Growth hormone therapy does not impact the development of intracranial hypertension in children with Chiari malformation.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Chiari malformation (CM) are prone to a variety of neurological sequelae, including benign intracranial hypertension (BIH). In these patients, BIH is attributed to impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow due to anatomical abnormalities of the posterior fossa. Occasionally, patients with CM may require growth hormone therapy (GHT), which can increase the production of CSF. It is thought that patients with CM who undergo GHT are at high risk of BIH-associated symptoms (BIHAS). We describe the incidence of neurological symptoms in 34 patients with CM before and during GHT. METHODS: The database of a pediatric endocrinology center was queried for patients with CM who received GHT from 2010-22. Records were reviewed for adverse events. Demographic and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Patients with neoplastic disease, active inflammation, or acute trauma were excluded. CM diagnoses were independently assigned by a neuroradiology department. Patients were grouped based on the presence and nature of symptoms before and during GHT. Relationships between starting dose/BMI and occurrence of BIHAS/all GHT-associated symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: GHT was not associated with new-onset or worsening of preexisting BIHAS in 33 out of 34 patients with CM. Five complex patients continued to have preexisting BIHAS, which did not worsen. Of the four patients who developed new-onset BIHAS during GHT, three patients' symptoms were attributed to other medical conditions. No patient permanently discontinued GHT due to BIHAS. CONCLUSIONS: Growth hormone therapy is likely a safe treatment in patients with Chiari malformation and is unlikely to cause BIHAS.

Precocious Puberty and GnRH Analogs: Current Treatment Practices and Perspectives among US Pediatric Endocrinologists.

INTRODUCTION: Gonadotropin releasing hormone analogs (GnRHas) are used for treatment of precocious puberty. Over the last decade, several new formulations have been approved. METHODS: The Drugs and Therapeutics Subcommittee of the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) undertook a review to ascertain the current treatment options, prescribing behaviors, and practices of GnRHas among pediatric endocrinologists practicing within the USA. The survey consisted of four main subsections: (1) description of clinical practice; (2) self-assessment of knowledge base of pediatric and adult GnRHa formulations; (3) current practice for treating central precocious puberty (CPP); and (4) utilization of healthcare resources. RESULTS: There were 223 survey respondents. Pediatric endocrine practitioners were most familiar with the pediatric one-monthly preparation, the 3-month preparation, and the histrelin implant (Supprelin®) (88%, 96%, and 91%, respectively), with lower familiarity for 24-week triptorelin intramuscular (Triptodur®) (65%) and 6-month subcutaneous leuprolide (Fensolvi®) (45%). Only 23% of the respondents reported being extremely familiar with the availability of adult formulations, and 25% reported being completely unaware of cost differences between pediatric and adult GnRHa preparations. The implant was the most preferred therapy (44%), but in practice, respondents reported a higher percentage of patients treated with the 3-month preparation. While family preference/ease of treatment (87%) was the key determinant for using a particular GnRHa preparation, insurance coverage also played a significant role in the decision (64%). Responses regarding assessment for efficacy of treatment were inconsistent, as were practices and criteria for obtaining an MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The survey indicated there is more familiarity with older, shorter acting GnRHas, which are prescribed in greater numbers than newer, longer acting formulations. There is lack of consensus on the need for central nervous system (CNS) imaging in girls presenting with CPP between 6 and 8 years of age and use of laboratory testing to monitor response to treatment. Insurance requirements regarding CNS imaging and laboratory monitoring are highly variable. Despite having similar constituents and bioavailability, there are substantial cost differences between the pediatric and adult formulations and lack of evidence for safe use of these formulations in children. The survey-based analysis highlights the challenges faced by prescribers while reflecting on areas where further research is needed to provide evidence-based practice guidelines for pediatric endocrinologists.

Pediatric Endocrine Society Statement on Considerations for Use of Teplizumab (Tzield™) in Clinical Practice.

Teplizumab (TzieldTM, Provention Bio), a monoclonal antibody directed at T-cell marker CD3, is the first medication approved by the FDA to delay progression from stage 2 to stage 3 type 1 diabetes. To date, the overwhelming majority of pediatric endocrinologists do not have experience using immunotherapeutics and seek guidance on the use of teplizumab in clinical practice. To address this need, the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) Diabetes Special Interest Group (Diabetes SIG) and Drug and Therapeutics Committee assembled a task force to review clinical trial data and solicit expert recommendations on the approach to teplizumab infusions. We present considerations on all aspects of teplizumab administration, utilizing evidence where possible and providing a spectrum of expert opinions on unknown aspects. We discuss patient selection and prescreening, highlighting the safety and considerations for monitoring and treatment of side effects. We propose a schedule of events, a protocol for administration, and discuss practice management aspects. We advocate for the need for further long-term systematic surveillance studies to continue evaluating the efficacy and safety of teplizumab.

Practice Variation among Pediatric Endocrinologists in the Dosing of Glucocorticoids in Young Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

A Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) Drugs and Therapeutics Committee workgroup sought to determine the prescribing practices of pediatric endocrinologists when treating children <10 years of age with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Our workgroup administered a 32-question online survey to PES members. There were 187 respondents (88.9% attending physicians), mostly from university-affiliated clinics (~80%). Ninety-eight percent of respondents prescribed the short-acting glucocorticoid hydrocortisone to treat young children, as per the Endocrine Society CAH Guidelines, although respondents also prescribed long-acting glucocorticoids such as prednisolone suspension (12%), prednisone tablets (9%), and prednisone suspension (6%). Ninety-seven percent of respondents indicated that they were likely/very likely to prescribe hydrocortisone in a thrice-daily regimen, as per CAH Guidelines, although 19% were also likely to follow a twice-daily regimen. To achieve smaller doses, using a pill-cutter was the most frequent method recommended by providers to manipulate tablets (87.2%), followed by dissolving tablets in water (25.7%) to create a daily batch (43.7%) and/or dissolving a tablet for each dose (64.6%). Thirty-one percent of providers use pharmacy-compounded hydrocortisone suspension to achieve doses of <2.5 mg. Our survey shows that practices among providers in the dosing of young children with CAH vary greatly and sometimes fall outside of the CAH Guidelines-specifically when attempting to deliver lower, age-appropriate hydrocortisone doses.