Hospital-Wide Adherence to Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Lowering opioid prescription doses and quantity decreases the risk of chronic opioid usage. A tool was inserted into the brief operative note for the surgeon to assess the severity of pain associated with the procedure. We studied surgeon adherence to current opioid-prescribing recommendations. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with 5486 patients were included in the study population. Each patient's prescription was scored yes or no for adherence on total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and days prescribed with the selection in the brief operative note. The entire study population was tested for an increase from the null-hypothesis "benchmark" value of 75% using a one-sided exact binomial test of a single proportion with P < 0.05. This procedure was repeated for subgroups, with P < 0.01. RESULTS: Adherence to guidelines was higher than the 75% benchmark for "total MMEs prescribed" (79.5%; P < 0.001), but lower for "number of days prescribed" (63.5%; P > 0.999). Surgeries with severe predicted pain showed the highest adherence toward total MMEs prescribed at 87.1%, followed by moderate (80.5%) and mild (74.5%). Severe cases also showed the highest adherence in number of days prescribed (92.4%). Adherence to total MMEs prescribed was highest among attending physicians (88.1%) and lowest among residents/fellows (76.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to current guidelines was 79.5% for MMEs prescribed but only 63.5% for days prescribed. Compliance with guidelines was better for severe procedures than mild or moderate. Differences were seen across surgical departments. While an improvement from previous reports, further improvement is needed to reduce the number of days of opioids prescribed and increase compliance with recommended guidelines.

Simultaneous Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Infective Endocarditis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Presentation.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) occur due to hematogenous bacterial spread, theoretically increasing the risk for concurrent infections. There is a scarcity of literature investigating this specific association. We aimed to assess the prevalence, comorbidities, and clinical presentation of patients who have simultaneous PJI and IE. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 655 patients (321 men, 334 women; 382 total hip arthroplasty, 273 total knee arthroplasty) who developed a PJI from July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, at one institution. There were two groups created: patients diagnosed with PJI with IE (PJI + IE) and PJI patients who did not have IE (PJI). We analyzed clinical outcomes and comorbidities. RESULTS: There were nine patients who had PJI with IE (1.4% of PJI patients). The C-reactive protein (170.9 versus 78, P = 0.026), Elixhauser comorbidity score (P = 0.002), length of hospital stay (10.9 versus 5.7 days, P = 0.043), and the 2-year postdischarge mortality rate (55.6 versus 9.0%, P = 0.0007) were significantly greater in the PJI + IE group. Comorbidities such as iron deficiency anemia (P = 0.03), coagulopathy (P = 0.02), complicated diabetes mellitus (P = 0.02), electrolyte disorders (P = 0.01), neurologic disease (P = 0.004), paralysis (P = 0.04), renal failure (P = 0.0001), and valvular disease (P = 0.0008) occurred more frequently in the PJI + IE group. Modified Duke's criteria were met for possible or definite IE in eight of the nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent PJIs and IE, although rare, are a potentially devastating disease state with increased length of hospital stay and 2-year mortality rates. This emphasizes the need for appropriate IE workups in patients who have a PJI. The modified Duke's criteria are effective in establishing a diagnosis for IE in this scenario.

Do Quality Measures or Hospital Characteristics Predict Readmission Penalties for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Quality rating systems exist to grade the value of care provided by hospitals, but the extent to which these rating systems correlate with patient outcomes is unclear. The association of quality rating systems and hospital characteristics with excess readmission penalties for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was studied. METHODS: The fiscal year 2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment System final rule was used to identify 2,286 hospitals subject to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Overall, 6 hospital quality rating systems and 5 hospital characteristics were obtained. These factors were analyzed to determine the effect on hospital penalties for THA and TKA excess readmissions. RESULTS: Hospitals that achieved a higher Medicare Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating demonstrated a significantly lower likelihood of receiving THA and TKA readmission penalties (Cramer's V = 0.236 and Rp = -0.233; P < .001 for both). Hospitals ranked among the US News & World Report's top 50 best hospitals for orthopaedics were significantly less likely to be penalized (V = 0.042; P = .043). The remaining 4 quality rating systems were not associated with readmission penalties. Penalization was more likely for hospitals with fewer THA and TKA discharges (Rp = -0.142; P < .001), medium-sized institutions (100 to 499 beds; V = 0.075; P = .002), teaching hospitals (V = 0.049; P = .019), and safety net hospitals (V = 0.043; P = .039). Penalization was less likely for West and Midwest hospitals (V = 0.112; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating and recognition among the US News & World Report's top 50 orthopaedic hospitals were associated with a reduced likelihood of THA and TKA readmission penalties. The other 4 widely accepted quality rating systems did not correlate with readmission penalties. Teaching and safety net hospitals may be biased toward higher readmission rates.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria leads to increased mortality. Little is known about development of SIRS in patients who have prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, clinical outcomes, and causative organisms in patients who develop SIRS with PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 655 patients (321 men, 334 women; 382 total hip, 273 total knee) who have hip or knee PJI at 1 institution between July 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. We formed 2 groups: patients who have SIRS alert (PJI + SIRS) and patients who do not have SIRS alert (PJI). We analyzed clinical outcomes, comorbidities, and operating room culture results. RESULTS: Of 655 patients, 63 developed SIRS with PJI (9.6%). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (27.0 versus. 6.9%, P < .001) and length of stay (7.7 versus. 5.6 days, P = .003) were greater in PJI + SIRS. At 2 years, reoperation (36.5 versus. 22.3%, P = .01) and mortality rates (17.5 versus. 8.8%, P = .03) were greater in PJI + SIRS. Risk factors included deficiency anemia (P = .001), blood loss anemia (P = .013), uncomplicated diabetes (P = .006), diabetes with complication (P = .001), electrolyte disorder (P < .00001), neurological disorder (P = .0001), paralysis (P = .026), renal failure (P = .005), and peptic ulcer disease (P = .004). Staphylococcus aureus more commonly speciated on tissue cultures in PJI + SIRS (P = .002). CONCLUSION: The incidence of SIRS is 10% among patients who have PJI. Development of PJI + SIRS is associated with increased lengths of stay, ICU admissions, and 2-year reoperation and mortality rates. Identifying certain comorbidities can stratify patients' risk of developing PJI + SIRS.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Did Not Reduce Postoperative Pain or Opioid Use After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newly developed regional anesthesia technique designed to manage postoperative hip pain following a fracture or surgery while also maintaining quadriceps strength and mobility. The goal of our study was to compare postoperative pain scores and opioid usage during the postoperative period before discharge following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the posterior approach between patients who received a PENG block and those who did not. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients undergoing elective, posterior approach THA at a single tertiary-care academic center. The 2 groups included a study group (THA with PENG block in 2021; n = 66) and a control group (THA before PENG block implementation in 2019; n = 70). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pain scores during postoperative minutes 0 to 59 (study group 6.8; control group 6.6; P = .81) or during postoperative minutes 60 to 119 (study group 6.2; control group 5.6; P = .40). There were no significant differences in total postoperative in-hospital morphine milliequivalent opioid consumption (study group 55.8 morphine milligram equivalents; control group 75.0 morphine milligram equivalents; P = .14). The study group was found to have a shorter length of stay (study group 17.0 hours; control group 32.6 hours; P < .0001) and faster mobilization (study group 3.0 hours; control group 4.9 hours; P < .0001) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that use of the PENG block did not result in lower postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption after THA using the posterior surgical approach. The study group had a shorter length of stay and time to mobilization than the control group, though this was likely due to standard hospital procedure shifting to same-day discharge for THA between 2019 and 2021 due to COVID-19.

Treatment of Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Requires Extensive Administrative Work.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) typically requires more resource utilization than primary total joint arthroplasty. This study quantifies the amount of time spent in the electronic medical record (EMR) for patients who have PJI requiring surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of EMR activity for 165 hip and knee PJIs was performed to capture work during the preoperative and postoperative time periods. Independent sample t tests were conducted to compare total time based on procedure, age, insurance, health literacy, sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The EMR work performed by the orthopaedic team was 338.4 minutes (min) (SD 130.3), with 119.4 minutes (SD 62.8) occurring preoperatively and 219.0 minutes (SD 112.9) postoperatively. Preoperatively, the surgeon's work accounted for 35.7 minutes (SD 25.4), mid-level providers 21.3 minutes (SD 15.9), nurses 38.6 minutes (SD 36.8), and office staff 32.7 minutes (SD 29.9). Infectious disease colleagues independently performed 158.9 minutes (SD 108.5) of postoperative work. Overall, PJI of the knees required more postoperative work. Secondary analysis revealed that patients who have hip PJI and a body mass index <30 and patients <65 years of age required more work when compared to the PJI of heavier and older individuals. There was no difference in total work based on insurance, health literacy, race, or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 hours of administrative work is required for surgical management of PJI. Surgeons alone performed 451% more work for PJI during the preoperative period (7.9 versus 35.7 min) compared to primary total joint arthroplasty. In efforts to provide best care for our sickest patients, much work is required perioperatively. This work is necessary to consider when assigning value and physician reimbursement.

The Use of General Anesthesia in Revision Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia gives superior outcomes for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of available data regarding contemporary general anesthesia (GA) approaches for revision TJA utilized at high-volume joint arthroplasty centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 850 consecutive revision TJAs (405 revision total hip arthroplasties and 445 revision total knee arthroplasties) performed over 4 years at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and reported on the lengths of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: Of the revision arthroplasty patients, 74.4% (632 of 850) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 68.5% (582 of 850) of subjects were able to participate in physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.7%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 11.3% (n = 96), while the reoperation rate was 9.4% (n = 80). CONCLUSIONS: While neuraxial anesthesia is commonly preferred when performing revision TJA, we have demonstrated favorable safety and efficiency metrics utilizing GA in conjunction with contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that modern GA techniques can be successfully used in revision TJA.

Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention is Well-Tolerated Without Inducing Resistance: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) maximizes reoperation-free survival. We evaluated SAT after DAIR of acutely infected primary TJA regarding: 1) adverse drug reaction (ADR)/intolerance; 2) reoperation for infection; and 3) antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) DAIR for acute periprosthetic joint infection at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2020 were identified (n = 115). Data were collected on patient demographics, infecting organisms, antibiotics, ADR/intolerances, reoperations, and antibiotic resistances. Median SAT duration was 11 months. Stepwise multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify covariates significantly associated with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: There were 11.1 and 16.3% of TKA and THA DAIR patients, respectively, who had ADR/intolerance to SAT. Patients prescribed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (P = .0014) or combination antibiotic therapy (P = .0169) after TKA DAIR had increased risk of ADR/intolerance. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between TKA (83.3%) and THA (65.1%) DAIR (P = .5900) at mean 2.8-year follow-up. Risk of reoperation for infection was higher among TKA Staphylococcus aureus infections (P = .0004) and lower with increased SAT duration (P < .0450). The optimal duration of SAT was nearly 2 years. No cases of antibiotic resistance developed due to SAT. CONCLUSIONS: Consider SAT after TJA DAIR due to improved reoperation-free survival and favorable safety profile. Prolonged SAT did not induce antibiotic resistance. Use trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with caution because of the increased likelihood of ADR/intolerance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Does the type of lower extremity fracture affect long-term opioid usage? A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION:  Patients recovering from musculoskeletal trauma have a heightened risk of opioid dependence and misuse, as these medications are typically required for pain management. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the association between fracture type and chronic opioid use following fracture fixation in patients who sustain lower extremity trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using PubMed and Web of Science to identify articles reporting chronic opioid use in patients recovering from surgery for lower extremity fractures. 732 articles were identified using keyword and MeSH search functions, and 9 met selection criteria. Studies were included in the final analysis if they reported the number of patients who remained on opioids 6 months after surgery for a specific lower extremity fracture (chronic usage). Logistic regressions and descriptive analyses were performed to determine the rate of chronic opioid use within each fracture type and if age, year, country of origin of study, or pre-admission opioid use influenced chronic opioid use following surgery. RESULTS: Bicondylar and unicondylar tibial-plateau fractures had the largest percentage of patients that become chronic opioid users (29.7-35.2%), followed by hip (27.8%), ankle (19.7%), femoral-shaft (18.5%), pilon (17.2%), tibial-shaft (13.8%), and simple ankle fractures (2.8-4.7%).Most opioid-naive samples had significantly lower rates of chronic opioid use after surgery (2-9%, 95% CI) when compared to samples that allowed pre-admission opioid use (13-50%, 95% CI). There were no significant associations between post-operative chronic opioid use and age, year, or country of origin of study. CONCLUSIONS:  Patients with lower extremity fractures have substantial risk of becoming chronic opioid users. Even the lowest rates of chronic opioid use identified in this meta-analysis are higher than those in the general population. It is important that orthopedic surgeons tailor pain-management protocols to decrease opioid usage after lower extremity trauma.

Effect of Fracture Type, Treatment, and Surgeon Training on Reoperation After Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of Vancouver B periprosthetic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs) is complex due to the overlap between arthroplasty and orthopedic trauma techniques. Our purpose was to assess the effects of fracture type, treatment difference, and surgeon training on the risk of reoperation in Vancouver B PPFF. METHODS: A collaborative research consortium of 11 centers retrospectively reviewed PPFFs from 2014 to 2019 to determine the effects of variations in surgeon expertise, fracture type, and treatment on surgical reoperation. Surgeons were classified as per fellowship training, fractures using the Vancouver classification, and treatment as open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or revision total hip arthroplasty with or without ORIF. Regression analyses were performed with reoperation as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Fracture type (Vancouver B3 versus B1: odds ratio [OR]: 5.70) was an independent risk factor for reoperation. No differences were found in reoperation rates with treatment (ORIF versus revision: OR 0.92, P = .883). Treatment by a nonarthroplasty-trained surgeon versus an arthroplasty specialist led to higher odds of reoperation in all Vancouver B fracture (OR: 2.87, P = .023); however, no significant differences were seen in the Vancouver B2 group alone (OR: 2.61, P = .139). Age was a significant risk factor for reoperation in all Vancouver B fractures (OR: 0.97, P = .004) and in the B2 fractures alone (OR: 0.96, P = .007). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that age and fracture type affect reoperation rates. Treatment type did not affect reoperation rates and the effect of surgeon training is unclear.

Surgical Approach Does Not Affect Chronic Opioid Usage After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Three different surgical approaches (the direct anterior, antero-lateral, and posterior) are commonly used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to an internervous and intermuscular approach, the direct anterior approach may result in less postoperative pain and opioid use, although all 3 approaches have similar outcomes 5 years after surgery. Perioperative opioid medication consumption poses a dose-dependent risk of long-term opioid use. We hypothesized that the direct anterior approach is associated with less opioid usage over 180 days after surgery than the antero-lateral or posterior approaches. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including 508 patients (192 direct anterior, 207 antero-lateral, and 109 posterior approaches). Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were identified from the medical records. The state prescription database was used to determine opioid use 90 days before and 1 year after THA. Regression analyses controlling for sex, race, age, and body mass index were used to determine the effect of surgical approach on opioid use over 180 days after surgery. RESULTS: No difference was seen in the proportion of long-term opioid users based on approach (P = .78). There was no significant difference in the distribution of opioid prescriptions filled between surgical approach groups in the year after surgery (P = .35). Not taking opioids 90 days prior to surgery, regardless of approach, was associated with a 78% decrease in the odds of becoming a chronic opioid user (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use prior to surgery, rather than THA surgical approach, was associated with chronic opioid consumption following THA.

Articulating Knee Spacers in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: All Polyethylene Tibia or Tibial Insert?

BACKGROUND: The best antibiotic spacer for periprosthetic knee joint infection treatment is unknown. Using a metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) component provides a functional knee and may avoid a second surgery. Our study investigated complication rates, treatment efficacies, durabilities, and costs of MoP articulating spacer constructs using either an all-polyethylene tibia (APT) or a polyethylene insert (PI). We hypothesized that while the PI would cost less, the APT spacer would have lower complication rates and higher efficacies and durabilities. METHODS: A retrospective review evaluated 126 consecutive articulating knee spacer (64 APTs and 62 PIs) cases from 2016 to 2020 was performed. Demographic information, spacer components, complication rates, infection recurrence, spacer longevity, and implant costs were analyzed. Complications were classified as follows: spacer-related; antibiotic-related; infection recurrence; or medical. Spacer longevity was measured for patients who underwent reimplantation and for those who had a retained spacer. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall complications (P < .48), spacer-related complications (P = 1.0), infection recurrences (P = 1.0), antibiotic-related complications (P < .24), or medical complications (P < .41). Average time to reimplantation was 19.1 weeks (4.3 to 98.3 weeks) for APT spacers and 14.4 weeks (6.7 to 39.7 weeks) for PI spacers (P = .09). There were 31% (20 of 64) of APT spacers and 30% (19 of 62) of PI spacers that remained intact for an average duration of 26.2 (2.3 to 76.1) and 17.1 weeks (1.7 to 54.7) (P = .25), respectively, for patients who lived for the duration of the study. PI spacers cost less than APT ($1,474.19 versus $2,330.47, respectively; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: APT and PI tibial components have similar results regarding complication profiles and infection recurrence. Both may be durable if spacer retention is elected, with PI constructs being less expensive.

Inconsistency and Ambiguity Within the International Classification of Disease 10 Procedure Coding System for Hip Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th Revision Procedure Coding System (PCS) was created to increase the granularity of procedural coding. These codes are entered by hospital coders from information derived from the medical record. Concern exists that this increase in complexity could lead to inaccurate data. METHODS: Medical records and ICD-10-PCS codes were reviewed for operatively treated geriatric hip fractures from January 2016 through February 2019 at a tertiary referral medical center. Definitions for each of the 7-unit figures from the 2022 American Medical Association's ICD-10-PCS official codebook were compared to the medical, operative, and implant records. RESULTS: There were 56% (135 of 241) of PCS codes that had ambiguous, partially incorrect, or frankly incorrect figures within the code. One or more inaccurate figures were noted in 72% (72 of 100) of fractures treated with arthroplasty compared to 44.7% (63 of 141) treated with fixation (P < .01). There was at least 1 frankly incorrect figure contained in 9.5% (23 of 241) of codes. Approach was coded ambiguously for 24.8% (29 of 117) of pertrochanteric fractures. Device/implant codes were partially incorrect in 34.9% (84 of 241) of all hip fracture PCS codes. Hemi and total hip arthroplasties were partially incorrect in 78.4% (58 of 74) and 30.8% (8/26) of device/implant codes, respectively. Significantly more femoral neck (69.4%, 86 of 124) than pertrochanteric fractures (41.9%, 49 of 117) had 1 or more incorrect or partially correct figures (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Despite the increased granularity of ICD-10-PCS codes, the application of this system is inconsistent and often incorrect when applied to hip fracture treatments. The definitions in the PCS system are difficult to be utilized by coders and do not reflect the operation performed.

Extensor Mechanism Disruption Remains a Challenging Problem.

BACKGROUND: Extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating problem commonly treated with allograft or synthetic reconstruction. Understanding of reconstruction success rates and patient recorded outcomes is lacking. METHODS: Patients who have an EMD after TKA undergoing mesh or whole-extensor allograft reconstruction between 2011 and 2019, with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed at two tertiary care centers. Functional failure was defined as extensor lag >30 degrees, amputation, or fusion, as well as revision extensor mechanism reconstruction (EMR). Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and factors for success were determined with logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of fifty-six EMRs (49 patients), 50.0% (28/56) were functionally successful at 3.2 years of mean follow-up (range, 0.2 to 7.4). In situ survivorship of the reconstructions at 36 months was 75.0% (42 of 58). There were 50.0% (14 of 28) of functionally failed EMRs that retained their reconstruction at last follow-up. Mean extensor lag among successes and failures was 5.4 and 71.0° (P = .01), respectively. Mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores were 67.1 and 48.8 among successes and failures (P = .01). There were 64.0% (16 of 25) of successes and 1 of 19 failures that obtained a Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement score above the minimum patient-acceptable symptom state for TKA. Survivorship and success rates were similar between reconstruction methods (P = .86; P = .76). All-cause mortality was 8.2% (4 of 49), each with EMR failure prior to death. All-cause reoperation rate was 42.9% (24 of 56), with a 14.3% (8 of 56) rate of revision EMR and 10.7% (6 of 56) rate of above-knee-amputation or modular fusion. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter investigation of mesh or allograft EMR demonstrated modest functional success at 3.2 years. Complication and reoperation rates were high, regardless of EMR technique. Therefore, EMD after TKA remains problematic.

Does In-Hospital Opioid Use Affect Opioid Consumption After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use strongly correlates with greater postoperative opioid use and complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of information regarding the effect of opioid consumption during the hospital stay and within the operating room on postoperative opioid use. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 369 consecutive patients undergoing primary TJA at an academic center over a 9-month period. Ninety-day preoperative and postoperative opioid prescriptions were obtained from the state's drug monitoring database. In-hospital opioid consumption data was obtained from the preoperative unit, operating room, postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and hospital floor. Multivariate analysis was utilized to compare patients' total in-hospital opioid consumption with their preoperative and postoperative use, along with opioid use throughout the hospitalization. RESULTS: Total in-hospital opioid consumption was independently associated with postoperative opioid use (rs = 0.17, P = .0010). Opioids consumed on the hospital floor correlated with opioid use in the preoperative unit (rs = 0.11, P = .0338) and PACU (rs = 0.15, P = .0032). Increased preoperative opioid consumption was the greatest risk factor for excessive postoperative use (rs = 0.44, P < .0001). A greater proportion of patients <65 years of age were high posthospital opioid consumers (P = .0146) and significantly more TKA patients were in the higher use groups (P = .0006). CONCLUSION: In-hospital opioid use is independently associated with preoperative and postoperative consumption. Preoperative opioid use remains the greatest risk factor for increased opioid consumption after TJA. Multimodal approaches to decrease reliance on opioids for pain control during hospitalization may offer hope to further decrease postoperative usage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Social Needs of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Many patients have unmet social needs that may affect their health care utilization and outcomes. We sought to examine a program to determine the types of social needs facing arthroplasty patients and methods used to address these needs. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, retrospective review of our integrated social needs program for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. A 16-question needs assessment was instituted as part of our perioperative protocol between February 1, 2020, to October 1, 2020. We examined the types of social needs in 250 primary TJA patients and a resolution method. We evaluated associations between social needs and demographics and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Outcome measures were also evaluated, including readmissions, discharge date, and outcome score changes. RESULTS: Forty-four (17.6%) patients had a social need. Social needs frequency increased in non-White patients (P ≤ .0001), non-English speakers (P = .0304), younger patients (P = .001), nonmarried patients (P = .0006), unemployed patients (P = .0189), and patients with less health literacy (P = .0215). ADI scores were positively associated with social needs at the national (P = .0006) and state levels (P = .0004). Overall, 75.9% of needs centered around utility payments, employment, prescription costs, education, and transportation. In addition, 64% of the identified needs were resolved through outside referrals. Ninety-day readmissions were significantly higher in patients with social needs (P = .0087). DISCUSSION: Overall, 17.6% of patients in our state have social needs before TJA. Factors increasing the risk of social needs include younger age, minority race, single or divorced marital status, unemployment, low health literacy, and higher ADI. The 90-day readmission rate was significantly higher in patients with social needs.

Prevalence of Chronic Opioid Use in the Elderly After Hip Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND: While interest has focused on opioid use after total hip arthroplasty, little research has investigated opioid use in elderly patients after hip fracture. We hypothesize that a substantial number of opioid-naïve elderly patients go on to chronic opioid use after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 219 patients 65 years and older who underwent surgical fixation between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019 for a native hip fracture. Patients were excluded for polytrauma, periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, recent major surgery, or death within 90 days of their hip surgery. The state prescription monitoring database was used to determine opioid use. RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients (26%) were postoperative chronic opioid users. Of the initial 188 opioid-naïve patients, 43 (23%) became chronic users. Of the 31 preoperative opioid users, 15 (48%) continued as chronic users. Chronic postoperative users were more likely to be White (76% vs 91%, P = .04), younger (78 vs 82 years, P = .003), and preoperative opioid users (odds ratio 3.3, P = .007). Arthroplasty vs fixation did not affect the rate of chronic opioid use (P = .22). CONCLUSION: Chronic opioid use is surprisingly common after hip fracture repair in the elderly. Twenty-three percent of opioid-naïve hip fracture patients became chronic users after surgery. Continued vigilance is needed by orthopedic surgeons to limit the amount and duration of postoperative narcotic prescriptions and to monitor for continued use.

Extensive Preoperative Work Is Required for Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Determining the clinical effort associated with preparing for revision total hip and knee arthroplasty is necessary to maintain the appropriate work relative value unit rating. We have investigated the work done by the orthopedic surgical team in the days and weeks prior to revision hip and knee arthroplasty using a count of time by team members in the electronic medical record (EMR). METHODS: EMR audit logs were generated, and preoperative work (POW) was calculated for members of the surgical team for 200 sequential revision cases. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to compare total POW for procedure, age, gender, insurance, and health literacy; significance threshold was set at P = .05. RESULTS: POW was 97.7 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 53.1). Surgeon POW accounted for 10.5 minutes (SD 9.3), nurses for 29.9 minutes (SD 34.2), mid-level providers for 22.1 minutes (SD 17.0), and office technicians for 34.1 minutes (SD 35.2). There was no difference in total POW based on procedure (hip vs knee), age, gender, insurance type, or health literacy. CONCLUSION: Revision arthroplasty requires substantial preoperative preparation from the surgical team. Most of this is by nurses, mid-level providers, and office staff. This does not seem to be different for hip or knee revisions or by age and gender. EMR audit logs capture the bare minimum POW required to prepare a patient for revision arthroplasty.

Price Transparency for Primary Hip & Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview of the Top 50 US News and World Report Orthopedic Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has mandated all hospitals to publish the charges of 300 common procedures to provide price transparency. The aims of our study are to evaluate 50 top orthopedic hospitals to determine compliance with this mandate and to assess the ease of finding cost information for arthroplasty procedures. METHODS: The websites of the top 50 US News and World Report (USNWR) orthopedic hospitals were searched to find publicly accessible procedural charges. Data included the number of clicks to locate pricing documents, number of files provided, and number of data rows pertaining to arthroplasty. Charge data was queried based on Diagnosis related group (DRG) codes (469, 470), Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes (27130, 27477), and keyword searches ("arthroplasty", "total hip", and "total knee"). RESULTS: Forty-four (88%) of the top 50 USNWR Orthopedic institutions had publicly accessible files containing cost information. Thirty three of the 44 institutions provided results with DRG search while less than 10 institutions used CPT and keyword searches. There was an average of 226,190 (range 304-1,121,876) rows of data per file. Average charges varied depending on the use of DRG, CPT or keyword searches ($6,663-$117,072). CONCLUSION: The majority of compliant hospitals published large data files requiring the use of DRG codes to find cost information with extreme variation in resultant charges provided. These findings underscore the lack of direct patient benefit afforded by the current mandate, as pricing determinations require expert knowledge in medical coding and have a high variability in the reported charges.

Does Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Improve Leg Strength in Patients With a Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy has been proposed to help patients build strength with fewer repetitions than standard physical therapy (PT). We sought to determine if BFR would improve quadriceps and hamstring strength in patients with instability and perceived weakness >1 year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with painful TKAs and flexion instability as well as quadriceps and hamstring weakness who performed a 6-week PT program and received isokinetic strength measurements (ISMs). Thirty-six patients completed a standard PT program (non-BFR) and 12 patients completed a BFR regimen. ISMs were taken before and after PT to quantify quadriceps and hamstring power, torque, and work compared to the contralateral leg. Statistical analysis was conducted on pre-PT and post-PT ISMs and decisions for revision surgery. RESULTS: There were no differences in ISMs after PT between the BFR and non-BFR groups. The non-BFR group showed statistically significant strength improvements in flexion but not extension (+28.7%-32.8%, P = .0145-.255). Although no significant difference was found in the BFR group, they saw improvements in all extension strength metrics (19.4%-23.4%, P = .3315-.3901) and flexion (25.7%-29.9%, P = .1994-.2392). No difference was observed between the groups in the rates of subsequent revision TKA (8.3% vs 16.7%, P = .3362). CONCLUSION: BFR did not improve quadriceps and hamstring strength compared to PT alone in patients with instability and weakness after TKA. Over 80% of total patients chose to avoid revision TKA after completion of focused PT with or without BFR.