Everolimus: a new mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trials and main characteristics of everolimus, with focus on treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent data were identified primarily through a search of MEDLINE and PubMed (1966-November 2010) using the primary search terms everolimus, RAD001, renal cell carcinoma, and mTOR inhibitors. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with cancer were evaluated, including Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials. Preference was given to Phase 2 and 3 studies evaluating use of everolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma. DATA SYNTHESIS: Everolimus is an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved for the management of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Actions of everolimus within the mTOR pathway result in decreased protein synthesis and cell cycle arrest, as well as decreased angiogenesis. A usual starting dose for patients with renal cell carcinoma is 10 mg daily. Everolimus undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, primarily through the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, which predisposes it to drug interactions with inducers and inhibitors of this enzyme. Most commonly reported adverse events associated with everolimus include anemia, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, mucositis, fatigue, and rash. Approval of everolimus was based on the results of a Phase 3 trial that demonstrated an increase in median progression-free survival by 2.1 months in patients receiving everolimus therapy as compared to placebo. The drug was recently added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as a treatment option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on tyrosine kinase therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a review of the currently available literature, everolimus provides a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on treatment with sunitinib and/or sorafenib.

Successful desensitization to oxaliplatin.

OBJECTIVE: To report the successful desensitization of a patient to oxaliplatin utilizing an 8-hour desensitization regimen in a controlled environment. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old white woman with metastatic colon cancer was receiving oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and capecitabine every 2 weeks, with a partial response to therapy. On her fifth cycle of this regimen, she experienced diaphoresis, hypotension, nausea, abdominal cramping, and coryza. According to the Naranjo probability scale, oxaliplatin, and not bevacizumab, was the probable cause of the hypersensitivity reaction. The woman continued therapy with capecitabine and bevacizumab, resulting in stable disease. Due to her initial response to the oxaliplatin-based regimen, it was decided to attempt desensitization to oxaliplatin in a controlled, inpatient environment. An 8-hour desensitization schedule was employed, and the patient successfully completed an additional 3 cycles with full-dose oxaliplatin. DISCUSSION: Hypersensitivity reactions to platinum-containing compounds are well described and potentially life threatening. With expanded use of oxaliplatin in various malignancies, an increased number of hypersensitivity reactions will likely be reported. Patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin are at risk for similar reactions to oxaliplatin. We achieved successful desensitization for oxaliplatin using increased concentrations of the drug over an 8-hour period concomitant with oral and intravenous corticosteroids and histamine blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to platinum compounds may result in discontinuation of active therapies in patients with metastatic disease. Desensitization to oxaliplatin is possible utilizing this approach.