RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The clinical course of schizophrenia is often characterized by recurrent relapses. Blood inflammatory markers are altered in acute psychosis, and may be state markers for illness relapse in schizophrenia. Few studies have investigated longitudinal, intra-individual changes in inflammatory markers as a predictor of relapse. In the present study, we explored this association in a relapse prevention trial in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We analyzed blood inflammatory markers in 200 subjects, with a mean 11 samples per subject, during the 30 month Preventing Relapse in schizophrenia: Oral Antipsychotics Compared to Injectable: eValuating Efficacy (PROACTIVE) trial. Associations between longitudinal changes in inflammatory markers and relapse were analyzed using a within-subjects design. RESULTS: 70 (35 %) of subjects relapsed during the study period. There were no significant differences in mean inflammatory marker levels based on relapse status (yes/no). Baseline levels of inflammatory markers did not predict incident relapse. Among subjects who relapsed, there was a significant decrease in mean blood IL-6 (n = 38, p = 0.019) and IFN-γ (n = 44, p = 0.012) levels from the visit before the relapse to the visit after relapse. CONCLUSION: Although there was some evidence for inflammation as a potential state marker for acute psychosis, we did not find significant evidence for its utility as a relapse-predictive marker.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Longitudinais , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , RecidivaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Positive associations between polymorphisms in the type-three metabotropic glutamate receptor gene (GRM3) and the pathogenesis of schizophrenia as well as response to antipsychotic treatment have been reported. The objective of this study was to determine whether refractory psychiatric symptoms in antipsychotic non-responders are related to polymorphisms in GRM3. METHODS: Ninety-five treatment refractory schizophrenia participants were enrolled. Prior to a medication switch, global psychopathology and negative symptoms were rated. These participants were genotyped for seven markers in GRM3. Genotype associations with symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Two markers in GRM3 (rs1989796 and rs1476455), were associated with the presence of refractory global symptoms as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total scores. Participants with an rs1476455_CC genotype had significantly higher BPRS scores than A-carriers (55.1±10.4 vs. 48.3±9.2; F=7.6, p=0.0071). Additionally, participants with the rs1989796_CC genotype had significantly higher BPRS scores than T-carriers (50.1±5.7 vs. 55.8±10.5, F=7.1, p=0.0091). No evidence for significant associations with negative symptoms was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphisms in the GRM3 gene may be associated with refractory global psychosis symptoms but not negative symptoms in persons with schizophrenia.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Receptores de Glutamato Metabotrópico/genética , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Esquizofrenia/genética , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatologia , Psicologia do EsquizofrênicoRESUMO
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary oro-facial, limb, and truncal movements. As a genetic basis for inter-individual variation is assumed, there have been a sizeable number of candidate gene studies. All subjects met diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and were randomized to receive antipsychotic medications as participants in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness project (CATIE). TD was assessed via the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale at regular intervals. Probable TD was defined as meeting Schooler-Kane criteria at any scheduled CATIE visit (207/710 subjects, 29.2%). A total of 128 candidate genes were studied in 710 subjects-2,580 SNPs in 118 candidate genes selected from the literature (e.g., dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, and GABA pathways) and composite genotypes for 10 drug-metabolizing enzymes. No single marker or haplotype association reached statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Thus, we found no support for either novel or prior associations from the literature.
Assuntos
Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/genética , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are claims that second-generation antipsychotics produce fewer extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) compared with first-generation drugs. AIMS: To compare the incidence of treatment-emergent EPS between second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine in people with schizophrenia. METHOD: Incidence analyses integrated data from standardised rating scales and documented use of concomitant medication or treatment discontinuation for EPS events. Mixed model analyses of change in rating scales from baseline were also conducted. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in incidence or change in rating scales for parkinsonism, dystonia, akathisia or tardive dyskinesia when comparing second-generation antipsychotics with perphenazine or comparing between second-generation antipsychotics. Secondary analyses revealed greater rates of concomitant antiparkinsonism medication among individuals on risperidone and lower rates among individuals on quetiapine, and lower rates of discontinuation because of parkinsonism among people on quetiapine and ziprasidone. There was a trend for a greater likelihood of concomitant medication for akathisia among individuals on risperidone and perphenazine. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of treatment-emergent EPS and change in EPS ratings indicated that there are no significant differences between second-generation antipsychotics and perphenazine or between second-generation antipsychotics in people with schizophrenia.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças dos Gânglios da Base/induzido quimicamente , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance represent growing concerns related to atypical antipsychotic (AAP) use as their incidence in the schizophrenia population is two-to-four-fold higher than the general population. Reduced methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) activity, resulting in aberrant folate metabolism and hyperhomocysteinemia, has been linked to cardiovascular disease and is unstudied in relation to AAP associated metabolic complications. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between MTHFR, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance in schizophrenia subjects receiving AAPs for >or=12 months. METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects were included in this cross-sectional analysis and screened for the metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and MTHFR 677C/T and 1298A/C genotype. RESULTS: Overall, 23 subjects (40%) met metabolic syndrome criteria. There were no differences in age, gender, race, or AAP exposure between genotype groups. For the 677 T allele carriers, 53% met metabolic syndrome criteria, compared to 23% in the CC genotype group, giving an OR=3.7, (95% CI=1.24-12.66, p=0.02). Thus, for T allele subjects, the risk was almost four times greater, despite similar antipsychotic exposure. Both waist circumference and MTHFR genotype significantly predicted insulin resistance (F=8.35, df=5, 51, p<0.0001), with these two terms interacting (F=8.6, df=2, p=0.0006) suggesting that TT subjects are at greater risk for insulin resistance with increasing central adiposity, which is independent of age, gender, BMI, or metabolic syndrome diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Results should be taken cautiously due to the small sample size, but suggest the MTHFR 677C/T variant may predispose patients to AAP metabolic complications.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Variação Genética/genética , Resistência à Insulina/genética , Síndrome Metabólica/induzido quimicamente , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/genética , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/genética , Metilenotetra-Hidrofolato Redutase (NADPH2)/genética , Metilenotetra-Hidrofolato Redutase (NADPH2)/metabolismo , Farmacogenética , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de Risco , Esquizofrenia/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This double-blind study compared a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs compared to a representative older agent for patients with schizophrenia who use or avoid illicit substances. METHODS: Schizophrenic subjects were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. The primary aim of this analysis was to delineate differences between the overall effectiveness of these five treatments among patients who used or did not use illicit substances. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation among patients who use illicit drugs (median 3.3 to 6.8 months). Among non-users time to treatment discontinuation was significantly longer for patients treated with olanzapine (median 13.0 months) than perphenazine ( 5.9 months), risperidone (5.6 months), or quetiapine (5.0 months); time to discontinuation for ziprasidone (4.3 months) was even shorter, although the latter difference was not significant. The difference between risperidone and quetiapine, although small, was significant. All remaining differences were non-significant. Similar results were found for discontinuation due to inefficacy. There were no differences between illicit users and non-users in symptom reduction and global improvement, after adjustment for differential duration of treatment. Differences in discontinuation results were attenuated by non-compliance, but the trends persisted after controlling for treatment compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic schizophrenia who avoid use of illicit drugs, olanzapine was more effective than other antipsychotics as reflected by longer time to all-cause discontinuation, but illicit substance abuse attenuated this advantage, reinforcing the need for concurrent substance abuse treatment.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Drogas Ilícitas/efeitos adversos , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Dibenzotiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Olanzapina , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Perfenazina/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Recusa do Paciente ao TratamentoRESUMO
Response to antipsychotics is highly variable, which may be due in part to differences in drug exposure. The goal of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of concentration exposure of olanzapine. Patients with Alzheimer's disease (n = 117) and schizophrenia (n = 406) were treated with olanzapine as part of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). Combined, these patients (n = 523) provided 1527 plasma samples for determination of olanzapine concentrations. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to determine the population pharmacokinetics of olanzapine, and patient-specific covariates were evaluated as potential contributors to variability in drug exposure. The population mean olanzapine clearance and volume of distribution were 16.1 L/h and 2150 L, respectively. Elimination of olanzapine varied nearly 10-fold (range, 6.66-67.96 L/h). Smoking status, sex, and race accounted for 26%, 12%, and 7% of the variability, respectively (P < .0001). Smokers cleared olanzapine 55% faster than non/past smokers (P < .0001). Men cleared olanzapine 38% faster than women (P < .0001). Patients who identified themselves as black or African American cleared olanzapine 26% faster than other races (P < .0001). Differences in olanzapine exposure due to sex, race, and smoking may account for some of the variability in response to olanzapine.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Fumar , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Algoritmos , Doença de Alzheimer/etnologia , Doença de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Antipsicóticos/sangue , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Benzodiazepinas/sangue , Benzodiazepinas/farmacocinética , Cromatografia Líquida , Feminino , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Análise Multivariada , Olanzapina , Esquizofrenia/etnologia , Esquizofrenia/metabolismo , Fatores Sexuais , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Distribuição Tecidual , Resultado do Tratamento , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is associated with excess cardiovascular mortality. We hypothesized outpatients with bipolar disorder would exhibit excess cardiovascular risk factors, particularly among prevalent users of the second-generation antipsychotics associated with weight gain and valproic acid derivatives. METHODS: This chart review of 217 patients with bipolar disorder examined cardiovascular risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. We also evaluated if certain medications were cross-sectionally associated with metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were not weighed and many did not have available lipid profiles. Over three-quarters of those with available data (n = 161) were overweight or obese (body mass index >or= 25) and nearly half were obese (body mass index >or= 30). A prevalence exceeding general population estimates was also observed for hypertriglyceridemia, elevated blood pressure/hypertension, and elevated fasting glucose/diabetes. Among those with all requisite data (n = 60), over 50% met criteria for National Cholesterol Education Program-defined metabolic syndrome, nearly double the expected prevalence. A trend toward greater prevalence of metabolic syndrome among prevalent users of the second-generation antipsychotics associated with weight gain was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and the metabolic syndrome were common in patients with bipolar disorder. These patients may be under-evaluated for cardiovascular risk and warrant screening and early intervention.
Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Antimaníacos/efeitos adversos , Antimaníacos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Bipolar/sangue , Transtorno Bipolar/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colesterol/sangue , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Lactente , Lipoproteínas HDL/sangue , Lipoproteínas LDL/sangue , Compostos de Lítio/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Lítio/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/sangue , Fatores de Risco , Triglicerídeos/sangueRESUMO
Understanding the biological processes that underlie why patients relapse is an issue of fundamental importance to the detection and prevention of relapse in schizophrenia. Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), a facilitator of brain plasticity, is reduced in patients with schizophrenia. In the present study, we examined whether decreases in plasma BDNF levels could be used as a biological predictor of relapse in schizophrenia. A total of 221 patients were prospectively evaluated for relapse over 30months in the Preventing Relapse in Schizophrenia: Oral Antipsychotics Compared to Injectables: eValuating Efficacy (PROACTIVE) study. Serial blood samples were collected at a maximum of 23 time points during the 30-month trial and BDNF levels were measured in plasma samples by ELISA. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that BDNF was not a significant predictor of relapse, hospitalization or exacerbation. Regardless of treatment group (oral second generation antipsychotic vs. long-acting injectable risperidone microspheres), baseline BDNF value did not differ significantly between those who experienced any of the adverse outcomes and those who did not. While contrary to the study hypothesis, these robust results offer little support for the use of plasma BDNF alone as a biomarker to predict relapse in schizophrenia.
Assuntos
Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo/metabolismo , Transtornos Psicóticos/sangue , Esquizofrenia/sangue , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Curva ROC , Recidiva , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Neurocognition is moderately to severely impaired in patients with schizophrenia. However, the factor structure of the various neurocognitive deficits, the relationship with symptoms and other variables, and the minimum amount of testing required to determine an adequate composite score has not been determined in typical patients with schizophrenia. An 'all-comer' approach to cognition is needed, as provided by the baseline assessment of an unprecedented number of patients in the CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness) schizophrenia trial. From academic sites and treatment providers representative of the community, 1493 patients with chronic schizophrenia were entered into the study, including those with medical comorbidity and substance abuse. Eleven neurocognitive tests were administered, resulting in 24 individual scores reduced to nine neurocognitive outcome measures, five domain scores and a composite score. Despite minimal screening procedures, 91.2% of patients provided meaningful neurocognitive data. Exploratory principal components analysis yielded one factor accounting for 45% of the test variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a single-factor model comprised of five domain scores was the best fit. The correlations among the factors were medium to high, and scores on individual factors were very highly correlated with the single composite score. Neurocognitive deficits were modestly correlated with negative symptom severity (r=0.13-0.27), but correlations with positive symptom severity were near zero (r<0.08). Even in an 'all-comer' clinical trial, neurocognitive deficits can be assessed in the overwhelming majority of patients, and the severity of impairment is similar to meta-analytic estimates. Multiple analyses suggested that a broad cognitive deficit characterizes this sample. These deficits are modestly related to negative symptoms and essentially independent of positive symptom severity.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Adulto , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Memória/fisiologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence and correlates of concomitant psychotropic medications and use of anticholinergic drugs to treat schizophrenia. METHODS: Concomitant medication use was studied at baseline for participants in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) trial. RESULTS: Of the 1,380 patients with baseline medication data, 82 percent were taking psychotropic medications. Of this group, 6 percent were taking two antipsychotics (one first generation and one second generation); 38 percent, antidepressants; 22 percent, anxiolytics; 4 percent, lithium, and 15 percent, other mood stabilizers. The strongest predictors of taking several medications were having anxiety or depression, being female, and taking second-generation antipsychotics. Conversely, African Americans and those with better neurocognitive functioning were less likely to be taking several concomitant psychotropic medications. In some cases symptoms that were likely targets of polypharmacy, such as depression, remained prominent, suggesting only partial response. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of psychotropic medications to treat people with schizophrenia is common. Empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of many of these agents for this population are lacking.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapêutico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psiquiatria , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between substance use and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness. This study used baseline assessments and examined psychosocial functioning assessed by the Quality of Life Scale. Participants were classified as being abstinent, using substances, or having a substance use disorder. RESULTS: Of the 1,460 participants, 23 percent used substances and 37 percent had a substance use disorder. Of the 544 with a substance use disorder, 87 percent used alcohol, 44 percent used marijuana, and 36 percent used cocaine. Compared with participants who used substances, those with a substance use disorder had higher rates of polysubstance use. Compared with those who were abstinent, those who used substances had higher overall psychosocial functioning, and those with a substance use disorder had similar overall functioning but lower scores on the common objects and activities subscales. Among participants with a substance use disorder, those who used cocaine had lower overall functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with abstinence, substance use and substance use disorder, unless they involved cocaine use, were generally associated with higher or equivalent overall psychosocial functioning. Patterns of substance use were similar to those in the community, suggesting that treatment of substance use disorders in schizophrenia should focus on reconnecting substance users to nonusing peer groups.
Assuntos
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.) , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In a pragmatic clinical trial, this study sought to compare relapses among patients receiving either long-acting injectable or oral second-generation antipsychotics. METHODS: PROACTIVE (Preventing Relapse Oral Antipsychotics Compared to Injectables Evaluating Efficacy), a prior 30-month relapse prevention study, compared use of a long-acting injectable second-generation antipsychotic with use of an oral second-generation antipsychotic by 305 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and found similar rates of first relapse between groups (42% with injectable medication, 32% with oral medication). This study examined subsequent relapses among patients who had relapsed in PROACTIVE and who continued in treatment, follow-up, or both. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (11%) experienced two relapses, and 13 patients (4%) had three relapses. Neither rate of relapse nor time to successive relapses differed between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was an impressively low rate of subsequent relapses in this pragmatic clinical trial. Because all patients had a clinic visit according to the biweekly long-acting injectable medication administration schedule, frequent contact may have contributed to low relapse rates. Maintaining frequent clinical contact may be a valid psychosocial relapse prevention treatment.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Risperidona/administração & dosagem , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Recidiva , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
There is a growing concern regarding the propensity of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) to induce weight gain and metabolic adverse effects. Recent consensus guidelines have recommended assessment and monitoring procedures to appropriately detect and manage these adverse effects. This study addresses the appreciation and readiness of clinicians to implement management guidelines for these adverse effects. Respondents indicated awareness of the risks of treatment with SGAs. The extent of monitoring for metabolic adverse effects was low and inconsistent across measures and in frequency of evaluation. Ongoing efforts are needed to support and encourage change in clinician practice.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Metabólicas/induzido quimicamente , Reconhecimento Psicológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Esquizofrenia/metabolismo , Aumento de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Doenças Metabólicas/classificação , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical characteristics of individuals with schizophrenia that develop tardive dyskinesia (TD) associated with antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: Baseline data on 1460 patients with schizophrenia were collected as part of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness schizophrenia study. Subjects who met Schooler-Kane criteria for probable TD were compared to those without TD. Multiple regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between TD and clinical variables. RESULTS: 212 subjects met the Schooler-Kane criteria for probable TD and 1098 had no history or current evidence of TD. Subjects with TD were older, had a longer duration of receiving antipsychotic medication, and were more likely to have been receiving a conventional antipsychotic and an anticholinergic agent. After controlling for important baseline covariates, diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension did not predict TD, whereas substance abuse significantly predicted TD. Differences in cognitive functioning were not significantly different after controlling for baseline covariates. The TD subjects also had higher ratings of psychopathology, EPSE, and akathisia. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the established relationships between the presence of TD and age, duration of treatment with antipsychotics, treatment with a conventional antipsychotic, treatment with anticholinergics, the presence of EPS and akathisia, and substance abuse. Subjects with TD had higher ratings of psychopathology as measured by the PANSS. We found no support for DM or hypertension increasing the risk of TD, or for TD being associated with cognitive impairment.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Agitação Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Agitação Psicomotora/epidemiologia , Agitação Psicomotora/etiologia , Assunção de Riscos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Until relatively recently, long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations were only available for first-generation antipsychotics and their utilization decreased as use of oral second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) increased. Although registry-based naturalistic studies show LAIs reduce rehospitalization more than oral medications in clinical practice, this is not seen in recent randomized clinical trials. PROACTIVE (Preventing Relapse Oral Antipsychotics Compared to Injectables Evaluating Efficacy) relapse prevention study incorporated efficacy and effectiveness features. At 8 US academic centers, 305 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to LAI risperidone (LAI-R) or physician's choice oral SGAs. Patients were evaluated during the 30-month study by masked, centralized assessors using 2-way video, and monitored biweekly by on-site clinicians and assessors who knew treatment assignment. Relapse was evaluated by a masked Relapse Monitoring Board. Differences between LAI-R and oral SGA treatment in time to first relapse and hospitalization were not significant. Psychotic symptoms and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score improved more in the LAI-R group. In contrast, the LAI group had higher Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms Alogia scale scores. There were no other between-group differences in symptoms or functional improvement. Despite the advantage for psychotic symptoms, LAI-R did not confer an advantage over oral SGAs for relapse or rehospitalization. Biweekly monitoring, not focusing specifically on patients with demonstrated nonadherence to treatment and greater flexibility in changing medication in the oral treatment arm, may contribute to the inability to detect differences between LAI and oral SGA treatment in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Recidiva , Risperidona/administração & dosagem , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Risperidona/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that basal ganglia volumes of first-episode neuroleptic-naïve patients with schizophrenia are smaller than those of normal control subjects. Subsequent exposure to neuroleptic medication appears to induce volumetric change. Possible reasons for this include differences in blood flow and metabolism between the neuroleptic-naïve and medicated states. METHODS: We used positron emission tomography (PET) to measure blood flow to the caudate and putamen, in a sample of 29 neuroleptic-naïve patients with schizophreniform disorders and 29 matched control subjects. We also studied a subset of the patient sample (n = 13), comparing their "before" versus "on" medication PET scans. RESULTS: We did not find a significant difference in blood flow to the caudate and putamen between neuroleptic-naïve patients and control subjects even after controlling for whole brain blood flow; however, in the subset of 13 patients compared in the "on" versus "off" medication states, there was a statistically significant increase in blood flow to both the caudate and putamen. CONCLUSIONS: Before treatment, there appears to be no difference in striatal blood flow between first-episode neuroleptic-naïve patients and healthy volunteers, but there appears to be a significant increase in blood flow to the striatum after the treatment is initiated.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Gânglios da Base/irrigação sanguínea , Gânglios da Base/efeitos dos fármacos , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Psicóticos/metabolismo , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Haloperidol/farmacologia , Haloperidol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Psicóticos/patologia , Putamen/irrigação sanguínea , Putamen/efeitos dos fármacos , Putamen/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risperidona/farmacologia , Risperidona/uso terapêutico , Tomografia Computadorizada de EmissãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) has been a public-academic collaboration in which guidelines for medication treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder were used in selected public outpatient clinics in Texas. Subsequently, these algorithms were implemented throughout Texas and are being used in other states. Guidelines require updating when significant new evidence emerges; the antipsychotic algorithm for schizophrenia was last updated in 1999. This article reports the recommendations developed in 2002 and 2003 by a group of experts, clinicians, and administrators. METHOD: A conference in January 2002 began the update process. Before the conference, experts in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia, clinicians, and administrators reviewed literature topics and prepared presentations. Topics included ziprasidone's inclusion in the algorithm, the number of antipsychotics tried before clozapine, and the role of first generation antipsychotics. Data were rated according to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality criteria. After discussing the presentations, conference attendees arrived at consensus recommendations. Consideration of aripiprazole's inclusion was subsequently handled by electronic communications. RESULTS: The antipsychotic algorithm for schizophrenia was updated to include ziprasidone and aripiprazole among the first-line agents. Relative to the prior algorithm, the number of stages before clozapine was reduced. First generation antipsychotics were included but not as first-line choices. For patients refusing or not responding to clozapine and clozapine augmentation, preference was given to trying monotherapy with another antipsychotic before resorting to antipsychotic combinations. CONCLUSION: Consensus on algorithm revisions was achieved, but only further well-controlled research will answer many key questions about sequence and type of medication treatments of schizophrenia.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Antipsicóticos/normas , Aripiprazol , Clozapina/uso terapêutico , Árvores de Decisões , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Psicologia do Esquizofrênico , Texas , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Patients with schizophrenia often suffer from sleep disturbances such as excessive sleeping and insomnia. Common medications for schizophrenia can have a sedative effect on patients. Not all antipsychotic medications have the same sedative effect, which is related to dosage and affinity for histamine H1 receptors. Studies have shown that, compared with conventional antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone generally cause less sedation yet are as effective in controlling psychosis and agitation. Sedation can be troublesome to patients who are trying to become re-integrated into society and interfere with their treatment regimen. Both persistent sedation and chronic insomnia can be managed by the physician.
RESUMO
Pharmacological treatments for serious mental illness (SMI) can cause weight gain and adverse metabolic effects. Many second generation antipsychotics and mood stabilizers appear to be particularly problematic in this regard. Several studies have investigated interventions for antipsychotic-induced, or less commonly mood stabilizer -induced, weight gain. Both lifestyle and pharmacological interventions have demonstrated effectiveness. We systematically review randomized controlled trials of pharmacological interventions for weight gain related to these medications. We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical trials for the most studied agents to estimate mean weight loss: metformin (2.93 kg, 95% C.I. 0.97-4.89, p=0.003), H(2) antagonists (1.78 kg (95% C.I. -0.50-4.06, p=0.13), topiramate (3.95 kg 95% C.I. 1.77-6.12, p=0.0004), and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (1.30 kg (95% C.I. -0.06-2.66, p=0.06). Among the studied options for antipsychotic-related weight gain, metformin has the strongest evidence base and may improve vascular risk factors beyond obesity. The use of topiramate is also supported by the literature and may improve psychotic symptoms in those refractory to treatment. A marginal benefit is seen with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and any vascular benefits from such weight loss may be counteracted by increases in blood pressure or heart rate. Pharmacological therapies may offer benefits as a means of supplementing the effects of lifestyle changes for weight loss. However, the existing evidence provides little evidence of specificity for pharmacological therapies to antipsychotic-induced weight gain and has not studied any connection between benefits and reduced incidence of diabetes mellitus or any vascular outcomes.