A Novel Grading System for Supraglottic Stenosis Based on Morphology and Functional Status.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, no classification system exists to grade the severity of supraglottic stenosis. The aim of this investigation was to (1) develop a novel grading system for supraglottic stenosis that can both enhance communication between providers and relay information about patient functional status and (2) determine the reliability of the grading system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with supraglottic stenosis at three institutions from 2010-2021 was conducted. After demographic data were collected, two focus group meetings of five laryngologists were held to develop a grading system based on functional status and morphology of stenosis seen on laryngoscopy. Three laryngologists then used the grading system to rate 20 case examples of supraglottic stenosis. Quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the novel grading system. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included. Epiglottic and arytenoid fixation were morphological features associated with worse functional outcomes such as requiring a G-tube or a tracheostomy, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was substantial to almost perfect (Kw = 0.79-0.81) and intra-rater reliability was almost perfect for all raters (0.88-1.0) when using the novel grading system. CONCLUSION: A grading system for supraglottic stenosis has been proposed with strong inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities. The proposed system has the advantage of being descriptive of both patient functionality and morphology of the stenosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3-According to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 level of evidence guidelines, this non-randomized retrospective cohort study is classified as level 3 evidence Laryngoscope, 133:1442-1447, 2023.

Safety and Predictors of 30-Day Adverse Events of Laryngeal Framework Surgery: An Analysis of ACS-NSQIP data.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize and identify predictors of 30-day adverse events in patients undergoing laryngeal framework surgery (LFS). STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement dataset. METHODS: LFS cases were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2008 to 2018. Demographic variables, patient comorbidities, and perioperative outcomes (any adverse event, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and unplanned intubation) were extracted. Patient-specific and surgery-specific factors associated with perioperative adverse events were examined using descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression (LR). RESULTS: Of 283 patients who underwent LFS, 225 underwent laryngoplasty medialization, 56 underwent laryngoplasty medialization with arytenoidectomy or arytenoidopexy via an external approach, and 2 underwent local myocutaneous or fasciocutaneous advancement flap along with laryngoplasty. Medical comorbidities were present in 33.6% of patients and 57.9% were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class III/IV (57.9%). LFS was performed as same-day surgery in 30.7% of cases. Fourteen patients (4.9%) suffered an adverse condition within 30 days following surgery. In univariate LR, ASA Class III or IV (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-30.1) was the only predictor associated with any adverse event. Arytenoid adduction (AA) was associated with increased risk of reoperation within 30 days of the initial surgery (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.0-49). CONCLUSIONS: LFS is a generally safe procedure with infrequent perioperative adverse events. In the ACS-NSQIP database, ASA classification of III or IV was associated with a higher risk for any 30-day adverse event and AA was associated with a higher risk for 30-day reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1414-1420, 2022.