Impact of safety-net hospital burden on achievement of textbook oncologic outcomes following resection in for stage I-IV colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is a benchmark for high-quality surgical cancer care but has not been studied at safety-net hospitals (SNH). The study sought to understand how SNH burden affects TOO achievement in colorectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for colorectal cancer patients who underwent resection for stage I-III plus stage IV with liver-only metastases (2010-2019). TOO was defined as R0 resection, AJCC-compliant lymphadenectomy (>12 nodes), no prolonged LOS, no 30-day mortality/readmission, and receipt of stage-appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 487,195 patients, 66.7% achieved TOO. Lower achievement was explained by adequate lymphadenectomy (87.3%), non-prolonged LOS (76.3%), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III (60.3%) and IV (54.1%). Treatment at high burden hospitals (HBH, >10% Medicaid/uninsured) was a predictor of non-TOO (Stage I/II: OR 0.83, III: OR 0.86, IV: OR 0.83; all p < 0.001). Achieving TOO was associated with decreased mortality (Stage I/II: HR 0.49, III: HR 0.48, IV: HR 0.57; all p < 0.001), and HBH treatment was a predictor of mortality (Stage I/II: HR 1.09, III: HR 1.05, IV: HR 1.07; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at higher SNH burden hospitals was associated with less frequent TOO achievement and increased mortality. Quality improvement targets include receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and avoidance of prolonged LOS.

SAGES peritoneal dialysis access guideline update 2023.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has been used for both de novo insertion and salvage of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters. Advanced laparoscopic, basic laparoscopic, open, and image-guided techniques have evolved as the most popular techniques. The aim of this guideline was to develop evidence-based guidelines that support surgeons, patients, and other physicians in decisions on minimally invasive peritoneal dialysis access and the salvage of malfunctioning catheters in both adults and children. METHODS: A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons reviewed the literature since the prior guideline was published in 2014 and developed seven key questions in adults and four in children. After a systematic review of the literature, by the panel, evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: After systematic review, data extraction, and evidence to decision meetings, the panel agreed on twelve recommendations for the peri-operative performance of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery and management of catheter dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In the adult population, conditional recommendations were made in favor of: staged hernia repair followed by PD catheter insertion over simultaneous and traditional start over urgent start of PD when medically possible. Furthermore, the panel suggested advanced laparoscopic insertion techniques rather than basic laparoscopic techniques or open insertion. Conditional recommendations were made for either advanced laparoscopic or image-guided percutaneous insertion and for either nonoperative or operative salvage. A recommendation could not be made regarding concomitant clean-contaminated surgery in adults. In the pediatric population, conditional recommendations were made for either traditional or urgent start of PD, concomitant clean or clean-contaminated surgery and PD catheter placement rather than staged, and advanced laparoscopic placement rather than basic or open insertion.

Process for quality assessment review of societal guidelines-an editorial to accompany "multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)".

BACKGROUND: The SAGES Guidelines Committee has implemented processes for Quality Assessment of SAGES-endorsed guidelines, with the aim of improving the quality of published guidelines. METHODS: We provide details of the processes developed, using standardized tools for assessing the methodological quality of practice guidelines. As an example, we describe the application of our processes to the recent multi-societal GERD consensus guideline. RESULTS: Assessment of the multi-societal GERD consensus guideline by the iterative processes of SAGES Quality Assurance taskforce improved the quality of the final manuscript in all domains of appraisal. These processes are easily applicable to future guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Such systems will increase the confidence in SAGES recommendations and increase the implementation of SAGES guidelines. By demonstrating the rigor of Quality Assessment, this confidence also extends to a further increase in the assurance of the publications of the Surgical Endoscopy journal.

Surgical approach to microwave and radiofrequency liver ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases less than 5 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represent the two most common malignant neoplasms of the liver. The objective of this study was to assess outcomes of surgical approaches to liver ablation comparing laparoscopic versus percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA), and MWA versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with HCC or CRLM lesions smaller than 5 cm. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted across seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, to identify all comparative studies between 1937 and 2021. Two independent reviewers screened for eligibility, extracted data for selected studies, and assessed study bias using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Random effects meta-analyses were subsequently performed on all available comparative data. RESULTS: From 1066 records screened, 11 studies were deemed relevant to the study and warranted inclusion. Eight of the 11 studies were at high or uncertain risk for bias. Our meta-analyses of two studies revealed that laparoscopic MW ablation had significantly higher complication rates compared to a percutaneous approach (risk ratio = 4.66; 95% confidence interval = [1.23, 17.22]), but otherwise similar incomplete ablation rates, local recurrence, and oncologic outcomes. The remaining nine studies demonstrated similar efficacy of MWA and RFA, as measured by incomplete ablation, complication rates, local/regional recurrence, and oncologic outcomes, for both HCC and CRLM lesions less than 5 cm (p > 0.05 for all outcomes). There was no statistical subgroup interaction in the analysis of tumors < 3 cm. CONCLUSION: The available comparative evidence regarding both laparoscopic versus percutaneous MWA and MWA versus RFA is limited, evident by the few studies that suffer from high/uncertain risk of bias. Additional high-quality randomized trials or statistically matched cohort studies with sufficient granularity of patient variables, institutional experience, and physician specialty/training will be useful in informing clinical decision making for the ablative treatment of HCC or CRLM.

SAGES/AHPBA guidelines for the use of microwave and radiofrequency liver ablation for the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or colorectal liver metastases less than 5 cm.

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represent the liver's two most common malignant neoplasms. Liver-directed therapies such as ablation have become part of multidisciplinary therapies despite a paucity of data. Therefore, an expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC or CRLM less than 5 cm in diameter in patients ineligible for other therapies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted for six key questions (KQ) regarding MWA or RFA for solitary liver tumors in patients deemed poor candidates for first-line therapy. Subject experts used the GRADE methodology to formulate evidence-based recommendations and future research recommendations. RESULTS: The panel addressed six KQs pertaining to MWA vs. RFA outcomes and laparoscopic vs. percutaneous MWA. The available evidence was poor quality and individual studies included both HCC and CRLM. Therefore, the six KQs were condensed into two, recognizing that these were two disparate tumor groups and this grouping was somewhat arbitrary. With this significant limitation, the panel suggested that in appropriately selected patients, either MWA or RFA can be safe and feasible. However, this recommendation must be implemented cautiously when simultaneously considering patients with two disparate tumor biologies. The limited data suggested that laparoscopic MWA of anatomically more difficult tumors has a compensatory higher morbidity profile compared to percutaneous MWA, while achieving similar overall 1-year survival. Thus, either approach can be appropriate depending on patient-specific factors (very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION: Given the weak evidence, these guidelines provide modest guidance regarding liver ablative therapies for HCC and CRLM. Liver ablation is just one component of a multimodal approach and its use is currently limited to a highly selected population. The quality of the existing data is very low and therefore limits the strength of the guidelines.

Protective Effect of Phosphatidylserine Blockade in Hemorrhagic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylserine (PS) is a key cell membrane phospholipid normally maintained on the inner cell surface but externalizes to the outer surface in response to cellular stress. We hypothesized that PS exposure mediates organ dysfunction in hemorrhagic shock. Our aims were to evaluate PS blockade on (1) pulmonary, (2) renal, and (3) gut function, as well as (4) serum lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), an inflammatory mediator generated by PS externalization, as a possible mechanism mediating organ dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were either (1) monitored for 130 min (controls, n = 3), (2) hemorrhaged then resuscitated (hemorrhage only group, n = 3), or (3) treated with Diannexin (DA), a PS blocking agent, followed by hemorrhage and resuscitation (DA + hemorrhage group, n = 4). Pulmonary dysfunction was assessed by arterial partial pressure of oxygen, renal dysfunction by serum creatinine, and gut dysfunction by mesenteric endothelial permeability (LP). LPA levels were measured in all groups. RESULTS: Pulmonary: there was no difference in arterial partial pressure of oxygen between groups. Renal: after resuscitation, creatinine levels were lower after PS blockade with DA versus hemorrhage only group (P = 0.01). Gut: LP was decreased after PS blockade with DA versus hemorrhage only group (P < 0.01). Finally, LPA levels were also lower after PS blockade with DA versus the hemorrhage only group but higher than the control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PS blockade with DA decreased renal and gut dysfunction associated with hemorrhagic shock and attenuated the magnitude of LPA generation. Our findings suggest potential for therapeutic targets in the future that could prevent organ dysfunction associated with hemorrhagic shock.

Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block for ED appendicitis pain control.

The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or TAP block is a well-established regional anesthetic block used by anesthesiologists for peri-operative pain control of the anterior abdominal wall. Multiple studies have demonstrated its utility to control pain for a range of procedures from inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomies to cesarean sections [1-3]. There are no cases describing the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided TAP block in the emergency department as a part of a multimodal pain pathway for patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis. We developed a pain protocol in conjunction with our surgical colleagues that incorporates the TAP block to reduce opioid use, and better treat acute pain in patients with acute appendicitis diagnosed in the emergency department. We successfully performed ultrasound-guided TAP blocks in 3 patients with computed tomography confirmed appendicitis, reducing pain and need for further opioid use. This interdepartmental collaborative pathway could be an ideal anesthetic plan for patients diagnosed in the emergency department with acute appendicitis.

Timing of Chemical Thromboprophylaxis and Deep Vein Thrombosis in Major Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal timing of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) and incidence of occult preoperative deep vein thrombosis (OP-DVT) in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: There is limited Level 1 data regarding the optimal timing of CTP in major colorectal surgery and the incidence of OP-DVT remains unclear. Both issues influence the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and may impact Medicare reimbursement because of penalties for hospital-acquired conditions. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery underwent preoperative lower extremity venous duplex (LEVD) immediately before surgery. Those without OP-DVT were randomized to preoperative or postoperative CTP with 5000 units of subcutaneous heparin. Patients underwent repeat LEVD in the recovery room and on postoperative day 2. Outcome measures included early (48-hrs) and overall (30-days) postoperative VTE, bleeding complications, and OP-DVT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (4.2%) had OP-DVT and were excluded. The randomized group included 376 patients (51.6% female) with mean age of 52.7 ±â€Š17.6 years. No pulmonary embolism occurred. There was no significant difference in preoperative versus postoperative CTP with respect to early postoperative DVT [3/184 (1.6%) vs 5/192 (2.6%); P = 0.72], DVT at 30 days (1.6% vs 3.6%; P = 0.34) or bleeding complications requiring reoperation (0.5% vs 1.6%; P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of OP-DVT is higher than that of perioperative DVT after colorectal surgery and preoperative screening LEVD should be considered to identify and treat patients at risk for pulmonary embolism. Preoperative and postoperative CTP are equally safe in protecting against VTE. CMS should account for these factors when assigning financial disincentives for perioperative VTE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01976988.

Lactate predicts massive transfusion in hemodynamically normal patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients at risk of deterioration because of occult injury may be hemodynamically normal on arrival. Early identification of these patients may improve care, especially for those who require massive transfusion (MT). We hypothesized that elevated admission lactate would predict the need for MT in hemodynamically normal patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All trauma patients treated at our university-based urban center over a 5-year period were reviewed. We included hemodynamically normal patients who had an admission lactate performed. First, a receiver-operating curve was used to determine the threshold lactate value. Subsequent analyses were then based on this value. Variables were analyzed using chi-square and unpaired t-tests, and univariable and multivariable regressions. RESULTS: There were 3468 hemodynamically normal patients with an admission lactate. Those who received MT (n = 19) had higher lactate than those who did not (n = 3449; 5.6 versus 2.6 mmol/L, P ≤ 0.001). Receiver-operating curve curve analysis revealed a threshold lactate value of 4 mmol/L with an area under the curve of 0.71. Patients with a lactate of >4 mmol/L had increased mortality (8% versus 2%), longer hospital length of stay (LOS, 6 versus 3 days), longer intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (6 versus 3 days), greater need for MT (2.8% versus 0.3%), and greater blood requirement (219 versus 38 mL; all P values < 0.001). After controlling for confounding variables, the predictive value of admission lactate >4 remained strong (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-14.2). CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically normal trauma patients, the admission lactate of >4 mmol/L is a robust predictor of MT requirement and associated with poor outcomes.

Applying peripheral vascular injury guidelines to penetrating trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of traumatic vascular injury is evolving because of endovascular therapies. National guidelines advocate for embolization of injuries to lower extremity branch vessels, including pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas, in hemodynamically normal patients without hard signs of vascular injury. However, patient stability and injury type may limit endovascular applicability at some centers. We hypothesized that for penetrating trauma, indications for endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular injuries, as outlined by national guidelines, are infrequent. METHODS: We reviewed records of patients sustaining penetrating peripheral vascular injuries treated at our university-based urban trauma center from 2006-2010. Patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: In 92 patients with penetrating peripheral vascular injuries, 82 were managed operatively and 10 were managed nonoperatively. Seventeen (18%) were hemodynamically unstable on arrival, 44 (48%) had multiple vessels injured, and 76 (83%) presented at night and/or on the weekend. No pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas were seen initially or at follow-up. Applying national guidelines to our cohort, only two patients (2.2%) met recommended criteria for endovascular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: According to national guidelines, indications for endovascular treatment of penetrating peripheral vascular injury are infrequent. Nearly two-thirds of patients with penetrating peripheral vascular injuries were hemodynamically unstable or had multiple vessels injured, making endovascular repair less desirable. Additionally, over 80% presented at night and/or on the weekend, which could delay treatment at some centers due to mobilization of the endovascular team. Trauma centers need to consider their resources when incorporating national guidelines in their treatment algorithms of penetrating vascular trauma.

Does gastric volume in trauma patients identify a population at risk for developing pneumonia and poor outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients may have full stomachs or impaired airway reflexes that place them at risk for aspiration and pneumonia. Our hypothesis was that trauma patients with larger gastric volumes as measured by abdominal computed tomography (CT) at admission have higher rates of pneumonia and worse outcomes. METHODS: We matched an initial cohort of 81 trauma patients with an admission CT of the abdomen and a diagnosis of pneumonia by Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Score of the head and chest with a control group of 81 trauma patients without pneumonia. We estimated gastric volumes on CT and compared variables using chi-square, t-tests, receiver operating curve analysis, and regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with pneumonia had larger gastric volumes than those without pneumonia (879 cm(3)versus 704 cm(3); P = 0.04). Receiver operating curve analysis gave a gastric volume threshold value of 700 cm(3) as a predictor of pneumonia. Patients with a gastric volume ≥ 700 cm(3) had more pneumonia (61% versus 41%; P = 0.01), stayed longer in the hospital (27.6 versus 19.7 d; P < 0.05) and the intensive care unit (18.4 versus 12.5 d; P = 0.01), required more days on the ventilator (18.1 versus 12.0 d; P = 0.02), and had a trend toward increased mortality (17% versus 11%; P = 0.2). On multivariate analysis, nasogastric or orogastric tube (odds ratio 3.0; P = 0.004) and gastric volume >700 cm(3) (odds ratio 2.7; P = 0.004) were independent predictors of pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients who developed pneumonia had larger initial gastric volumes. A straightforward estimate of gastric volume on admission abdominal CT may predict patients at risk for developing pneumonia and poor outcomes. Clinicians should be especially vigilant in taking precautions against pneumonia and have a lower threshold for suspecting pneumonia in patients with abdominal CT gastric volumes ≥ 700 cm(3).

Single injection, ultrasound-guided planar nerve blocks: An essential skill for any clinician caring for patients with rib fractures.

In patients with acute rib fractures, regional anesthesia has the potential to reduce suffering, decrease opiate use, lower rates of in-hospital delirium, and improve pulmonary function. While many regional anesthesia techniques are complex and time consuming, two single injection nerve blocks, the serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block, are particularly fast, safe, and simple methods to anesthetize the chest wall. Herein we describe two cases in which the serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block were each used with great success in achieving improved pain control in trauma patients with multiple rib fractures. We believe that any provider who routinely cares for patients with rib fractures (emergency physicians and trauma surgeons alike) can and should learn to use these straightforward nerve blocks.

Correlation between IVC dimensions and volume status on CT scan.

BACKGROUND: End points of resuscitation in trauma patients are difficult to define. The size of the inferior vena cava (IVC) on CT scan may accurately indicate volume status and guide resuscitation efforts. Our hypothesis was that IVC "flatness" on CT scan reflects volume status in hemodynamically normal trauma patients. METHODS: The study population was drawn from a database of trauma patients who had abdominal CT scans and lactate levels drawn on arrival. Lactate was chosen as a marker of volume status since hypotensive patients were unlikely to undergo CT. Anteroposterior (AP) and transverse (TV) diameters of the IVC were measured at the suprarenal and infrarenal locations. A flatness index was calculated for each location (TV ÷ AP) and this value was correlated with heart rate, blood pressure, and lactate. RESULTS: There was no difference in IVC flatness at the suprarenal or infrarenal position for patients with an elevated lactate compared with those with a normal lactate: 1.54 ± 0.18 versus 1.43 ± 0.08 (P = 0.2) suprarenal and 1.54 ± 0.46 versus 1.68 ± 0.58 (P = 0.4) infrarenal. IVC flatness at the suprarenal location weakly correlated with blood pressure (r = -0.29). IVC flatness did not correlate with blood pressure at the infrarenal location (r = -0.1). IVC flatness did not correlate with heart rate (P > 0.3) or age (P > 0.2). CONCLUSION: These results did not demonstrate a correlation between IVC flatness and the markers of intravascular volume of heart rate, blood pressure, or lactate. IVC flatness on CT scan is not a valid indicator of volume status in hemodynamically normal trauma patients.

A novel CT volume index score correlates with outcomes in polytrauma patients with pulmonary contusion.

BACKGROUND: Exact quantification of pulmonary contusion by computed tomography (CT) may help trauma surgeons identify high-risk populations. We hypothesized that the size of pulmonary contusions, measured accurately, will predict outcomes. Our specific aims were to (1) precisely quantify pulmonary contusion size using pixel analysis, (2) correlate contusion size with outcomes, and (3) determine the threshold contusion size portending complications. METHODS: Thoracic CTs of 106 consecutive polytrauma patients with pulmonary contusion were evaluated at a university-based urban trauma center. A novel CT volume index (CTVI) score was calculated based on the ratio of affected lung to total lung [slices of lung on CT × affected pixel region/lung pixel region × 0.45 (left side) + slices of lung on CT × affected pixel region/lung pixel region × 0.55 (right side)]. Multivariate analysis correlated CTVI and patient predictors' impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 106 polytrauma patients (mean ISS = 28 ± 1.2, AIS chest = 3.5 ± 0.1), 39 developed complications (acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], pneumonia, and/or death). Mean CTVI was significantly higher in the group with complications (0.28 ± 0.03 versus 17 ± 0.02, P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, CTVI predicted longer ICU LOS (R(2) = 0.84, P < 0.01). A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis identified a CTVI threshold score of 0.2 (AUC 0.67, P < 0.01) for developing pneumonia, ARDS or death. Patients with CTVI scores of 0.2 or more had longer hospitalization, longer ICU LOS, more ventilator days, and developed pneumonia (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Higher CTVI scores predicted prolonged ICU LOS across all sizes of pulmonary contusion. Pulmonary contusion volumes greater than 20% of total lung volume specifically identifies patients at risk for developing complications.

Timing is everything: delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in initially stable trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The indications for immediate intubation in trauma are not controversial, but some patients who initially appear stable later deteriorate and require intubation. We postulated that initially stable, moderately injured trauma patients who experienced delayed intubation have higher mortality than those intubated earlier. METHODS: Medical records of trauma patients intubated within 3 h of arrival in the emergency department at our university-based trauma center were reviewed. Moderately injured patients were defined as an ISS < 20. Early intubation was defined as patients intubated from 10-24 min of arrival. Delayed intubation was defined as patients intubated ≥25 min after arrival. Patients requiring immediate intubation, within 10 min of arrival, were excluded. RESULTS: From February 2006 to December 2007, 279 trauma patients were intubated in the emergency department. In moderately injured patients, mortality was higher with delayed intubation than with early intubation, 11.8% versus 1.8% (P = 0.045). Patients with delayed intubations had greater frequency of rib fractures than their early intubation counterparts, 23.5% versus 3.6% (P = 0.004). Patients in the delayed intubation group had lower rates of cervical gunshot wounds than the early intubation group, 0% versus 10.7% (P = 0.048) and a trend toward fewer of skull fractures 2.9% versus 16.1%, (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that delayed intubation is associated with increased mortality in moderately injured patients who are initially stable but later require intubation and can be predicted by the presence of rib fractures.

Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter as an estimate of intracranial pressure in adult trauma.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) is currently measured with invasive monitoring. Sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) may provide a noninvasive estimate of ICP. Our hypothesis was that bedside ONSD accurately estimates ICP in acutely injured patients. The specific aims were (1) to determine the accuracy of ONSD in estimating elevated ICP, (2) to correlate ONSD and ICP in unilateral and bilateral head injuries, and (3) to determine the effect of ICP monitor placement on ONSD measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded prospective study of adult trauma patients requiring ICP monitoring was performed at a University-based urban trauma center. The ONSD was measured by ultrasound pre- and post-placement of an ICP monitor (Camino Bolt or Ventriculostomy). RESULTS: One-hundred fourteen measurements were obtained in 10 trauma patients requiring ICP monitoring. Pre- and post-ONSD were compared with side of injury in the presence of an ICP monitor. ROC analysis demonstrated ONSD poorly estimates elevated ICP (AUC = 0.36). Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for estimating ICP with ONSD were 36%, 38%, 40%, 16%, and 37%. Poor correlation of ONSD to ICP was observed with unilateral (R(2) = 0.45, P < 0.01) and bilateral (R(2) = 0.21, P = 0.01) injuries. ICP monitor placement did not affect ONSD measurements on the right (P = 0.5), left (P = 0.4), or right and left sides combined (P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic ONSD as a surrogate for elevated ICP in lieu of invasive monitoring is not reliable due to poor accuracy and correlation.

Protective effect of phosphatidylserine blockade in sepsis induced organ dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylserine is usually an intracellularly oriented cell membrane phospholipid. Externalized phosphatidylserine on activated cells is a signal for phagocytosis. In sepsis, persistent phosphatidylserine exposure is also a signal for activation of the coagulation and inflammatory cascades. As such, phosphatidylserine may be a key molecule in sepsis induced cellular and organ injury. We hypothesize that phosphatidylserine blockade provides a protective effect in sepsis induced organ dysfunction. METHODS: Sepsis was induced in adult female rats using an endotoxin model. Diannexin, a homodimer of annexin A5, was administered for phosphatidylserine blockade. Rats were allocated to control (n = 5), sepsis (n = 6), or sepsis and phosphatidylserine blockade (n = 9) groups. Gut, pulmonary, renal, and hematologic dysfunctions were evaluated by mesenteric microvascular fluid leak, partial pressure of oxygen, serum creatinine, activated clotting time, and glomerular fibrin deposition, respectively. RESULTS: Rats in the sepsis group demonstrated gut, renal, and hematologic dysfunction. Phosphatidylserine blockade reversed signs of gut dysfunction and mesenteric microvascular leak (P < .01). In addition, phosphatidylserine blockade corrected systemic coagulopathy, as measured by activated clotting time (P = .03) and glomerular fibrin deposition (P = .008). There was no difference in renal dysfunction (P = .1) or pulmonary dysfunction in any of the groups (P = .6). CONCLUSION: In sepsis, phosphatidylserine blockade had a protective effect on gut dysfunction and coagulopathy. Increased phosphatidylserine exposure may be a key mediator of organ dysfunction and coagulopathy during sepsis. These data may provide insights into novel treatment options for septic patients.

Type and Quantity of Pharmacologic Therapy for Crohn's Disease before Eventual Surgical Treatment.

Treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) relies on medical therapy with surgery reserved for medically refractory cases. This study measured pharmaceutical therapies that CD patients receive before surgery. Prospective data were collected on 558 patients undergoing surgery for medically refractory CD from November 1999 through June 2014. Patient demographics and preoperative medical therapies were tabulated, including types and number of doses of aminosalicylic acid, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologic therapies. Most patients had been treated with preoperative aminosalicylic acid (72%), steroids (77%), or immunomodulators (69%). Forty-two per cent of patients were treated with a biologic before surgery with a mean number of 20 doses (range, 1-130). In 29 per cent of patients, all therapeutic modalities were used before surgery. Biologic therapy was more common in the last seven years of the study compared with the first eight years (64% vs 35%; P < 0.01). More patients had been treated with all therapeutic modalities before surgery in the second half of the study period (37% vs 19%; P < 0.01). CD patients undergoing surgery have had extensive pharmaceutical treatment. In the current era, more patients have been placed on biologic therapies and more than one third of them failed all available classes of medications before surgical intervention.

Confronting the chronically anticoagulated, acute care surgery patient as we evolve into the post-warfarin era.

There are a growing number of new anticoagulants used as an alternative to warfarin. Surgeons will be confronted with an increasing number of patients who may be on these outpatient medications and must be familiar with their management strategies. The purpose of this review is to examine the mechanisms, monitoring and therapeutic reversal of the non-warfarin antithrombotic agents now so frequently confronting the acute care surgeon.

Effect of surgery resident change of shift on trauma resuscitations and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The ability of surgery residents to provide continuity of care has come under scrutiny with work hour restrictions. The impact of the surgery resident sign-out period (6-8am and 6-8pm) on trauma outcomes remains unknown. We hypothesize that during shift change, resuscitation times are prolonged with worse outcomes. METHODS: Records of patients treated at a university-based urban trauma center during 2008 and 2009 were reviewed. Patients were separated into a shift change group (6-8am and 6-8pm) and a control group of all other time periods and compared using ANOVA, chi square, and unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 4361 consecutive trauma patients. There was no difference in gender, acuity, resuscitation times, Glasgow Coma Scale, revised trauma score, injury severity score (ISS), or probability of survival score between patients arriving during shift change compared to other times (p>0.2). There was no difference in total emergency department time for patients arriving during shift change (p = 0.07), even when stratified by ISS (ISS<15, p = 0.09; ISS>15, p = 0.2). Length of stay was increased for patients arriving during shift change compared to other times (5 vs 4 days, p<0.05). This was more pronounced for those with ISS>15 (16 vs 11 days, p = 0.03); however, there was no impact on intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, and mortality (p>0.3) regardless of ISS. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma outcomes are generally unaffected by patient arrival during shift change when resident sign-outs occur. Although adaptations are being made to accommodate trauma patient arrival during these times, we need to continue paying close attention, especially to seriously injured patients, to ensure that there are no delays in care that may potentially affect patient outcomes.