RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Overdose from opioids has reached epidemic proportions. Large healthcare systems can utilize existing technology to encourage responsible opioid prescribing practices. Our study measured the effects of using the electronic medical record (EMR) with direct clinician feedback to standardize opioid prescribing practices within a large healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study compared a 12 month pre- and post-intervention in 14 emergency departments after four interventions utilizing the EMR were implemented: (1) deleting clinician preference lists, (2) defaulting dose, frequency, and quantity, (3) standardizing formulary to encourage best practices, and (4) creating dashboards for clinician review with current opioid prescribing practices. Outlying clinicians received feedback through email and direct counseling. Total number of opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges pre- and post-intervention were recorded as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of prescriptions per 100 discharges/clinician exceeding 3-day supply (defined as 12 tablets), number exceeding 30 morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD)/day, and number of non-formulary prescriptions. RESULTS: There were >700,000 discharges during pre- and post-intervention periods. Percentage of total number opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges decreased from 14.4% to 7.4%, a 7.0% absolute reduction, (95% CI,6.9%-7.2%). There was a 5.9% to 0.7% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 3-days, (95% CI, 5.1%-5.3%), a 4.3% to 0.3% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 30 MEDD, (95% CI, 3.9%-4.0%), and a 0.3% to 0.1% reduction in non-formulary prescriptions, (95% CI, 0.2%-0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A multi modal approach using EMR interventions which provide real time data and direct feedback to clinicians can facilitate appropriate opioid prescribing.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ohio , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients who leave before treatment is complete (LBTC) represent medicolegal risk and lost revenue. We sought to examine LBTC return visits characteristics and potential revenue effects for a large healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study examined all encounters from January 1-December 31, 2019 at 18 EDs. The LBTC patients were divided into left without being seen (LWBS), defined as leaving prior to completed medical screening exam (MSE), and left subsequent to being seen (LSBS), defined as leaving after MSE was complete but before disposition. We recorded 30-day returns by facility type including median return hours, admission rate, and return to index ED. Expected realization rate and potential charges were calculated for each patient visit. RESULTS: During the study period 626,548 ED visits occurred; 20,158 (3.2%) LBTC index encounters occurred, and 6745 (33.5%) returned within 30 days. The majority (41.7%) returned in <24 hours with 76.1% returning in 10 days and 66.4% returning to index ED. Median return time was 43.3 hours, and 23.2% were admitted. Urban community EDs had the highest 30-day return rate (37.8%, 95% confidence interval, 36.41-39.1). Patients categorized as LSBS had longer median return hours (66.0) and higher admission rates (29.8%) than the LWBS cohort. There was a net potential realization rate of $9.5 million to the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: In our system, LSBS patients had longer return times and higher admission rates than LWBS patients. There was significant potential financial impact for the system. Further studies should examine how healthcare systems can reduce risk and financial impacts of LBTC patients.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes/psicologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Comportamento de Escolha , Tratamento de Emergência/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Triagem/métodos , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) is designed to identify professional practice trends that affect quality and safety of practicing physicians. Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) is employed when physician nonconformance is identified. The goal of this novel OPPE initiative was threefold: (1) meet The Joint Commission's accreditation standards, (2) assess documentation for compliance and risk, and (3) maintain procedural competency to provide optimal patient care. METHODS: A quality assurance project with OPPE program development was initiated in 18 emergency departments across a large health care system. First, a monthly comprehensive peer review meeting assessed cases across the system for medicolegal risk. Physicians with reasonable practice concerns were identified and referred to FPPE. Second, a standardized OPPE chart review was performed biannually by a quality assurance committee assessing all physician charts for clinical care, medicolegal risk, and quality. Last, completion of a procedure lab every three years was required to maintain competency. OUTCOMES: For systemwide peer review in 2019, 47 cases were referred and 12.8% had quality concerns. For standardized OPPE chart review, 221 physicians were reviewed on 1,219 charts on the following metrics: insufficient medical decision making, diagnoses not medical/legally supported, and charts with red flags. Nine physicians (4.1%) and 17 charts (1.4%) were deficient in all three measures, and 8 physicians (3.6%) had deficiencies in ≥ 50% of their charts. For procedure lab competency, 19.0% of physicians completed the lab in 2019 with no quality concerns. CONCLUSION: A structured OPPE algorithm can aid large health care systems in identifying deviations from practice standards for which additional FPPE can be beneficial.
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Médicos , Acreditação , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Prática ProfissionalRESUMO
Aims: To determine whether a comprehensive ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) protocol is associated with reduced sex disparities over 5 years. Methods and results: This was an observational cohort study of 1833 consecutive STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before (1 January 2011-14 July 2014, control group) and after (15 July 2014-15 July 2019, protocol group) implementation of a protocol for early guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), rapid door to balloon time (D2BT), and use of trans-radial PCI. In the control group, females had less GDMT (77.1% vs. 68.1%, P = 0.03), similarly low trans-radial PCI (19.0% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.73), and longer D2BT [104 min (79, 133) vs. 112 min (85, 147), P = 0.02] corresponding to higher in-hospital mortality [4.5% vs. 10.3%, odds ratio (OR) 2.44 (1.34-4.46), P = 0.004], major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE, 9.8% vs. 16.3%, OR 1.79 (1.14-2.84), P = 0.01], and net adverse clinical events [NACE, 16.1% vs. 28.3%, OR 2.06 (1.42-2.99), P < 0.001]. In the protocol group, no significant sex differences were observed in GDMT (87.2% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.81) or D2BT [85 min (64-106) vs. 89 min (65-111), P = 0.06], but trans-radial PCI was used less in females (77.6% vs. 71.2%, P = 0.03). In-hospital mortality [2.5% vs. 4.4%, OR 1.78 (0.91-3.51), P = 0.09] and MACCE [9.0% vs. 11.1%, OR 1.27 (0.83-1.92), P = 0.26] were similar between sexes, but higher NACE in females approached significance [14.8% vs. 19.4%, OR 1.38 (0.99-1.92), P = 0.05] due to higher bleeding risk [7.2% vs. 11.1%, OR 1.60 (1.04-2.46), P = 0.03]. Conclusions: A comprehensive STEMI protocol was associated with sustained reductions for in-hospital ischaemic outcomes over 5 years, but higher bleeding rates in females persisted.
RESUMO
The authors review the rationale behind and approaches to testing for COVID-19, the quality of currently available tests, the role of data analytics in strategizing testing, and using the electronic medical record and other programs designed to steward COVID-19 testing and follow-up of patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Two protocols were developed to guide the use of subdissociative dose ketamine (SDDK) for analgesia and dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate the safety of these protocols implemented in 18 EDs within a large health system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review to evaluate all adult patients who received intravenous (IV) SDDK for analgesia and intramuscular (IM) dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium in 12 hospital-based and six freestanding EDs over a one-year period from the protocol implementation. We developed a standardized data collection form and used it to record patient information regarding ketamine use, concomitant medication use, and any comorbidities that could have impacted the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Approximately 570,000 ED visits occurred during the study period. SDDK was used in 210 ED encounters, while dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium was used in 37 ED encounters. SDDK was used in 83% (15/18) of sites while dissociative sedation ketamine was used in 50% (9/18) of sites. Endotracheal intubation, non-rebreather mask, and nasal cannula ≥ four liters per minute were identified in one, five, and three patients, respectively. Neuropsychiatric adverse events were identified in 4% (9/210) of patients who received SDDK. CONCLUSION: Patients experienced limited neuropsychiatric adverse events from SDDK. Additionally, dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium led to less endotracheal intubation than reported in the prehospital literature. The favorable safety profile of ketamine use in the ED may prompt further increases in usage.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Dissociativos , Delírio/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Ketamina , Manejo da Dor , Adulto , Analgesia , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Sedação Consciente , Feminino , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient boarding in the emergency department (ED) is a significant issue leading to increased morbidity/mortality, longer lengths of stay, and higher hospital costs. We examined the impact of boarding patients on the ED waiting room. Additionally, we determined whether facility type, patient acuity, time of day, or hospital occupancy impacted waiting rooms in 18 EDs across a large healthcare system. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study that included all ED encounters between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. Encounters with missing Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level were excluded. ESI levels were defined as high (ESI 1,2), middle (ESI 3), and low (ESI 4,5). Spearman correlation coefficients measured the relationship between boarded patients and number of patients in ED waiting room. A multivariable mixed effects model identified drivers of this relationship. RESULTS: A total of 1,134,178 encounters were included. Spearman correlation coefficient was significant between number of patients in the ED waiting room and patient boarding (0.54). For every additional patient boarded/hour, the number of patients waiting/hour in the waiting room increased by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.09). The number of patients waiting for a room/hour was 2.28 times higher for middle than for high acuity. The number of patients in waiting room slightly decreased as hospital occupancy increased (95% CI = 0.997-0.997). CONCLUSION: Number of patients in ED waiting room are directly related to boarding times and hospital occupancy. ED waiting room times should be considered as not just an ED operational issue, but an aspect of hospital throughput.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians must maintain procedural skills, but clinical opportunities may be insufficient. We sought to determine how often practicing emergency physicians in academic, community and freestanding emergency departments (EDs) perform 4 procedures: central venous catheterization (CVC), tube thoracostomy, tracheal intubation, and lumbar puncture (LP). METHODS: This was a retrospective study evaluating emergency physician procedural performance over a 12-month period. We collected data from the electronic records of 18 EDs in one healthcare system. The study EDs included higher and lower volume, academic, community and freestanding, and trauma and non-trauma centers. The main outcome measures were median number of procedures performed. We examined differences in procedural performance by physician years in practice, facility type, and trauma status. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 182 emergency physicians performed 1582 of 2805 procedures (56%) and supervised (resident, nurse practitioner or physician assistant) an additional 1223 of the procedures they did not perform (43%). Median (interquartile range) physician performance for each procedure was CVC 0 [0, 2], tube thoracostomy 0 [0, 0], tracheal intubation 3 [0.25, 8], and LP 0 [0, 2]. The percentage of emergency physicians who did not perform at least one of each procedure during the 1-year time frame ranged from 25.3% (tracheal intubation) to 76.4% (tube thoracostomy). Physicians who work at high-volume EDs (>50,000 visits per year) performed nearly twice as many tracheal intubations, CVCs, and LPs than those at low-volume EDs or freestanding EDs when normalized per 1000 visits. Years out of training were inversely related to total number of procedures performed. Emergency physicians at trauma centers performed almost 3 times as many tracheal intubations and almost 4 times as many CVCs compared to non-trauma centers. CONCLUSION: In a large healthcare system, regardless of ED type, emergency physicians infrequently performed the 4 procedures studied. Physicians in high-volume EDs, trauma centers, and recent graduates performed more procedures. Our study adds to a growing body of research that suggests clinical frequency alone may be insufficient for all emergency physicians to maintain competency.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Systems to improve ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care have traditionally focused on improving door-to-balloon time. However, prompt guideline-directed medical therapy and transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are also associated with reduced STEMI mortality. The incremental prognostic value of each facet of STEMI care on clinical outcomes within a STEMI system of care is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We implemented systems-based strategies at our hospital to improve 3 STEMI care metrics: (1) prompt guideline-directed medical therapy before sheath insertion for PCI, (2) use of transradial primary PCI, and (3) door-to-balloon time. We assessed the incremental association of metrics achieved with in-hospital adverse events and 30-day mortality. Of 1272 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI at our hospital (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016), the percentage with achievement of zero, 1, 2, or 3 STEMI care metrics was 7.1%, 24.1%, 43.8%, and 25.1%; and 30-day mortality was 15.6%, 8.6%, 3.6%, and 3.2%, respectively (log-rank P<0.001). After adjusting for known clinical predictors of STEMI in-hospital mortality, achievement of at least 2 STEMI care metrics was associated with significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P=0.041). Each metric provided incremental prognostic value when modeled in stepwise order of their occurrence in clinical practice (final model C statistic, 0.677; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prompt guideline-directed medical therapy before sheath insertion for PCI, transradial primary PCI, and door-to-balloon time add incremental prognostic value in STEMI care. Expanding STEMI systems of care from a singular focus on door-to-balloon time to a comprehensive focus on multifaceted STEMI care offers an opportunity to further improve STEMI outcomes.
Assuntos
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Cateterismo Periférico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Artéria Radial , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Idoso , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidade , Lista de Checagem/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Punções , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receive suboptimal care and have worse outcomes than men. Whether strategies to reduce STEMI care variability impact disparities in the care and outcomes of women with STEMI is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the care and outcomes of men versus women with STEMI before and after implementation of a comprehensive STEMI protocol. METHODS: On July 15, 2014, the authors implemented: 1) emergency department catheterization lab activation; 2) STEMI Safe Handoff Checklist; 3) immediate transfer to an immediately available catheterization lab; and 4) radial first approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors prospectively studied consecutive patients with STEMI and assessed guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) before PCI, median door-to-balloon time (D2BT), in-hospital adverse events, and 30-day mortality stratified by sex before (January 1, 2011 to July 14, 2014; control group) and after (July 15, 2014 to December 31, 2016) implementation of the STEMI protocol. RESULTS: Of 1,272 participants (68% men, 32% women), women were older with more comorbidities than men. In the control group, women had less GDMT (77% vs. 69%; p = 0.019) and longer D2BT (median 104 min; [interquartile range (IQR): 79 to 133] min vs. 112 [IQR: 85 to 147] min; p = 0.023). Women had more in-hospital stroke, vascular complications, bleeding, transfusion, and death. In the comprehensive 4-step STEMI protocol, sex disparities in GDMT (84% vs. 80%; p = 0.32), D2BT (89 [IQR: 68 to 106] min vs. 91 [IQR: 68 to 114] min; p = 0.15), and in-hospital adverse events resolved. The absolute sex difference in 30-day mortality decreased from the control group (6.1% higher in women; p = 0.002) to the comprehensive 4-step STEMI protocol (3.2% higher in women; p = 0.090). CONCLUSIONS: A systems-based approach to STEMI care reduces sex disparities and improves STEMI care and outcomes in women.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Fatores Sexuais , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The authors describe the epidemiology and clinical course of older persons examined in emergency departments (EDs) for abdominal pain. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of older persons (>or=60 years) examined in participating EDs for nontraumatic abdominal pain. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, ED diagnoses, findings of radiographic imaging, disposition, operative procedures, length of hospitalization, and final diagnoses. Patients were interviewed at 2 weeks to determine clinical course, final diagnoses, and mortality status. The authors compared ED diagnoses with final diagnoses, reporting the percentage change in aggregate and for the 12 most common diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 360 patients (mean age, 73.2+/- 8.8 years; 66% women; 51% white) who met selection criteria, 209 (58%) were admitted to the hospital and 63 (18%) required surgery or an invasive procedure. For patients with complete follow-up information (n=337), 37 (11%) had repeated ED visits and 23 (7%) were readmitted to the hospital. The case-fatality rate was 5%. Leading causes of abdominal pain were nonspecific (14.8%), urinary tract infection (8.6%), bowel obstruction (8%), gastroenteritis (6.8%), and diverticulitis (6.5%). The ED and final diagnoses matched 82% of the time. Older patients had higher mortality rates (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4--14) and lower diagnostic concordance rates (76% vs 87%; p=.01). Study limitations include inability to enroll all eligible persons and possible inaccuracies in participant-reported follow-up interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain in older patients should be investigated thoroughly as, in this study, nearly 60% of patients were hospitalized, 20% underwent operative or invasive procedures, 10% had return ED visits, and 5% died within a 2-week follow-up period.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive ability of a simple six-item triage risk screening tool (TRST) to identify elder emergency department (ED) patients at risk for ED revisits, hospitalization, or nursing home (NH) placement within 30 and 120 days following ED discharge. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 650 community-dwelling elders (age 65 years or older) presenting to two urban academic EDs. Subjects were prospectively evaluated with a simple six-item ED nursing TRST. Participants were interviewed 30 and 120 days post-ED index visit and the utilization of EDs, hospitals, or NHs was recorded. Main outcome measurement was the ability of the TRST to predict the composite endpoint of subsequent ED use, hospital admission, or NH admission at 30 and 120 days. Individual outcomes of ED use, hospitalization, and NH admissions were also examined. RESULTS: Increasing cumulative TRST scores were associated with significant trends for ED use, hospital admission, and composite outcome at both 30 and 120 days (p < 0.0001 for all, except 30-day ED use, p = 0.002). A simple, unweighted five-item TRST ("lives alone" item removed after logistic regression modeling) with a cut-off score of 2 was the most parsimonious model for predicting composite outcome (AUC = 0.64) and hospitalization at 30 days (AUC = 0.72). Patients defined as high-risk by the TRST (score > or = 2) were significantly more likely to require subsequent ED use (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2 to 2.3), hospital admission (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 2.2 to 5.1), or the composite outcome (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.9) at both 30 days and 120 days than the low-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Older ED patients with two or more risk factors on a simple triage screening tool were found to be at significantly increased risk for subsequent ED use, hospitalization, and nursing home admission.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
The purpose of this study, a component of a randomized clinical trial, was to assess the influence of the emergency department environment and participant characteristics on the accuracy of self-reported health care utilization. Interviews of 612 seniors aged 65 to 93 were conducted in two emergency departments. The research assistant, upon completion of each interview, rated characteristics of the emergency department and compared participants' self-reports of emergency department use and hospitalization during the previous 4 weeks with data from hospital records: 3.6% overreported and 2.2% underreported visits to the emergency department. Regarding hospitalizations, 2.6% overreported and 1.2% underreported. Discrepancies were associated with male gender, cognitive deficits, and risk status. Inconsistencies were not related to any of the environmental variables. These findings suggest that seniors without cognitive decline report reliable data even in a potentially challenging environment.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ambiente de Instituições de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Ohio , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
The purposes of this study were to describe suicidal persons who come to the emergency department (ED) and to examine the relationship between clinical and health service characteristics and decisions regarding post-ED care. Data were collected from three hospital EDs by means of a retrospective review of records. During the 1-month study period, 163 ED visits were for suicidal ideation (f = 110) or behavior (f = 53). The mean age of the patients was 36.5 years (range = 5-87 years); 51% were female patients. Clinical decisions about post-ED care tended to be cautious, regardless of a patient's level of suicidality, with 71% of patients either transferred for psychiatric evaluation or admitted to the psychiatric unit. Emergency department staff tended to be slightly more conservative than mental health professionals, but the difference in their decisions about disposition was not significant.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Hospitais de Condado , Hospitais de Ensino , Hospitais Filantrópicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Transferência de Pacientes , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia , Centros de TraumatologiaRESUMO
The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of use of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in older ED patients with acute nontraumatic abdominal pain, describe the most common diagnostic CT findings, and determine the proportion of diagnostic CT results. This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study of 337 patients 60 years or older. History was obtained prospectively; charts were reviewed for radiographic findings, dispositions, diagnoses, and clinical course, and patients were followed up at 2 weeks for additional information. The prevalence of use of abdominal CT was 37%. The most common diagnostic findings were diverticulitis (18%), bowel obstruction (18%), nephrolithiasis (10%), and gallbladder disease (10%). Eight percent of patients had findings suggestive of neoplasm. Overall, 57% of CT results were diagnostic (95% confidence interval [CI], 49%-66%), 75% (95% CI, 63%-84%) for patients requiring acute medical or surgical intervention, and 85% (95% CI, 62%-97%) for patients requiring acute surgical intervention. CT use is highly prevalent in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain. CT results are often diagnostic, especially for patients with emergent conditions.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Geriatria , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of mental status impairment in elderly emergency department patients and to assess documentation of and referrals by emergency physicians for mental status impairment after discharge from the ED. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study of a convenience sample of 297 patients 70 years or older presenting to an urban teaching hospital ED over a 12-month period. Patients were screened with the Orientation-Memory-Concentration examination for cognitive impairment and the Confusion Assessment Method for delirium. Documentation, dispositions, and referrals were abstracted from chart review. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-seven of the 337 eligible patients were enrolled. Seventy-eight of the 297 (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21% to 31%) patients had mental status impairment; 30 (10%; 95% CI 7% to 14%) had delirium; 48 (16%; 95% CI 12% to 20%) had cognitive impairment without delirium; 17 (6%; 95% CI 3% to 9%) screened positive on both examinations. Only 22 (28%; 95% CI 19% to 40%) of the 78 patients had any documentation of mental status impairment by the emergency physician. Specific mention of delirium, cognitive impairment, or an acceptable synonym was noted in 13 (17%; 95% CI 9% to 27%). Of 34 (44%; 95% CI 32% to 55%) patients with mental status impairment discharged home, only 6 (18%; 95% CI 7% to 35%) had plans documented by the emergency physician to address impairment. Eleven (37%; 95% CI 20% to 56%) of the 30 patients with delirium were discharged home. Sixteen (70%; 95% CI 47% to 87%) of the 23 patients with cognitive impairment who were discharged home had no prior history of dementia; these patients were less likely to have specialized assistance with care (13%; 95% CI 4% to 27%) than those with known dementia (58%; 95% CI 28% to 85%). CONCLUSION: Impaired mental status is common among older ED patients. Lack of documentation, admission, or referral by emergency physicians suggests a lack of recognition of this important problem.
Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Delírio/diagnóstico , Delírio/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , População UrbanaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little research has examined trauma outcomes in the very elderly (>80 years), the fastest growing subset of our geriatric population. Our objective was to describe demographics, mechanism of injury and injury severity of very elderly trauma patients and examine the association between trauma center (TC) verification and hospital mortality in this age group. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Database consisted of a 1996 countywide trauma registry. Subjects consisted of patients > 80 years of age. The setting consisted of Level I (TCI) and Level II (TCII) trauma centers, and acute care (AC) hospitals. The z score analysis was performed using the Major Trauma Outcome Study and a county-specific risk/outcome equation. In addition, a logistic regression model examined hospital mortality (outcome variable) using age, ISS, arrival GCS, and TC verification as predictor variables. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics; ANOVA; and forward stepwise logistic regression model (OR; 95% CI). RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-five patients with a mean age of 85.9 (+/-4.8) years (range 80-101). Overall mortality was 9.9%. Using z score analysis, survival at TCII performed as predicted (-1.59), while AC performed less than predicted (-3.41). In the regression model, GCS (OR 0.68; CI 0.57-0.79), ISS (OR 1.1; CI 1.05-1.2) and AC setting (OR 3.2; CI 1.1-9.5) predicted hospital mortality. TCs had significantly better outcomes than AC hospitals in a subset of severely injured patients (ISS 21-45) (56% v 8% survival; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted outcomes, in this population, differed between TC and AC settings. Head injury, injury severity, and lack of TC verification are associated with hospital mortality in very elderly trauma patients.