[Occupational safety in the treatment of COVID-19 patients : Relevant laws and regulations for the treating personnel]. / Arbeitsschutz bei der Versorgung von COVID-19-Patienten : Relevante Gesetze und Regelungen für das versorgende Personal.

The intensive medical care of COVID-19 patients presents the deployed personnel with as yet unknown challenges. For example, protective equipment is now being extensively used, which was otherwise only used in selected situations. Working in such an environment is to be evaluated differently under the aspect of occupational safety than other patient care, especially as more than 1900 suspected cases of a SARS-CoV-19 occupational disease were reported among healthcare workers in Germany. Even in a pandemic, the legal requirements remain valid and personal protective equipment (PPE) has to comply with given standards. The use of FFP3 masks is required in aerosol-forming situations, such as endotracheal intubation or bronchoscopy. In contrast to surgical face masks, there is a maximum wearing time for FFPs masks. Furthermore, in a pandemic there is a basic danger of PPE shortage and recycling of face masks is under discussion. Therefore, usage of non-EU certified PPE may come into effect but this has to follow the requirements defined by European regulations. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the currently relevant rules and regulations in Germany.

Comparison of sedation and general anaesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation on cerebral oxygen saturation and neurocognitive outcome†.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Although general anaesthesia (TAVI-GA) and sedation (TAVI-S) have previously been described for TAVI, the difference in safety and efficacy of both methods has not been studied in a randomized trial. METHODS: The INSERT trial was a single centre, controlled parallel-group trial with balanced randomization. Sixty-six patients (68-94 yr) with acquired aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral CoreValve™ were assigned to TAVI-GA or TAVI-S. Comparable operative risk was determined from risk-scores (EUROscore, STS-Score). Monitoring and anaesthetic drugs were standardized. Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy was used to monitor cerebral-oxymetry blinded. Primary outcome was the perioperative cumulative cerebral desaturation. As secondary outcomes, changes in neurocognitive function and respiratory and haemodynamic adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 66 included patients, 62 (TAVI-GA: n=31, TAVI-S: n=31) were finally analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In 24 patients (39%) cerebral desaturation was observed. Cumulative cerebral desaturation was comparable (TAVI-GA:(median [IQR]) (0[0/1308] s%) vs. TAVI-S:(0[0/276] s%); P=0.505) between the groups. Neurocognitive function did not change within and between groups. Adverse events were more frequently observed in TAVI-S patients (P<0.001). Bradypnoea (n=16, 52%) and the need for airway manoeuvres (n=11, 36%) or bag-mask-ventilation (n=6, 19%) were the most common respiratory adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral desaturation occurred in both patient groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Based on primary outcome, both methods were shown to be comparable. Neurocognitive outcome was similar. The higher incidence of adverse events in the sedation group suggests a potential advantage of general anaesthesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 01251328.

Replacement of aprotinin by ε-aminocaproic acid in infants undergoing cardiac surgery: consequences for blood loss and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Once aprotinin was no longer available for clinical use, ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid became the only two options for antifibrinolytic therapy. We compared aprotinin and EACA with respect to their blood-sparing efficacy and other major clinical outcome criteria in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from a large consecutive cohort of infants (n=227) aged 31-365 days undergoing primary cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass encompassing the transition from aprotinin to EACA (aprotinin n=88, EACA n=139); all other aspects including the medical team and departmental protocols remained unchanged. The primary outcome was postoperative blood loss measured as chest tube output (CTO). Secondary outcome parameters were transfusion requirements, reoperation due to bleeding, renal, vascular, and neurological complications, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: CTO was significantly higher in the EACA patients {aprotinin 18 (13-27) ml kg(-1) 24 h(-1), EACA 23 (15-37) ml kg(-1) 24 h(-1) [mean (inter-quartile range)], P=0.001}, but transfusion requirements and donor exposures were not significantly different. A sensitivity analysis strengthened our finding that the increased blood loss in the EACA group was attributable to lower efficacy of EACA. There were no significant differences in the other clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: CTO was lower in aprotinin-treated patients. Nonetheless, EACA remains a suitable substitute without measurable differences in other clinical outcome criteria.

Switch from aprotinin to ε-aminocaproic acid: impact on blood loss, transfusion, and clinical outcome in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: With the withdrawal of aprotinin from worldwide marketing in November 2007, many institutions treating patients at high risk for hyperfibrinolysis had to update their therapeutic protocols. At our institution, the standard was switched from aprotinin to ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation including neonates. Although both antifibrinolytic medications have been used widely for many years, there are few data directly comparing their blood-sparing effect and their side-effects especially in neonates. METHODS: Perioperative data from 235 neonates aged up to 30 days undergoing primary cardiac surgery were analysed. Between July 1, 2006 and November 5, 2007, all patients (n=95) received aprotinin. Starting November 6, 2007 until December 31, 2009, all patients (n=140) were treated with EACA. The primary outcome criterion was blood loss; secondary outcome criteria were transfusion requirements, renal, vascular, and neurological complications and also in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: All descriptive and intraoperative data variable were similar. Blood loss was significantly higher in the EACA group (P=0.001), but there was no difference in the rate of re-operation for bleeding (P=0.218) nor the number of transfusions. There were no differences in the incidences of postoperative renal, neurological, and vascular events or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In neonatal patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the switch to EACA treatment led to a higher postoperative blood loss. However, there were no differences in transfusion requirements or major clinical outcomes.