Predictive Parameters in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan for Unresectable Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Pooled Analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify positive predictors for survival in uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP), by retrospectively pooling data from three centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis including patients ([Formula: see text] 18 years) treated with M-PHP between February 2014 and December 2019 for unresectable liver-dominant or liver-only metastases from UM. Predictors for OS were assessed using uni- and multivariate analyses. Other study outcome measures were response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), liver progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS) and complications according to CTCAEv5.0. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients (47.5% males; median age 59.0 years) completed a minimum of one M-PHP. At a median follow-up time of 15.0 months, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease were seen in five (5.0%), 55 (54.5%), 30 (29.7%) and 11 (10.9%) patients, respectively, leading to a 89.1% disease control rate. Median PFS, LPFS and OS were 9.0, 11.0 and 20.0 months, respectively. Survival analyses stratified for radiological response demonstrated significant improved survival in patients with CR or PR and SD category. Treatment of the primary tumor with radiotherapy, ≥ 2 M-PHP and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) < 248 U/L were correlated with improved OS. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% (n = 2). Most common complication was hematological toxicity (self-limiting in most cases). CONCLUSION: M-PHP is safe and effective in patients with UM liver metastases. Achieving CR, PR or SD is associated with improved survival. Primary tumor treatment with radiotherapy, normal baseline LDH and > 1 M-PHP cycles are associated with improved OS.

CT attenuation measurements are valuable to discriminate pledgets used in prosthetic heart valve implantation from paravalvular leakage.

OBJECTIVES: Sutures with polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) felt pledgets are commonly used in prosthetic heart valve (PHV) implantation. Paravalvular leakage can be difficult to distinguish from PTFE felt pledgets on multislice CT because both present as hyperdense structures. We assessed whether pledgets can be discriminated from contrast-enhanced solutions (blood/saline) on CT images based on attenuation difference in an ex vivo experiment and under in vivo conditions. METHODS: PTFE felt pledgets were sutured to the suture ring of a mechanical PHV and porcine aortic annulus, and immersed and scanned in four different contrast-enhanced (Ultravist®; 300 mg jopromide ml(-1)) saline concentrations (10.0, 12.0, 13.6 and 15.0 mg ml(-1)). Scanning was performed on a 256-slice scanner with eight different scan protocols with various tube voltage (100 kV, 120 kV) and tube current (400 mAs, 600 mAs, 800 mAs, 1000 mAs) settings. Attenuation of the pledgets and surrounding contrast-enhanced saline were measured. Additionally, the attenuation of pledgets and contrast-enhanced blood was measured on electrocardiography (ECG)-gated CTA scans of 19 patients with 22 PHVs. RESULTS: Ex vivo CT attenuation differences between the pledgets and contrast-enhanced solutions were larger by using higher tube voltages. CT attenuation values of the pledgets were higher than contrast-enhanced blood in patients: 420±26 Hounsfield units (mean±SD, range 383-494) and 288±41 Hounsfield units (range 202-367), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PTFE felt pledgets have consistently higher attenuation than surrounding contrast-enhanced blood. CT attenuation measurements therefore may help to differentiate pledgets from paravalvular leakage, and detect paravalvular leakage in patients with suspected PHV dysfunction.