Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of effective systemic therapy options for patients with advanced, chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (FRESCO-2) at 124 hospitals and cancer centres across 14 countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan) with histologically or cytologically documented metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who had received all current standard approved cytotoxic and targeted therapies and progressed on or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive fruquintinib (5 mg capsule) or matched placebo orally once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus best supportive care. Stratification factors were previous trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib, or both, RAS mutation status, and duration of metastatic disease. Patients, investigators, study site personnel, and sponsors, except for selected sponsor pharmacovigilance personnel, were masked to study group assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. A non-binding futility analysis was done when approximately one-third of the expected overall survival events had occurred. Final analysis occurred after 480 overall survival events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04322539, and EudraCT, 2020-000158-88, and is ongoing but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Aug 12, 2020, and Dec 2, 2021, 934 patients were assessed for eligibility and 691 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive fruquintinib (n=461) or placebo (n=230). Patients had received a median of 4 lines (IQR 3-6) of previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and 502 (73%) of 691 patients had received more than 3 lines. Median overall survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-8·2) in the fruquintinib group versus 4·8 months (4·0-5·8) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 286 (63%) of 456 patients who received fruquintinib and 116 (50%) of 230 who received placebo; the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the fruquintinib group included hypertension (n=62 [14%]), asthenia (n=35 [8%]), and hand-foot syndrome (n=29 [6%]). There was one treatment-related death in each group (intestinal perforation in the fruquintinib group and cardiac arrest in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Fruquintinib treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. These data support the use of fruquintinib as a global treatment option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ongoing analysis of the quality of life data will further establish the clinical benefit of fruquintinib in this patient population. FUNDING: HUTCHMED.

Risk factors affecting delay of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to lead to poor prognosis, but few studies have looked at associated factors. This study aimed to identify risk factors for delay in initiating AC. METHODS: Data from 200 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection and AC for stage III CRC between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: AC was initiated more than 8 weeks after surgery in 12.5% of patients (the delay group). Compared to those with no delay (the non-delay group), patients in the delay group had significantly higher rates of synchronous double cancers (2.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.001), preoperative bowel obstruction (10.3% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.003), laparotomy (56.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02), concomitant resection (2.9% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (32.0% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median 12 vs. 30 days, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, synchronous double cancers (odds ratio 10.2, p = 0.008), preoperative bowel obstruction (odds ratio 4.6, p = 0.01), concomitant resection (odds ratio 5.2, p = 0.03), and postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (odds ratio 4.0, p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors for delay in initiating AC. CONCLUSION: Careful preoperative treatment planning for CRC patients with synchronous double cancers, preoperative bowel obstruction, and concomitant resection, and management for postoperative complication are necessary to avoid delay in initiating AC.

Survival impact of sequential chemotherapy following pembrolizumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy is the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) with positive programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive scores. However, data on second-line chemotherapy following pembrolizumab are scarce. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted to determine the efficacies of pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatments and the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy for patients with R/M HNSCC who were refractory or intolerant to first-line treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated with pembrolizumab, and 29 received second-line therapy, with 27 opting for cetuximab-containing regimens. The median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS on next-line therapy for first-line treatment were 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-8.7), 22.1 (95% CI, 12.6-not reached), and 15.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 5.4 (95% CI, 3.3-6.8), 15.8 (95% CI, 8.6-not reached), and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.1-not reached) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group, respectively. The overall response rate and median PFS for second-line treatment were 48.3% (95% CI, 30.4-67.0) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 2.30-8.84). The median OS for patients who received second-line treatment was 18.4 months, which was superior to the median OS of 6.0 months for patients who received the best supportive care (log-rank p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that cetuximab-containing second-line chemotherapy can improve outcomes in R/M HNSCC, even after first-line therapy failure or intolerance.

Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5 and days 8-12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33. RESULTS: Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.93; Pnoninferiority = 0.5920). In patients with a baseline sum of the diameter of target lesions of <60 mm (n = 216, post hoc analyses), the adjusted median OS was similar between groups (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control, 21.4 vs. 20.7 months; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.55-1.55). Grade ≥3 adverse events (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control) included neutropenia (65.8% vs. 41.6%) and diarrhoea (1.5% vs. 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab did not demonstrate noninferiority to fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line treatment for mCRC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-173618, jRCTs031180122.

Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, and Biweekly Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: MODURATE, a Phase Ib Study.

BACKGROUND: In this phase Ib study MODURATE, we optimized the dosing schedule and tested the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure. METHODS: We included a dose escalation (3 + 3 design) and an expansion cohort. Patients were administered trifluridine/tipiracil (25-35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5), irinotecan (150-180 mg/m2, day 1), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, day 1) every 2 weeks. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the dose escalation cohort was administered to at least 15 patients in both cohorts combined. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Five dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D was defined as trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg. Of 16 patients who received RP2D, 86% (14/16) experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia without febrile neutropenia. Dose reduction, delay, and discontinuation occurred in 94%, 94%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Three patients (19%) showed partial response and 5 had stable disease for >4 months, with a median progression-free and overall survival of 7.1 and 21.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab administration may have moderate antitumor activity with high risk of severe myelotoxicity in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000019828) and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180028)].

Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G).

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of > 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70. DISCUSSION: This study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs041220120.

Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) and to identify clinical factors that facilitate treatment selection. METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who underwent NIVO or IRI treatment between November 2016 and June 2018 at three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma pretreated with fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, no previous NIVO or IRI treatment, and adequate organ function. Main outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Interaction between treatment groups and clinical factors regarding OS were tested using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for relevant variables. RESULTS: Both NIVO (n = 71) and IRI (n = 61) groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for sex distribution. NIVO and IRI groups had ORR of 20% and 6%, median PFS of 1.6 and 1.8 months, and median OS of 6.4 and 6.4 months, respectively. Interaction analysis did not reveal any significant interaction between NIVO and IRI related to OS for various factors. NIVO group tended to have fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events than IRI group, especially neutropenia (3% vs. 28%) and febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 8%). In the NIVO group, one patient developed pneumonitis, and four patients developed skin reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Although no remarkable differences in efficacy were found between IRI and NIVO for AGC, NIVO had a better safety profile compared to IRI. We found no clinical markers that can assist treatment decisions.

Clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary or malignancy of undefined primary origin who were referred to a regional cancer center.

BACKGROUND: A regional cancer hospital has been identified to be crucial in the management of malignancies of undefined primary origin (MUO) and cancer of unknown primary (CUP). This hospital primarily consists of oncologists with expertise in CUP, pathologists, and interventional radiologists. Early consultation or referral of MUO and CUP to a cancer hospital is deemed important. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical, pathological, and outcome data of all patients (n = 407) referred to the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital (ACCH) in Japan over an 8-year period. RESULTS: In total, 30% of patients were referred for a second opinion. Among 285 patients, 13% had non-neoplastic disease or confirmed primary site and 76% had confirmed CUP (cCUP), with 29% of cCUP being identified as favorable risk. In 155 patients with unfavorable-risk CUP, 73% had primary sites predicted by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and distribution of metastatic sites, whereas 66% of them received site-specific therapies based on the predicted primary sites. The median overall survival (OS) was found to be poor in patients with MUO (1 month) and provisional CUP (6 months). In addition, the median OS of 206 patients with cCUP treated at the ACCH was 16 months (favorable risk, 27 months; unfavorable risk, 12 months). No significant difference was noted in OS between patients with non-predictable and predictable primary-sites (13 vs 12 months, p = 0.411). CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with unfavorable-risk CUP remains to be poor. Site-specific therapy based on IHC is not recommended for all patients with unfavorable-risk CUP.

The impact of combined PD-L1 positive score on clinical response to nivolumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is recommended for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (aESCC) refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of the tumor proportion score (TPS). However, the role of combined positive score (CPS) in predicting nivolumab efficacy remains unclear. We aimed to study whether TPS or CPS is a more suitable biomarker for predicting nivolumab efficacy in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients with aESCC treated with fluoropyrimidines and platinum and subsequently received nivolumab monotherapy between January 1, 2014 and September 15, 2020. Next, we evaluated the efficiencies of TPS and CPS in predicting the clinical response to nivolumab using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay. RESULTS: This study included 50 patients (CPS groups: ≥ 10/1-10/ < 1, n = 24/18/8, respectively; TPS groups, ≥ 10%/1%-10%/ < 1%, n = 17/8/25, respectively). The median progression-free survival was 3.2, 2.5, and 1.5 months in the ≥ 10, 1-10 [hazard ratio (HR) vs. CPS of ≥ 10 group, 1.01; p = 0.98; adjusted HR, 1.33; p = 0.56], and < 1 CPS groups (HR vs. CPS of ≥ 10 group, 3.44; p = 0.006; adjusted HR, 1.67; p = 0.41), respectively. For the patients with CPS of ≥ 10/1-10/ < 1 and TPS of ≥ 10%/1%-10%/ < 1%, the objective response rate was 30%/25%/0% and 36%/0%/19% and the disease control rate was 60%/50%/12% (p = 0.06) and 65%/40%/38% (p = 0.30), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a CPS of < 1 is not a strong predictor of efficacy but can predict the absence of response to nivolumab in patients with aESCC.

Clinical and microbiological features of obstructive cholangitis with bloodstream infection caused by Pandoraea apista identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and ribosomal RNA sequencing in a cancer patient.

BACKGROUND: Pandoraea species are multidrug-resistant glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli that are usually isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and from water and soil. Reports of diseases, including bloodstream infections, caused by Pandoraea spp. in non-CF patients are rare, and the clinical and microbiological characteristics are unclear. The identification of Pandorea spp. is limited by conventional microbiological methods and may be misidentified as other species owing to overlapping biochemical profiles. Here, we report the first case of obstructive cholangitis with bacteremia caused by Pandoraea apista in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer. A 61-year-old man with advanced colorectal cancer who underwent right nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 4 years earlier with well-controlled diabetes mellitus was admitted to our hospital with fever for 2 days. The last chemotherapy (regorafenib) was administered approximately 3 weeks ago, and an endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy was performed 2 weeks ago under hospitalization for obstructive jaundice. Two days prior, he presented with fever with chills. He was treated with piperacillin-tazobactam for obstructive cholangitis and showed improvement but subsequently presented with exacerbation. Bacterial isolates from the blood and bile samples were identified as P. apista using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Based on the susceptibility results of the isolates, he was successfully treated with oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg/day for 14 days for P. apista infection. CONCLUSIONS: Pandoraea species are often misidentified. Therefore, multiple approaches should be used to identify them, and decisions regarding antimicrobial treatment should be based on actual in vitro susceptibility. Only seven cases of Pandoraea spp. bloodstream infections have been reported, and we report the first case of cholangitis with bacteremia.

Topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform eruption due to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing starting with a very strong or a weak topical corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH1512, colorectal part).

BACKGROUND: Although pre-emptive therapy with oral tetracycline, moisturizer, sunscreen, and topical corticosteroid is useful for preventing acneiform eruption (AfE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, no studies have examined the efficacy of topical corticosteroids themselves, or investigated the optimal potency of corticosteroid for treating facial AfE (FAfE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screened patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer started pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline and moisturizer on initiation of cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Patients who developed grade 1 or 2 FAfE were randomly allocated to two groups: a ranking-down (RD) group that started with a very strong corticosteroid and serially ranked down every 2 weeks unless FAfE exacerbated; and a ranking-up (RU) group that started with a weak corticosteroid and serially ranked up at exacerbation. FAfE grade, patient quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) with topical corticosteroid were evaluated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of times grade 2 or higher FAfE was identified in the central review of the 8-week treatment period. RESULTS: No significant differences in total numbers of grade 2 or higher FAfE or in AEs caused by topical corticosteroids were observed between groups during the 8 weeks. Incidence of grade 2 or higher FAfE tended to be lower in the RD group during the first 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Considering the long-term care of FAfE, the RU regimen appears suitable and should be considered the standard treatment for FAfE due to EGFR inhibitor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024113).

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (DESTINY-CRC01): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: HER2 amplification has been identified in 2-3% of patients with colorectal cancer, although there are currently no approved HER2-targeted therapies for colorectal cancer. We aimed to study the antitumour activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (an antibody-drug conjugate of humanised anti-HER2 antibody with topoisomerase I inhibitor payloads) in patients with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: DESTINY-CRC01 is an open-label, phase 2 study that recruited patients from 25 clinics and hospitals in Italy, Japan, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer that had progressed on two or more previous regimens (HER2-targeted therapies other than trastuzumab deruxtecan permitted), were aged 18 years or older (≥20 years in Japan), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, and had RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumours. Patients were enrolled into one of three cohorts by HER2 expression level: cohort A (HER2-positive, immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ or IHC2+ and in-situ hybridisation [ISH]-positive), cohort B (IHC2+ and ISH-negative), or cohort C (IHC1+). Patients received 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate in cohort A by independent central review which was assessed in the full analysis set and safety was assessed in the safety analysis set. Both the full analysis set and the safety analysis set included all patients who received one or more doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03384940. FINDINGS: Between Feb 23, 2018, and July 3, 2019, 78 patients were enrolled in the study (53 in cohort A, seven in cohort B, and 18 in cohort C), all of whom received at least one dose of study drug. For the 53 (68%) patients with HER2-positive tumours (cohort A), a confirmed objective response was reported in 24 (45·3%, 95% CI 31·6-59·6) patients after a median follow-up of 27·1 weeks (IQR 19·3-40·1). Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of all participants were decreased neutrophil count (17 [22%] of 78) and anaemia (11 [14%]). Five patients (6%) had adjudicated interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (two grade 2; one grade 3; two grade 5, the only treatment-related deaths). INTERPRETATION: Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed promising and durable activity in HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard treatment, with a safety profile consistent with that reported in previous trastuzumab deruxtecan trials. Interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis are important risks requiring careful monitoring and prompt intervention. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) plays a key role in hematopoiesis. However, the oncogenic role of FLT3 amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics, prognosis, and treatment efficacy of an FLT3 inhibitor (regorafenib) in patients with mCRC with FLT3 amplifications. Tumor tissue samples from 2329 patients were sequenced using NGS in the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project in Japan. The effects of clinicopathological features, co-altered genes, prognosis, and efficacy of regorafenib were investigated. Between April 2015 and June 2018, 85 patients with mCRC with FLT3 amplification were observed. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with or without FLT3 amplification. The frequency of RAS or other gene co-alterations was inversely correlated with the copy number status. Median survival time in patients with FLT3 amplification was significantly shorter compared with those with non-FLT3 amplification. Further investigations of FLT3 amplification as a potential treatment target in mCRC are warranted.

The Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, a novel therapy targeting KRAS G12C mutation has demonstrated promising activities for corresponding advanced solid tumors, including metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, the prognostic impact of the KRAS G12C mutation remains unclear in patients with mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with mCRC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2005 and December 2017 at four large oncology facilities in Japan. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with KRAS G12C and those with non-G12C mutations. RESULTS: Among 2,457 patients with mCRC, 1,632 met selection criteria, and of these, 696 had KRAS exon 2 mutations, including 45 with KRAS G12C mutation tumors. Patient characteristics were not significantly different between the KRAS G12C and non-G12C groups. At a median follow-up of 64.8 months, patients with the KRAS G12C mutation showed significantly shorter first-line progression-free survival (PFS; median, 9.4 vs. 10.8 months; p = .015) and overall survival (OS; median, 21.1 vs. 27.3 months; p = .015) than those with non-G12C mutations. Multivariate analysis also showed that KRAS G12C mutation was significantly associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.96, p = .030) and OS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-2.00; p = .044). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that, compared with non-G12C mutations, KRAS G12C mutation is significantly correlated with shorter first-line PFS and OS. These findings indicate the relevance of a stratified treatment targeting KRAS G12C mutation in mCRC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Among patients with KRAS exon 2 mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.4 and 21.1 months, respectively, for G12C mutation and 10.8 and 27.3 months, respectively, for patients with non-G12C mutations, indicating significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.01; p = .015) and OS (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08; p = .015) in patients with G12C mutation than in those with non-G12C mutations. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that KRAS G12C mutation was independently associated with shorter first-line PFS and OS. Thus, these findings underscore the relevance of a stratified treatment targeting KRAS G12C mutation in mCRC.

Combination therapy of capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: Safety lead-in results from the QUATTRO-II study.

Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but demonstrates high neutropenia incidence among Asian patients. Hence, we conducted the randomized phase II QUATTRO-II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04097444; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRTCs041190072) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (CAPOXIRI) combination plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, expecting a lower incidence of neutropenia without compromising the efficacy. Methods We investigated the recommended doses (RD) of oxaliplatin and irinotecan as a safety lead-in portion of Step 1 before initiating the randomized portion as Step 2. Four dose levels of CAPOXIRI (fixed dose of capecitabine, 1600 mg/m2; escalated/de-escalated doses of oxaliplatin and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) were investigated in a 3 + 3 manner. A dose level of ≤ 2/6 of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) cases was expected as the RD. Results In Step 1, we included nine patients (three and six in levels 0 and + 1, respectively). Level 0 (irinotecan, 200 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2) did not demonstrate DLTs. In level + 1 (irinotecan, 200 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2), although one patient experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia, no further safety concerns were observed. As a preliminary efficacy result, the objective response rate in all nine patients was 89 % (100 and 83 % in levels 0 and + 1, respectively). Conclusions The RD of CAPOXIRI plus bevacizumab was 200, 130, and 1600 mg/m2 for irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, respectively, and 7.5 mg/kg for bevacizumab. The randomized portion is still ongoing.

Second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ML18174 study, which showed benefits of bevacizumab (BEV) continuation beyond progression (BBP) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), excluded patients with first-line progression-free survival (PFS) shorter than 3 months. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab. METHODS: The subjects of this study were mCRC patients who experienced disease progression < 100 days from commencement of first-line chemotherapy containing BEV initiated between Apr 2007 and Dec 2016. Second-line chemotherapy regimens were classified into two groups with and without BEV/other anti-angiogenic agents (BBP and non-BBP) and efficacy and safety were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified as subjects of this study. Baseline characteristics were numerically different between BBP (n = 37) and non-BBP (n = 25) groups, such as performance status (0-1/> 2/unknown: 89/8/3 and 56/40/4%), RAS status (wild/mutant/unknown: 32/54/16 and 76/16/8%). Response rate was 8.6% in BBP group and 9.1% in non-BBP group (p = 1.00). Median PFS was 3.9 months in BBP group and 2.8 months in non-BBP group (HR [95%CI]: 0.79 [0.46-1.34], p = 0.373, adjusted HR: 0.87 [0.41-1.82], p = 0.707). Median overall survival was 8.5 months in BBP group and 5.4 months in non-BBP group (HR 0.66 [0.38-1.12], p = 0.125, adjusted HR 0.53 [0.27-1.07], p = 0.078). CONCLUSION: In mCRC patients who experienced early progression in first-line chemotherapy, second-line chemotherapy showed poor clinical outcomes regardless use of anti-angiogenic agents.

Open versus laparoscopic surgery for primary appendiceal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for primary appendiceal tumors compared to that of open surgery has not been demonstrated to date because primary appendiceal tumors are rare. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgeries for primary appendiceal tumors. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, the data of patients who had been histologically diagnosed with primary appendiceal tumors at 43 tertiary hospitals in Japan between 2000 and 2017 were analyzed. In total, 922 patients were assessed, and 679 cases were eligible for analysis. Using propensity scores, the baseline characteristics were matched for 114 open surgery cases and 114 laparoscopic surgery cases. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (excluding patients with stage IV disease with distant metastasis) and overall survival. RESULTS: The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 1.5%. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 80.4% (95% confidence interval: 71.0-89.7) and 78.2% (95% confidence interval: 69.0-87.3) in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.57). No significant difference was observed in the 5-year overall survival rates between the laparoscopic [83.5% (95% confidence interval: 74.4-92.7)] and open surgery [72.7% (95% confidence interval: 62.3-83.0); p = 0.09] groups. In multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio: 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.23-1.06), p = 0.0707]. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery and can be considered a treatment option for primary appendiceal tumors.

A triplet combination of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: The triplet-agent (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; FOLFOXIRI) combined with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has shown promising results in Western trials. This phase Ib study assessed the safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in Japanese patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type mCRC received weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 at week 1 and subsequently 250 mg/m2) plus FOLFOXIRI that consisted of irinotecan (100, 120, and 150 mg/m2 defined as dose levels 0, 1, and 2), followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2. The dose level of irinotecan was escalated starting at dose level 1 in a 3 + 3 manner. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled. The MTD was not reached at dose level 2 and the RP2D was 150 mg/m2 irinotecan. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), fatigue (11%), paronychia (22%), and acneiform rash (11%). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any of the enrolled patients. No treatment-related death was observed. The ORR was 89% (95% confidence interval 52-100%). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of the combination of cetuximab and FOLFOXIRI was acceptable and promising anti-tumor activity was demonstrated, supporting further study in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC.

Second-line chemotherapy using taxane in patients with advanced gastric cancer who presented with severe peritoneal metastasis: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who present with severe peritoneal metastasis (SPM) have poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of second-line treatment for patients with such condition. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients receiving taxane-based second-line chemotherapy at three Japanese institutions between 2010 and 2016. Patients with AGC who present with SPM were included if they had massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake requiring intravenous nutritional support. RESULTS: In this study, 43 (40%) of 108 patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score ≥ 2, and the median serum albumin level of the patients was 3.3 g/dL. Ramucirumab was used in combination with paclitaxel in 21 patients. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 5.1 and 2.8 months, respectively. Inadequate oral intake was considered a negative prognostic factor of both OS and PFS in the multivariate analysis. Three treatment-related deaths were observed, which include those attributed to febrile neutropenia, gastrointestinal perforation, and pneumonitis. Common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (35%), leukopenia (30%), anemia (24%), and anorexia (16%). We observed febrile neutropenia in 8% and gastrointestinal perforation in 4% of patients, and such conditions were dominantly observed in patients with inadequate oral intake. CONCLUSION: Taxane-based second-line chemotherapy was effective and safe for patients with AGC who present with SPM. Attention must be provided when treating patients with inadequate oral intake as they are likely to have short prognosis and serious toxicities.

Phase I study of napabucasin in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Napabucasin is an oral NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 bioactivatable agent that generates reactive oxygen species, is hypothesised to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways, including STAT-3, and is expected to result in cancer cell death. This phase I study investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of napabucasin co-administered with fluorouracil, l-leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable stage IV CRC received oral napabucasin 240 mg twice daily (BID). Intravenous FOLFIRI and bevacizumab therapy was initiated on day 3 at approved doses. Unacceptable toxicity was evaluated over the first 30 days of treatment, after which treatment continued in 14-day cycles until toxicity or disease progression. Endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumour response based on RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Four patients received treatment; three were evaluable during the unacceptable toxicity period. All four patients experienced diarrhoea and decreased appetite (considered napabucasin-related in four and two patients, respectively), and three patients experienced neutrophil count decreased. No unacceptable toxicity was reported during the 30-day evaluation period. No grade 4 events, deaths, or serious adverse events were reported. The addition of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab to napabucasin did not significantly change the pharmacokinetic profile of napabucasin; however, results were variable among patients. The best overall response was stable disease in two patients (50.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Napabucasin 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI and bevacizumab was tolerated, with a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC.