Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 75: 213-220, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272712

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In pediatric healthcare, patient satisfaction queries exclude children and solicit quantitative ratings from caregivers. We sought satisfaction perspectives from hospitalized children 7 to 17 years and their caregivers by qualitatively analyzing interview responses. DESIGN AND METHODS: English and Spanish-speaking children and their parents on five inpatient units completed two open-ended questions about their satisfaction at hospital discharge (T1, face to face) and 7 to 10 days later (T2, telephone). The questions asked about what was good and what could be better at the hospital. Responses were analyzed using descriptive semantic content analysis and consensus coding methods. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 11.9 years (SD = 3.17); 51% were male. At T1, 362 patients offered 833 responses; 600 parents offered 1496 responses. At T2, 252 patients offered 552 responses; 488 parents offered 1290 responses. At T1 and T2, the most frequent patient response to what was good was 'Staff took good care of me' and for caregivers was 'Staff behaving professionally'. At T1, the most frequent patient response about what could be better was 'more activities for kids', and at T2, 'Nothing' and 'More food options and better food quality'; for caregivers at T1, 'Nothing' and 'Not liking the physical space', and at T2, 'Nothing', and 'More communication and professionalism from hospital staff'. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients and their caregivers are willing and able to offer perspectives about satisfaction with care, and suggestions for improvement before discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pediatric patients and their caregivers' perspectives about care yield actionable recommendations for hospital systems.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Pacientes Internados , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitalização , Alta do Paciente , Criança Hospitalizada
2.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 50: 113-120, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812854

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction is a quality improvement indicator used to evaluate care. Ratings of patient satisfaction in pediatrics exclude the child voice. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a new model that included both child and parent satisfaction ratings. DESIGN AND METHODS: We executed a randomized, two-arm, unblinded cohort study comparing child (aged 7-17 years) and parent reports (Arm 1) to parent report only (Arm 2) among a convenience sample of inpatients at a single urban pediatric medical center. The primary (feasibility and acceptability) and secondary outcomes were assessed at the time of discharge (T1) and approximately 10 days following discharge (T2) (standard timing). RESULTS: Of 672 screened families, 89.3% (n = 600) enrolled in the study; 362 children and parents were randomized to Arm 1 and 238 parents to Arm 2. Patients (98.6%) and parents (99.8%) indicated preference for providing satisfaction ratings at the time of discharge. Seventy-five percent of families (n = 488) completed T1 and T2; neither child nor parent ratings differed significantly between T1 and T2 nor did parent ratings differ between the two study arms. Nurse friendliness, courtesy, and feeling well cared for were among the highest rated items at T1 and T2 by both children and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Children 7 to 17 years of age and their parents are willing and like to provide satisfaction with care ratings prior to hospital discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This measurement model could yield valid findings representative of hospitalized children and their parents, and could become the basis for a new and needed measurement approach for pediatric satisfaction with hospital care.


Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Workplace Health Saf ; 71(7): 347-351, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36708014

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nurses who work at night have used naps to alleviate their sleepiness and fatigue. Research has shown night shifts, sleepiness, and fatigue predict nurses' missed workdays. Thus, nighttime napping may have a beneficial consequence of reducing nurses' sickness absences. The purpose of this brief report was to describe the difference in rates of short-term sickness absence before and after implementation of a 30-min nap opportunity in one U.S. hospital for 12-hr shift nurses. METHODS: The study was a retrospective pre-post evaluation design. Eight units provided nap opportunities for the nurses. Full-time nurses were classified into night and rotating shifts based on their 2 years of scheduling patterns. Absence data were extracted from the hospital's timekeeping system and annual absence rates were computed. A single linear mixed model with rank transformed data was conducted for each group. Median estimates, minimum and maximum, and p-values were reported. FINDINGS: The median absence rates for night shift nurses were 4.3% and 4.0% for the pre-napping and post-napping implementation periods, respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = .241). The median absence rates for rotating shift nurses were 2.0% and 3.9% for the pre-napping and post-napping implementation periods, respectively; and the difference increase was statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: A nap policy which provides nurses with the opportunity to take nighttime naps did not benefit their sickness absence rates. Future research needs to examine the actual napping process on sickness absences, as well as explore other sickness management avenues.


Assuntos
Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Sono , Humanos , Sonolência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tolerância ao Trabalho Programado , Fadiga/prevenção & controle
4.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(2): e382, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571519

RESUMO

Introduction: Patient satisfaction ratings differ between minority and nonminority respondents in studies of hospitalized adults, but little is known about such differences in pediatrics. Our goal was to determine if patient satisfaction ratings completed by hospitalized children and their parents at the point of discharge differed by race/ethnicity, language, child gender, and age. Methods: We used a mixed-methods design. English and Spanish-speaking families from 5 inpatient units at 1 pediatric hospital completed ratings, face-to-face, before scheduled hospital discharge (T1), and again by telephone after discharge (T2). Participating children and their parents completed an 8-item satisfaction survey, and parents additionally completed 7 discharge readiness items. Results: The refusal rate was 10.7%, with 600 families enrolled; non-white families represented 66% of both study refusals and completions. The proportion of racial/ethnic groups in our study exceeded those in our standard survey sample. There were no significant differences in satisfaction ratings between non-white and white families or by child gender, age, or language. Conclusions: The lack of rating differences by demographic characteristics, the low refusal and attrition rates, and a more racially/ethnically representative sample of both child and parent perspectives indicate this approach to measuring satisfaction is acceptable and feasible to demographically diverse families.

5.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(2): e387, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571518

RESUMO

Introduction: Despite the well-known dangers of working in the healthcare industry, healthcare organizations have historically accepted workplace injuries as business as usual. In 2017, Children's National Hospital began our Employee and Staff Safety program to drive down the employee injury rate and address this disturbing industry trend. Methods: With guidance and support from executive leadership, we created an Employee and Staff Safety program that aligned employee safety work with existing patient safety and quality improvement efforts. Team leads collected and analyzed baseline employee injury data and identified areas of highest injuries. Dedicated subcommittees focused on five specific areas: slips, trips, and falls; sharps injuries; blood and body fluid exposures; verbal and physical violence; and overexertion injuries. Subcommittees established aims, identified key drivers, and brainstormed interventions for tests of change. Results: Because the inception of the Employee and Staff Safety program, Children's National has seen significant reductions in our Days Away Restricted or Transfer (DART) rate. The DART rate shows a sustained 37% reduction since the baseline period of FY16-FY17 (1.48 injuries/200,000 h worked to 0.93 injuries/200,000 h worked). The regression trend shows a significant decrease (38.3%) in DART injuries, from 1.544 to 0.952 over 56 months; P = 0.016. Conclusions: Active leadership support and analyzing data on specific employee harm areas coupled with targeted interventions, helped improve Children's National's DART rate. The Employee and Staff Safety program's success in utilizing patient safety and quality improvement tools creates a generalizable framework for other hospitals to advance their high-reliability journey.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA