching Trust with a cancer centre, medical and surgical inpatients and intensive care unit (ICU). Subjects were recruited prospectively from all adult inpatients referred for initiation of PN. METHOD: Seventy patients (cases) with refeeding hypophosphataemia were matched with controls who had not experienced a fall in phosphate levels when commenced on PN. Their nutritional requirements, nutrition intake, and biochemical test results were compared and statistical analyses performed to show if any differences between cases and controls were due to chance. RESULTS: Independent risk factors for developing refeeding hypophosphataemia were: significant malnutrition measured as a Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) score of three or more; less than 12 mmols total phosphate in the first day's PN regimen; and an initial rate of infusion of PN of more than 70% of calculated requirements. In addition increasing amounts of non-lipid phosphate in the first day's PN regimen were found to be protective. Hypomagnesaemia prior to starting PN was non-significantly associated with refeeding hypophosphataemia. Other biochemical markers included in the study: albumin, calcium, C-reactive protein, glucose and urea, did not show an association. ICU, cancer and postoperative patients were not found to be more at risk. CONCLUSION: Patients with a high NRS score prior to commencing nutrition support may be more at risk than others of refeeding hypophosphataemia. The first 24 h PN regimen should be run slowly providing less than 70% of calculated protein and calorie requirements but containing more than 12 mmol phosphate.

Host pharmacogenetics in the treatment of HIV and cancer.

Physicians prescribing drugs are routinely confronted with the balance between efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenetics involves the study of how inheritance influences response to drugs, and its goal is to enable the appropriate selection of these individuals, thus eliminating unpredictable responses. Pharmacogenetics can be used to identify target populations that either will have minimal benefit or a better outcome including better survival or improvement in surrogate end points. As we move towards common use of targeted therapies, the future of medicine will involve an examination of the interplay between multiple genetic factors, as the response to drugs is likely to be complex and polyfactorial especially in chronic diseases. There has already been some success in situations where single genes play a large role in the overall drug response, and this is discussed with reference to commonly used cytotoxics and anti-retrovirals, encompassing the major principles of pharmacogenetics.