Type 2 diabetes albuminuric and non-albuminuric phenotypes have different morphological and functional ultrasound features of diabetic kidney disease.

AIMS: Whether different diabetic kidney disease (DKD) phenotypes recognise differences in morphological and vascular properties of the kidney is still unexplored. We evaluated the potential role of kidney ultrasonography in differentiating DKD phenotypes in subjects with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, single-centre study. Total (TRV) and parenchymal renal volumes (PRV) were calculated by applying the ellipsoid formula for conventional (2D) ultrasonography and with manual segmentation for 3D ultrasonography, and then adjusted for body surface area (aTRV, aPRV). Renal resistive index (RI) was contextually determined. DKD phenotypes have been defined based on increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR >30 mg/g) and/or reduced eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m2 ). Recruitment was planned to have groups of the same size. RESULTS: Among 256 subjects, 26.2% had No-DKD, 24.6% increased albuminuria only (Alb+ ), 24.2% non-albuminuric DKD (Alb- DKD), and 25.0% albuminuric DKD (Alb+ DKD). Compared to No-DKD, RI was significantly higher in all DKD phenotypes, being the highest in Alb+ DKD, and with a significant trend of RI > 0.70 to increase across phenotypes. In comparison with No-DKD, both 2D and 3D volumes were increased in Alb+ and significantly reduced in Alb- DKD as well as in Alb+ DKD, with significantly lower volumes in Alb- DKD as compared to Alb+ DKD at the same reduced levels of eGFR. In adjusted regressions, compared to No-DKD, RI was associated with Alb+ ; both RI and aPRV3D were associated with Alb+ DKD; only aPRV3D with Alb- DKD. Compared to No-DKD, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses, designed taking into account conventional risk factors, showed that US parameters did not ameliorate the characterisation of Alb+ and Alb+ DKD, while aPRV3D significantly improved the phenotyping of Alb- DKD. CONCLUSIONS: As a novel information, we reported that, in type 2 diabetes, the emerging normoalbuminuric DKD phenotype showed reduced TRVs and PRVs even when compared, at similarly reduced eGFR levels, with Alb+ DKD opening. In perspective, these findings suggest a possible role of imaging for better discrimination of DKD phenotypes in clinical practice.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology of the GI Tract, Liver, and Pancreas in Patients with COVID.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pulmonary involvement has been extensively reported in the literature. Current data highlight how COVID-19 is a systemic disease, affecting many other organs, including the gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic organs. Recently, these organs have been investigated using imaging modalities of ultrasound and particularly computed tomography. Radiological findings of the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic involvement in patients with COVID-19 are generally nonspecific but are nonetheless helpful to evaluate and manage COVID-19 patients with involvement of these organs.

Looking for appropriateness in follow-up CT of oncologic patients: Results from a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the inappropriateness rate of oncological follow-up CT examinations. METHODS: Out of 7.000 oncology patients referred for follow-up CT examinations between March and October 2022, a random sample of 10 % was included. Radiology residents assessed the appropriateness using the Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines, supervised by senior radiologists. Association between inappropriateness and clinical variables was investigated and variables influencing inappropriateness were analyzed through a binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Three-hundred-eighty-eight examinations (56.1 %) were consistent with AIOM guidelines. An additional 100 (14.5  %) examinations did not follow the recommended schedule but were nevertheless considered appropriate because of suspected recurrence/progression (10.7 %) or adverse event requiring imaging assessment (3.8 %). Two-hundred-four (29.4 %) examinations were rated as inappropriate. Inappropriateness causes were as follows: CT not included in the relevant guideline (n = 47); CT extended to additional anatomical regions (n = 59); CT requested at a shorter time-interval (n = 98). No statistically significant difference was found in age, sex, scan region, and primary cancer between appropriate and inappropriate examinations. The only variable significantly associated with inappropriateness was being referred by a specific hospital unit named "unit 2" in the study (p = 0.009), which was demonstrated to be the only appropriateness independent predictor (OR 1.952). CONCLUSION: This study shows that majority of oncological patients referred for follow-up CT follows standard guidelines. However, a non-negligible proportion was rated as inappropriate, mainly due to the shorter time-interval. No clinical variable was associated with inappropriateness, except for referral by a specific hospital unit.

Chemotherapy-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: Findings from MR Imaging.

Chemotherapy-induced liver injury has been found to be quite common in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Being aware of chemotherapy-induced hepatotoxicity is important for avoiding errors in detecting liver metastases and for defining the most appropriate clinical management strategy. MRI imaging has proven to be a useful troubleshooting tool that helps overcome false negatives in tumor response imaging after chemotherapy due to liver parenchyma changes. The purpose of this review is, therefore, to describe the characteristics of magnetic resonance imaging of the broad spectrum of liver damage induced by systemic chemotherapeutic agents in order to avoid misdiagnoses of liver metastases and disease progression and to define the most appropriate clinical management strategy.