A Medium-Term Comparison of Quality of Life and Pain After Robotic or Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to compare medium-term outcomes between robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using validated quality of life (QoL) and pain assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent RC or LC between 2012 and 2017 at a single academic institution were examined. Cases converted to open were excluded. Patients were contacted by telephone in 2019 and completed two standardized surveys to rate their QoL and pain. RESULTS: Of those screened, 122 (35.8%) completed both surveys. Ninety three (76.2%) underwent RC and 29 (23.8%) underwent LC. The groups (RC versus LC) were similar based on mean age (47.9 versus 45.5 y, P = 0.48), gender (66.7% versus 72.4% female, P = 0.56), race (86.0% White/5.4% Black versus 72.4% White/13.8% Black, P = 0.2), insurance status (98.9% versus 100.0% insured, P = 0.58), median body mass index (31.8 versus 31.3, P = 0.43), and median Charlson Comorbidity Index (1 versus 0, P = 0.14). Fewer RC patients had a history of steroid use compared to LC (16.1% versus 34.5%, P = 0.03). No overall significant difference in QoL was demonstrated. LC group had higher severity of "tiring-exhausting pain" (P = 0.04), "electric-shock pain" (P = 0.003), and "shooting pain" (P = 0.05). The "overall intensity" of pain in the "gallbladder region" between the groups was similar at the time of follow-up (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: QoL over 2-7 y following time of surgery is comparable for robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with a higher severity of subset categories of pain, but overall pain between the two approaches is comparable.

Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is evolving as an important surgical approach in the field of general surgery. We aimed to evaluate the learning curve for RALS procedures involving repair of hiatal hernias. METHODS: A series of robotic-assisted hiatal hernia (HH) repairs were performed between 2013 and 2017 by a surgeon at a single institution. Data were entered into a retrospective database. Patient demographics and intraoperative parameters including console time (CT), surgery time (ST), and total operative time (OT) were examined and abstracted for learning curve analysis using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Assessment of perioperative and post-operative outcomes were calculated using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 57.4 years, average BMI was 29.9 kg/m2, median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was 2, and average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 2.8. The series had a mean CT of 132.6 min, mean ST of 145.1 min, and mean OT of 197.4 min. The CUSUM learning curve for CT was best approximated as a third-order polynomial consisting of three unique phases: the initial training phase (case 1-40), the improvement phase (case 41-85), and the mastery phase (case 86 onwards). There was no significant difference in perioperative complications between the phases. Short-term clinical outcomes were comparable with national standards and did not correlate significantly with operative experience. CONCLUSIONS: The three phases identified with CUSUM analysis represented characteristic stages of the learning curve for robotic hiatal hernia procedures. Our data suggest the training phase is achieved after 40 cases and a high level of mastery is achieved after approximately 85 cases. Thus, the CUSUM method serves as a useful tool for objectively evaluating practical skills for surgeons and can ultimately help establish milestones that assess surgical competency during robotic surgery training.

Transgastric large-organ extraction: the initial human experience.

INTRODUCTION: In laparoscopy, it often is the case that port sites are enlarged for specimen extraction. This leads to higher risk of trocar site complications, such as infection or incisional hernia. Natural orifice surgery (NOTES) is beneficial for minimizing these complications, and this is emphasized when the extracted specimen is of large volume. We have been using transgastric technique for appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Of these transgastric operations, we focus on the one with relatively large-organ extraction: LSG with transoral remnant extraction (TORE). We describe the details and feasibility of this procedure and compare the outcomes to conventional LSG. METHODS: All patients undergoing LSG were considered candidates for TORE and were consented for this procedure if interested after an informed discussion. Eighteen LSGs with TORE (TORE group) and ten conventional LSGs (non-TORE group) were performed from August 2010 to March 2011. We retrospectively compared these two groups for the age, sex, preoperative body mass index, operating room time, hospital stay, excess weight loss (EWL), and trocar site complications. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with TORE consists of conventional LSG and transgastric retrieval of the resected stomach. The procedure exceeds exactly the same manner as conventional LSG until the initial stapling of the stomach. For TORE, the gastrectomy is initiated 5 cm proximal to the pylorus than usual LSG to save the space for the gastrotomy used for specimen retrieval. After the gastrectomy is completed, the full thickness of the distal most part of the staple line is incised open as wide as 2 cm by using electric cautery or ultrasonic dissector. A flexible upper endoscope, which has been in the stomach already as a bougie for gastrectomy, is then guided into the peritoneal cavity through the gastrotomy. The specimen is grasped endoscopically with a snare and extracted transorally. Following this, the gastrotomy is closed laparoscopically. The final shape of the gastric sleeve is identical to the one of conventional LSG. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the TORE and the non-TORE group for patients' profile, operating room time, hospital stay, and EWL. Neither group has experienced perioperative complications. All specimens were extracted readily and safely in the TORE group. Of the ten cases in the non-TORE group, four required extension of the trocar site. No trocar site complications were found in the TORE group, whereas the extended trocar site developed panniculitis in two cases of the non-TORE group; one required panniculectomy for refractory induration. CONCLUSIONS: TORE can be safely and easily performed by surgeons with laparoscopic and endoscopic skill, and with commonly available instruments. While producing identical outcomes, our initial experience with the TORE technique demonstrates an advantage over traditional LSG, because it minimizes trocar site complications. Transgastric organ extraction is potentially applicable to other large-organ extractions in laparoscopic surgery without excessive risk or resources. Larger case volume and longer follow-up period is awaited.

Panniculus morbidus resection complicated by multiple gastrointestinal hernias: A case report.

Introduction: Prevalence of obesity and obesity-related complications are steadily rising in the United States. Panniculus morbidus is a rare end stage complication of abdominal obesity characterized by excess abdominal skin and subcutaneous tissue induced by severe lymphedema. The resulting pannus can limit a patient's mobility, impair activities of daily living including hygiene maintenance and subject the skin and soft tissue to intertrigo, cellulitis and chronic skin ulcerations. Case presentation: We present the case of a 39-year-old female with a BMI of 57 kg/m2 who presented for evaluation of primary umbilical and ventral hernias, as well as a large pannus causing significant abdominal and back pain. A massive panniculectomy with hernia repair was performed to correct the gastrointestinal herniation and panniculus. Clinical discussion: Panniculus morbidus is a debilitating complication of longstanding obesity. Massive panniculectomy is one of the only treatments available to restore functional status and facilitate future weight loss. Ventral and umbilical hernias commonly accompany panniculus morbidus and can pose a challenge to repair. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that both panniculus morbidus and multiple primary gastrointestinal hernias can be effectively managed with a panniculectomy and concomitant hernia repair with onlay mesh, all together safely improving patient ambulation, weight loss and quality of life.

Pyloric gland adenoma of gallbladder-reports of two cases and a brief review of literature.

Adenomas of the gallbladder are uncommon benign epithelial neoplasms. Rarely, they can give rise to gallbladder cancer, which is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract, carrying a poor prognosis and decreased survival. Here we report the case histories of two patients, 40-year-old and 53-year-old males who presented with >1 cm gallbladder polyps, which were detected and confirmed using various imaging studies. Cholecystectomy was performed on both patients and the subsequent pathologic exam revealed 1.2 and 1.6 cm polyps in the lumen. Histopathologically, both polyps showed features reminiscent of "pyloric" gland type of adenoma. The differences between the two cases in regard to histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics will be discussed. We will also briefly review the latest nomenclature on such low-grade polypoid gallbladder entities.

Laparoscopic management of obstructed gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

We describe a novel, minimally invasive method of managing an obstructed gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy. In addition, we briefly review the management of obstructed gastric conduit in patients status-post minimally invasive esophagectomy. On literature review, it was noted that gastrojejunostomy after esophagectomy was exceptionally rare. Only one other reported case of gastrojejunostomy after esophagectomy was found in the literature. This is the first reported case to our knowledge of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy for obstructed gastric conduit is technically feasible, and it effectively managed the obstruction in our patient.