Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(4): 260-269, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534083

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW), the dynamics of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections at different anatomical sites are not well understood. Information on HPV concordance between anatomic sites can inform the extent of autoinoculation, and susceptibility of different anatomic areas to HPV infection. We described and assessed correlates of HPV concordance across anal, oral, and genital samples. METHODS: We enrolled 1876 MSM and TGW aged 18 to 26 years in 3 US cities. Oral, genital, and anal samples were self-collected for type-specific HPV DNA testing (37 types). Demographics, sexual behaviors, and health history were self-reported. Kappa statistics based on percent positive agreement (kappa+) and generalized estimating equations were used to describe and identify correlates of HPV type-specific concordance between anatomic sample pairs. RESULTS: Any HPV was detected in 69.9%, 48.6%, and 7.4% of anal, genital, and oral samples, respectively. Detection of any HPV (concurrence) was most common in anal-genital pairs (40.9%) and uncommon in oral-genital and oral-anal pairs (3.4% and 6.5% respectively). Type-specific concordance was poor across all sample pairs (kappa+ <0.20). Younger age and older age at first sex were positively associated with type-concordant anal-genital infections. Sexual behaviors were unassociated with concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Poor oral/anogenital concordance suggests the oral mucosa has different susceptibility to HPV infection, differential clearance and/or autoinoculation between oral and anogenital sites is unlikely. There was some observed concurrence and concordance between anal and genital sites, unassociated with sexual behavior, suggesting autoinoculation. Longitudinal studies are necessary to further elucidate mechanisms of multisite infections.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Papillomavirus Humano , Cidades , Comportamento Sexual , Canal Anal , Prevalência , Papillomaviridae/genética
2.
J Infect Dis ; 225(3): 422-430, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended since 2011 for boys aged 11-12 years, with catch-up vaccination recommended through age 26 years for previously unvaccinated men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: During 2016-2018, a cross-sectional study enrolled MSM and transgender women aged 18-26 years in Seattle, Washington. Participants submitted self-collected penile swab specimens for HPV genotyping. HPV vaccination history was self-reported. We compared HPV prevalence among vaccinated participants with that in participants with no or unknown vaccination history, using log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 687 participants, 348 (50.7%) self-reported ever receiving ≥1 HPV vaccine dose; the median age at first HPV vaccination was 21 years, and the median age at first sex, 17 years. Overall, the prevalence of penile quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV)-type HPV was similar in vaccinated participants (12.1%) and participants with no or unknown vaccination (15.6%) (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.69 [95% confidence interval, .47-1.01]). However, the prevalence was significantly lower in participants vaccinated at age ≤18 years than in those with no of unknown vaccination (0.15 [.04-.62]), corresponding to a vaccine effectiveness of 85% against 4vHPV-type HPV. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that HPV vaccination is effective in preventing penile HPV infections in young MSM when administered at age ≤18 years.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos , Vacinação
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(1): 81-85, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34166303

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We assessed the sensitivity of self-reported human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among young adult men who have sex with men (MSM) with documented HPV vaccination. METHODS: During 2016-2018, MSM and transgender women aged 18 to 26 years were enrolled in Seattle, WA. A history of HPV vaccination was assessed via self-administered survey, clinic electronic medical records, and the Washington State Immunization Information System. We assessed self-report sensitivity among participants with documented prior HPV vaccination (≥1 dose) in either the electronic medical record or the Washington State Immunization Information System, and used logistic regression to compare sensitivity by age, number of doses, and time since first dose. RESULTS: Of 292 participants with ≥1 documented HPV vaccine dose, 243 self-reported ≥1 dose (sensitivity, 83.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.4%-87.3%). Compared with participants whose first dose was <1 year ago, the likelihood of self-report was lower among those with ≥3 years since first dose (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5). Furthermore, compared with participants with only 1 documented HPV vaccine dose, the likelihood of self-reporting ≥1 dose was higher among those with 2 (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.5) or ≥3 doses (aOR, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.7-14.4). Among 115 participants with ≥3 documented doses, sensitivity for recalling ≥3 doses was 69.6% (95% CI, 60.3%-77.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Most young adult MSM with a documented history of HPV vaccination self-reported prior HPV vaccination. Although recall was highest in those with ≥3 doses, 30% of this fully vaccinated subgroup did not correctly recall the number of doses received, highlighting limitations of self-reporting. Furthermore, results indicating reduced recall with ≥3 years since first dose suggest that sensitivity of self-report among young adult MSM may decline over time as adolescent vaccination coverage increases.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Imunização , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Autorrelato , Vacinação , Washington/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(5): 885-890, 2021 09 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33621333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JORRP) is a rare and serious disease caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) presumably acquired during vaginal delivery. HPV vaccination of females through age 26 years, recommended in the United States since 2006, can prevent HPV transmission. We assessed trends in JORRP cases before and after HPV vaccine introduction in the United States. METHODS: Case-patients were identified from 26 pediatric otolaryngology centers in 23 U.S. states. Demographics and clinical history were abstracted from medical records. Case-patients were grouped by year of birth, and birth-cohort incidences were calculated using number of births from either national or state-level natality data from the 23 states. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in 2-year intervals. RESULTS: We identified 576 U.S. JORRP case-patients born in 2004-2013. Median age at diagnosis was 3.4 years (interquartile range: 1.9, 5.5). Number of identified JORRP case-patients declined from a baseline of 165 born in 2004-2005 to 36 born in 2012-2013. Incidence of JORRP per 100 000 births using national data declined from 2.0 cases in 2004-2005 to 0.5 cases in 2012-2013 (IRR = 0.2, 95% CI = .1-.4); incidence using state-level data declined from 2.9 cases in 2004-2005 to 0.7 cases in 2012-2013 (IRR = 0.2, 95% CI = .1-.4). CONCLUSIONS: Over a decade, numbers of JORRP case-patients and incidences declined significantly. Incidences calculated using national denominator data are likely underestimates; those calculated using state-level denominator data could be overestimates. These declines are most likely due to HPV vaccination. Increasing vaccination uptake could lead to elimination of this HPV-related disease.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Infecções Respiratórias , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
J Pediatr ; 234: 149-157.e3, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33689710

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate among pediatricians and family physicians human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendation practices for 11- to 12-year-old youth; report parental refusal/deferral of HPV vaccination; and report barriers to HPV vaccination changed over time. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed nationally representative networks of pediatricians and family physicians in 2008, 2010, 2013-2014, and 2018. Male vaccination questions were not asked in 2008; barriers and parental vaccine refusal questions were not asked in 2010. RESULTS: Response rates were 80% in 2008 (680/848), 72% in 2010 (609/842), 70% in 2013-2014 (582/829), and 65% in 2018 (588/908). The proportion of physicians strongly recommending HPV vaccination for 11- to 12-year-old patients increased from 53% in 2008 to 79% in 2018 for female patients and from 48% in 2014 to 76% in 2018 for male patients (both P < .0001). The proportion of physicians indicating ≥50% of parents refused/deferred HPV vaccination remained steady for female patients (24% in 2008 vs 22% in 2018, P = .40) and decreased for male patients (42% in 2014 vs 28% in 2018, P < .001). Physician barriers to providing HPV vaccination were rare and decreased over time. Increasing numbers of physicians reported perceived parental barriers of vaccine safety concerns (5% "major barrier" in 2008 vs 35% in 2018, P < .0001) and moral/religious concerns (5% in 2008 vs 25% in 2018, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2008 and 2018, more primary care physicians reported recommending HPV vaccination for adolescents, fewer reported barriers, and more physicians reported parents who had vaccine safety or moral/religious concerns.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Pais/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Sex Transm Dis ; 48(10): 709-713, 2021 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States; men who have sex with men (MSM) have higher prevalence of infection and related disease compared with other men. We assessed whether differences in HPV acquisition exist among MSM according to their sexual positioning practices, as well as self-reported receipt of HPV vaccination. METHODS: We enrolled young MSM and transgender women aged 18 to 26 years in Chicago, IL (N = 666). Participants self-reported their history of HPV vaccination and submitted self-collected anal swab specimens for type-specific HPV detection using an L1-consensus PCR assay. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess relationships between sexual positioning practices and detection of any HPV or quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV) types by vaccination status, defined as self-reported receipt of ≥1 HPV vaccine dose versus none. RESULTS: Among 666 participants, 400 (60.1%) had any anal HPV, and 146 (21.9%) had a 4vHPV type. Among vaccinated participants, 18, 36, and 177 reported exclusively insertive, exclusively receptive, or both sexual positioning practices, respectively. Compared with participants reporting exclusively insertive anal sex, odds of any HPV were significantly higher among participants engaging exclusively in receptive anal sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52-13.78), as well as those engaging in both (aOR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.71-6.44). Vaccinated participants, compared with unvaccinated participants, had lower odds of 4vHPV-type HPV regardless of sexual positioning practices (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Adult men and transgender women who practice anal receptive sex have high prevalence of infection with any HPV. Routine vaccination of all adolescents is expected to reduce HPV-related disease incidence among adult MSM and transgender women as vaccinated cohorts age.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Adolescente , Adulto , Chicago/epidemiologia , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(37): 1294-1299, 2021 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34529636

RESUMO

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) have been shown to be highly protective against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations (1-3). Data are limited on the level of protection against hospitalization among disproportionately affected populations in the United States, particularly during periods in which the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, predominates (2). U.S. veterans are older, more racially diverse, and have higher prevalences of underlying medical conditions than persons in the general U.S. population (2,4). CDC assessed the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalization among 1,175 U.S. veterans aged ≥18 years hospitalized at five Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) during February 1-August 6, 2021. Among these hospitalized persons, 1,093 (93.0%) were men, the median age was 68 years, 574 (48.9%) were non-Hispanic Black (Black), 475 were non-Hispanic White (White), and 522 (44.4%) had a Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥3 (5). Overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 80.4%-91.1%) and was similar before (February 1-June 30) and during (July 1-August 6) SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant predominance (84.1% versus 89.3%, respectively). Vaccine effectiveness was 79.8% (95% CI = 67.7%-87.4%) among adults aged ≥65 years and 95.1% (95% CI = 89.1%-97.8%) among those aged 18-64 years. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are highly effective in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization in this older, racially diverse population of predominately male U.S. veterans. Additional evaluations of vaccine effectiveness among various age groups are warranted. To prevent COVID-19-related hospitalizations, all eligible persons should receive COVID-19 vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Vacinas Sintéticas , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas de mRNA
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(49): 1700-1705, 2021 Dec 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882654

RESUMO

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech) provide strong protection against severe COVID-19, including hospitalization, for at least several months after receipt of the second dose (1,2). However, studies examining immune responses and differences in protection against COVID-19-associated hospitalization in real-world settings, including by vaccine product, are limited. To understand how vaccine effectiveness (VE) might change with time, CDC and collaborators assessed the comparative effectiveness of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization at two periods (14-119 days and ≥120 days) after receipt of the second vaccine dose among 1,896 U.S. veterans at five Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs) during February 1-September 30, 2021. Among 234 U.S. veterans fully vaccinated with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and without evidence of current or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, serum antibody levels (anti-spike immunoglobulin G [IgG] and anti-receptor binding domain [RBD] IgG) to SARS-CoV-2 were also compared. Adjusted VE 14-119 days following second Moderna vaccine dose was 89.6% (95% CI = 80.1%-94.5%) and after the second Pfizer-BioNTech dose was 86.0% (95% CI = 77.6%-91.3%); at ≥120 days VE was 86.1% (95% CI = 77.7%-91.3%) for Moderna and 75.1% (95% CI = 64.6%-82.4%) for Pfizer-BioNTech. Antibody levels were significantly higher among Moderna recipients than Pfizer-BioNTech recipients across all age groups and periods since vaccination; however, antibody levels among recipients of both products declined between 14-119 days and ≥120 days. These findings from a cohort of older, hospitalized veterans with high prevalences of underlying conditions suggest the importance of booster doses to help maintain long-term protection against severe COVID-19.†.


Assuntos
Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , Vacina BNT162/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Eficácia de Vacinas/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Vacina BNT162/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidade do Paciente , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares
9.
J Infect Dis ; 222(12): 2052-2060, 2020 11 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended for young adult men who have sex with men (MSM) since 2011. METHODS: The Vaccine Impact in Men study surveyed MSM and transgender women aged 18-26 years in 3 US cities during 2016-2018. Self-collected anal swab and oral rinse specimens were assessed for 37 types of HPV. We compared HPV prevalence among vaccinated and unvaccinated participants and determined adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 1767 participants, 704 (39.8%) self-reported receiving HPV vaccine. Median age at vaccination (18.7 years) was older than age at first sex (15.7 years). Quadrivalent vaccine-type HPV was detected in anal or oral specimens from 475 (26.9%) participants. Vaccine-type HPV prevalence was lower among vaccinated (22.9%) compared with unvaccinated (31.6%) participants; aPR for those who initiated vaccination at age ≤18 years was 0.41 (CI, 0.24-0.57) and at age >18 years was 0.82 (CI, 0.67-0.98). Vaccine effectiveness of at least 1 HPV vaccine dose at age ≤18 years or >18 years was 59% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest real-world effectiveness of HPV vaccination among young adult MSM. This effect was stronger with younger age at vaccination.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/prevenção & controle , Doenças da Boca/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adolescente , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus , Doenças do Ânus/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças da Boca/virologia , Prevalência , Autorrelato , Pessoas Transgênero , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
10.
N Engl J Med ; 377(15): 1428-1437, 2017 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26465681

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ebola virus has been detected in the semen of men after their recovery from Ebola virus disease (EVD). We report the presence of Ebola virus RNA in semen in a cohort of survivors of EVD in Sierra Leone. METHODS: We enrolled a convenience sample of 220 adult male survivors of EVD in Sierra Leone, at various times after discharge from an Ebola treatment unit (ETU), in two phases (100 participants were in phase 1, and 120 in phase 2). Semen specimens obtained at baseline were tested by means of a quantitative reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay with the use of the target sequences of NP and VP40 (in phase 1) or NP and GP (in phase 2). This study did not evaluate directly the risk of sexual transmission of EVD. RESULTS: Of 210 participants who provided an initial semen specimen for analysis, 57 (27%) had positive results on quantitative RT-PCR. Ebola virus RNA was detected in the semen of all 7 men with a specimen obtained within 3 months after ETU discharge, in 26 of 42 (62%) with a specimen obtained at 4 to 6 months, in 15 of 60 (25%) with a specimen obtained at 7 to 9 months, in 4 of 26 (15%) with a specimen obtained at 10 to 12 months, in 4 of 38 (11%) with a specimen obtained at 13 to 15 months, in 1 of 25 (4%) with a specimen obtained at 16 to 18 months, and in no men with a specimen obtained at 19 months or later. Among the 46 participants with a positive result in phase 1, the median baseline cycle-threshold values (higher values indicate lower RNA values) for the NP and VP40 targets were lower within 3 months after ETU discharge (32.4 and 31.3, respectively; in 7 men) than at 4 to 6 months (34.3 and 33.1; in 25), at 7 to 9 months (37.4 and 36.6; in 13), and at 10 to 12 months (37.7 and 36.9; in 1). In phase 2, a total of 11 participants had positive results for NP and GP targets (samples obtained at 4.1 to 15.7 months after ETU discharge); cycle-threshold values ranged from 32.7 to 38.0 for NP and from 31.1 to 37.7 for GP. CONCLUSIONS: These data showed the long-term presence of Ebola virus RNA in semen and declining persistence with increasing time after ETU discharge. (Funded by the World Health Organization and others.).


Assuntos
Ebolavirus/isolamento & purificação , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Sêmen/virologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Ebolavirus/genética , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Serra Leoa , Sobreviventes , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
11.
Sex Transm Dis ; 47(7): 473-480, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541306

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a common sexually transmitted infection. Men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) are at high risk for anal HPV infection and subsequent anal cancer. This study assessed the association of partner discordances with prevalent high-risk anal HPV (HRAHPV) among MSM and TGW. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in the cross-sectional young men's HPV study of gay, bisexual, and other MSM, and TGW, aged 18 to 26 years, from 2 cities. Participants completed a confidential standardized computer-assisted interview and provided self-collected anal swabs for type-specific HPV DNA testing. Multivariate analyses were conducted for 3 discordances of interest (i.e., partner age, race/ethnicity, and concurrent partner) to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-two participants were included for partner race/ethnicity discordance, 601 for partner age discordance, and 581 for concurrent partner analysis. Most reported being older than 21 years, cisgender male, and gay. Adjusted odds of HRAHPV were not significantly increased among participants reporting partner age discrepancy >10 years (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.51-1.56), partner race/ethnicity discordance (aOR, 0.88; CI, 0.62-1.24), or partner with concurrent partners (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.50-1.42), compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis did not identify any partner discordances associated with HRAHPV. Because HPV infection can persist for years, sexual mixing patterns with early partners might be more relevant than the most recent sex partner. Prevalence of HRAHPV was high and could be preventable by preexposure vaccination, as recommended for everyone through age 26 years including MSM and TGW.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecções por HIV , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Pessoas Transgênero , Adolescente , Adulto , Cidades , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Comportamento Sexual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Sex Transm Dis ; 46(10): e93-e96, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517807

RESUMO

Among the US civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 14 to 59 years in 2013 to 2016, prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in urine was 1.3% overall. Prevalence was 2.1% among females, 0.5% among males, and highest at 9.6% among non-Hispanic black females. Estimate instability limited analysis of factors beyond sex, age, and race/Hispanic ethnicity.


Assuntos
Tricomoníase/epidemiologia , Vaginite por Trichomonas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Etnicidade , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tricomoníase/etnologia , Tricomoníase/urina , Vaginite por Trichomonas/urina , Trichomonas vaginalis , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
13.
Sex Transm Dis ; 46(10): 657-662, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31517805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence is high among men who have sex with men (MSM), yet little is known about HPV among transgender women (TGW). We assessed HPV prevalence and knowledge among TGW compared with MSM. METHODS: We enrolled TGW and MSM aged 18 to 26 years from clinics in Chicago and Los Angeles during 2012 to 2014. Participants self-reported gender identity, HIV status, HPV knowledge, and vaccination status. Self-collected anal and oral specimens were tested for HPV DNA (37 types); serum was tested for HPV antibodies (4 vaccine types). Prevalence among unvaccinated TGW and MSM was compared using prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Participants without DNA or serologic evidence of HPV were considered naïve. RESULTS: Among 1033 participants, 49 were TGW. Among 44 TGW and 855 MSM who were unvaccinated, any HPV DNA was detected in anal specimens from 39 (88.6%) TGW and 606 (70.9%) MSM (PR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), and oral specimens from 4 (9.1%) TGW and 81 (9.5%) MSM (PR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4-2.5). Antibodies were detected among 37 (84.1%) TGW and 467 (54.6%) MSM (PR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8). Most participants were naïve to 1 or more HPV vaccine type/s, including 29 (65.9%) TGW and 775 (90.6%) MSM (PR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9). Most TGW (55.1%) had never heard of HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Among TGW, HPV prevalence was high and knowledge was low. Most were still naïve to 1 or more HPV vaccine type. Although vaccination ideally occurs prior to exposure, findings support existing national recommendations to vaccinate TGW and MSM, and suggest additional outreach might increase vaccination.


Assuntos
Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Pessoas Transgênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Chicago/epidemiologia , Cidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Masculino , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais , Comportamento Sexual , Adulto Jovem
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(32): 698-702, 2019 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31415491

RESUMO

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is recommended to prevent new HPV infections and HPV-associated diseases, including some cancers. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)* routinely recommends HPV vaccination at age 11 or 12 years; vaccination can be given starting at age 9 years. Catch-up vaccination has been recommended since 2006 for females through age 26 years, and since 2011 for males through age 21 years and certain special populations through age 26 years. This report updates ACIP catch-up HPV vaccination recommendations and guidance published in 2014, 2015, and 2016 (1-3). Routine recommendations for vaccination of adolescents have not changed. In June 2019, ACIP recommended catch-up HPV vaccination for all persons through age 26 years. ACIP did not recommend catch-up vaccination for all adults aged 27 through 45 years, but recognized that some persons who are not adequately vaccinated might be at risk for new HPV infection and might benefit from vaccination in this age range; therefore, ACIP recommended shared clinical decision-making regarding potential HPV vaccination for these persons.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/normas , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
15.
Sex Transm Dis ; 45(12): 803-807, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944645

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). National guidelines recommend that MSM receive HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia screening at least annually, and hepatitis A and B and human papillomavirus vaccinations. We investigated associations between disclosure of male-male sexual orientation/behavior and receipt of this panel of services. METHODS: Gay, bisexual, and other MSM aged 18 through 26 years were enrolled from health clinics serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities in Los Angeles and Chicago during 2012 to 2014. Participants completed a computer-assisted self-interview regarding health care services, disclosure of sexual orientation/behavior, and recent HIV test results. Proportions receiving recommended care, prevalence ratios (PRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: Overall, 817 participants visited a provider within the past year. Of these, 525 (64.3%) had disclosed, and 749 (91.7%) felt they could disclose if important to health. In total, 548 (67.1%) received all STI screenings, and 74 (9.1%) received all vaccinations. Only 105 (12.9%) received any human papillomavirus vaccination. More disclosing participants received all recommended screenings (adjusted PR [aPR],1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) and all recommended care components (aPR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3) than nondisclosing participants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite national recommendations, receipt of a complete panel of STI care services was low among young MSM. Vaccine uptake was lower than STI screening. However, most participants visited a health care provider in the past year and most disclosed, suggesting opportunities to improve services. Providers might encourage disclosure by improving sexual history taking and education, which could increase opportunities for MSM to receive recommended care.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Revelação , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Chicago , Feminino , Gonorreia/prevenção & controle , Homossexualidade Feminina , Humanos , Los Angeles , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Assunção de Riscos , Parceiros Sexuais , Sífilis/prevenção & controle , Pessoas Transgênero , Adulto Jovem
16.
Sex Transm Dis ; 45(10): 660-665, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30204745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at risk for cancers attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV), including oropharyngeal cancer. Human papillomavirus vaccination is recommended for US MSM through age 26 years. Oral HPV infection is associated with oropharyngeal cancer. We determined oral HPV prevalence and risk factors among young MSM. METHODS: The Young Men's HPV study enrolled MSM aged 18 through 26 years from clinics in Chicago and Los Angeles during 2012 to 2014. Participants self-reported demographics, sexual behaviors, vaccination and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status. Self-collected oral rinse specimens were tested for HPV DNA (37 types) by L1-consensus PCR. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk factors associated with oral HPV among participants not previously vaccinated. RESULTS: Oral HPV was detected in 87 (9.4%) of 922; 9-valent vaccine types were detected in 37 (4.0%) of 922. Among HIV-positive participants, 17 (19.3%) of 88 had oral HPV detected. Oral HPV was more prevalent among those reporting first sex at 18 years of age or younger (aPR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.16-5.12); HIV infection (aPR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.14-3.48); greater than 5 sex partners within the past month (aPR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13-3.31); performing oral sex on greater than 5 partners within the last 3 months (aPR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.12-3.13); and having greater than 5 male sex partners within the last 3 months (aPR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08-2.87). Only 454 (49.2%) of 922 were aware that HPV can cause oropharyngeal cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Many oral HPV infections were with types targeted by vaccination. Oral HPV infections were significantly associated with HIV and sexual behaviors. Fewer than half of participants were aware that HPV could cause oropharyngeal cancer.


Assuntos
Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Boca/virologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Identidade de Gênero , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(4): 538-545, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29417361

RESUMO

Introduction Screening for specific sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) during pregnancy has been a longstanding public health recommendation. Prior studies have described associations between these infections and socioeconomic factors such as race/ethnicity and education. Objectives We evaluated the prevalence of STDs and the correlation socioeconomic factors have with the presence of these infections among pregnant women in the United States. Methods We conducted an analysis using self-reported data from 12,948 recently pregnant women from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in 5 states during 2009-2011. Responses to questions about curable STDs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, trichomoniasis) diagnosed during pregnancy were utilized to calculate weighted STD prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A logistic regression was also conducted to identify maternal socioeconomic characteristics significantly associated with STDs; results are displayed as adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR). The PRAMS protocol was approved at PRAMS participating sites and by CDC's Institutional Review Board. Results Overall, 3.3% (CI 2.9-3.7) reported ≥ 1 curable STD during her most recent pregnancy. The adjusted STD prevalence was higher among women with younger age (aPR, 2.4; CI 1.8-3.4), non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity (aPR, 3.3; CI 2.4-4.1), unmarried status (aPR, 2.1; CI 1.4-3.0), no college education (aPR, 1.4; CI 1.0-1.9), annual income < $25,000 (aPR, 2.0; CI 1.3-3.2), and no pre-pregnancy health insurance (aPR, 1.4; CI 1.1-1.8). Conclusions for Practice This is the largest study of prevalence of self-reported curable STDs among U.S. pregnant women. Differences in STD prevalence highlight the association between certain socioeconomic factors and the presence of STDs.


Assuntos
Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Gestantes , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/etiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Prevalência , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/etiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
J Infect Dis ; 215(7): 1070-1079, 2017 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28170037

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We report the first nationally representative prevalence data on genital human papillomavirus (HPV) in males in the United States, using findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2013-2014. METHODS: Using penile swabs from males aged 14-59 years, we estimated the HPV DNA prevalence and prevalence ratios (PRs) with respect to sexual behaviors and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: The prevalence of any HPV was 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.3%-46.1%) and of high-risk (HR) HPV was 23.4% (95% CI, 21.3%-25.6%). Prevalence of any HPV was 12.5% in 14-19 year olds and was higher in older age groups, through ages 25-29 years, and then similar through age 59 years. After adjustment for age and race, any HPV prevalence was associated with lifetime number of sex partners (≥15 vs 1-2; PR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.12-5.02) and past-year number of sex partners (≥2 vs 0; PR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.46). Comparisons of consecutively older age groups revealed that the prevalence of quadrivalent HPV vaccine types (4vHPV), types 6, 11, 16, and 18, was significantly higher only between ages 25-29 and 20-24 years (PR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.31-5.96), whereas the prevalence of other HPV types was significantly higher only between ages 20-24 and 14-19 years (PR, 3.39; 95% CI, 2.49-4.61). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 42.2% of US males aged 14-59 years have detectable genital HPV infections. Differences in the age-specific prevalence of 4vHPV types and non-4vHPV types suggest that the vaccination program has had an impact on the prevalence of HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 among males.


Assuntos
DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Parceiros Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
J Infect Dis ; 215(12): 1832-1835, 2017 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28505338

RESUMO

Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections was assessed among 1033 young men who have sex with men (MSM) aged 18-26 years. HPV (any type) was detected in 742 (71.8%) anal specimens and 101 (9.8%) oral specimens. Although HPV was detected in specimens from both anatomical sites in 83 (8.0%) participants, type-specific concordance for at least 1 HPV type was found in only 35 (3.4%) participants. HIV and smoking were associated with higher prevalence at both sites and frequency of concordant types. Coinfections of identical HPV types were rare, suggesting independent infection events and/or different modes of clearance.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ânus/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças da Boca/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canal Anal/virologia , Doenças do Ânus/complicações , Doenças do Ânus/virologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Soropositividade para HIV/complicações , Soropositividade para HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças da Boca/complicações , Doenças da Boca/virologia , Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Fumar , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
20.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(10): 637-641, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28876317

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections cause approximately 30,700 cancers annually among US men and women, cervical cancer being the most common. Human papillomavirus vaccination is recommended routinely for US girls and boys at age 11 to 12 years, and for those not previously vaccinated, through age 26 and 21 years for women and men, respectively. Our objective was to assess current cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination practices among sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in the United States. METHODS: We surveyed a geographically diverse convenience sample of US STD clinics identified by members of the National Coalition of STD Directors within 65 state, territorial, and local jurisdictions. An online multiple-choice survey about clinical services was administered to clinic directors or designees during October 2014 to February 2015. RESULTS: Survey respondents included 78 clinics from 46 states and territories. Of these clinics, 31 (39.7%) offered both cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, 6 (7.7%) offered cervical cancer screening only, 21 (26.9%) offered HPV vaccination only, and 20 (25.6%) offered neither cervical cancer prevention service. Among those not offering the service, the most commonly reported barrier to cervical cancer screening was time constraints (25/41, 61.0%); for HPV vaccination it was reimbursement (11/26, 42.3%). CONCLUSIONS: By early 2015, in a geographically diverse group of 78 STD clinics, 39.7% provided nationally recommended HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening, whereas 25.6% provided neither. Further research could identify strategies for STD clinics to reduce HPV-associated cancers by increasing provision of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening services, particularly among medically underserved populations.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Vacinação , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/virologia , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA