Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 22(11): 1543-1549, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30006728

RESUMO

Introduction Comprehension of healthcare terminology across diverse populations is critical to patient education and engagement. Methods Women in Oahu, Hawai'i with a recent delivery were interviewed about their understanding of ten common obstetric terms. Health literacy was assessed by the rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine (REALM). Multivariable models predicted total terms comprehended by demographic factors. Results Of 269 participants, self-reported primary race was 20.5% Japanese, 19.0% Native Hawaiian, 19.0% White, 16.7% Filipino, 11.5% other Asian, 9.7% other Pacific Islander, and 3.7% other race/ethnicity; 12.7% had low health literacy. On average, participants understood 6.0 (SD: 2.2) of ten common obstetric terms. Comprehension varied by term, ranging from 97.8% for "Breastfeeding" to 27.5% for "VBAC routinely available." Models showed (1) being Filipino, Japanese, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander (vs. white); (2) having low (vs. adequate) health literacy; (3) having a high school (vs. a college) degree; and (4) being under 25-years-old (vs. 35 +) were significantly associated with less comprehension. Discussion Participants were unfamiliar with common obstetrics terminology. Comprehension struggles were more common among populations with maternal health disparities, including Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups, and those with low health literacy.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Letramento em Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia , Participação do Paciente , Gestantes/psicologia , Terminologia como Assunto , Povo Asiático/psicologia , Humanos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/psicologia , Ilhas do Pacífico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Gestantes/etnologia
2.
Stroke ; 47(10): 2611-7, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27608816

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ethnic disparities in readmission after stroke have been inadequately studied. We sought to compare potentially preventable readmissions (PPR) among a multiethnic population in Hawaii. METHODS: Hospitalization data in Hawaii from 2007 to 2012 were assessed to compare ethnic differences in 30-day PPR after stroke-related hospitalizations. Multivariable models using logistic regression were performed to assess the impact of ethnicity on 30-day PPR after controlling for age group (<65 and ≥65 years), sex, insurance, county of residence, substance use, history of mental illness, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Thirty-day PPR was seen in 840 (8.4%) of 10 050 any stroke-related hospitalizations, 712 (8.7%) of 8161 ischemic stroke hospitalizations, and 128 (6.8%) of 1889 hemorrhagic stroke hospitalizations. In the multivariable models, only the Chinese ethnicity, compared with whites, was associated with 30-day PPR after any stroke hospitalizations (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}], 1.40 [1.05-1.88]) and ischemic stroke hospitalizations (OR, 1.42 [CI, 1.04-1.96]). When considering only one hospitalization per individual, the impact of Chinese ethnicity on PPR after any stroke hospitalization (OR, 1.22 [CI, 0.89-1.68]) and ischemic stroke hospitalization (OR, 1.21 [CI, 0.86-1.71]) was attenuated. Other factors associated with 30-day PPR after any stroke hospitalizations were Charlson Comorbidity Index (per unit increase) (OR, 1.21 [CI, 1.18-1.24]), Medicaid (OR, 1.42 [CI, 1.07-1.88]), Hawaii county (OR, 0.78 [CI, 0.62-0.97]), and mental illness (OR, 1.37 [CI, 1.10-1.70]). CONCLUSIONS: In Hawaii, Chinese may have a higher risk of 30-day PPR after stroke compared with whites. However, this seems to be driven by the high number of repeated PPR within the Chinese ethnic group.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/etnologia , Readmissão do Paciente , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etnologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Etnicidade , Feminino , Havaí , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia
3.
Am J Public Health ; 106(3): 485-91, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691107

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We compared the age at admission and the severity of illness of hospitalized Micronesians with 3 other racial/ethnic groups in Hawaii. METHODS: With Hawaii Health Information Corporation inpatient data, we determined the age at admission and the severity of illness for 162,152 adult, non-pregnancy-related hospital discharges in Hawaii from 2010 to 2012. We performed multivariable linear regression analyses within major disease categories by racial/ethnic group. We created disease categories with all patient refined-diagnosis related groups. RESULTS: Hospitalized Micronesians were significantly younger at admission than were comparison racial/ethnic groups across all patient refined-diagnosis related group categories. The severity of illness for Micronesians was significantly higher than was that of all comparison racial/ethnic groups for cardiac and infectious diseases, higher than was that of Whites and Japanese for cancer and endocrine hospitalizations, and higher than was that of Native Hawaiians for substance abuse hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Micronesians were hospitalized significantly younger and often sicker than were comparison populations. Our results will be useful to researchers, state governments, and hospitals, providers, and health systems for this vulnerable group.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Povo Asiático , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Japão/etnologia , Masculino , Micronésia/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , População Branca
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 16: 133, 2016 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27089888

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rural/urban variations in admissions for heart failure may be influenced by severity at hospital presentation and local practice patterns. Laboratory data reflect clinical severity and guide hospital admission decisions and treatment for heart failure, a costly chronic illness and a leading cause of hospitalization among the elderly. Our main objective was to examine the role of laboratory test results in measuring disease severity at the time of admission for inpatients who reside in rural and urban areas. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed discharge data on 13,998 hospital discharges for heart failure from three states, Hawai'i, Minnesota, and Virginia. Hospital discharge records from 2008 to 2012 were derived from the State Inpatient Databases of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and were merged with results of laboratory tests performed on the admission day or up to two days before admission. Regression models evaluated the relationship between clinical severity at admission and patient urban/rural residence. Models were estimated with and without use of laboratory data. RESULTS: Patients residing in rural areas were more likely to have missing laboratory data on admission and less likely to have abnormal or severely abnormal tests. Rural patients were also less likely to be admitted with high levels of severity as measured by the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG) severity subclass, derivable from discharge data. Adding laboratory data to discharge data improved model fit. Also, in models without laboratory data, the association between urban compared to rural residence and APR-DRG severity subclass was significant for major and extreme levels of severity (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.43 and 1.55, 95% CI 1.26-1.92, respectively). After adding laboratory data, this association became non-significant for major severity and was attenuated for extreme severity (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94-1.32 and 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.78, respectively). CONCLUSION: Heart failure patients from rural areas are hospitalized at lower severity levels than their urban counterparts. Laboratory test data provide insight on clinical severity and practice patterns beyond what is available in administrative discharge data.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hospitais Rurais , Hospitais Urbanos , Admissão do Paciente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(9): 1814-24, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27000850

RESUMO

Objective To assess differences in the rates of preeclampsia among a multiethnic population in Hawaii. Methods We performed a retrospective study on statewide inpatient data for delivery hospitalizations in Hawaii between January 1995 and December 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of maternal race/ethnicity on the rates of preeclampsia after adjusting for age, multiple gestation, multiparity, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, obesity and smoking. Results A total of 271,569 hospital discharges for delivery were studied. The rates of preeclampsia ranged from 2.0 % for Chinese to 4.6 % for Filipinos. Preeclampsia rates were higher among Native Hawaiians who are age <35 and non-obese (OR 1.54; 95 % CI 1.43-1.66), age ≥35 and non-obese (OR 2.31; 95 % CI 2.00-2.68), age ≥35 and obese (OR 1.80; 95 % CI 1.24-2.60); other Pacific Islanders who are age <35 and non-obese (OR 1.40; 95 % CI 1.27-1.54), age ≥35 and non-obese (OR 2.18; 95 % CI 1.79-2.64), age ≥35 and obese (OR 1.68; 95 % CI 1.14-2.49); and Filipinos who are age <35 and non-obese (OR 1.55; 95 % CI 1.43-1.67), age ≥35 and non-obese (OR 2.26; 95 % CI 1.97-2.60), age ≥35 and obese (OR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.04-2.59) compared to whites. Pregestational diabetes (OR 3.41; 95 % CI 3.02-3.85), chronic hypertension (OR 5.98; 95 % CI 4.98-7.18), and smoking (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 1.07-1.33) were also independently associated with preeclampsia. Conclusions for Practice In Hawaii, Native Hawaiians, other Pacific Islanders and Filipinos have a higher risk of preeclampsia compared to whites. For these high-risk ethnic groups, more frequent monitoring for preeclampsia may be needed.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Saúde das Minorias , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
6.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(9): 1965-70, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27146394

RESUMO

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine primary cesarean delivery rates among women with low risk pregnancies in urban and rural hospitals in Hawaii. Methods This is a retrospective study of all low-risk women (term, vertex, singleton) who had a primary cesarean delivery in any Hawaii hospital from 2010 to 2011 using a statewide health information database. Hospitals were divided into two categories: rural and urban. Results Of the 27,096 women who met criteria for this study, 7105 (26.2 %) delivered in a rural hospital. Low-risk women who delivered in a rural hospital had a primary cesarean delivery rate of 18.5 % compared to 11.8 % in the urban hospitals, p < .0001. Low-risk women who delivered at rural hospitals had significantly higher unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for cesarean delivery. The association with rural hospital was stronger after adjusting for confounders, aOR 2.47 (95 % CI 2.23-2.73) compared to unadjusted OR 1.70 (95 % CI 1.58-1.83) for primary cesarean delivery. Conclusions on practice In a geographically isolated population, rates of primary cesarean delivery among low-risk women are significantly higher in rural hospitals. This disparity should be investigated further.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Women Health ; 56(3): 257-80, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26361937

RESUMO

Limited English proficiency is associated with disparities across diverse health outcomes. However, evidence regarding adverse birth outcomes across languages is limited, particularly among U.S. Asian and Pacific Islander populations. The study goal was to consider the relationship of maternal language to birth outcomes using statewide hospitalization data. Detailed discharge data from Hawaii childbirth hospitalizations from 2012 (n = 11,419) were compared by maternal language (English language or not) for adverse outcomes using descriptive and multivariable log-binomial regression models, controlling for race/ethnicity, age group, and payer. Ten percent of mothers spoke a language other than English; 93% of these spoke an Asian or Pacific Islander language. In multivariable models, compared to English speakers, non-English speakers had significantly higher risk (adjusted relative risk [ARR]: 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-3.04) of obstetric trauma in vaginal deliveries without instrumentation. Some significant variation was seen by language for other birth outcomes, including an increased rate of primary Caesarean sections and vaginal births after Caesarean, among non-English speakers. Non-English speakers had approximately two times higher risk of having an obstetric trauma during a vaginal birth when other factors, including race/ethnicity, were controlled. Non-English speakers also had higher rates of potentially high-risk deliveries.


Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idioma , Mães , Resultado da Gravidez/etnologia , Adulto , Ásia/etnologia , Povo Asiático , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ilhas do Pacífico/etnologia , Parto , Assistência Perinatal , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
8.
Environ Health ; 14: 81, 2015 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26446010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sugar cane harvesting by burning on Maui island is an environmental health issue due to respiratory effects of smoke. Volcanic smog ("vog") from an active volcano on a neighboring island periodically blankets Maui and could confound a study of cane smoke's effects since cane burning is not allowed on vog days. This study examines the association between cane burning and emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and prescription fills for acute respiratory illnesses. METHODS: This retrospective study controlled for confounders that could increase respiratory distress on non-burn days by matching each burn day with a non-burn day and then comparing the ratio of patients with respiratory distress residing in the path of sugar burn smoke to those residing elsewhere on Maui on burn versus non-burn days. Patients with acute respiratory distress were defined as those with one or more acute respiratory diagnoses at one of the hospitals or emergency departments on Maui. Separately, patients with acute respiratory illness were identified through prescription records from four community pharmacies, specifically defined as those who filled prescriptions for acute respiratory distress. RESULTS: There were 1,256 reports of respiratory distress prescriptions and 686 hospital/ED diagnoses of acute respiratory illness. The ratio of cases within to outside of smoke exposure was higher on burn days for both the ED/hospital data and the pharmacy, though not statistically significant. In post-hoc analyses of the pharmacy data based on the number of acres burned as a proxy for volume of smoke, there was a dose response trend for acreage burned such that the highest quartile showed a statistically significant higher proportion of acute respiratory distress in the exposed versus non-exposed regions (P = 0.015, OR 2.4, 95% CI [1.2-4.8]). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for confounders on non-burn days, there was a significantly higher incidence of respiratory distress in smoke-exposed regions when greater amounts of acres were burned. Health officials should consider actions to reduce the negative health outcomes associated with sugar cane burning practices.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Fumaça/efeitos adversos , Agricultura , Feminino , Incêndios/estatística & dados numéricos , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Doenças Respiratórias/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saccharum
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 15: 239, 2015 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest Pacific Islander women have disparate rates of preterm birth, primary cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and low birthweight infants. However, data is limited. In order to improve the health of Pacific Islanders, it is essential to better understand differences in obstetric outcomes in this diverse population METHODS: This study compared perinatal outcomes between Pacific Islander (9,646) and White (n = 5,510) women who delivered a singleton liveborn in any Hawaii hospital from January 2010 to December 2011 using the Hawaii Health Information Corporation (HHIC) database. Pacific Islanders were disaggregated into the following groups: Native Hawaiian, Samoan, Micronesian, and Other Pacific Islanders. Perinatal outcomes (e.g. hypertensive diseases, birthweight, mode of delivery) were compared using multivariable logistic models controlling for relevant sociodemographic and health risk factors (e.g. age and payer type). RESULTS: Significant differences in perinatal outcomes between Pacific Islander and White women and newborns were noted. All Pacific Islander groups had an increased risk of hypertension. Outcome differences were also seen between Pacific Islanders groups. Native Hawaiians had the highest risk of low birthweight infants, Samoans had the highest risk of macrosomic infants and Micronesians had the highest risk of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Important differences in perinatal outcomes among Pacific Islanders exist. It is important to examine Pacific Islander populations separately in future research, public health interventions, and policy.


Assuntos
Peso ao Nascer , Diabetes Mellitus/etnologia , Hipertensão/etnologia , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Macrossomia Fetal/etnologia , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Saúde Materna/etnologia , Micronésia/etnologia , Gravidez , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Samoa/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 12: E124, 2015 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26247424

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare in-hospital deaths and length of stays for diabetes-related preventable hospitalizations (D-RPHs) in Hawai'i for Asian American, Pacific Islander, and white Medicare recipients aged 65 years or older. METHODS: We considered all hospitalizations of older (>65 years) Japanese, Chinese, Native Hawaiians, Filipinos, and whites living in Hawai'i with Medicare as the primary insurer from December 2006 through December 2010 (n = 127,079). We used International Classification of Diseases - 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes to identify D-RPHs as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Length of stays and deaths during hospitalization were compared for Asian American and Pacific Islander versus whites in multivariable regression models, adjusting for age, sex, location of residence (Oahu, y/n), and comorbidity. RESULTS: Among the group studied, 1,700 hospitalizations of 1,424 patients were D-RPHs. Native Hawaiians were significantly more likely to die during a D-RPH (odds ratio [OR], 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-10.87) than whites. Filipinos had a significantly shorter length of stay (relative risk [RR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) for D-RPH than whites. Among Native Hawaiians with a D-RPH, 59% were in the youngest age group (65-75 y) whereas only 6.3% were in the oldest (≥85 y). By contrast, 23.2% of Japanese were in the youngest age group, and 32.2% were in the oldest. CONCLUSION: This statewide study found significant differences in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of D-RPHs for Asian American and Pacific Islanders in Hawai'i. Native Hawaiians were more likely to die during a D-RPH and were hospitalized at a younger age for a D-RPH than other studied racial/ethnic groups. Focused interventions targeting Native Hawaiians are needed to avoid these outcomes.


Assuntos
Complicações do Diabetes/etnologia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/etnologia , Hospitalização/tendências , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações do Diabetes/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Multivariada , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 12: E152, 2015 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378898

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Korean Americans are a growing but understudied population group in the United States. High rates of potentially preventable hospitalizations suggest that primary care is underutilized. We compared preventable hospitalizations for chronic conditions in aggregate and for congestive heart failure (CHF) for Korean Americans and whites in Hawaii. METHODS: Discharge data from 2010 to 2012 for all hospitalizations of adults in Hawaii for preventable hospitalizations in aggregate and for CHF included 4,345 among Korean Americans and 81,570 among whites. Preventable hospitalization rates for chronic conditions and CHF were calculated for Korean Americans and whites by sex and age group (18-64 y vs ≥65 y). Unadjusted rate ratios for Korean Americans were calculated relative to whites. Multivariate models, controlling for insurance type and comorbidity, provided adjusted rate ratios (aRRs). RESULTS: Korean American women and men aged 65 or older were at greater risk of preventable hospitalization overall than white women (aRR, 2.48; P = .003) and white men (aRR, 1.82; P = .049). Korean American men aged 65 or older also were at greater risk of hospitalization for CHF relative to white men (aRR, 1.87; P = .04) and for older Korean American women (aRR, 1.75; P = .07). Younger age groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Older Korean American patients may have significant disparities in preventable hospitalizations, which suggests poor access to or poor quality of primary health care. Improving primary care for Korean Americans may prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, improve quality of life for Korean Americans with chronic illness, and reduce health care costs.


Assuntos
Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Doença Crônica/etnologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Coreia (Geográfico)/etnologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Fatores de Risco , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
12.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 14: 298, 2014 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25174436

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence regarding maternal quality and safety outcomes across heterogeneous Asian and Pacific Islanders subgroups in the United States is limited, despite the importance of this topic to health disparities research and quality improvement efforts. METHODS: Detailed discharge data from all Hawai'i childbirth hospitalizations (n = 75,725) from 2008 to 2012 were considered. Validated measures of maternal quality and safety were compared in descriptive and multivariable models across seven racial/ethnic groups: Filipino, Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islander (e.g., Samoan, Tongan, Micronesian), Japanese, Chinese, white, and other race/ethnicity. Multivariable models adjusted for age group, payer, rural vs. urban hospital location, multiple gestation, and high-risk pregnancy. RESULTS: Compared to whites, Japanese, Filipinos, and Other Pacific Islanders had significantly higher overall delivery complication rates while Native Hawaiians had significantly lower rates. Native Hawaiians also had significantly lower rates of obstetric trauma in vaginal delivery with and without instruments compared to whites (Rate Ratio (RR):0.66; 95% CI:0.50-0.87 and RR:0.62; 95% CI:0.52-0.74, respectively). Japanese and Chinese had significantly higher rates of obstetric trauma for vaginal deliveries without instruments (RR:1.52; 95% CI:1.27-1.81 and RR:1.95;95% CI:1.53-2.48, respectively) compared to whites, and Chinese also had significantly higher rates of birth trauma in vaginal delivery with instrument (RR 1.42; 95% CI:1.06-1.91). Filipinos and Other Pacific Islanders had significantly higher rates of Cesarean deliveries compared to whites (RR:1.15; 95% CI:1.11-1.20 and RR:1.16; 95% CI:1.10-1.22, respectively). Other Pacific Islanders also had significantly higher rates of vaginal births after Cesarean (VBAC) deliveries compared to whites (RR: 1.28; 95% CI:1.08-1.51) and Japanese had significantly lower rates of uncomplicated VBACs (RR:0.77; 95% CI:0.63-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation was seen for Asian and Pacific Islander subgroups across maternal quality and safety outcomes. Notably, high rates of obstetric trauma were seen among Chinese and Japanese vaginal deliveries. Filipinos and other Pacific Islanders had high rates of Cesarean deliveries. Native Hawaiians had better quality and safety outcomes than whites on several quality and safety measures, including obstetric trauma during vaginal delivery. Other Pacific Islanders had high rates of VBACs, while Japanese had lower rates. This information can help guide clinical practice, research, and quality improvement efforts.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etnologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Traumatismos do Nascimento/etnologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , China/etnologia , Extração Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Extração Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Japão/etnologia , Micronésia/etnologia , Parto , Segurança do Paciente , Filipinas/etnologia , Gravidez , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Samoa/etnologia , Tonga/etnologia , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/efeitos adversos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Ethn Dis ; 23(1): 6-11, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23495615

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A serious challenge to eliminating US health disparities stems from the inability to reliably measure outcomes, particularly for numerically small populations. Our study aimed to produce reliable estimates of health care quality among Native Hawaiian (NH), Other Pacific Islander (PI), and Asian American (AA) subgroups. DESIGN: Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were used to calculate 3 PQI composites and 8 individual chronic condition indicators. Data sources were the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and the Hawaii Health Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk-adjusted PQI rates for adults were computed for 2005 through 2007. Relative rates for 2007 were calculated for each racial/ethnic group and compared to Whites. Statistical significance was based on P < .05 from a two-sided t test. RESULTS: The combined AANHPI group had higher overall and chronic PQI composite rates than Whites in 2007. When disaggregated into discrete racial/ethnic subgroups, Chinese and Japanese had lower rates than Whites for all 3 composites, whereas NH and Other PI subgroups typically had the worst health outcomes. Trends in PQI rates from 2005 through 2007 showed persistent gaps between groups, especially across chronic PQIs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent efforts to reduce racial/ethnic health care disparities, significant gaps remain in potentially preventable hospitalization rates. Practical tools that measure inequities across diverse, numerically small populations may suggest ways to optimally funnel limited resources toward improving racial/ethnic differences in health outcomes.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde das Minorias , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Asiático , Havaí , Humanos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto Jovem
14.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 10: E123, 2013 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23886042

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 25% of individuals aged 65 years or older in the United States have diabetes mellitus. Diabetes rates in this age group are higher for Asian American and Pacific Islanders (AA/PI) than for whites. We examined racial/ethnic differences in diabetes-related potentially preventable hospitalizations (DRPH) among people aged 65 years or older for Japanese, Chinese, Filipinos, Native Hawaiians, and whites. METHODS: Discharge data for hospitalizations in Hawai'i for people aged 65 years or older from December 2006 through December 2010 were compared. Annual rates of DRPH by patient were calculated for each racial/ethnic group by sex. Rate ratios (RRs) were calculated relative to whites. Multivariable models controlling for insurer, comorbidity, diabetes prevalence, age, and residence location provided final adjusted rates and RRs. RESULTS: A total of 1,815 DRPH were seen from 1,515 unique individuals. Unadjusted RRs for DRPH by patient were greater than 1 in all AA/PI study groups compared with whites, but were highest among Native Hawaiians and Filipinos [corrected]. In fully adjusted models accounting for higher diabetes prevalence in AA/PI groups, Native Hawaiian (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.59), Filipino (aRR = 2.26), and Japanese (aRR = 1.86) men retained significantly higher rates of diabetes-related potentially preventable hospitalizations than whites, as did Filipino women (aRR = 1.61). CONCLUSION: Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Japanese men and Filipino women aged 65 years or older have a higher risk than whites for DRPH. Health care providers and public health programs for elderly patients should consider effective programs to reduce potentially preventable hospitalizations among Native Hawaiian, Filipino, and Japanese men and Filipino women aged 65 years or older.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/etnologia , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Populacionais/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Hawaii Med J ; 69(8): 194-7, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20845285

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of Kawasaki syndrome (KS) among different racial/ethnic groups in Hawaii. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of children <18 years of age, with a focus on children <5 years of age, living in Hawaii who were hospitalized with KS using the 1996-2006 Hawaii State Inpatient Data. RESULTS: Children <5 years of age accounted for 84% of the 528 patients <18 years of age with KS. The average annual incidence among this age group was 50.4 per 100,000 children <5 years of age, ranging from 45.5 to 56.5. Asian and Pacific Islander children accounted for 92% of the children <5 years of age with KS during the study period; the average annual incidence was 62.9 per 100,000. Within this group, Japanese children had the highest incidence (210.5), followed by Native Hawaiian children (86.9), other Asian children (84.9), and Chinese children (83.2). The incidence for white children (13.7) was lower than for these racial/ethnic groups. The median age of KS admission for children <5 years of age was 21 months overall, 24 months for Japanese children, 14.5 months for Native Hawaiian children and 26.5 months for white children. CONCLUSIONS: The high average annual KS incidence for children <5 years of age in Hawaii compared to the rest of the United States population reflects an increased KS incidence among Asian and Pacific Islander children, especially Japanese children. The incidence for white children was slightly higher than or similar to that generally reported nationwide.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/etnologia , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Povo Asiático , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , População Branca
16.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 102(1): 69-77, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31769399

RESUMO

Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a zoonotic, parasitic nematode causing angiostrongyliasis or rat lungworm disease. Clinical diagnosis in humans is currently confirmed by detection of parasite DNA in cerebrospinal fluid. This study estimated human exposure to A. cantonensis in volunteer participants solicitated via public venues on east Hawai'i Island using blood-based tests. Antibodies were screened in sera by crude antigen ELISA, followed by a 31-kDa dot-blot test developed and validated in Thailand. Human participants (n = 435) donated blood samples and completed a questionnaire to self-report relevant symptomology or clinical diagnosis. Among symptoms reported by participants diagnosed by licensed clinicians, headaches, high eosinophil counts, stiff neck, fatigue, and joint pain were most severe during the initial 3 months of infection. ELISA results revealed 22% of the serum samples as positive, 46% as equivocal, and 32% as negative. A subset of 186 samples was tested by dot blot, with 30% testing positive and 70% testing negative. A significantly higher mean ELISA value was found among recently (2014-2015) clinically diagnosed participants as than among those with a diagnosis before 2010 (P = 0.027). All dot-blot positives were also ELISA positive and were significantly associated with higher ELISA values compared with dot-blot negatives (P = 0.0001). These results suggest that an ELISA using crude antigen isolated from adult A. cantonensis from Hawai'i may be an effective initial screening method for estimating exposure to A. cantonensis in Hawai'i and likewise suggest that dot-blot tests using the 31-kDa antigen exhibit efficacy as a diagnostic for exposure.


Assuntos
Angiostrongylus cantonensis , Antígenos de Helmintos , Infecções por Strongylida/epidemiologia , Infecções por Strongylida/imunologia , Zoonoses , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Criança , Feminino , Havaí , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Ratos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Hawaii J Med Public Health ; 78(3): 89-97, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30854254

RESUMO

Childbirth is a national priority area for healthcare quality improvement. Patient perspectives are increasingly valued in healthcare, yet Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) perspectives of healthcare quality are often understudied, particularly from individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP). Our study goal was to understand factors that consumers in Hawai'i, including AAPI and those with LEP, use to compare patient care in hospitals, especially for childbirth. A total of 400 women ages 18 years and older with a recent childbirth completed an in-person interview in English (n=291), Tagalog (n=42), Chinese (n=36), or Marshallese (n=31) on O'ahu, Hawai'i. Participants described if (yes/no), and how (open-ended), they believed hospitals in the state varied in providing patient care. Open-ended responses were coded by two independent raters using the framework approach. Respondents were 53.3% Asian, 30.8% Pacific Islander, 13.5% White, and 2.5% other race/ethnicity; 17.8% reported limited English proficiency. Overall, 66.8% of respondents affirmed that local hospitals varied in patient care; Marshallese, other Pacific Islanders, and non-English speakers were significantly less likely to say that Hawai'i hospitals varied in patient care. Among those who endorsed hospital variation, commonly reported themes about this variation were: (1) patient experience, (2) patient overall impression, (3) childbirth options (eg, waterbirths), (4) staff, (5) facilities (eg, "emergency capabilities"), (6) high-tech levels of care, and (7) the hospital's area of focus (eg, "women and children"). We provide insights into factors that diverse patients use to compare patient care in hospitals in Hawai'i to add value, relevance, and engagement to healthcare quality research and dissemination efforts.


Assuntos
Hospitais/normas , Trabalho de Parto , Mães/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Havaí , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto/métodos , Masculino , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 28(2): 103-110, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously reported reduction in the rate of hospitalisations with medication harm among older adults with our 'Pharm2Pharm' intervention, a pharmacist-led care transition and care coordination model focused on best practices in medication management. The objectives of the current study are to determine the extent to which medication harm among older inpatients is 'community acquired' versus 'hospital acquired' and to assess the effectiveness of the Pharm2Pharm model with each type. METHODS: After a 3-year baseline, six non-federal general acute care hospitals with 50 or more beds in Hawaii implemented Pharm2Pharm sequentially. The other five such hospitals served as the comparison group. We measured frequencies and quarterly rates of admissions among those aged 65 and older with 'community-acquired' (International Classification of Diseases-coded as present on admission) and 'hospital-acquired' (coded as not present on admission) medication harm per 1000 admissions from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS: There were 189 078 total admissions from 2010 through 2014, 7% of which had one or more medication harm codes. There were 16 225 medication harm codes, 70% of which were community-acquired, among these 13 795 admissions. The varied times when the intervention was implemented across hospitals were associated with a significant reduction in the rate of admissions with community-acquired medication harm compared with non-intervention hospitals (p=0.001), and specifically harm by anticoagulants (p<0.0001) and by medications in therapeutic use (p<0.001). The hospital-acquired medication harm rate did not change. The rate of admissions with community-acquired medication harm was reduced by 4.28 admissions per 1000 admissions per quarter in the Pharm2Pharm hospitals relative to the comparison hospitals. CONCLUSION: The Pharm2Pharm model is an effective way to address the growing problem of community-acquired medication harm among high-risk, chronically ill patients. This model demonstrates the importance of deploying specially trained pharmacists in the hospital and in the community to systematically identify and resolve drug therapy problems.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Transferência de Pacientes/organização & administração , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Feminino , Havaí , Humanos , Masculino , Risco Ajustado
19.
Womens Health Issues ; 29(1): 17-22, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30482594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that women have higher 30-day readmission rates than men after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ACS is a distinct subset of patients in whom gender differences have not been adequately studied. METHODS: Hawaii statewide hospitalization data from 2010 to 2015 were assessed to compare gender differences in 30-day readmission rates among patients hospitalized with ACS who underwent PCI during the index hospitalization. Readmission diagnoses were categorized using an aggregated version of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Condition Categories. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to evaluate the effect of gender on the 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: A total of 5,354 patients (29.4% women) who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of ACS and underwent PCI were studied. Overall, women were older, with more identified as Native Hawaiian, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors compared with men. The 30-day readmission rate was 13.9% in women and 9.6% in men (p < .0001). In the multivariable model, female gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.60), Medicaid (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06), Medicare (1.72; 95% CI, 1.35-2.19), heart failure (1.88; 95% CI, 1.53-2.33), atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.54; 95% CI-1.21-1.95), substance use (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.77), history of gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.29-4.58), and chronic kidney disease (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.42-2.22) were independent predictors of 30-day readmissions. Readmission rates were highest during days 1 through 6 (peak, day 3) after discharge. The top three cardiac causes of readmissions were heart failure, recurrent angina, and recurrent ACS. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is an independent predictor of 30-day readmission after ACS that requires PCI. Our finding suggests women are at a higher risk of post-ACS cardiac events such as heart failure and recurrent ACS, and further gender-specific intervention is needed to reduce 30-day readmission rate in women after ACS.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Havaí , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
20.
Med Care Res Rev ; 75(1): 100-126, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885123

RESUMO

Asian and Pacific Islander (API) 30-day potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) are understudied. Hawaii Health Information Corporation data from 2007-2012 statewide adult hospitalizations ( N = 495,910) were used to compare API subgroup and White PPRs. Eight percent of hospitalizations were PPRs. Seventy-two percent of other Pacific Islanders, 60% of Native Hawaiians, and 52% of Whites with a PPR were 18 to 64 years, compared with 22% of Chinese and 21% of Japanese. In multivariable models including payer, hospital, discharge year, residence location, and comorbidity, PPR disparities existed for some API subpopulations 65+ years, including Native Hawaiian men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-1.24), Filipino men (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.04-1.38), and other Pacific Islander men (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.19-1.43) and women (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.02-1.51) compared with Whites, while many API groups 18 to 64 years had significantly lower PPR odds. Distinct PPR characteristics across API subpopulations and age groups can inform policy and practice. Further research should determine why elderly API have higher PPR rates, while nonelderly rates are lower.


Assuntos
Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Havaí , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA