Evaluation of hemostatic devices in a randomized porcine model of junctional hemorrhage and 72-hour prolonged field care.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage control in prolonged field care (PFC) presents unique challenges that drive the need for enhanced point of injury treatment capabilities to maintain patient stability beyond the Golden Hour. To address this, two hemostatic agents, Combat Gauze (CG) and XSTAT, were evaluated in a porcine model of uncontrolled junctional hemorrhage for speed of deployment and hemostatic efficacy over 72 hours. METHODS: The left subclavian artery and subscapular vein were isolated in anesthetized male Yorkshire swine (70-85 kg) and injured via 50% transection, followed by 30 seconds of hemorrhage. Combat Gauze (n = 6) or XSTAT (n = 6) was administered until bleeding stopped and remained within subjects for observation over 72 hours. Physiologic monitoring, hemostatic efficacy, and hematological parameters were measured throughout the protocol. Gross necropsy and histology were performed following humane euthanasia. RESULTS: Both CG and XSTAT maintained hemostasis throughout the full duration of the protocol. There were no significant differences between groups in hemorrhage volume (CG: 1021.0 ± 183.7 mL vs. XSTAT: 968.2 ± 243.3 mL), total blood loss (CG: 20.8 ± 2.7% vs. XSTAT: 20.1 ± 5.1%), or devices used (CG: 3.8 ± 1.2 vs. XSTAT: 5.3 ± 1.4). XSTAT absorbed significantly more blood than CG (CG: 199.5 ± 50.3 mL vs. XSTAT: 327.6 ± 71.4 mL) and was significantly faster to administer (CG: 3.4 ± 1.6 minutes vs. XSTAT: 1.4 ± 0.5 minutes). There were no significant changes in activated clot time, prothrombin time, or international normalized ratio between groups or compared with baseline throughout the 72-hour protocol. Histopathology revealed no evidence of microthromboemboli or disseminated coagulopathies across evaluated tissues in either group. CONCLUSION: Combat Gauze and XSTAT demonstrated equivalent hemostatic ability through 72 hours, with no overt evidence of coagulopathies from prolonged indwelling. In addition, XSTAT offered significantly faster administration and the ability to absorb more blood. Taken together, XSTAT offers logistical and efficiency advantages over CG for immediate control of junctional noncompressible hemorrhage, particularly in a tactical environment. In addition, extension of indicated timelines to 72 hours allows translation to PFC.

Noninvasive Cerebral Perfusion and Oxygenation Monitoring Augment Prolonged Field Care in a Non-Human Primate Model of Decompensated Hemorrhage and Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Decompensated hemorrhagic shock (DHS) is the leading cause of preventable death in combat casualties. "Golden hour" resuscitation effects on cerebral blood flow and perfusion following DHS in prolonged field care (PFC) are not well investigated. Using an established non-human primate model of DHS, we hypothesized noninvasive regional tissue oxygenation (rSO2) and Transcranial Doppler (TCD) would correlate to the invasive measurement of partial pressure of oxygen (PtO2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in guiding hypotensive resuscitation in a PFC setting. METHODS: Ten rhesus macaques underwent DHS followed by a 2 h PFC phase (T0-T120), and subsequent 4 h hospital resuscitation phase (T120-T360). Invasive monitoring (PtO2, MAP) was compared against noninvasive monitoring systems (rSO2, TCD). Results were analyzed using t tests and one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Linear correlation was determined via Pearson r. Significance = P < 0.05. RESULTS: MAP, PtO2, rSO2, and mean flow velocity (MFV) significantly decreased from baseline at T0. MAP and PtO2 were restored to baseline by T15, while rSO2 was delayed through T30. At T120, MFV returned to baseline, while the Pulsatility Index significantly elevated by T120 (1.50 ±â€Š0.31). PtO2 versus rSO2 (R2 = 0.2099) and MAP versus MFV (R2 = 0.2891) shared very weak effect sizes, MAP versus rSO2 (R2 = 0.4636) displayed a low effect size, and PtO2 versus MFV displayed a moderate effect size (R2 = 0.5540). CONCLUSIONS: Though noninvasive monitoring methods assessed here did not correlate strongly enough against invasive methods to warrant a surrogate in the field, they do effectively augment and direct resuscitation, while potentially serving as a substitute in the absence of invasive capabilities.