Development of a Cost-Effective Educational Tool to Promote Acceptance of the HPV Vaccination by Hispanic Mothers.

Although vaccination against the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) reduces the risk of related morbidities, the vaccine uptake remains low in adolescents. This has been attributed to limited parental knowledge and misconceptions. In this cross sectional study, we assessed the (1) clarity of educational material informing Hispanic mothers about HPV, cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine, (2) determined vaccination acceptability and (3) identified predictors of vaccine acceptance in an underserved health setting. 418 Hispanic mothers received the educational material and completed an anonymous survey. 91 % of participants understood most or all of the information provided. 77 % of participants reported vaccine acceptance for their children; this increased to 84 % when only those with children eligible to receive vaccination were included. Significant positive predictors of maternal acceptance of the HPV vaccine for their children were understanding most or all of the provided information, older age and acceptance of the HPV vaccine for themselves. Concerns about safety and general dislike of vaccines were negatively associated with HPV vaccine acceptance. Prior knowledge, level of education, previous relevant gynecologic history, general willingness to vaccinate and other general beliefs about vaccines were not significantly associated with HPV vaccine acceptance. The majority of participants reported understanding of the provided educational material. Vaccine acceptability was fairly high, but was even higher among those who understood the information. This study documents a cost-effective way to provide Hispanic mothers with easy-to-understand HPV-related information that could increase parental vaccine acceptability and future vaccine uptake among their children.

Safety and tolerability of a new low-dose contraceptive patch in obese and nonobese women.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and tolerability of a new low-dose levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE) contraceptive patch was compared with 2 combination oral contraceptives in 2 clinical studies in which approximately 30% of enrolled participants were obese. STUDY DESIGN: Two phase 3, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trials compared the LNG/EE contraceptive patch (n = 1579) with combination oral contraceptives (n = 581) in healthy women 17-40 years of age. Combination oral contraceptives were LNG 100 µg per EE 20 µg (combination oral contraceptive 20; n = 375) or LNG 150 µg per EE 30 µg (combination oral contraceptive 30; n = 206). Safety and tolerability data from the 2 trials were evaluated in integrated safety analyses. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent adverse events of 2% or greater in the LNG/EE contraceptive patch were nasopharyngitis (5.2%), nausea (4.1%), upper respiratory infection (3.5%), headache (3.4%), sinusitis (2.9%), cervical dysplasia (2.3%), and urinary tract infection (2.1%). Including skin reaction-related treatment-emergent adverse events, the proportion of women who experienced any treatment-emergent adverse event was similar among women randomized to the contraceptive patch (47.5%), the combination oral contraceptive 20 (47.4%), or the combination oral contraceptive 30 (46.8%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in obese vs nonobese participants in all groups. Serious adverse events occurred in less than 1% of participants in any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The LNG/EE contraceptive patch and combination oral contraceptives were well tolerated and associated with similar treatment-emergent adverse event incidences in obese and nonobese women.

The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing(®), a decade after its introduction.

OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical experience with the contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR, NuvaRing(®)) since its introduction over ten years ago. METHODS: The literature was searched on efficacy, cycle control, safety, user preference and satisfaction of the CVR in comparison with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and the patch, with special attention to recent developments. RESULTS: The ring has the same working mechanism and contraindications as COCs. Serum levels of steroids are steadier, whereas oestrogenic exposure is lower. Contraceptive efficacy is similar, as are metabolic changes. Cycle control is better, and compliance and continuation rates are equal or higher. Oestrogen-related adverse symptoms appear to be fewer, but reports on the incidence of venous thrombosis are conflicting. Expulsion of the ring is reported by 4% to 20% of women. Local adverse events are the main reason for discontinuation. Acceptability is as high as with COCs and, after structured counselling, the ring is preferred by many women to the pill or the patch. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of the CVR, and the metabolic changes and adverse events it elicits, are generally comparable to those of COCs, yet oestrogenic exposure is lower and cycle control superior. After counselling, the ring is preferred to the pill by many women.

Breaking the cycle of pain in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: toward standardization of early diagnosis and treatment: consensus panel recommendations.

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects about 15% of female adults in the United States. The source of this pain in many women is the bladder, specifically interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS). Despite the frequent occurrence of IC/PBS as a cause of CPP, there currently are no universally accepted guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of this disorder, and, consequently, many patients do not receive appropriate treatment in a timely manner. In an effort to develop a rational way to diagnose and treat patients with CPP, a panel of leaders in urology, gynecology, urogynecology and general women's health met to review recent literature, reach consensus and formulate 2 algorithms, one for diagnosing and the other for managing IC/PBS. This article reflects the results of that meeting.

The effect of transdermal and vaginal estrogen therapy on markers of postmenopausal estrogen status.

OBJECTIVE: To compare serum 17beta-estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estrone sulfate, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, sex hormone-binding globulin, vaginal pH, and the vaginal maturation indices in women using a low-dose transdermal patch releasing 14 microg of E2 per day and a vaginal ring releasing 7.5 microg of E2 per day. DESIGN: Twenty-four postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to either the patch (n = 12) or the ring (n = 12) for a 12-week study period. Serum E2, E1, estrone sulfate, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured by immunoassay at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. Vaginal pH was determined at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks. Vaginal cytologic examinations for vaginal maturation index were done at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty women completed the study. The patch significantly increased serum E1 and E2 levels at 6 and 12 weeks (P < 0.01); there was no significant increase in serum E1 and E2 levels with the ring. Both the patch and the ring significantly reduced vaginal pH at 6 (P < 0.001) and 12 (P < 0.001) weeks and significantly reduced the percentage of vaginal parabasal cells at 12 weeks with no significant difference between the two groups. Both preparations increased the proportion of superficial cells; the increase was significant only with the patch (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A transdermal E2 skin patch releasing 14 microg of E2 per day had an effect on vaginal pH and vaginal maturation indices similar to that of a vaginal E2 ring releasing 7.5 microg of E2 per day. Therefore, this patch is likely to relieve symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy.

YAZ and the novel progestin drospirenone.

Drospirenone is a novel progestin that is structurally related to 17 alpha-spirolactone and has antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic activity. A 3-mg dose of drospirenone was first used in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) 30 microg in a combination oral contraceptive (COC) that is administered for 21 days, followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval (HFI) (drospirenone/30EE, or Yasmin). The 21/7 regimen is considered to be the standard regimen for COC delivery. A formulation with the metabolic benefit of COCs containing a lower estrogen dose has been developed combining drospirenone 3 mg with EE 20 microg and using a regimen of 24 days of active pills, followed by a 4-day HFI (drospirenone/20EE-24/4), or YAZ (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Wayne, New Jersey). Since drospirenone has a half-life of > 30 hours, its activity extends for a prolonged time into the shortened HFI. This new COC has been shown to provide effective contraception and to have a good safety profile. Two large noninterventional studies have recently evaluated the safety of drospirenone/30EE in 2 areas of special interest: hyperkalemia and thromboembolic events. Use of a drospirenone-containing COC was not associated with an increased risk of either type of disorder in comparison with COCs containing other progestins. Drospirenone/20EE-24/4 provides a low dose of EE in combination with drospirenone in an effective and safe COC that is administered using a regimen with a shortened HFI. Drospirenone/20EE-24/4 is the only COC with 3 indications: contraception and the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder in women who wish to use a COC for birth control, and the treatment of moderate acne in women who are at least 14-years-old, have achieved menarche and wish to use a COC for birth control.

Evolving trends in the successful management of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of interstitial cystitis (IC), including the presentation of patients with the disorder, and to explore diagnostic and treatment options. STUDY DESIGN: Current literature concerning the history, etiology, diagnosis and treatment of IC was used to support expert recommendations regarding patient management. Experts discussed the literature surrounding IC, focusing on diagnostic tools and currently available treatment modalities. RESULTS: Diagnosis of IC may often be delayed or missed due to the similarity of symptoms with a number of other conditions. A detailed medical history and careful physical examination are key for diagnosis, and a variety of screening and diagnostic tools are also available. Once a patient is diagnosed with IC, multimodal treatment through pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches is recommended. CONCLUSION: The involvement of both the patient and physician in determining the therapeutic approach, the use of multimodal therapies, regular follow-up and staff involvement in care can bring relief to a substantial number of patients with this condition.

Combined hormonal contraceptive trials: variable data collection and bleeding assessment methodologies influence study outcomes and physician perception.

Initially approved for use in the United States nearly 50 years ago, oral hormonal contraceptives containing both estrogen and progestin have undergone steady improvements in safety and convenience. Concurrent with improvements in safety associated with decreasing doses of both steroids, there has been an increased incidence of unscheduled bleeding and spotting. There exist no standards regarding data collection techniques and methods, and reporting and analysis of bleeding and spotting events during combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) trials. For the regulatory review of hormonal contraceptives, data regarding the incidence of bleeding and spotting events are not included in either of the traditional categories of efficacy and safety. Standardization of methods for collecting and analyzing data about cycle control in all clinical trials of CHCs is long overdue. Until such standards are developed and implemented, clinicians need to familiarize themselves with the techniques used in each study in order to provide correct information to their patients about the frequency of bleeding and spotting associated with different formulations and delivery systems.

Recommendations for standardization of data collection and analysis of bleeding in combined hormone contraceptive trials.

This is the second of a two-article series describing the outcomes of the Hormonal Contraceptives Trial Methodology Consensus Conference held in Philadelphia, PA, on September 23, 2005. The first manuscript, "Hormonal Contraceptive Trials: Variable Data Collection and Bleeding Assessment Methodologies Influence Study Outcome and Physician Perception," provided a description of methodologies applied in the US Food and Drug Administration medical officer's review of clinical trial data as contained in the Summary Basis of Approvals of New Drug Applications, results of the review and general conclusions. This manuscript provides recommendations regarding best practices in trial design, data collection and analysis regarding bleeding data in combined hormone contraception trials.

Incisional endometriomas after Cesarean section: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To review a series of women with endometriomas developing in the scar of the skin incision performed for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 37 patients diagnosed with incisional endometrioma at the time of surgical excision from 1975 to 2005 were identified from the comprehensive surgical database, which includes all operative procedures performed at this institution. The medical records of 33 of the 37 patients were available for review. RESULTS: The endometriomas ranged in size from a diameter of 1-12 cm and were initially observed to be present 6 months to 9 years (mean, 3.2) after the surgical procedure. Diagnosis was best made by needle aspiration of chocolate colored fluid from the mass. Medical therapy with a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist, medroxyprogesterone acetate or combination oral contraceptives had been attempted in 14 patients without a change in lesion size. All patients were cured by surgical excision of the endometrioma. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of incisional endometriomas following cesarean section during the 30-year period was 0.08%. Optimal treatment is by surgical excision. It is hypothesized that failure to close the parietal and visceral peritoneum with sutures at the time of cesarean section may markedly increase the postoperative occurrence of an endometrioma in the skin incision scar.

Management of patients with interstitial cystitis or chronic pelvic pain of bladder origin: a consensus report.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial cystitis (IC) remains a challenging disease to treat, but increased awareness, better diagnostic tools, and effective pharmacologic agents can help non-urologists successfully manage this condition. Interstitial cystitis is much more prevalent than previously thought and is often misdiagnosed. Left untreated, IC can have a deleterious effect on the quality of life of the affected individual. In-office symptom-based techniques have been developed to screen for the presence of IC in both women and men presenting with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) or chronic prostatitis (CP), and effective pharmacologic treatments exist that can provide acute and long-term symptom relief. Individual patient response to therapy varies, with some patients taking up to several months to achieve an optimal therapeutic response. To optimize patient response, a comprehensive algorithm for the diagnosis and management of IC should be utilized. Symptoms and progress should be assessed at each follow-up visit and changes in therapy made accordingly. Patients should be encouraged to learn as much as possible about IC and to take charge of the management of symptoms using their physician for guidance in decision making. The importance of this aspect of therapy should be reinforced at each subsequent visit. The entire office staff also has an important role in understanding and acknowledging each patient's pain and frustration as well as in providing support and education about IC. SCOPE: This paper presents recommendations from a multidisciplinary panel for the evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care of patients with IC or CPP of bladder origin.

Serum Nestorone and ethinyl estradiol levels, and ovulation inhibition in women using three different dosage combinations of a Nestorone progestogen-ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring on a bleeding-signaled regimen.

OBJECTIVES: This trial tested the hypothesis that menstrually signaled use of contraceptive vaginal rings ("rings") releasing low-dose combinations of Nestorone (NES) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) would reliably suppress luteal activity and ovulation, and prevent unintended pregnancy, while controlling the incidence of menstrual bleeding episodes and bleeding days. METHODS: Nestorone/ethinyl estradiol rings releasing 50/10, 50/20 and 150/15 mug/day were studied through 6 months. A ring was to be used continuously, until its removal was signaled by menstrual bleeding. Reinsertion was required 96 h after removal. Serum for NES, EE and progesterone were collected and assayed, and vaginal ultrasound scans were performed in three 5-week periods to examine luteal activity, follicular growth, ovulation and their correlates. In 10 subjects using the 150/15 ring, six samples were drawn in the 24-h period after ring removal to examine serum levels of NES and EE. RESULTS: One hundred sixty subjects at three doses provided blood samples. Median serum concentrations of NES and EE demonstrated dose ratios slightly below the nominal dose ratios expected. Serum NES concentrations declined 19-22% from weeks 3 to 25. Changes in EE levels depended on dose. Nestorone levels fell 81% by 24 h after ring removal and EE levels fell by 50%. Luteal activity was completely suppressed in 94-95% of cycles and in 90% of subjects. Three pregnancies occurred in subjects participating in this serum sampling study. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory serum levels of NES and EE, and a high level of ovulation suppression were achieved. Irregular ring use, however, permitted pregnancies to occur.

Clinical performance and menstrual bleeding patterns with three dosage combinations of a Nestorone progestogen/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring used on a bleeding-signaled regimen.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the clinical performance of contraceptive vaginal rings (rings) delivering Nestorone (NES) progestin and ethinyl estradiol (EE). Ring removal times were signaled by menstrual events. Bleeding patterns, adverse events, patterns of use and continuation rates were the principal parameters evaluated. METHODS: In a two-stage 6-month trial, subjects were randomized to use rings releasing 50 microg/day of NES and either 10 (50/10) or 20 (50/20) microg/day of EE. Subjects were to keep rings continuously in situ until menstrual bleeding or prolonged spotting-signaled removal. Reinsertion was to occur 96 h later. After the randomized stage, an open-label 6-month trial of rings releasing 150 microg/day of NES and 15 microg/day of EE (150/15) began with the same menstrually signaled regimen. RESULTS: Two-hundred forty-six subjects participated in the trial. Six-month pregnancy rates ranged by ring dose from 1.3 to 3.9 per 100. For each ring dose combination, 6-month continuation rates were above 80 per 100. Bleeding and spotting (B+S) days in women with the 50 microg/day NES rings were similar in number to those experienced by cycling women not using contraception. Nevertheless, in the initial 90 days, fewer B+S days were reported by subjects with the 50/20 ring than by subjects with the 50/10 ring (p < .05). Throughout the trial, subjects using the 150/15 ring reported significantly fewer B+S episodes than did subjects with either 50 microg/day NES ring. CONCLUSION: Combined contraceptive rings used with a bleeding-signaled regimen led to few terminations attributed to bleeding problems and to acceptable continuation rates. The 150/15 ring appeared to induce fewer bleeding problems than did the lower-dose NES combination rings, but no important difference in 6-month continuation rates among the three doses was noted.

Safety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel.

OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrel (Implanontrade mark) were investigated in a multicenter clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN: Sexually active American women (N=330) with apparently normal menstrual cycles used the implant for up to 2 years. All subjects recorded bleeding and/or spotting daily in a diary. Safety was assessed through adverse experiences (AEs), laboratory tests and physical and gynecologic examinations. RESULTS: Total exposure was 474 woman-years (6186 cycles), and 68% of subjects had at least 1 year of exposure. No pregnancies occurred. The most common bleeding pattern observed throughout the study was infrequent bleeding, defined as less than three episodes of bleeding in a reference period (excluding amenorrhea). The least common pattern was frequent bleeding, defined as more than five episodes of bleeding in a reference period. Infrequent, prolonged and frequent bleeding patterns were most common early in the study and declined thereafter. During the 3-month Reference Periods 2-8 (Months 4-24), the incidence of amenorrhea ranged from 14% to 20%. Forty-three subjects (13%) withdrew from the study because of bleeding pattern changes and 76 subjects (23%) discontinued because of other AEs. Other common AEs leading to discontinuation, besides bleeding irregularities, were emotional lability (6.1%), weight increase (3.3%), depression (2.4%) and acne (1.5%). Use of Implanon (etonogestrel subdermal implant, referred to herein as ENG implant) for up to 2 years had no clinically significant effects on laboratory parameters, physical and pelvic examinations, vital signs or body mass index. The average length of time required for ENG implant insertion and that for removal were 0.5 and 3.5 min, respectively, and all the procedures were uncomplicated. The return to normal menstrual cycles and fertility was rapid after removal. CONCLUSIONS: Implanon is a safe, highly effective and rapidly reversible new method of contraception.

Contraceptive vaginal rings releasing Nestorone and ethinylestradiol: a 1-year dose-finding trial.

In a multicenter 1-year trial of contraceptive vaginal rings (rings) involving 150 women, three dose combinations of the progestin Nestorone (NES) and ethinylestradiol (EE) were compared with respect to effectiveness, safety and acceptability. Mean in vitro drug release rates for the three doses were 150 and 15, 150 and 20 and 200 and 15 microg/day of NES and EE, respectively. Each ring remained in situ for 21 days, removed for 7 days and then reinserted for a total of 13 cycles of use. We studied ring performance with respect to pregnancy and other termination events, adverse events, the extent of ovulation inhibition, serum drug levels and bleeding control. We also assessed the rings' effects on the vagina using a standardized colposcopy procedure. Seventy-two percent of the women completed the 1-year (> or = 350 days) study. In studied cycles, luteal activity (progesterone > or = 10 nmol/L) was noted in 17%, 7% and 12% of subjects with monitored cycles at the 150/15, 150/20 and 200/15 doses, respectively (p = .34). Two pregnancies occurred, both in subjects using the 200/15 microg/day ring. Breakthrough bleeding during ring use averaged about 2 days/year and breakthrough bleeding and spotting averaged about 7 days/year. In the entire trial, only two women discontinued because of bleeding problems. Medical conditions, chiefly vaginal problems, personal reasons and device loss or repeated expulsion were the principal reasons given for study discontinuation. Vaginal and cervical colposcopy, conducted with standardized techniques and standardized interpretations, revealed no elevated event incidence attributable to ring use. Clinical performance and adverse event profiles indicate that each of these 1-year NES/EE rings, used on a 21-day-in and 7-day-out regimen, provided women effective, acceptable and safe long-acting contraception under their own control.

Premenstrual disorders: epidemiology and disease burden.

Many women of childbearing age experience a variety of symptoms related to the menstrual cycle that may be limited to mild discomfort or extend to premenstrual syndrome or, depending on the degree of emotional and somatic impairment, to the most severe premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). With PMDD, women experience markedly compromised quality of life and ability to function in several settings, leading to higher direct medical costs for increased physician visits and laboratory tests, and higher indirect costs to employers through lower productivity at work. Diagnostic criteria established for premenstrual disorders may now enable physicians to evaluate their patients' complex symptoms more precisely and recommend a form of treatment that can alleviate the original complaint and improve healthcare for women.

Oral steroid contraception.

Oral steroid contraception is a popular method of family planning worldwide. Over the past several decades, this method of contraception has changed significantly by decreasing the estrogen dose, changing the progestin component, and reducing the hormone free interval. Despite the popularity of oral steroid contraception, there has been much criticism regarding the associated risks of venous thromboembolism and stroke. Despite these established, yet uncommon risks, oral steroid contraception has many important health benefits. This review highlights the available formulations of oral contraceptives along with their evidence-based associated risks and benefits. Highlights regarding future directions for development of novel oral contraceptives are also addressed.

New contraceptive patch wearability assessed by investigators and participants in a randomized phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate skin irritation and patch adhesiveness of a new weekly low-dose levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) contraceptive patch (LNG/EE patch). STUDY DESIGN: This analysis was part of an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study that randomized healthy women to the LNG/EE patch (one patch weekly for three consecutive weeks, followed by a patch-free week for 13 cycles) or to an oral contraceptive for six cycles followed by seven LNG/EE patch cycles. Participants selected patch application sites of abdomen, buttock or upper torso. Investigators rated patch adhesiveness and skin irritation using standardized scales. Participants rated skin irritation and itching daily using standardized scales and recorded patch fall-off on daily diary cards. RESULTS: A total of 32,508 patches were applied (n=1273). At the five clinic visits in which investigators rated the patches, they rated adhesiveness=0 (no lift) for ≥84% of participants and skin irritation=absent/mild for 97% of patches. Participants reported that 2-3.7% of patches fell off and rated skin irritation as absent or mild for 92- 95% of patches, according to site. CONCLUSION: Investigator- and participant-rated assessments of LNG/EE patch adhesiveness and irritation demonstrated a low incidence of patch detachment, skin irritation and pruritus. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This secondary analysis of a phase 3 clinical trial of a new weekly low-dose LNG and EE contraceptive patch, which used assessment by both investigators and participants, observed a low incidence of skin irritation, pruritus and patch detachment.

Self-reported and verified compliance in a phase 3 clinical trial of a novel low-dose contraceptive patch and pill.

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy rates in US contraceptive clinical trials are increasing due to decreased treatment compliance. This study compared compliance with a new low-dose levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) contraceptive patch (CP, Twirla™) with that of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive (COC) in a demographically diverse population. STUDY DESIGN: This analysis was part of an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study that randomized healthy sexually active women (17-40years) to 13cycles of LNG/EE CP or 6cycles of COC, then 7cycles of LNG/EE CP. We defined self-reported compliance as cycles that, according to diaries, show 21days of patch wear without missed days or any patch worn >7days or 21days of pill-taking without missed pill days. We verified compliance by detectable plasma presence of LNG and EE at cycles 2, 6, and 13. RESULTS: Of the intention-to-treat population with diary information (N=1328, mean age 26.4years, 46% minorities, 33% obese), 10.0% of the CP (n=998) versus 21.2% of the COC group (n=330) self-reported noncompliance after 6cycles (p<.001). Laboratory assessments verified 10-14% of participants in both groups as noncompliant. Self-reported perfect use did not vary between obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m(2)] versus nonobese (BMI <30kg/m(2)) participants in both groups or when stratified by age, education, or race/ethnicity in the CP group. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported compliance was significantly greater in the CP than COC group and did not vary by obesity status. Discrepancies between self-reported and verified compliance question reliability of patient diaries. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This paper, based on an analysis of a phase 3 trial, shows that compliance was significantly greater with a new weekly transdermal CP than with a once-daily COC in obese as well as nonobese participants. Discrepancies between self-reported compliance and laboratory-verified compliance raise questions regarding the reliability of patient diaries.

A dose-finding, cross-over study to evaluate the effect of a Nestorone®/Estradiol transdermal gel delivery on ovulation suppression in normal ovulating women.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the lowest effective of three Nestorone (NES)/estradiol (E2) transdermal gel doses to ensure ovulation suppression in 90-95% of cycles. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, three-treatment-period cross-over study to evaluate the effects of NES/E2 transdermal gel on ovulation inhibition, suppression of follicular growth and pharmacokinetic parameters. The doses were low (1.5 mg NES/0.5 mg E2), medium (3.0 mg NES/1.0 mg E2) and high (4.5 mg NES/1.5 mg E2). Participants applied gel daily to a fixed area on the abdomen for 21 consecutive days. They were interviewed regarding their experiences using the gel. RESULTS: Eighteen participants were randomized; 16 completed the study. Median NES C(max) values for low, medium and high dose groups at day 21 were 318.6 pmol/L, 783.0 pmol/L and 1063.8 pmol/L, respectively. Median maximum follicular diameter was higher with the lowest dose with 16.2 mm versus 10.0 and 10.4 mm with the medium and high doses, respectively. Among adherent participants, ovulation was inhibited in all dose groups, except for one participant in the medium dose (6.7%) that had luteal activity and an ultrasound image suggestive of a luteinized unruptured follicle. There were few reports of unscheduled bleeding, with more episodes reported for the lower dose. Adverse events were mild, and no skin irritation was reported from gel application. CONCLUSION: While all three doses blocked ovulation effectively and were evaluated as safe and acceptable, the medium dose was considered the lowest effective dose based on a more adequate suppression of follicular development. Further development of this novel contraceptive delivering NES and E2 is warranted and has potential for improved safety compared to ethinyl-estradiol-based methods.