Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Fam Med ; 21(5): 388-394, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37748906

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There are numerous supportive quality improvement (QI) projects to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices in primary care, but recruiting physician practices to join these projects is challenging, costly, and time consuming. We aimed to identify factors leading primary care practices to decline participation in QI projects, and strategies to improve the feasibility and attractiveness of QI projects in the future. METHODS: For this qualitative study, we contacted 109 representatives of practices that had declined participation in 1 of 4 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded EvidenceNOW projects. The representatives were invited to participate in a 15-minute interview or complete a 5-question questionnaire. Thematic analysis was used to organize and characterize findings. RESULTS: Representatives from 31 practices (28.4% of those contacted) responded. Overwhelmingly, respondents indicated that staff turnover, staffing shortages, and general time constraints, exacerbated by the pandemic, prevented participation in the QI projects. Challenges with electronic health records, an expectation of greater financial compensation for participation, and confidence in the practices' current care practices were secondary reasons for declining participation. Tying participation to value-based programs and offering greater compensation were identified as strategies to facilitate recruitment. None of the respondents' recommendations, however, addressed the primary issues of staffing challenges and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Staffing challenges and general time constraints, exacerbated by the pandemic, are compromising primary care practices' ability to engage in QI research projects. To encourage participation, policy makers should consider direct supports for primary care, which may also help to alleviate burnout.


Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde
2.
Genet Med ; 24(3): 729-735, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906500

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Monogenic disorders can present clinically heterogeneous symptoms. We hypothesized that in patients with a monogenic disorder caused by a large deletion, frequently additional loss-of-function (LOF)-intolerant genes are affected, potentially contributing to the phenotype. METHODS: We investigated the LOF-intolerant gene distribution across the genome and its association with benign population and pathogenic classified deletions from individuals with presumably monogenic disorders. For people with presumably monogenic epilepsy, we compared Human Phenotype Ontology terms in people with large and small deletions. RESULTS: We identified LOF-intolerant gene dense regions that were enriched for ClinVar and depleted for population copy number variants. Analysis of data from >143,000 individuals with a suspected monogenic disorder showed that 2.5% of haploinsufficiency disorder-associated deletions can affect at least 1 other LOF-intolerant gene. Focusing on epilepsy, we observed that 13.1% of pathogenic and likely pathogenic ClinVar deletions <3 megabase pair, covering the diagnostically most relevant genes, affected at least 1 additional LOF-intolerant gene. Those patients have potentially more complex phenotypes with increasing deletion size. CONCLUSION: We could systematically show that large deletions frequently affected admditional LOF-intolerant genes in addition to the established disease gene. Further research is needed to understand how additional potential disease-relevant genes influence monogenic disorders to improve clinical care and the efficacy of targeted therapies.


Assuntos
Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA , Genoma , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA/genética , Haploinsuficiência , Humanos , Fenótipo
3.
J Community Health ; 44(1): 178-184, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30194519

RESUMO

Although better community health has long been assumed to be good for local businesses, evidence demonstrating the relationship between community health and employee performance is quite limited. Drawing on human resources data on 6103 employees from four large US manufacturing plants, we found that employees living in counties with poor community health outcomes had considerably higher rates of absenteeism and tardiness (ABT). For example, in one company, employees living in communities with high rates of children on free or reduced lunch had higher rates of ABT compared to other employees [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.52-3.04], and employees living in communities with high rates of drug overdose deaths had higher rates of ABT (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.77). In one plant, the annual value of lost wages due to ABT was over $1.3 million per year. Employees reported that poor community health (e.g., poverty, caregiving burdens, family dysfunction, drug use) resulted in "mental stress" leading to distraction, poor job performance, and more rarely, lapses in safety. These findings bolster the case for greater private sector investment in community health.


Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Desempenho Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Setor Privado/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(11): 1968-1977, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30066117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than 100 million individuals in the USA have been diagnosed with a chronic disease, yet chronic disease care has remained fragmented and of inconsistent quality. Improving chronic disease management has been challenging for primary care and internal medicine practitioners. Practice facilitation provides a comprehensive approach to chronic disease care. The objective is to evaluate the impact of practice facilitation on chronic disease outcomes in the primary care setting. METHODS: This systematic review examined North American studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (database inception to August 2017). Investigators independently extracted and assessed the quality of the data on chronic disease process and clinical outcome measures. Studies implemented practice facilitation and reported quantifiable care processes and patient outcomes for chronic disease. Each study and their evidence were assessed for risk of bias and quality according to the Cochrane Collaboration and the Grade Collaboration tool. RESULTS: This systematic review included 25 studies: 12 randomized control trials and 13 prospective cohort studies. Across all studies, practices and their clinicians were aware of the implementation of practice facilitation. Improvements were observed in most studies for chronic diseases including asthma, cancer (breast, cervical, and colorectal), cardiovascular disease (cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease), and type 2 diabetes. Mixed results were observed for chronic kidney disease and chronic illness care. DISCUSSION: Overall, the results suggest that practice facilitation may improve chronic disease care measures. Across all studies, practices were aware of practice facilitation. These findings lend support for the potential expansion of practice facilitation in primary care. Future work will need to investigate potential opportunities for practice facilitation to improve chronic disease outcomes in other health care settings (e.g., specialty and multi-specialty practices) with standardized measures.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Doença Crônica/tendências , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos
5.
Ann Fam Med ; 16(Suppl 1): S65-S71, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29632228

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Practice facilitation is a promising approach to helping practices implement quality improvements. Our purpose was to describe practice facilitators' and practice leaders' perspectives on implementation of a practice facilitator-supported quality improvement program and describe where their perspectives aligned and diverged. METHODS: We conducted interviews with practice leaders and practice facilitators who participated in a program that included 35 improvement strategies aimed at the ABCS of heart health (aspirin use in high-risk individuals, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation). Rapid qualitative analysis was used to collect, organize, and analyze the data. RESULTS: We interviewed 17 of the 33 eligible practice leaders, and the 10 practice facilitators assigned to those practices. Practice leaders and practice facilitators both reported value in the program's ability to bring needed, high-quality resources to practices. Practice leaders appreciated being able to set the schedule for facilitation and select among the 35 interventions. According to practice facilitators, however, relying on practice leaders to set the pace of the intervention resulted in a lower level of program intensity than intended. Practice leaders preferred targeted assistance, particularly electronic health record documentation guidance and linkages to state smoking cessation programs. Practice facilitators reported that the easiest interventions were those that did not alter care practices. CONCLUSIONS: The dual perspectives of practice leaders and practice facilitators provide a more holistic picture of enablers and barriers to program implementation. There may be greater opportunities to assist small practices through simple, targeted practice facilitator-supported efforts rather than larger, comprehensive quality improvement projects.


Assuntos
Liderança , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Mudança , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
6.
J Community Health ; 43(3): 560-565, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29218540

RESUMO

Virtually all large employers engage in corporate philanthropy, but little is known about the extent to which it is directed toward improving community health. We conducted in-depth interviews with leaders of corporate philanthropy from 13 of the largest manufacturing companies in the US to understand how giving decisions were made, the extent to which funding was directed towards improving community health, and whether companies coordinate with local public health agencies. We found that corporate giving was sizable and directed towards communities in which the manufacturers have a large presence. Giving was aligned with the social determinants of health (i.e., aimed at improving economic stability, the neighborhood and physical environment, education, food security and nutrition, the community and social context, and the health care system). However, improving public health was not often cited as a goal of corporate giving, and coordination with public health agencies was limited. Our results suggest that there may be opportunities for public health agencies to help guide corporate philanthropy, particularly by sharing community-level data and offering their measurement and evaluation expertise.


Assuntos
Obtenção de Fundos , Indústrias , Saúde Pública/economia , Humanos , Indústrias/economia , Indústrias/organização & administração , Características de Residência
7.
Ann Emerg Med ; 69(2): 172-180, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27569108

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We examine emergency department (ED) use and hospitalizations through the ED after Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance expansion in Illinois, a Medicaid expansion state. METHODS: Using statewide hospital administrative data from 2011 through 2015 from 201 nonfederal Illinois hospitals for patients aged 18 to 64 years, mean monthly ED visits were compared before and after ACA implementation by disposition from the ED and primary payer. Visit data were combined with 2010 to 2014 census insurance estimates to compute payer-specific ED visit rates. Interrupted time-series analyses tested changes in ED visit rates and ED hospitalization rates by insurance type after ACA implementation. RESULTS: Average monthly ED visit volume increased by 14,080 visits (95% confidence interval [CI] 4,670 to 23,489), a 5.7% increase, after ACA implementation. Changes by payer were as follows: uninsured decreased by 24,158 (95% CI -27,037 to -21,279), Medicaid increased by 28,746 (95% CI 23,945 to 33,546), and private insurance increased by 9,966 (95% 6,241 to 13,690). The total monthly ED visit rate increased by 1.8 visits per 1,000 residents (95% CI 0.6 to 3.0). The monthly ED visit rate decreased by 8.7 visit per 1,000 uninsured residents (95% CI -11.1 to -6.3) and increased by 10.2 visit per 1,000 Medicaid beneficiaries (95% CI 4.4 to 16.1) and 1.3 visits per 1,000 privately insured residents (95% CI 0.6 to 1.9). After adjusting for baseline trends and season, these changes remained statistically significant. The total number of hospitalizations through the ED was unchanged. CONCLUSION: ED visits by adults aged 18 to 64 years in Illinois increased after ACA health insurance expansion. The increase in total ED visits was driven by an increase in visits resulting in discharge from the ED. A large post-ACA increase in Medicaid visits and a modest increase in privately insured visits outpaced a large reduction in ED visits by uninsured patients. These changes are larger than can be explained by population changes alone and are significantly different from trends in ED use before ACA implementation.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Illinois , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Dig Dis Sci ; 62(10): 2668-2685, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Scoping reviews are preliminary assessments intended to characterize the extent and nature of emerging research evidence, identify literature gaps, and offer directions for future research. We conducted a systematic scoping review to describe published scientific literature on strategies to identify and reduce opioid misuse among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and disorders. METHODS: We performed structured keyword searches to identify manuscripts published through June 2016 in the PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to extract original research articles that described healthcare practices, tools, or interventions to identify and reduce opioid misuse among GI patients. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) was used to classify the strategies presented. RESULTS: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. A majority of studies used quasi-experimental or retrospective cohort study designs. Most studies addressed the CCM's clinical information systems element. Seven studies involved identification of opioid misuse through prescription drug monitoring and opioid misuse screening tools. Four studies discussed reductions in opioid use by harnessing drug monitoring data and individual care plans, and implementing self-management and opioid detoxification interventions. One study described drug monitoring and an audit-and-feedback intervention to both identify and reduce opioid misuse. Greatest reductions in opioid misuse were observed when drug monitoring, self-management, or audit-and-feedback interventions were used. CONCLUSION: Prescription drug monitoring and self-management interventions may be promising strategies to identify and reduce opioid misuse in GI care. Rigorous, empirical research is needed to evaluate the longer-term impact of these strategies.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Gastroenteropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/prevenção & controle , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/prevenção & controle , Autocuidado , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Doença Crônica , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Fatores de Risco
9.
J Emerg Med ; 48(6): 744-50, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25766427

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous calls for hospitals to employ quality improvement (QI) interventions to improve emergency department (ED) performance, their impact has not been explored in multi-site investigations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between use of QI interventions (patient flow strategies, ED electronic dashboards, and five-level triage systems) and hospital performance on receipt of percutaneous intervention (PCI) within 90 min for acute myocardial infarction patients, a publicly available quality measure. METHODS: This was an exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of secondary data from 292 hospitals. Data were drawn from the Quality Improvement Activities Survey, the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey, and Hospital Compare. Linear regression models were used to detect differences in PCI performance scores based on whether hospitals employed one or more QI interventions. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of hospitals reported widespread use of patient flow strategies, 62% reported using a dashboard, and 74% reported using a five-level triage system. Time to PCI performance scores were 3.5 percentage points higher (i.e., better) for hospitals that used patient flow strategies and 6.2 percentage points higher for hospitals that used a five-level triage system. Scores were 10.4 percentage points higher at hospitals that employed two quality improvement interventions and 12.8 percentage points higher at hospitals that employed three. CONCLUSION: Employing QI interventions was associated with better PCI scores. More research is needed to explore the direction of this relationship, but results suggest that hospitals should consider adopting patient flow strategies, electronic dashboards, and five-level triage systems to improve PCI scores.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/métodos
10.
JAMA ; 314(4): 375-83, 2015 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26219055

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: In fiscal year (FY) 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instituted the Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, which reduces payments to the lowest-performing hospitals. However, it is uncertain whether this program accurately measures quality and fairly penalizes hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of hospitals penalized by the HAC Reduction Program and to evaluate the association of a summary score of hospital characteristics related to quality with penalization in the HAC program. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for hospitals participating in the FY2015 HAC Reduction Program were obtained from CMS' Hospital Compare and merged with the 2014 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and FY2015 Medicare Impact File. Logistic regression models were developed to examine the association between hospital characteristics and HAC program penalization. An 8-point hospital quality summary score was created using hospital characteristics related to volume, accreditations, and offering of advanced care services. The relationship between the hospital quality summary score and HAC program penalization was examined. Publicly reported process-of-care and outcome measures were examined from 4 clinical areas (surgery, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia), and their association with the hospital quality summary score was evaluated. EXPOSURES: Penalization in the HAC Reduction Program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital characteristics associated with penalization. RESULTS: Of the 3284 hospitals participating in the HAC program, 721 (22.0%) were penalized. Hospitals were more likely to be penalized if they were accredited by the Joint Commission (24.0% accredited, 14.4% not accredited; odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.70); they were major teaching hospitals (42.3%; OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09-2.29) or very major teaching hospitals (62.2%; OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.55-4.39; vs nonteaching hospitals, 17.0%); they cared for more complex patient populations based on case mix index (quartile 4 vs quartile 1: 32.8% vs 12.1%; OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.44-2.71); or they were safety-net hospitals vs non-safety-net hospitals (28.3% vs 19.9%; OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.11-1.68). Hospitals with higher hospital quality summary scores had significantly better performance on 9 of 10 publicly reported process and outcomes measures compared with hospitals that had lower quality scores (all P ≤ .01 for trend). However, hospitals with the highest quality score of 8 were penalized significantly more frequently than hospitals with the lowest quality score of 0 (67.3% [37/55] vs 12.6% [53/422]; P < .001 for trend). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among hospitals participating in the HAC Reduction Program, hospitals that were penalized more frequently had more quality accreditations, offered advanced services, were major teaching institutions, and had better performance on other process and outcome measures. These paradoxical findings suggest that the approach for assessing hospital penalties in the HAC Reduction Program merits reconsideration to ensure it is achieving the intended goals.


Assuntos
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Hospitais/normas , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , American Hospital Association , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Programas Obrigatórios , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
11.
Acad Emerg Med ; 2024 Apr 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38590030

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persons living with dementia (PLWD) experience frequent and costly emergency department (ED) visits, with poor outcomes attributed to suboptimal care and postdischarge care transitions. Yet, patient-centered data on ED care experiences and postdischarge needs are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine the facilitators and barriers to successful ED care and care transitions after discharge, according to PLWD and their caregivers. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study involving ED patients ages 65 and older with confirmed or suspected dementia and their caregivers. The semistructured interview protocol followed the National Quality Forum's ED Transitions of Care Framework and addressed ED care, care transitions, and outpatient follow-up care. Interviews were conducted during an ED visit at an urban, academic ED. Traditional thematic analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 11 patients and 19 caregivers. Caregivers were more forthcoming than patients about facilitators and challenges experienced. Characteristics of the patients' condition (e.g., resistance to care, forgetfulness), the availability of family resources (e.g., caregiver availability, primary care access), and system-level factors (e.g., availability of timely appointments, hospital policies tailored to persons with dementia) served as facilitators and barriers to successful care. Some resources that would ameliorate care transition barriers could be easily provided in the ED, for example, offering clear discharge instructions and care coordination services and improving patient communication regarding disposition timeline. Other interventions would require investment from other parts of the health care system (e.g., respite for caregivers, broader insurance coverage). CONCLUSIONS: ED care and care transitions for PLWD are suboptimal, and patient-level factors may exacerbate existing system-level deficiencies. Insight from patients and their caregivers may inform the development of ED interventions to design specialized care for this patient population. This qualitative study also demonstrated the feasibility of conducting ED-based studies on PLWD during their ED visit.

12.
Gerontologist ; 2024 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853407

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Self-direction is an approach that allows older adults and people with disabilities to determine the home and community-based services they receive, including the ability to hire caregivers of their choice. Self-direction has been shown to improve outcomes for the service recipients. The promotion of choice and control in self-direction may also affect family caregivers. We conducted a systematic review examining the impact of self-direction on a broad range of caregiver outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review guided by PRISMA guidelines. Literature search was conducted in 8 databases. We appraised risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Sixteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included. We found, with moderate certainty, that self-direction is associated with improved caregivers' personal and social wellbeing. Caregivers also reported reduced unmet needs and increased access to care for the care recipients under self-direction. Self-direction did not appear to reduce caregiving hours. With less certainty, self-direction was also positively associated with increased respite care use, perception of choice, and intention to continue caregiving by caregivers. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Beyond delivering person-centered services that improve recipient outcomes, self-direction may also improve the outcomes of family caregivers.

13.
Med Care Res Rev ; : 10775587241247682, 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708895

RESUMO

Vertical integration of health systems-the common ownership of different aspects of the health care system-continues to occur at increasing rates in the United States. This systematic review synthesizes recent evidence examining the association between two types of vertical integration-hospital-physician (n = 43 studies) and hospital-post-acute care (PAC; n = 10 studies)-and cost, quality, and health services utilization. Hospital-physician integration is associated with higher health care costs, but the effect on quality and health services utilization remains unclear. The effect of hospital-PAC integration on these three outcomes is ambiguous, particularly when focusing on hospital-SNF integration. These findings should raise some concern among policymakers about the trajectory of affordable, high-quality health care in the presence of increasing hospital-physician vertical integration but perhaps not hospital-PAC integration.

14.
J Pain ; 25(7): 104493, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336029

RESUMO

In response to the opioid epidemic and high rates of chronic pain among the veteran population, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs implemented the TelePain-Empower Veterans Program (EVP), a nonpharmacological pain management program for veterans. Delivered virtually, TelePain-EVP incorporates integrated health components (Whole Health, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and Mindful Movement) through interdisciplinary personalized coaching. The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the implementation of TelePain-EVP to identify determinants to implementation, benefits and challenges to participation, and recommendations for future direction. We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct semistructured telephone interviews with TelePain-EVP leaders (n = 3), staff (n = 10), and veterans (n = 22). The interview guides aligned with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic content analysis organized and characterized findings. Several CFIR domains emerged as determinants relevant to program implementation, including innovation (eg, design); individuals (eg, deliverers, recipients); inner (eg, communications) and outer settings (eg, local conditions); and implementation process (eg, reflecting and evaluating). Identified determinants included facilitators (eg, virtual delivery) and barriers (eg, staff shortages). Participants reported improvements in pain management coping skills, interpersonal relationships, and sense of community, but no self-reported reductions in pain or medication use. Program improvement recommendations included using centralized staff to address vacancies, collecting electronic data, offering structured training, and providing course materials to veteran participants. Qualitative data can inform the sustained implementation of TelePain-EVP and other similar telehealth pain management programs. These descriptive data should be triangulated with quantitative data to objectively assess participant TelePain-EVP outcomes and associated participant characteristics. PERSPECTIVE: A qualitative evaluation of a telehealth program to manage chronic pain, guided by the CFIR framework, identified determinants of program implementation. Additionally, participants reported improvements in pain management coping skills, interpersonal relationships, and sense of community, but no self-reported reductions in pain or medication use.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Manejo da Dor , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Telemedicina , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Dor Crônica/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Idoso , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Terapia de Aceitação e Compromisso
15.
Ann Emerg Med ; 61(6): 616-623.e2, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23489652

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Medicare's new, mandatory Hospital Inpatient Value-Based Purchasing Program introduces financial rewards or penalties to hospitals according to achievement or improvement on several publicly reported quality measures. Our objective was to describe hospital reporting on the 4 emergency department (ED)-related program measures, variation in performance on the ED measures across hospital characteristics, and the characteristics of hospitals that were more likely to receive performance scores based on improvement versus achievement. METHODS: This was an exploratory, descriptive analysis. We merged 2008 to 2010 performance data from Hospital Compare with the 2009 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. We calculated a composite score for the 4 ED measures and used Kruskal-Wallis tests to examine differences in performance across hospital characteristics. We also examined differences in the percentage of scores that were awarded according to improvement versus achievement. RESULTS: There were 2,927 hospitals that qualified for the value-based purchasing program and were included in the analysis. For-profit hospitals received the highest scores; public hospitals and hospitals lacking The Joint Commission (TJC) accreditation received the lowest scores. Public hospitals had the largest share of scores awarded according to improvement (39.8%); for-profit hospitals had the lowest (27.8%). CONCLUSION: We found variation in performance by hospital characteristics on the ED-related program measures. Although public and non-TJC-accredited hospitals trailed in performance, they showed strong signs of improvement, signaling that performance gaps by ownership and accreditation may decrease. Considering the increasing scope of the value-based purchasing program, ED leaders should monitor both achievement and improvement on the 4 ED-related program measures.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Medicare/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Aquisição Baseada em Valor/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
16.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 10: E198, 2013 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286272

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Older adults have higher rates of emergency department use than do younger adults, and the number of centenarians is expected to increase. The objective of this study was to examine centenarians' use of the emergency department in the United States, including diagnoses, charges, and disposition. METHODS: The 2008 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality provided encounter-level data on emergency department visits and weights for producing nationwide estimates. From this data set, we collected patient characteristics including age, sex, primary diagnosis, and disposition. We used χ(2) tests and t tests to test for significant differences among people aged 80 to 89, 90 to 99, and 100 years or older. RESULTS: Centenarians had a lower rate of emergency department use than those aged 90 to 99 (736 per 1,000 vs 950 per 1,000; P < .05). We found no significant difference in use between centenarians and those aged 80 to 89. The most common diagnoses for centenarians were superficial injuries (5.8% of visits), pneumonia (5.1%), and urinary tract infections (5.1%). Centenarians were more likely to visit the emergency department for fall-related injuries (21.5%) than those aged 80 to 89 (14.1%; P < .05) and 90 to 99 (18.7%; P < .05). Centenarians were more likely to die in the emergency department (2.0%) than were those aged 80 to 89 (0.6%; P < .05) and 90 to 99 (0.7%; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Centenarians in emergency departments in the United States have different diagnoses, conditions, and outcomes than other older Americans.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
J Rural Health ; 39(1): 61-68, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829624

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Anchor institutions ("anchors") are large employers, rooted in a community by reason of mission, capital, or relationships. Many anchors have encouraged coronavirus vaccination for employees and their families. Our objective was to determine whether the presence of an anchor was associated with a higher county-level vaccination rate. METHODS: A cross-sectional study focused on 745 small- and mid-sized US counties. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Reference USA's US Business Database, Economic Innovation Group's Distressed Communities Index database, 2021 County Health Ratings and Rankings, 2020 US Presidential Election popular vote data, and National Center for Health Statistics urban-rural classification data. We constructed 3 explanatory variables of interest: a binary variable indicating whether the county had an anchor; a continuous variable representing the number of anchors within a county; and the percent of all workers in the county who were employed by an anchor. Multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for race/ethnicity, political party allegiance, rurality, economic distress, and prevalence of smoking and adult obesity. FINDINGS: Counties with an anchor had vaccination rates 2.31 (P<.01) percentage points higher than those without an anchor. The number of anchors in a county was also significantly associated with higher vaccination rates. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts by anchors to encourage vaccination may have been successful, and that anchors may be well positioned to amplify public health messages. However, the influence and efforts of anchors to increase vaccination did not fully mitigate disparities in vaccination rates by race, ethnicity, and political party allegiance.


Assuntos
Coronavirus , Etnicidade , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Fumar
18.
J Occup Environ Med ; 65(12): 1003-1007, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37590376

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the actions used by health professionals employed by large, for-profit businesses to promote uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, and factors that facilitated and hindered coordination with local public health leaders. METHODS: In this qualitative multiple case study, we conducted telephone interviews with health professionals from businesses, health department leaders, and others who could provide information about local vaccination efforts (e.g., emergency managers, reporters). RESULTS: Businesses' self-interest (i.e., need to keep employees working), vaccine mandates, and characteristics of the businesses (e.g., ownership, expertise) facilitated leadership in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Coordination with local health departments was influenced by the resources of the local health department and history of collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals employed by large businesses can serve as key public health partners, but their role is shaped by characteristics of the businesses and communities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Saúde Pública , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Propriedade
19.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 49(4): 199-206, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739267

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) interventions in primary care are increasingly designed and implemented by multisector partnerships, yet little guidance exists on how to best monitor or evaluate these partnerships. The goal of this project was to describe an approach for evaluating the development and effectiveness of a multisector partnership using data from the first year of the Healthy Hearts for Michigan (HH4M) Cooperative, a multisector partnership of nine organizations tasked with designing and implementing evidence-based QI strategies for hypertension management and tobacco cessation in 50 rural primary care practices. METHODS: The researchers developed a 49-item online survey focused on factors that facilitate or hinder multisector partnerships, drawing on implementation science and partnership, engagement, and collaboration research. The team surveyed all 44 members of the HH4M Cooperative (79.5% response rate) and conducted interviews with 14 members. The interviews focused on implementation phase-specific goals, accomplishments, and challenges. Descriptive analysis was used for the survey results, and thematic analysis for the interview data. RESULTS: Respondents reported strong overall performance by the Cooperative during its first year, which facilitated the successful completion of several intervention design tasks. Strengths included having a clear purpose and trust and respect among members. Areas for improvement included a need for common terminology, clarification of roles and functions, and improvement in communication across workgroups. Lack of engagement from physician practices due to capacity constraints, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, was the Cooperative's biggest challenge. CONCLUSION: This multimethod approach to evaluating the development and effectiveness of a multisector partnership yielded practical, actionable feedback to program leaders.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Melhoria de Qualidade , Humanos , Pandemias , Comunicação , Atenção Primária à Saúde
20.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun ; 35: 101199, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37671245

RESUMO

Background: The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is particularly high in several US states, which include the state of Michigan. Hypertension and smoking are two major risk factors for mortality due to CVD. Rural Michigan is disproportionally affected by CVD and by primary care shortages. The Healthy Hearts for Michigan (HH4M) study aims to promote hypertension management and smoking cessation through practice facilitation and quality improvement efforts and is part of the multi-state EvidenceNOW: Building State Capacity initiative to provide external support to primary care practices to improve care delivery. Methods: Primary care practices in rural and underserved areas of Michigan were recruited to join HH4M, a pragmatic, single-arm hybrid Type 2 effectiveness-implementation study during which practice facilitation was delivered at the practice level for 12 months, followed by a 3-month maintenance period. Results: Fifty-four practices were enrolled over a 12-month recruitment period. At baseline, the mean proportion (standard deviation) of patients at the practice level meeting the clinical quality measures were: blood pressure, 0.72 (0.12); tobacco screening, 0.80 (0.30); tobacco cessation intervention, 0.57 (0.28); tobacco screening and cessation intervention: 0.78 (0.26). Conclusion: This three-year research program will evaluate the ability of rural and medically underserved primary care practices to implement the quality improvement model by identifying drivers of and barriers to sustainable implementation, and test whether the model improves (a) blood pressure control and (b) tobacco use screening and cessation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA