Comparison of Short-Term Postoperative Analgesia by Epidural, Femoral Nerve Block, or Combination Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block in Dogs Undergoing Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare early postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing unilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) that received bupivacaine via preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB), combination femoral-sciatic nerve block (F+SNB), or lumbosacral epidural (EPI). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: Forty-five client-owned dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO. METHODS: Dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: FNB, F+SNB, or EPI. Assessments were completed by an observer blinded to treatment at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after extubation using the Glasgow Composite Pain Score-Short Form (GCPS-SF). Dogs with a total score ≥ 6 or ≥ 3 in any category were given a rescue analgesic. Outcome measures analyzed for differences across treatments were the GCPS-SF at each time point, time to first rescue analgesic, and total number of rescue analgesic doses per dog. RESULTS: The GCPS-SF score at extubation was significantly higher for FNB (median 3) compared to F+SNB (median 2). A significantly higher proportion of dogs receiving FNB (4/14) than F+SNB (0/17) required rescue analgesic at extubation. There was no significant difference in the proportion of dogs requiring rescue at extubation between FNB and EPI (2/14) or between F+SNB and EPI. There was no significant difference in the median time to first rescue between FNB (0 hours) and F+SNB (2 hours) or between F+SNB and EPI (1.5 hours). CONCLUSION: In dogs undergoing unilateral TPLO, bupivacaine administered via FNB, alone or in combination with sciatic nerve block, can provide short-term postoperative analgesia not different to that with administration via lumbosacral epidural.

Surgical management of a subepiglottic thyroglossal duct cyst in a dog.

A 2 yr old dog presented for dysphagia and coughing secondary to a 4 cm × 4 cm turgid subepiglottic mass. Cervical radiographs, an esophagram, and computed tomography confirmed the presence of a cystic mass that was not intimately associated with any surrounding structures. An incisional biopsy confirmed the cystic nature of the mass and helped to rule out a malignancy. A marginal surgical excision was performed via a ventral approach. Histopathology of the mass was consistent with a thyroglossal duct cyst. This is the first report of a thyroglossal duct cyst in this location in a dog. There was no recurrence of clinical signs 14 mo after surgery.