Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Europace ; 20(3): 528-534, 2018 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28170028

RESUMO

Aims: Stress-induced right bundle-branch block morphology ventricular ectopy (SI-RBVE) may be caused by left ventricular myocardial anomalies. While frequent ventricular ectopy (FVE) has been linked to poor outcomes, the prognostic value of SI-RBVE has not been established. The study aims to determine whether SI-RBVE is associated with increased mortality. Methods and results: Three hundred forty-three patients with an intermediate to high probability of coronary artery disease were prospectively included. Patients were referred for a single-photon emission computed tomography and underwent a stress test according to standard protocols. Stress-induced right bundle-branch block morphology ventricular ectopy (VE) was defined as one or more induced premature beats with positive predominance in V1. Frequent VE was defined as the presence of seven or more ventricular premature beats per minute or any organized ventricular arrhythmia. During a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.3 years, 59 deaths occurred. The death rate was higher in the SI-RBVE group (23.4% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.021). Age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13), P < 0.001] and peripheral artery disease [OR = 2.47 (95% CI: 1.35-4.50) P = 0.003] were independent factors of mortality, but single-photon emission computed tomography findings were not. There was an interaction between SI-RBVE and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In patients with LVEF > 50%, SI-RBVE was an incremental risk factor for mortality [OR = 2.83 (95% CI: 1.40-5.74), P = 0.004]. Stress-induced right bundle-branch block morphology VE patients also presented higher rates of known coronary artery disease, ischaemia, scar, and ST-segment changes. Frequent VE was not related to mortality. Conclusion: Stress-induced right bundle-branch block morphology VE is associated with an increased mortality in patients with preserved LVEF.


Assuntos
Bloqueio de Ramo/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Teste de Esforço/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/etiologia , Idoso , Bloqueio de Ramo/diagnóstico , Bloqueio de Ramo/mortalidade , Bloqueio de Ramo/fisiopatologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Volume Sistólico , Fatores de Tempo , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/diagnóstico , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/mortalidade , Complexos Ventriculares Prematuros/fisiopatologia
3.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 28(4): 292-298, 2021 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Current guidelines for patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) on electrocardiogram are based on troponin measurement. The HEART score is reportedly a reliable work-up strategy that combines clinical evaluation with troponin value. A clinical rule that could select very low-risk patients without the need for a blood test (HEAR score, being the HEART score without the troponin item) would be of great interest. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the safety of a HEAR score <2 to rule-out non-STEMI without troponin measurement. Secondary objective was to assess the safety of a sequential strategy that combines HEAR score and HEART (defined as two-step HEART strategy). DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational study in six emergency departments. Patients with nontraumatic chest pain and no alternative diagnosis were included and followed up for 45 day. Patients were considered at low-risk if the HEAR score was <2 or, for the two-step HEART strategy, if the HEART score was <4. OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was the 45-day rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with a HEAR score <2. A HEAR score based strategy was consider safe if the rate of the primary endpoint was below 1%, with an upper margin of the 95% confidence interval (CI) below 3%. RESULTS: Among 1452 patients included, 1402 were analyzed and 97 (7%) had a MACE during the follow-up period. The HEAR score was <2 in 279 (20%) patients and one presented a MACE [0.4% (95% CI: 0.01-1.98)]. The two-step HEART strategy classified low-risk an additional 476 patients (34%) and one of these 476 patients had a MACE [0.3% (95% CI: 0.03-0.95)]. The two-step HEART strategy would have theoretically avoided 360 troponin measurements (19%). CONCLUSIONS: In our prospective multicenter study, a HEAR based work-up strategy was safe, with a very low risk of MACE at 45 day. We also report that a two-step HEART-based strategy may safely allow significant reduction of troponin measurements in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito , Troponina , Biomarcadores , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Eletrocardiografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA