Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 718, 2022 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36050630

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccines are an effective tool to prevent illness due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, infection after vaccination still occurs. We evaluated all infections identified among recipients of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in five U.S. states during January-March 2021. METHODS: Using observational data reported to CDC, we compared the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, and the sex, age, and vaccine product received for individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections to those of the vaccinated population using Poisson regression models. We also compared the proportion of vaccine breakthrough cases due to a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern to data reported to CDC's national genomic surveillance program. RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence of reported SARS-CoV-2 infection was 97% lower among vaccinated as compared to unvaccinated persons aged ≥ 16 years (68 vs 2252 cases per 100,000 people). Vaccinated adults aged ≥ 85 years were 1.6 times (95% CI 1.3-1.9) as likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 than vaccinated adults aged < 65 years. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine recipients were 1.4 times (95% CI 1.3-1.6) as likely to experience infection compared to Moderna COVID-19 recipients. The proportion of infections among vaccinated persons caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern was similar to the proportion of circulating viruses identified as variants of concern in the five states during the same time. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinated persons had a substantially lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to unvaccinated persons. Adults aged ≥ 85 years and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recipients had a higher risk of infection following vaccination. We provide an analytic framework for ongoing evaluation of patterns associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated persons using observational surveillance and immunization data. Our findings reinforce the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing infection in real-world settings.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Adulto , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(12): 2212-2214, 2021 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968772

RESUMO

Following increases in reported cases of hepatitis A, we assessed the impact of hepatitis A vaccine in Alaska Native persons. During 1996-2018, only 6 cases of hepatitis A were identified, all in unvaccinated adults. Populations can be protected against hepatitis A by achieving sufficient vaccination coverage over time.


Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite A , Hepatite A , Adulto , Alaska/epidemiologia , Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Vacinação , Cobertura Vacinal
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 41(4): e120-e125, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35067639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2019, 5 cases of invasive Haemophilus influenzae serotype b (Hib) occurred in the Anchorage region of Alaska over a period of 16 days. No cases had occurred in Alaska in the preceding 26 months. METHODS: Alaska Hib isolates from 2005 through 2019 were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Rates were compared with the CDC's Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) data. RESULTS: A total of 33 cases of invasive Hib occurred in Alaska from 2005 through 2019. Of the 5 cases associated with the cluster, 2 (40%) occurred in adults and all occurred in the Anchorage region. In contrast, only 14% (4/28) of the noncluster cases occurred in this region (P < 0.01). Two cluster cases were linked epidemiologically and the bacteria were nearly identical. The other 3 cluster cases were caused by 3 genetically distinct bacteria. When the full period was evaluated, the unadjusted rate of invasive Hib disease in Alaska was 15.5 times higher in Alaska Native (AN) people than non-AN people [1.3/100,000 vs. 0.07/100,000, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 10.2-22.5). The age-adjusted rate of invasive Hib disease in Alaska was 9.4 times higher than the ABCs rate (95% CI: 6.3-14.1). CONCLUSIONS: While clustered in time and space, the 5 cases in 2019 were not due to a single bacterial strain. AN people continue to have elevated rates of invasive Hib infection compared with both non-AN people in Alaska and the ABCs population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Haemophilus , Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Adulto , Alaska/epidemiologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/microbiologia , Haemophilus influenzae , Humanos , Lactente , Sorogrupo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA