RESUMO
The care of patients with trisomy 13 and 18 is a source of significant controversy. While these conditions are life limiting, indisputable data refutes the notion that these conditions are lethal or incompatible with life. Despite such evidence, arguments of beneficence, quality of life and limited resources are invoked to make the case to limit care to trisomy children. Lessons learned in our ignominious history with Down syndrome should guide us as we explore care for patients with trisomy 13 and 18. As clinicians we should strive with equipoise to carefully examine available data, the current status of practices related to care from palliation to intensive interventions, rise above our personal prejudices and listen to the voices of families imploring us to consider their opinions regarding the value of the life of a child with trisomy 13 or 18. We should recall and learn from our Down syndrome odyssey and select the road previously not taken as we chart a course to the best possible care for our trisomy 13 and 18 sisters and brothers. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cromossômicos/terapia , Trissomia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Cromossomos Humanos Par 13 , Cromossomos Humanos Par 18 , Síndrome de Down/terapia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13 , Síndrome da Trissomía do Cromossomo 18RESUMO
Late preterm (LPT) neonates (34 0/7th-36 6/7th weeks' gestation) account for 70% of all premature births in the United States. LPT neonates have a higher morbidity and mortality risk than term neonates. LPT birth rates vary across geographic regions. Unwarranted variation is variation in medical care that cannot be explained by sociodemographic or medical risk factors; it represents differences in health system performance, including provider practice variation. The purpose of this study is to identify regional variation in LPT births in North Carolina that cannot be explained by sociodemographic or medical/obstetric risk factors. We searched the NC State Center for Health Statistics linked birth-death certificate database for all singleton term and LPT neonates born between 1999 and 2006. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to control for socio-demographic and medical/obstetric risk factors. The main outcome was the percent of LPT birth in each of the six perinatal regions in North Carolina. We identified 884,304 neonates; 66,218 (7.5%) were LPT. After multivariable logistic regression, regions 2 (7.0%) and 6 (6.6%) had the highest adjusted percent of LPT birth. Analysis of a statewide birth cohort demonstrates regional variation in the incidence of LPT births among NC's perinatal regions after adjustment for sociodemographic and medical risk factors. We speculate that provider practice variation might explain some of the remaining difference. This is an area where policy changes and quality improvement efforts can help reduce variation, and potentially decrease LPT births.
Assuntos
Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Feminino , Geografia , Idade Gestacional , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Registro Médico Coordenado , Análise Multivariada , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Fatores de Risco , Fatores SocioeconômicosAssuntos
Aborto Induzido , Nascimento Prematuro , Aborto Legal , Aborto Espontâneo , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezAssuntos
Aborto Induzido , Nascimento Prematuro , Aborto Espontâneo , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Test web-based implementation for the science of enhancing resilience (WISER) intervention efficacy in reducing healthcare worker (HCW) burnout. DESIGN: RCT using two cohorts of HCWs of four NICUs each, to improve HCW well-being (primary outcome: burnout). Cohort 1 received WISER while Cohort 2 acted as a waitlist control. RESULTS: Cohorts were similar, mostly female (83%) and nurses (62%). In Cohorts 1 and 2 respectively, 182 and 299 initiated WISER, 100 and 176 completed 1-month follow-up, and 78 and 146 completed 6-month follow-up. Relative to control, WISER decreased burnout (-5.27 (95% CI: -10.44, -0.10), p = 0.046). Combined adjusted cohort results at 1-month showed that the percentage of HCWs reporting concerning outcomes was significantly decreased for burnout (-6.3% (95%CI: -11.6%, -1.0%); p = 0.008), and secondary outcomes depression (-5.2% (95%CI: -10.8, -0.4); p = 0.022) and work-life integration (-11.8% (95%CI: -17.9, -6.1); p < 0.001). Improvements endured at 6 months. CONCLUSION: WISER appears to durably improve HCW well-being. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT02603133; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02603133.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Esgotamento Psicológico , Esgotamento Profissional/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following delivery, extremely premature infants are vulnerable to rapid development of hypothermia and hypoglycemia. To reduce local rates of these morbidities, a multidisciplinary team developed a protocol standardizing evidence-based care practices during the first hour after birth. METHODS: Using quality improvement methodology, the Golden Hour protocol was implemented for all inborn infants <27 weeks' gestation. Data were collected (2012-2017) over three phases; pre-protocol (n = 80), Phase I (n = 42), and Phase II (n = 92). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in infant characteristics. Improvements in hypothermia (59% vs 26% vs 38%; p = 0.001), hypoglycemia (18% vs 7% vs 4%; p = 0.012), and minutes to completion of stabilization [median (Q1,Q3) 110 (89,138) vs 111 (94,135) vs 92 (74,129); p = 0.0035] were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an evidence-based, Golden Hour protocol is an effective intervention for reducing hypothermia and hypoglycemia in extremely premature infants.
Assuntos
Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipotermia/prevenção & controle , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/organização & administração , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Masculino , Tempo para o TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate antenatal corticosteroids (ANS) use in pregnant women with hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of ANS use in the Perinatal Quality Collaborative of North Carolina between 2015 and 2017. RESULTS: Twenty-five centers participated, with 9% (1580/17,692) of mothers delivering at <34 weeks; of these, 81% (1286/1580) received a full course of ANS, which was not different between phases (p = 0.32), or between Level III/IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs; 82%), and I/II NICUs (76%) (p = 0.05). In Level III/IV NICUs, White mothers were more likely to receive ANS (87%) than African Americans (77%) or other race/ethnicity (80%) (including Hispanics) (p = 0.001). ANS use did not differ among mothers with different payers (p = 0.94). CONCLUSION: The rates of full ANS courses did not significantly increase from 2015-2017 and disparities persisted. Targeted efforts to improve ANS exposures among hypertensive African American and Hispanic mothers, as well as in community hospital settings are needed.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Doenças do Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Pré-Eclâmpsia/etnologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Melhoria de Qualidade , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , North Carolina , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/etnologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , População BrancaRESUMO
State Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are networks of multidisciplinary teams working to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. To address the shared needs across state PQCs and enable collaboration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in partnership with March of Dimes and perinatal quality improvement experts from across the country, supported the development and launch of the National Network of PQCs National Network of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (NNPQC). This process included assessing the status of PQCs in this country and identifying the needs and resources that would be most useful to support PQC development. National representatives from 48 states gathered for the first meeting of the NNPQC to share best practices for making measurable improvements in maternal and infant health. The number of state PQCs has grown considerably over the past decade, with an active PQC or a PQC in development in almost every state. However, PQCs have some common challenges that need to be addressed. After its successful launch, the NNPQC is positioned to ensure that every state PQC has access to key tools and resources that build capacity to actively improve maternal and infant health outcomes and healthcare quality.
Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias/organização & administração , Saúde do Lactente , Saúde Materna , Melhoria de Qualidade , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Apoio Social , Estados UnidosRESUMO
State Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are networks of multidisciplinary teams working to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. To address the shared needs across state PQCs and enable collaboration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in partnership with March of Dimes and perinatal quality improvement experts from across the country, supported the development and launch of the National Network of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives (NNPQC). This process included assessing the status of PQCs in this country and identifying the needs and resources that would be most useful to support PQC development. National representatives from 48 states gathered for the first meeting of the NNPQC to share best practices for making measurable improvements in maternal and infant health. The number of state PQCs has grown considerably over the past decade, with an active PQC or a PQC in development in almost every state. However, PQCs have some common challenges that need to be addressed. After its successful launch, the NNPQC is positioned to ensure that every state PQC has access to key tools and resources that build capacity to actively improve maternal and infant health outcomes and healthcare quality.
Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Saúde do Lactente , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Obstetrícia , Pediatria , Gravidez , Apoio Social , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central venous catheters in the NICU are associated with significant morbidity and mortality because of the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of catheter dwell time on risk of CLABSI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 13,327 infants with 15,567 catheters (93% peripherally inserted central catheters [PICCs], 7% tunneled catheters) and 256,088 catheter days cared for in 141 NICUs. CLABSI was defined using National Health Surveillance Network criteria. We defined dwell time as the number of days from line insertion until either line removal or day of CLABSI. We generated survival curves for each week of dwell time and estimated hazard ratios for CLABSI at each week by using a Cox proportional hazards frailty model. We controlled for postmenstrual age and year, included facility as a random effect, and generated separate models by line type. RESULTS: Median postmenstrual age was 29 weeks (interquartile range 26-33). The overall incidence of CLABSI was 0.93 per 1000 catheter days. Increased dwell time was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI for PICCs. For tunneled catheters, infection incidence was significantly higher in weeks 7 and 9 compared with week 1. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not routinely replace uninfected PICCs for fear of infection but should consider removing tunneled catheters before week 7 if no longer needed. Additional studies are needed to determine what daily maintenance practices may be associated with decreased risk of infection, especially for tunneled catheters.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Central lines in NICUs have long dwell times. Success in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) requires a multidisciplinary team approach to line maintenance and insertion. The Perinatal Quality Collaborative of North Carolina (PQCNC) CLABSI project supported the development of NICU teams including parents, the implementation of an action plan with unique bundle elements and a rigorous reporting schedule. The goal was to reduce CLABSI rates by 75%. METHODS: Thirteen NICUs participated in an initiative developed over 3 months and deployed over 9 months. Teams participated in monthly webinars and quarterly face-to-face learning sessions. NICUs reported on bundle compliance and National Health Surveillance Network infection rates at baseline, during the intervention, and 3 and 12 months after the intervention. Process and outcome indicators were analyzed using statistical process control methods (SPC). RESULTS: Near-daily maintenance observations were requested for all lines with a 68% response rate. SPC analysis revealed a trend to an increase in bundle compliance. We also report significant adoption of a new maintenance bundle element, central line removal when enteral feedings reached 120 ml/kg per day. The PQCNC CLABSI rate decreased 71%, from 3.94 infections per 1000 line days to 1.16 infections per 1000 line days with sustainment 1 year later (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative structure targeting team development, family partnership, unique bundle elements and strict reporting on line care produced the largest reduction in CLABSI rates for any multiinstitutional NICU collaborative.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Lista de Checagem , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/organização & administração , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/métodos , North Carolina , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress syndrome and chronic lung disease are prevalent disorders in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Evidence demonstrates that timely surfactant administration improves respiratory outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether basic quality-improvement methods can reduce the time to initial surfactant dose for premature infants. DESIGN/METHODS: The study was conducted in a 48-bed neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within a midsize academic centre. The authors included infants less than 27 weeks born from May 2007 to November 2007. Prior to the intervention, we obtained baseline data on the timing of initial surfactant dose. The intervention was designed using a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The authors changed the process of surfactant administration to include administration of surfactant in the delivery room and a respiratory therapist on the delivery room team. The primary outcome measures were percentage of eligible infants who received surfactant in the delivery room and minutes after delivery at which the initial dose of surfactant was administered. RESULTS: After the authors changed the surfactant administration process, 20/21 (95%) of eligible infants received surfactant in the delivery room. The authors decreased the time after delivery of initial surfactant dose from a mean of 26 min to 10.2 min (p=0.0004). The variation in timing of the initial surfactant dose also decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrated that quality-improvement methods can be used to improve the timeliness and reduce variation in timing of surfactant administration within a NICU. Future studies should assess whether these results can be replicated in a variety of NICU settings.