Combined Gait and Grasping in Autistic and Non-Autistic Youths.

This study was designed to extend research on motor skill development in autism spectrum disorder using a dual-task skill. Nine autistic and 18 non-autistic youths walked without grasping or while reaching to grasp a small or large object. Step extremity ratio, percent time in double support, and normalized speed were quantified. We hypothesized that gait would differ between autistic and non-autistic youth and that differences would be moderated by the phase (approach and grasp) and the complexity of the task (walking and grasping versus walking alone). Although gait parameters were similar during the walking-only trials, the combined task resulted in slower speed and shorter steps in autistic youth, particularly during the grasp phase. These findings, while in a small sample, offer preliminary evidence that autistic youth who show typical gait during simple assessments of motor ability may have difficulties in more complex tasks that require the coordination of movements.

Coordination and concurrency in bimanual rotation tasks when moving away from and toward the body.

In the present series of experiments we investigated how object transport and rotate movements are performed when they are directed away from (Experiment 1) and toward (Experiment 2) the body under both unimanual and bimanual conditions. Our results indicated that unimanual conditions are faster and more efficiently produced than bimanual movements in far peripersonal space, suggesting that there is a cost to performing bimanual movements. However, in near peripersonal space, bimanual same movements were performed in a manner similar to unimanual movements, indicating that there is no significant cost associated with similar bimanual movements that are performed using the lower visual field and in near peripersonal space. Both experiments also indicate that the two hands are tightly synchronized when the two movements being performed require the same rotation. However, when performing bimanual movements where the rotation being performed by the two hands is different, this synchronization is weaker. Finally, the combined results from the two experiments indicated that movements made toward the body are not performed in a similar manner to movements that are made away from the body. Specifically, it is clear from the current studies that movements toward the body are performed faster and possibly that the hands are less synchronized for bimanual movements requiring different rotations by the two hands.

Planning for the future: the implementation of an automated clinical system.

Preparing for automation is as important to the whole automation process as choosing the correct system. Planning should start some time before actual purchase. Once the strategic planning is complete, staff can begin researching what applications are available, what they do, what vendors are reputable, etc. Then the agency can begin the actual implementation.

Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension.

The goal of the present study was to understand which characteristics (movement time or velocity) of target motion are important in the control and coordination of the transport and grasp-preshape components of prehensile movements during an interception task. Subjects were required to reach toward, grasp and lift an object as it entered a target area. Targets approached along a track at four velocities (500, 750, 1000 and 1250 mm/s) which were presented in two conditions. In the distance-controlled condition, targets moving at all velocities traveled the same distance. In the viewing-time-controlled condition, combinations of velocity and starting distances were performed such that the moving target was visible for 1000 ms for all trials. Analyses of kinematic data revealed that when, target distance was controlled, velocity affected all transport-dependent measures; however, when viewing time was controlled, these dependent measures were no longer affected by target velocity. Thus, the use of velocity information was limited in the viewing-time-controlled condition, and subjects used other information, such as target movement time, when generating the transport component of the prehensile movement. For the grasp-preshape component, both peak aperture and peak-aperture velocity increased as target velocity increased, regardless of condition, indicating that target velocity was used to control the spatial aspects of aperture formation. However, the timing of peak aperture was affected by target velocity in the distance-controlled condition, but not in the viewing-time-controlled condition. These results provide evidence for the autonomous generation of the spatial and temporal aspects of grasp preshape. Thus, an independence between the transport and grasp-preshape phases was found, whereby the use of target velocity as a source of information for generating the transport component was limited; however, target velocity was an important source of information in the grasp-preshape phase.