Association between mortality and highly antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia.

Data on the relationship between antimicrobial resistance and mortality remain scarce, and this relationship needs to be investigated in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this study was to compare the ICU mortality rates between patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia due to highly antimicrobial-resistant (HAMR) bacteria and those with ICU-acquired pneumonia due to non-HAMR bacteria. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using the French National Surveillance Network for Healthcare Associated Infection in ICUs ("REA-Raisin") database, gathering data from 200 ICUs from January 2007 to December 2016. We assessed all adult patients who were hospitalized for at least 48 h and presented with ICU-acquired pneumonia caused by S. aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, or A. baumannii. The association between pneumonia caused by HAMR bacteria and ICU mortality was analyzed using the whole sample and using a 1:2 matched sample. Among the 18,497 patients with at least one documented case of ICU-acquired pneumonia caused by S. aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa, or A. baumannii, 3081 (16.4%) had HAMR bacteria. The HAMR group was associated with increased ICU mortality (40.3% vs. 30%, odds ratio (OR) 95%, CI 1.57 [1.45-1.70], P < 0.001). This association was confirmed in the matched sample (3006 HAMR and 5640 non-HAMR, OR 95%, CI 1.39 [1.27-1.52], P < 0.001) and after adjusting for confounding factors (OR ranged from 1.34 to 1.39, all P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that ICU-acquired pneumonia due to HAMR bacteria is associated with an increased ICU mortality rate, ICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration.

Vasopressors to treat refractory septic shock.

Norepinephrine is the first line vasopressor used in patients with septic shock. However, norepinephrine doses above 1 µg/kg/min are associated with mortality rates of over 80%, suggesting a need to implement adjunctive strategies prior to reaching this dosage. The present study therefore sought to review the existing and emergent vasopressor agents for patients with refractory septic shock. This paper summarizes the use of vasoactive drugs that may be considered in the context of refractory shock. The clinical application of present and future therapies and the related outcome are discussed. A review of the available literature indicated that vasopressin may be a good first option in patients with refractory septic shock, but evidence remains somewhat sparse. Although the use of vasopressin in these circumstances is likely preferable to the use of terlipressin, a pro-drug with an extended half-life, the use of selepressin, a pure V1 agonist, should be further assessed in future studies. Angiotensin II is another emerging option that uses a different signaling pathway. However, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and methylene blue do not appear to be appropriate in the management of patients with refractory septic shock. In conclusion, the use of different adjunctive agents in combination with the use of norepinephrine may be useful in patients with refractory septic shock, but care must be taken to avoid excessive vasoconstriction.

Implementation of an electronic checklist in the ICU: Association with improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an electronic checklist during the morning rounds on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, before/after study in a single ICU of a university hospital. A systematic electronic checklist focusing on guidelines adherence was introduced in January 2012. From January 2008 to June 2014, we screened patients with ICU stay durations of at least 48hours. Propensity score-matched analysis with conditional logistic regression was used to compare the rate of VAP and number of days free of invasive devices before and after implementation of the electronic checklist. RESULTS: We analysed 1711 patients (before group, n=761; after group, n=950). The rates of VAP were 21% and 11% in the before and after groups, respectively (p<0.001). In propensity-score matched analysis (n=742 in each group), VAP occurred in 151 patients (21%) during the before period compared with 72 patients (10%) during the after period (odds ratio [OR]=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.27-0.53). The after group showed increases in ICU-free days (OR=1.05; 95% CI=1.04-1.07) and mechanical ventilation-free days (OR=1.03; 95% CI=1.01-1.04). CONCLUSION: In this matched before/after study, implementation of an electronic checklist was associated with positive effects on patient outcomes, especially on VAP. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Integrating extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) in the initial assessment of severe trauma: Impact on the management of 756 patients.

BACKGROUND: Before total body computed tomography scan, an initial rapid imaging assessment should be conducted in the trauma bay. It generally includes a chest x-ray, pelvic x-ray, and an extended focused ultrasonography assessment for trauma. This initial imaging assessment has been poorly described since the increase in the use of ultrasound. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of this initial imaging work-up in severe trauma patients. A secondary aim was to assess the therapeutic impact of a chest x-ray according to the lung ultrasonography findings. METHODS: Patients with severe trauma who were admitted directly to our level 1 trauma center were consecutively included in this retrospective single center study. The diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic impact, and appropriate decision rate were calculated according to the initial assessment results of the whole body computed tomography scan and surgery reports. RESULTS: Among the 1315 trauma patients admitted, 756 were included in this research. Lung ultrasound showed a higher diagnostic accuracy for haemothorax and pneumothorax cases than the chest x-ray. Sensitivity and specificity of the abdominal ultrasound to detect intraperitoneal effusion were 70% and 96%, respectively. The initial assessment had a therapeutic impact in 76 (10%) of the patients, including 16 (2%) immediate laparotomies and 58 (7%) chest tube insertions. The pelvic x-ray had no therapeutic impact, and when the lung ultrasound was normal, the chest x-ray had a therapeutic impact of only 0.13%. Combining the chest x-ray and lung ultrasound allowed adequate management of all the pneumothorax and haemothorax cases. Only one of the 756 patients had initial management that was judged as inappropriate. This patient had a missed pelvic disjunction with active retroperitoneal bleeding, and underwent an inappropriate immediate laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the initial imaging assessment allowed appropriate decisions in 755 of 756 patients, with a global therapeutic impact of 10%. The pelvic x-ray had a minimal therapeutic impact, and in the patients with normal lung ultrasounds, the chest x-ray marginally affected the management of our patients. The potential consequences of abandoning systematic chest and pelvic x-rays should be investigated in future randomized prospective studies.

Risk factors for death in septic shock: A retrospective cohort study comparing trauma and non-trauma patients.

The aim of this study was to compare septic shock directly associated-mortality between severe trauma patients and nontrauma patients to assess the role of comorbidities and age. We conducted a retrospective study in an intensive care unit (ICU) (15 beds) of a university hospital (928 beds). From January 2009 to May 2015, we reviewed 2 anonymized databases including severe trauma patients and nontrauma patients. We selected the patients with a septic shock episode. Among 385 patients (318 nontrauma patients and 67 severe trauma patients), the ICU death rate was 43%. Septic shock was directly responsible for death among 35% of our cohort, representing 123 (39%) nontrauma patients and 10 (15%) trauma patients (P < 0.0). A sequential organ failure assessment score above 12 (odds ratio [OR]: 6.8; 95% confident interval (CI) [1.3-37], P = 0.025) was independently associated with septic shock associated-mortality, whereas severe trauma was a protective factor (OR: 0.26; 95% CI [0.08-0.78], P = 0.01). From these independent risk factors, we determined the probability of septic shock associated-mortality. The receiver-operating characteristics curve has an area under the curve at 0.76 with sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 86%. Trauma appears as a protective factor, whereas the severity of organ failure has a major role in the mortality of septic shock. However, because of the study's design, unmeasured confounding factors should be taken into account in our findings.

NOREPINEPHRINE: NOT TOO MUCH, TOO LONG.

The study was designed to assess whether high dosages of norepinephrine are associated with increased death rate and to determine the dosage of norepinephrine associated with an intensive care unit (ICU) death rate greater than 90%. We conducted a retrospective, noninterventional, observational study in a single ICU (15 beds) of an academic hospital. From January 2009 to May 2013, data of all patients with a diagnosis of septic shock were extracted from our database. Data were collected at the time of the admission in ICU, at the onset of septic shock, and when the maximal posology of norepinephrine was reached. Mortality was assessed in ICU, in hospital, and at day 90. Among the 324 patients with septic shock, the death rate was 48%. The death rate reached 90% for the quantile of patients receiving more than 1 µg/kg per minute of norepinephrine. In our cohort, four independent factors associated with mortality were identified: age (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.04]; P = 0.02), thrombocytopenia (odds ratio, 3.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-8.5]; P < 0.001), urine output less than 500 mL (odds ratio, 8.7 [95% confidence interval, 3.6-25]; P < 0.001), and dosage of norepinephrine greater than 1 µg/kg per minute (odds ratio, 9.7 [95% confidence interval, 4.5-23]; P < 0.001). However, because of the study's design, unmeasured confounding factors should be taken into account in our findings.