Tighter is better: Can a simple and cost-free parameter predict response to cardiac synchronization therapy?

BACKGROUND: Several studies have evaluated the role of QRS duration (QRSd) or QRS narrowing as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to reduce nonresponders. AIM: Our study aimed to determine the correlation between the relative change in QRS index (QI) compared to clinical outcome and prognosis in patients who underwent CRT implantation. METHODS: A three-centers study involving 398 patients with a CRT device was conducted. Clinical, echocardiographic and pharmacological variables, QRSd before and after CRT implantation and QI were measured. RESULTS: In a 6-month follow-up, a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV) were observed. QI was related to reverse remodeling (multiple r-squared: 0.48, adjusted r-squared: 0.43, p = .001), and the cut-off value that best predicted LV reverse remodeling after 6 months of CRT was 12.25% (AUC 0.7, p = .001). At 24 months, a statistically significant difference was found between patients with a QI ≤ 12.25% and those with a QI > 12.25% regarding NYHA class worsening (p = .04). The mean of the QI of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was lower than patients who died of other causes (p = .0179). A correlation between pre-CRT QRSd/LVEDV and QI was observed (r = + 0.20; p = .0003). A higher QRSd/LVEDV ratio was associated with an improved LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV (p < .0001) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: QI narrowing after CRT was related to greater echocardiographic reverse remodeling and a lower rate of adverse events (death or cardiovascular hospitalizations). The QI can improve the prediction of adverse events in a population with CRT regardless of comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index. QI could be used to predict CRT response.

[New frontiers in pacing: from myocardial pacing to conduction system pacing]. / Nuove frontiere dell'elettrostimolazione: dal pacing del miocardio comune al pacing del sistema di conduzione.

For many years, cardiac pacing has been based on the stimulation of right ventricular common myocardium to correct diseases of the conduction system. The birth and the development of cardiac resynchronization have led to growing interest in the correction and prevention of pacing-induced dyssynchrony. Many observational studies and some randomized clinical trials have shown that conduction system pacing (CSP) can not only prevent pacing-induced dyssynchrony but can also correct proximal conduction system blocks, with reduction of QRS duration and with equal or greater effectiveness than biventricular pacing. Based on these results, many Italian electrophysiologists have changed the stimulation target from the right ventricular common myocardium to CSP. The two techniques with greater clinical impact are the His bundle stimulation and the left bundle branch pacing. The latter, in particular, because of its easier implantation technique and better electric parameters, is spreading like wildfire and is representing a real revolution in the cardiac pacing field. However, despite the growing amount of data, until now, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines give a very limited role to CSP.