Clinical Usefulness of the Active Fixation Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead Compared With the Passive Fixation Quadripolar Lead in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the stability of the Medtronic Attain Stability Quad (ASQ), a novel quadripolar active fixation left ventricular (LV) lead with a side helix, to that of conventional quadripolar leads with passive fixation (non-ASQ) and evaluated their LV lead performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all, 183 consecutive patients (69 ASQ, 114 non-ASQ) who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between January 2018 and June 2021 were enrolled. Complications, including elevated pacing capture threshold (PCT) levels, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV lead dislodgement, were analyzed during the postimplantation period until the first outpatient visit after discharge. The frequency of LV lead-related complications was significantly lower in the ASQ than non-ASQ group (14% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.019). Specifically, LV lead dislodgement occurred only in the non-ASQ group, and elevated PCT levels were significantly lower in the ASQ group (7% vs. 23%; P=0.007). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significantly lower incidence of LV lead-related complications in the ASQ group (log-rank P=0.005). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed a significant reduction in lead-related complications associated with ASQ (hazard ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.83; P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The ASQ group exhibited fewer LV lead-related complications requiring reintervention and setting changes than the non-ASQ group. Thus, the ASQ may be a favorable choice for CRT device implantation.

Clinical Significance of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Duration for Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are reportedly associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, little is known about the association between ATA duration and the risk of VA. We investigated the relationship between ATA duration and subsequent VA in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).Methods and Results: We investigated associations between the longest ATA duration during the first year after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation and VA and VA relevant to ATA (VAATA) in 160 CRT-D patients. ATAs occurred in 63 patients in the first year. During a median follow-up of 925 days from 1 year after CRT implantation, 40 patients experienced 483 VAs. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher risk of VA in patients with than without ATA in the first year (log rank P=0.0057). Hazard ratios (HR) of VA (HR 2.36, 2.10, and 3.04 for ATA >30s, >6 min and >24 h, respectively) and only VAATA (HR 4.50, 5.59, and 11.79 for ATA >30s, >6 min and >24 h, respectively) increased according to the duration of ATA. In multivariate analysis, ATA >24 h was an independent predictor of subsequent VA (HR 2.42; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ATA >24 h in the first year after CRT had a higher risk of subsequent VA and VAATA. The risk of VA, including VAATA, increased with the longest ATA duration.

Transvenous lead extraction versus surgical lead extraction or conservative treatment for cardiac implantable electronic device infections: Propensity score-weighted analyses of a nationwide claim-based database.

INTRODUCTION: Infection is one of the most important complications associated with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. The number of reports comparing the outcomes of transvenous lead extraction (TLE), surgical lead extraction, and conservative treatment for CIED infections using a real-world database is limited. This study investigated the association between the treatment strategies for CIED infections and their outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 3605 patients with CIED infections admitted to 681 hospitals using a nationwide claim-based database collected between April 2012 and March 2018. RESULTS: We divided the 3605 patients into TLE (n = 938 [26%]), surgical lead extraction (n = 182 [5.0%]), and conservative treatment (n = 2485 [69%]) groups. TLE was performed more frequently in younger patients and at larger hospitals (p for trend < .001 for both). The rate of TLE increased during the study period, whereas that of surgical lead extraction decreased (p for trend < .001 for both). TLE was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (vs. surgical lead extraction: odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.70; vs. conservative treatment: OR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22-0.94) and lower 30-day readmission rates (vs. surgical lead extraction: OR, 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.56; vs. conservative treatment: OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.13) in propensity score-weighted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Only 26% of patients hospitalized for CIED infections received TLE. TLE was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day recurrence rates than surgical lead extraction and conservative treatment, suggesting that TLE should be more widely recommended as a first-line treatment for CIED infections.

Leadless pacemaker implantation in a patient with a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is increasingly used in patients with end-stage heart failure. However, LVADs are associated with challenges, especially in the presence of a cardiac implantable electronic device. Although a leadless pacemaker (PM), the Micra™ Transcatheter Pacing System, can be used with LVADs, data regarding HeartMate 3™ LVAD are limited. In this report, we present a patient with a HeartMate 3™ LVAD who underwent successful leadless PM implantation after the removal of an infected cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.

Right Atrial Septal Lead Enhances the Favorable Effects of the Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Algorithm.

The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) algorithm provides synchronized left ventricular pacing (sLVP). However, ensuring a high sLVP rate is challenging. We assessed the association between the sLVP rate and pacing sites in the right atrium. We evaluated 71 patients who underwent CRT and in whom the adaptive CRT algorithm was applied (53 men; mean age, 66 ± 14 years; median follow-up period, 301 days; IQR: 212-596 days). The atrial pacing leads were positioned in the right atrial (RA) septum in 17 patients (septal group) and in the RA appendage in 54 patients (RA appendage group), with significantly higher sLVP rates in the septal group compared with the RA appendage group (81% ± 30% vs 63% ± 37%; P = 0.045). In patients with first-degree atrioventricular blocks, the sLVP rates tended to be higher in the septal group. Therefore, RA septal pacing increased sLVP rates in patients undergoing CRT.

Implications of ventricular arrhythmia after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data are available on whether ventricular arrhythmia (VA) or shock therapy increases mortality. Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the risk of VA, little is known about the prognostic value of VA among patients with CRT devices. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implications of VA as a prognostic marker for CRT. METHODS: We investigated 330 CRT patients within 1 year after CRT device implantation. The primary endpoint was the composite endpoint of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: Forty-three patients had VA events. These patients had a significantly higher risk of the primary endpoint, even among CRT responders (P = .009). Fast VA compared to slow VA was associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.34; P = .035). Shock therapy was not associated with a primary endpoint (shock therapy vs antitachycardia pacing: HR 1.49; 95% CI 0.73-3.03; P = .269). The patients with VA had a lower prevalence of response to CRT (23 [53%] vs 202 [70%]; P = .031) and longer left ventricular paced conduction time (174 ± 23 ms vs 143 ± 36 ms; P = .003) than the patients without VA. CONCLUSION: VA occurrence within 1 year was related to paced electrical delay and poor response to CRT. VA could be associated with poor prognosis among CRT patients.

Evaluation of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate over biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm enables synchronized left ventricular pacing (sLVP) to achieve fusion with intrinsic right ventricular activation. Although sLVP presents benefits over biventricular pacing, the adequate sLVP rate for better clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between sLVP rates and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Our study cohort included 271 consecutive patients, who underwent CRT implantation between April 2016 and August 2021. RESULTS: We evaluated 63 patients on whom we applied the aCRT algorithm [48 men, mean age: 64 ±â€¯14 years; median follow-up period: 316 days (interquartile range: 212-809 days)]. At the 6-month follow-up after CRT implantation, the frequency of CRT responders was 71 % (n = 45). The sLVP rate was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (75 ±â€¯30 % vs. 47 ±â€¯40 %, p = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value during the sLVP rate was 59.4 % for the prediction of CRT responders (area under the curve, 0.70; sensitivity, 80 %; specificity, 61 %; positive predictive value, 84 %; and negative predictive value, 55 %). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the higher-sLVP group (sLVP ≧59.4 %, n = 43) had a better prognosis (cardiac death and heart failure hospitalization) than the lower-sLVP group (sLVP <59.4 %, n = 20) (log-rank p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that a higher sLVP rate was associated with a good prognosis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: sLVP was associated with CRT response, and a higher sLVP rate (≧59.4 %) was important for good prognosis in patients with aCRT.

Demonstration of Arrhythmia Substrate-Associated Dispersion of Repolarization by Epicardial Unipolar Mapping in Brugada Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial unipolar mapping has not been thoroughly investigated in Brugada syndrome (BrS). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the characteristics of epicardial unipolar potentials in BrS and investigate the differences from overt cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Epicardial mapping was performed in 8 patients with BrS and 6 patients with cardiomyopathy. We investigated the J-wave amplitudes using unipolar recordings at delayed potential (DP) sites via bipolar recordings. The repolarization time (RT) at and around the DP recording sites was measured, and maximum dispersion of the RT divided by the distance was defined as the RT dispersion index. RESULTS: Epicardial mapping at baseline revealed significantly higher J-wave amplitude with bipolar DP in patients with BrS than in patients with cardiomyopathy. J-wave amplitude ≥0.42 mV had 99.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing BrS. The RT dispersion index was significantly higher in patients with BrS than in patients with cardiomyopathy at baseline. In all patients with BrS, coved-type unipolar electrograms without negative T waves (short RT) appeared close to coved-type electrograms with negative T waves (long RT) at the DP recording sites after pilsicainide administration. Thus, a steep RT dispersion was observed in this region, and ventricular arrhythmias emerged from this shorter RT area in all 3 patients with BrS in whom ventricular arrhythmias were induced. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar DP-related prominent unipolar J waves and steep repolarization gradients may be more specific for characterizing BrS than for overt cardiomyopathy. Ventricular arrhythmias in BrS are associated with a steep repolarization gradient, indicating phase 2 re-entry as a possible cause.

Effect of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with pacemaker dependency.

BACKGROUND: An adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm allows continuous adjustments of pacing timings of atrioventricular delays by periodic automatic evaluation of electrical conduction. This applies to patients with an atrioventricular block and is effective in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices; however, whether this algorithm benefits patients with pacemaker dependency is uncertain. METHODS: This study examined the clinical impact of an aCRT algorithm in patients diagnosed with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and pacemaker dependency. A total of 359 patients underwent CRT between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients undergoing pacemaker-dependent CRT with the aCRT algorithm function were selected. Sixty-four patients with pacemaker dependency (31 with aCRT algorithm and 33 without) were included. Pacemaker dependency was defined as the absence of spontaneous ventricular activity during the sensing test at VVI 30 bpm or prolonged atrioventricular delay (> 300 ms). The primary endpoint was the composite clinical outcome of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between groups. During a median follow-up of 1,067 days (interquartile range 553-1,776 days), aCRT reduced the risk of composite clinical outcomes in patients with pacemaker dependency (log-rank P = 0.028). In addition, using the aCRT algorithm was an independent predictor of the composite clinical outcomes in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.94, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The aCRT algorithm significantly reduced the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with pacemaker dependency. This algorithm may be an important tool for managing such patients.

Implantable loop recorder uncovered torsades de pointes in long-QT syndrome type 1 with multi cause of syncope.

An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is now widely used for differential diagnosis of unexplained syncope or recurrent syncope with unknown causes. In the inherited arrhythmia syndromes, ILR may be useful for management of the therapeutic strategies; however, there is no obvious evidence to uncover arrhythmic syncope by ILR in long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients. Here we experienced a 19-year-old female patient with LQTS type 1 who had recurrent syncope even after beta-blocker therapy but no arrhythmias were documented, and some episodes might be due to non-cardiogenic causes. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy was also recommended; however, she could not accept ICD but was implanted with ILR for further continuous monitoring. Two years later, she suffered syncope during a brief run, and ILR recorded an electrocardiogram at that moment. Thus a marked QT interval prolongation as well as T-wave alternance resulting in development of torsades de pointes could be detected. Although ILR is just a diagnostic tool but does not prevent sudden cardiac death, most arrhythmic events in LQTS are transient and sometimes hard to be diagnosed as arrhythmic syncope. ILR may provide direct supportive evidence to select the optimal therapeutic strategy in cases where syncope is difficult to diagnose. Learning objective: Long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients often suffer recurrent syncope even after beta-blocker therapy, but torsades de pointes (TdP) is not always detected by standard 12­lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring, and some syncope might be non-cardiogenic. In this case, implantable loop recorder (ILR) documented the evidence of QT interval prolongation and beat-by-beat T-wave alternance subsequent TdP. Thus, ILR may provide useful evidence for the optimal treatment strategy in LQTS cases where syncope is difficult to diagnose.

SMART Pass automatic deactivation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The SMART Pass algorithm for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prevents inappropriate shocks due to oversensing. The mechanisms and significance of SMART Pass deactivation remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether SMART Pass deactivation is associated with inappropriate shocks and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 115 patients who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation between 2016 and 2021. SMART Pass deactivation and inappropriate shocks during follow-up were assessed. The QRS amplitudes of the subcutaneous (S-ECG) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at the time of implantation (pre) and SMART Pass deactivation (post) were measured. The patients were divided into the SP-ON group with SMART Pass consistently on and the SP-OFF group with the experience of SMART Pass deactivation. RESULTS: Three of 12 patients in the SP-OFF group experienced inappropriate shocks during a median follow-up of 1094 (interquartile range, 887-1502) days compared with 4 of 87 patients in the SP-ON group. Pre- and post-S-ECG QRS amplitudes were significantly lower in the SP-OFF group than in the SP-ON group (both P < .05), despite similar 12-lead ECG QRS amplitude in both groups. A significant temporary drop in the QRS amplitude of the S-ECG led to SMART Pass deactivation (pre-QRS amplitude vs amplitude at deactivation, P = .015; 95% CI, 0.3-1.9). CONCLUSION: The rate of inappropriate shocks was numerically higher after SMART Pass deactivation. A low QRS amplitude in S-ECG was a potential risk factor for SMART Pass deactivation. Careful follow-up and suitable management are required for managing patients with risks of SMART Pass deactivation.

Significance of effective cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing for clinical responses: An analysis based on the effective cardiac resynchronization therapy algorithm.

BACKGROUND: High percent ventricular pacing maximizes cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. An effective CRT algorithm classifies each left ventricular (LV) pace as effective or ineffective on the basis of the detection of QS or QS-r morphology on the electrogram; however, the relationship between percent effective CRT pacing (%e-CRT) and responses is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the association between %e-CRT and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Of the 136 consecutive CRT patients, 49 using the adaptive and effective CRT algorithm with percent ventricular pacing > 90% were evaluated. The primary and secondary outcomes were heart failure (HF) hospitalization and prevalence of CRT responders, defined as patients with an improvement in LV ejection fraction of ≥10% or a reduction in LV end-systolic volume of ≥15% after CRT device implantation, respectively. RESULTS: We divided the patients into the effective group (n = 25) and the less effective group (n = 24) by the median value of %e-CRT (97.4% [93.7%-98.3%]). During the median follow-up period of 507 days (interquartile range 335-730 days), the effective group had a significantly lower risk of HF hospitalization than the less effective group as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank, P = .016). Univariate analysis revealed %e-CRT ≥ 97.4% (hazard ratio 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.95; P = .045) as a predictor of HF hospitalization. The effective group had a higher prevalence of CRT responders than the less effective group (23 [92%] vs 9 [38%]; P < .001). Univariate analysis revealed that %e-CRT ≥ 97.4% (odds ratio 19.20; 95% confidence interval 3.63-101.00; P < .001) was a predictor of CRT response. CONCLUSION: High %e-CRT is associated with high CRT responder prevalence and low HF hospitalization risk.

Interference of cardiac implantable electronic devices and computed tomography imaging in the current era with a phantom model.

Introduction: Cardiac implantable electronic devices are used in patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. Computed tomography irradiation is not prohibited for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, despite adverse events being reported. Hence, appropriate preparation and knowledge are required before computed tomography irradiation can be carried out in these patients. Since there is limited knowledge or literature about the influence of computed tomography irradiation in cases with recent cardiac implantable electronic devices, we aimed to evaluate the adverse events and elucidate the necessary and sufficient safety measures associated with this therapy. Methods and Results: We placed cardiac implantable electronic devices on an anthropomorphic phantom model and observed their electrical activity in electrograms, while various protocols of computed tomography irradiation were implemented and adverse events evaluated. Oversensing with pauses of up to 3.2 s was observed in standard computed tomography protocols, but ventricular tachyarrhythmia or other clinically significant events could not be confirmed. Oversensing with pauses of up to 8.0 s was observed and ventricular tachyarrhythmia was detected in the maximum-dose protocols. However, treatments such as antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia were not observed because of their absence. Conclusion: Computed tomography irradiation for patients using cardiac implantable electronic devices is highly unlikely to cause clinically significant adverse events with the device settings and computed tomography protocols currently being used. Changing or monitoring the device settings routinely before computed tomography irradiation is not necessarily required for most patients.

N-terminal pro atrial natriuretic peptide as a prognostic marker of cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.

Background: Although the dynamic changes of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) expressions in a failing heart are well-documented, the clinical implications of detailed measurements of each ANP molecular form processed from proANP remain unclear. Methods: Patients screening was conducted on patients who were eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) between 2014 and 2019 in our institution. Blood samples and echocardiographic parameters were collected on the day before and six months after implantation. Total ANP, proANP, and N-terminal fragment of proANP (NT-proANP) were examined as predictive biomarkers for cardiac death, left ventricular assist device implantation, and heart failure hospitalization following CRT implantation. Results: A total of 86 subjects (mean age 70 years, 64 males) who underwent successful CRT implantation were enrolled. Plasma levels of total ANP, proANP, and NT-proANP were not normally distributed [25.8 pM (interquartile range: 11.1-53.1), 2.2 pM (1.0-5.4), and 4.1 nM (2.4-7.1), respectively]. Over a median follow-up of 2.7 years, 31 patients (2 deaths and 29 heart failure hospitalizations) reached the endpoints. Among the different ANP forms, only NT-proANP emerged as an independent predictor of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio of 2.542 in those with levels above vs. below the median, 95 % confidence interval 1.151-5.615, p = 0.021). NT-proANP levels were associated with left atrial volume and left diastolic functional parameters and decreased in response to echocardiographic improvements at six months post-implantation (16 ± 44 % decrease in responders vs 18 ± 60 % increase in non-responders, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Pre-implantation NT-proANP levels could serve as a predictive factor for clinical outcomes in recipients of CRT.

Fatal Arrhythmic Risks in Cardiac Sarcoidosis With Mildly Impaired Cardiac Function.

Background: The prognosis and later fatal arrhythmia in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with relatively preserved cardiac function were unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and arrhythmic events in patients with CS and mildly impaired cardiac function. Methods: Data were collected from a nationwide Japanese cohort survey conducted in 57 hospitals (n = 420); 322 patients with CS with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35% were investigated. Results: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) manifestation was present in 50 patients (16%) and absent in 272 (84%), of whom 36 (72%) and 46 (17%), respectively, had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Over a median of 5 years, 23 all-cause deaths and 31 appropriate ICD discharges were observed. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, all-cause death did not differ between patients with and without VT manifestation (P = 0.660), although appropriate ICD therapy was significantly less used in patients without VT manifestation than in those with VT manifestation (P < 0.001). Of the 272 patients without VT manifestation, 18 had ventricular arrhythmic events (VAEs), including 3 sudden cardiac deaths and 15 appropriate ICD discharges. In multivariate analysis, concomitant nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) with atrioventricular block (AVB), lower LVEF, abnormal gallium-67 scintigraphy or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the heart (Ga/PET), and concomitant NSVT with abnormal Ga/PET at CS diagnosis were independent predictors of VAEs (P = 0.008, P = 0.021, P = 0.049, and P = 0.024, respectively). Conclusions: If concomitant NSVT with AVB, concomitant NSVT with abnormal Ga/PET, or abnormal Ga/PET is observed in patients with CS and mildly impaired cardiac function (LVEF >35%), ICD should be considered as primary prevention.

Adding interactive face-to-face lectures to passive lectures effectively reduces radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure remains a major concern for electrophysiologists and patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of altering awareness of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using interactive face-to-face (FTF) lectures compared to passive lectures. METHODS: Patients who underwent their first catheter ablation with radiofrequency energy for atrial fibrillation between January 2014 and December 2020 were included in this study. All operators attended an e-learning lecture on radiation exposure before catheter ablation. The addition of FTF lectures to this lecture was introduced in 2018. The effect on radiation exposure was compared between the pre-FTF and FTF periods by comparing fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. RESULTS: A total of 896 patients [mean age, 66 ±â€¯11 years; 603 men (67 %)] were included in this study. For pre-FTF (n = 345), only pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 112 patients and PVI with additional ablation in 233 patients. For FTF lectures (n = 551), PVI-only was performed in 302 patients and PVI with additional ablation in 249 patients. Fluoroscopy time, cumulative air kerma, and cumulative air kerma per time significantly reduced after FTF introduction in both PVI-only group [pre-FTF and FTF; 37 ±â€¯15 min and 16 ±â€¯10 min (p < 0.0001), 477 ±â€¯582 mGy and 108 ±â€¯156 mGy (p < 0.0001), 11 ±â€¯12 mGy/min, and 5 ±â€¯6 mGy/min (p < 0.0001), respectively] and PVI with additional ablation group [pre-FTF and FTF; 48 ±â€¯17 min and 15 ±â€¯13 min (p < 0.0001), 613 ±â€¯483 mGy and 68 ±â€¯96 mGy (p < 0.0001), 12 ±â€¯10 mGy/min, and 4 ±â€¯4 mGy/min (p < 0.0001), respectively]. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: FTF lectures can reduce radiation exposure.

A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the incidence of periprocedural cerebral embolisms caused by catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation (Embo-Abl study): Study design.

BACKGROUND: Although catheter ablation (CA) has become a standard therapeutic approach to atrial fibrillation (AF), it imposes a low but relevant risk of thromboembolic complications of around 0.5%-1%, including ischemic strokes, and has an additional risk of clinically silent cerebral embolisms (SCEs) of 10%-40%. Both cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation are routinely used clinically worldwide, yet there are few prospective data comparing the incidence of cerebral embolism after CA of AF between CB and RF ablation. METHODS: The aim of the Embo-Abl study will be to compare the incidence of cerebral embolisms on 3 T diffusion-weighted image magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after CA of AF between CB and RF ablation in patients with AF in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, randomized fashion. The primary endpoint of the Embo-Abl study will be the occurrence of MRI-detected SCE 1-3 days after CA. The patients will be registered and randomly assigned to either the CB or RF ablation group in a 1:1 ratio. The study cohort will include 230 patients with AF from a multicenter in Japan. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: The Embo-Abl study will be the first to compare the incidence of periprocedural cerebral embolisms caused by CA of AF between CB and RF ablation in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled fashion.