[Initial scotomas in normal tension glaucoma].

PURPOSE: To investigate risk factors for initial visual field pattern in normal tension glaucoma (NTG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 107 subjects, who underwent 24-2 or 30-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard visual fields as part of a multicenter study of newly diagnosed NTG patients. Only the eyes with initial parafoveal scotoma (IPFS) or initial nasal step (INS) Were included. IPFS was defined as a glaucomatous visual field (VF) defect in 1 hemifield (≥ 3 adjacent points with p < 5% within the central 10 degrees of fixation, ≥ 1 point with p < l% lying at the innermost paracentral points, and no VF abnormality outside the central 10 degrees). INS was defined in 1 hemifield (≥ 3 adjacent points with p < 5% in the nasal periphery outside 10 degrees of fixation, the nasal- most point with p < 1%, and no VF abnormality within the central 10 degrees). Clinical characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Mean untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) (14.0 ± 1.3 vs. 16.0 ± l.4 mmHg; p = 0.0102) was significantly lower in patients with an IPFS than in patients with an INS. There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.6487) or spherical equivalent (p = 0.7561). CONCLUSION: Initial visual field pattern of NTG is influenced by untreated IOP level.

Efficacy and safety of first-line or second-line selective laser trabeculoplasty for normal-tension glaucoma: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of first-line and second-line selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: 100 patients with NTG were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated with SLT as a first-line or second-line treatment for NTG. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction rate, outflow pressure improvement rate (ΔOP), success rate at 1 year and complications. Success was defined as ΔOP≥20% (criterion A) or an IOP reduction ≥20% (criterion B) without additional IOP-lowering eye-drops, repeat SLT or additional glaucoma surgeries. The incidence of transient IOP spike (>5 mm Hg from the pretreatment IOP), conjunctival hyperaemia, inflammation in the anterior chamber and visual impairment due to SLT were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients (99 eyes) were initially enrolled in this study, including 74 eyes assigned to the first-line SLT group and 25 eyes to the second-line SLT group. The mean IOP of 16.3±2.1 mm Hg before SLT decreased by 17.1%±9.5% to 13.4±1.9 mm Hg at 12 months after SLT in the first-line group (p<0.001), and the mean IOP of 15.4±1.5 mm Hg before SLT decreased by 12.7%±9.7% to 13.2±2.0 mm Hg at 12 months after SLT (p=0.005) in the second-line group. Both groups showed significant reductions in IOP. Higher pre-SLT IOP and thinner central corneal thickness were associated with greater IOP reduction. The success rate at 1 year was higher in the first-line compared with the second-line group, with lower pretreatment IOP and the use of IOP-lowering medication before SLT being associated with treatment failure. Most post-treatment complications were minor and transient. CONCLUSIONS: SLT may be an effective and safe treatment option for NTG, as either a first-line or second-line treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered in the UMIN-CTR (UMIN Test ID: UMIN R000044059).

Comparison of surgical outcomes between iStent inject W implantation and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy in combination with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Purpose: To examine primary open-angle glaucoma patients after undergoing combined cataract surgery with microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (µLOT-Phaco) or iStent inject W implantation (iStent-Phaco), and then evaluate the surgical outcomes after a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Methods: Between October 2020 and July 2022, 39 µLOT-Phaco eyes and 55 iStent-Phaco eyes that underwent surgery were evaluated in this retrospective, multicenter comparative case series. Data that included preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and occurrence of complications were collected from medical records and then examined. Surgical failure was defined as patients exhibiting a < 20% reduction in the preoperative IOP or an IOP > 18 mmHg on two consecutive follow-up visits, or when patients were required to undergo reoperation. Success rates were determined based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: At 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, there was a significant postoperative reduction in the IOP (p < 0.001) and in the medications scores (p < 0.001) for both of the groups. In the µLOT-Phaco and iStent-Phaco groups, the probabilities of success at 6 and 12 months were 55.3 and 45.5%, and 48.4 and 45.5% (p = 0.38; log-rank test), respectively. In the iStent-Phaco group, there was a significant decrease in the hyphema. Conclusion: Comparable surgical outcomes occurred for both the µLOT and iStent inject W procedures.

Additive effects of brimonidine tartrate 0.1%/brinzolamide 1% fixed-dose combination in prostaglandin analog-treated Japanese glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: A brimonidine tartrate 0.1%/brinzolamide 1% fixed-dose combination (BBFC) was recently approved for glaucoma and ocular hypertension treatment in Japan. We investigated the efficacy and safety of BBFC used concomitantly with prostaglandin analogs (PG) or a PG/beta-blocker fixed-dose combination (PG/beta FC). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma. BBFC (Ailamide) was concomitantly administered to either the PG or the PG/beta FC group, and intraocular pressure (IOP) and safety were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks. The groups were stratified into low and high IOP baseline groups based on the median baseline IOP. RESULTS: We enrolled 100 patients, 91 of whom completed the 12-week follow-up. The mean ages were 67.1 and 65.7 years in the PG group (n = 45, baseline IOP of 15.7 ± 2.3 mmHg) and the PG/beta FC group (n = 46, baseline IOP of 16.3 ± 2.3 mmHg), respectively. After BBFC administration, IOPs at 4 and 12 weeks were 13.0 ± 2.0 and 13.0 ± 2.6 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in the PG group, respectively, and 13.7 ± 2.4 and 13.7 ± 2.2 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in the PG/beta FC group, respectively. IOP decreased by - 2.0 ± 1.8 mmHg (P < 0.0001) and -1.9 ± 1.4 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in the low baseline PG group (14.1 mmHg) and low baseline PG/beta FC group (14.8 mmHg) at 12 weeks, respectively. Sixteen adverse events were identified, all of which were common and did not affect visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: BBFC can be used concomitantly with PG or PG/beta FC to reduce IOP without serious complications.

Noninferiority of Microhook to Trabectome: Trabectome versus Ab Interno Microhook Trabeculotomy Comparative Study (Tram Trac Study).

PURPOSE: To elucidate the noninferiority of ab interno microhook trabeculotomy (µTLO) using a recently developed reusable stainless spatula-type microhook device to incise the trabecular meshwork to Trabectome (Neomeix, Inc) surgery in terms of the 1-year postoperative outcomes of Japanese patients with glaucoma by means of propensity score analyses. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 553 and 392 patients who underwent Trabectome surgery and µTLO, respectively, between January 2014 and March 2020 at 10 facilities. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate the propensity score, which indicates the likelihood of treatment assignment (Trabectome or µTLO). We set the following factors as outcome-related covariates: age, sex, facility, glaucoma disease types, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma drug score, mean deviation of Humphrey visual field test results, antithrombotic drug use, the presence or absence of combined cataract surgery, and incision range of the trabecular meshwork (1 or 2 quadrants). We analyzed 4 different methods (matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW], stratification, and regression adjustment) using the propensity score. We set 15% as the noninferiority margin based on previous Trabectome meta-analysis results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was surgical success at 1 year after surgery. We defined surgical success as satisfying all 3 criteria: (1) IOP within 5 to 21 mmHg, (2) IOP reduction of 20% or more from preoperative IOP, and (3) no additional glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: The 95% confidence interval of risk difference of surgical failure in µTLO in reference to Trabectome surgery was -12.1% to +9.5% in matching, -12.7% to +11.1% in IPTW, -12.2 to +7.0 in stratification, and -9.7% to +8.1% in regression adjustment, all of which fell within the predetermined noninferiority margin of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical success of µTLO at 1 year after was not inferior to that of Trabectome surgery.

Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among anterior chamber angle evaluations using automated 360-degree gonio-photos.

PURPOSE: To investigate the reproducibility for the iridocorneal angle evaluations using the pictures obtained by a gonioscopic camera, Gonioscope GS-1 (Nidek Co., Gamagori, Japan). METHODS: The pragmatic within-patient comparative diagnostic evaluations for 140 GS-1 gonio-images obtained from 35 eyes of 35 patients at four ocular sectors (superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal angles) were conducted by five independent ophthalmologists including three glaucoma specialists in a masked fashion twice, 1 week apart. We undertook the observer agreement and correlation analyses of Scheie's angle width and pigmentation gradings and detection of peripheral anterior synechia and Sampaolesi line. RESULTS: The respective Fleiss' kappa values for the four elements between manual gonioscopy and automated gonioscope by the glaucoma specialist were 0.22, 0.40, 0.32 and 0.58. Additionally, the respective intraobserver agreements for the four elements by the glaucoma specialist each were 0.32 to 0.65, 0.24 to 0.71, 0.35 to 0.70, and 0.20 to 0.76; the Fleiss' kappa coefficients for the four elements among the three glaucoma specialists were, respectively, 0.31, 0.38, 0.31, and 0.17; the Fleiss' kappa coefficients for the angle width and pigmentation gradings between the two glaucoma specialists each were 0.30 to 0.35, and 0.29 to 0.43, respectively. Overall, the Kendall's tau coefficients for the angle gradings reflected the positive correlations in the evaluations. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested slight-to-substantial intraobserver agreement and slight-to-fair (among the three) or fair-to-moderate (between the two each) interobserver agreement for the angle assessments using GS-1 gonio-photos even by glaucoma specialists. Sufficient training and a solid consensus should allow us to perform more reliable angle assessments using gonio-photos with high reproducibility.

Stratification-Based Investigation of Adjunctive Brimonidine or Timolol to a Prostaglandin Analogue in Japanese Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: We previously investigated the efficacy and safety of adding 0.1% brimonidine (Brim) or 0.5% timolol (Tim) to prostaglandin analogue (PGA) monotherapy to treat patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) with intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≤16 mmHg. Herein, we describe an additional post-hoc stratifying analysis of the possible differences in the effect of IOP-lowering and pulse rate (PR) after adjunctive Brim or Tim to PGA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 128 subjects. Patients with NTG treated with PGA were stratified based on their baseline IOP. The changes in IOP from baseline and the effect of patient factors on IOP changes were investigated. Patients were stratified by age for investigation of their PR and blood pressure (BP). The change and the effect of patient factors on PR and BP were investigated. RESULTS: After stratification analysis, in 52 eyes treated with Brim and 61 eyes with Tim with baseline IOP 12 ≤ IOP ≤ 16 mmHg, both eye drops lowered IOP significantly (P < 0.0001), and the IOP-lowering efficacy of Brim was non-inferior to that of Tim. However, in 9 Brim- and 6 Tim-treated eyes with baseline IOP of <12 mmHg, no statistically significant decrease in IOP was evident with either eye drop. In the Tim group, PR decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after stratification by age. CONCLUSION: The IOP-lowering efficacy of Brim was non-inferior to that of Tim after stratification by baseline IOP (12 ≤ IOP ≤ 16 mmHg). The discrepancy in the IOP-lowering effects of Brim and Tim observed in the previous study was thought to be related to enrolled subjects with low baseline IOP. PR decreased significantly in the Tim group even after age stratification. PR should be considered when selecting ß-blockers for glaucoma treatment.

Comparisons between retinal vessel calibers and various optic disc morphologic parameters with different optic disc appearances: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study.

The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study (GSAS) is a multicenter collaborative study of the characteristics of glaucomatous optic disc morphology using a stereo fundus camera. This study evaluated the retinal vessel calibers and correlations using GSAS fundus photographs between retinal vessels and 38 optic nerve head (ONH) morphologic parameters comprehensively. In all 240 eyes, the mean central retinal arteriolar equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal venular equivalent (CRVE) were 138.4 and 216.5 µm, respectively; the CRAE correlated with age, visual field scores and 19 ONH parameters and CRVE correlated with age, intraocular pressure, visual field scores and 11 ONH parameters. Among the different optic disc appearances including focal ischemia (FI) (n = 53, 22%), generalized enlargement (GE) (n = 53, 22%), myopic glaucoma (MY) (n = 112, 47%), and senile sclerosis (SS) (n = 22, 9%), the CRAE did not differ significantly; CRVE was significantly narrower in SS than in FI and MY. In FI, GE, MY, and SS disc types, CRAE correlated with 3, 14, 9, and 2 ONH parameters, respectively, and CRVE corelated with 9, 0, 12, and 6 ONH parameters, respectively. We confirmed previous observations on the effect of retinal vessel narrowing on glaucomatous changes in the ONH and visual field. The associations between retinal vessel caliber and ONH morphologic parameters vary among different optic disc appearances, suggesting different effects of vascular changes in each disc type.

[Mechanism of blurred vision after brinzolamide instillation].

PURPOSE: Eye drops of carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (Brinzolamide) are known to case blurred vision after instillation. Using tear film stability analysis system (TSAS) and functional visual acuity measurement (FVAM) we studied the mechanism of blurred vision. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were studied. Before instillation of brinzolamide 1%, immediately after and at 3, 5, 10 minutes after 1 minutes eye-closure after instillation the breakup index (BUI) of TSAS and FVAM were measured. RESULTS: Before instillation of brinzolamide 1%, immediately after and at 3, 5, 10 minutes since 1 minutes eye-closure after instillation the BUI of TSAS was 88.3 +/- 1.2, 38.5 +/- 7, 72.1 +/- 4.2, 78.8 +/- 5.1, 83.7 +/- 2.2 respectively, and the FVAM was 1.013 +/- 0.0047, 0.925 +/- 0.029, 1 +/- 0.0075, 1.007 +/- 0.0072, 1.015 +/- 0.0052 respectively. Immediately after 1 minutes eye-closure both BUI and FVAM were low. From 3 minutes after instillation both BUI and FVAM recovered. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that blurred vision after instillation of brinzolamide 1% is associated with the unstableness of tear film. Analyses by TSAS and FVAM are useful to determine both the vision improvement and pharmacokinetics after instillation.

Validating the efficacy of the binomial pointwise linear regression method to detect glaucoma progression with multicentral database.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We previously reported the benefit of applying binomial pointwise linear regression (PLR: binomial PLR) to detect 10-2 glaucomatous visual field (VF) progression. The purpose of the current study was to validate the usefulness of the binomial PLR to detect glaucomatous VF progression in the central 24°. METHODS: Series of 15 VFs (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 SITA-standard) from 341 eyes of 233 patients, obtained over 7.9±2.1 years (mean±SD), were investigated. PLR was performed by regressing the total deviation of all test points. VF progression was determined from the VF test points analyses using the binomial test (one side, p<0.025). The time needed to detect VF progression was compared across the binomial PLR, permutation analysis of PLR (PoPLR) and mean total deviation (mTD) trend analysis. RESULTS: The binomial PLR was comparable with PoPLR and mTD trend analyses in the positive predictive value (0.18-0.87), the negative predictive value (0.89-0.95) and the false positive rate (0.057-0.35) to evaluate glaucomatous VF progression. The time to classify progression with binomial PLR (5.8±2.8 years) was significantly shorter than those with mTD trend analysis (6.7±2.8 years) and PoPLR (6.6±2.7 years). CONCLUSIONS: The binomial PLR method, which detected glaucomatous VF progression in the central 24° significantly earlier than PoPLR and mTD trend analyses, shows promise for improving our ability to detect visual field progression for clinical management of glaucoma and in clinical trials of new glaucoma therapies.

The usefulness of the Deep Learning method of variational autoencoder to reduce measurement noise in glaucomatous visual fields.

The aim of the study was to investigate the usefulness of processing visual field (VF) using a variational autoencoder (VAE). The training data consisted of 82,433 VFs from 16,836 eyes. Testing dataset 1 consisted of test-retest VFs from 104 eyes with open angle glaucoma. Testing dataset 2 was series of 10 VFs from 638 eyes with open angle glaucoma. A VAE model to reconstruct VF was developed using the training dataset. VFs in the testing dataset 1 were then reconstructed using the trained VAE and the mean total deviation (mTD) was calculated (mTDVAE). In testing dataset 2, the mTD value of the tenth VF was predicted using shorter series of VFs. A similar calculation was carried out using a weighted linear regression where the weights were equal to the absolute difference between mTD and mTDVAE. In testing dataset 1, there was a significant relationship between the difference between mTD and mTDVAE from the first VF and the difference between mTD in the first and second VFs. In testing dataset 2, mean squared prediction errors with the weighted mTD trend analysis were significantly smaller than those form the unweighted mTD trend analysis.

Usefulness of data augmentation for visual field trend analyses in patients with glaucoma.

AIM: To investigate the usefulness of data augmentation in visual field (VF) trend analyses in patients with glaucoma. METHOD: This study included 6380 VFs from 638 eyes of 417 patients with open-angle glaucoma. Various affine transformations were applied to augment the VF data: (1) rotation, (2) scaling, (3) vertical and horizontal shift and (4) a combination of these different transformations. Using pointwise linear regression (PLR), the total deviation (TD) values of a patient's 10th VF were predicted using TD values from shorter VF series (from first to third VFs (VF1-3) to first to ninth VFs (VF1-9)) with and without VF data augmentation, and the root mean squared error (RMSE) was calculated. RESULTS: With PLR, mean RMSE without VF augmentation averaged from 3.95 (VF1-3) to 19.01 (VF1-9) dB. The RMSE was significantly improved by applying the different transformations: (1) rotation (from VF1-3 to VF1-7), (2) scaling (from VF1-3 to VF1-6), (3) vertical and horizontal shifts (from VF1-3 to VF1-4) and (iv) a combination of these (from VF1-3 to VF1-7). Progression rates in VF1-10 had better agreement with those in shorter VF series when a combination of affine transformation was applied. The differences in rates were between 1.9 (VF1-3) and 0.39 (VF1-9) dB if augmentation was used, which was significantly smaller than that observed when augmentation was not applied (from 2.6 with VF1-3 to 0.26 dB with VF1-9). CONCLUSION: It is useful to apply VF data augmentation techniques when predicting future VF progression in glaucoma using PLR, especially with short VF series.

[Temporal changes in intraocular pressure during adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy of two cases of West syndrome].

BACKGROUND: Two cases of West syndrome demonstrated changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) associated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) therapy. CASES: A nine-month-old (Case 1) and a six-month-old (Case 2) female infant were treated for West syndrome. In Case 1, the IOP was 14 mmHg in the right eye and 16 mmHg in the left eye before ACTH therapy was started. Although the IOP did not change at the beginning of the treatment, it rose to 36 mmHg in the right eye and 25 mmHg in the left eye after an increase in ACTH dosage. In Case 2, the IOP was 10 mmHg in the right eye and 9 mmHg in the left eye before ACTH therapy, it increased to 18 mmHg in both eyes after treatment was started. The IOP returned to baseline levels in both cases after ACTH therapy concluded. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that it is necessary to monitor IOP when ACTH therapy is given to patients with West syndrome.

Validation of formula-predicted glaucomatous optic disc appearances: the Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study.

AIMS: The Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study (GSAS) is a multicentre collaborative study of the characteristics of glaucomatous optic disc morphology using a stereo fundus camera. Using the GSAS dataset, we previously established a formula for predicting different appearances of glaucomatous optic discs, although the formula lacked validation in an independent dataset. In this study, the formula was validated in another testing dataset. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Testing dataset contained three-dimensionally analysed optic disc topographic parameters from 93 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma; six topographic parameters (temporal and nasal rim-disc ratios, mean cup depth, height variation contour, disc tilt angle and rim decentring absolute value) were used for predicting different appearances of glaucomatous optic discs. The agreement between grader-classified optic disc types, that is, focal ischemic (FI), generalized enlargement, myopic glaucomatous (MY), and senile sclerotic (SS) and formula-predicted optic disc types, that is, pFI, pGE, pMY and pSS, were assessed. RESULTS: Based on this formula, the eyes were classified with pFI (21 eyes, 22.6%), pGE (27 eyes, 29.0%), pMY (26 eyes, 28.0%) and pSS (19 eyes, 20.4%) when the top predictive element based on the formula was considered as the optic disc appearance in each eye. The six topographic parameters used in the formula differed significantly among the four predicted optic disc types. Substantial agreement (κ = 0.7496) was seen for the top two predictive elements based on the formula that agreed with the graders' classification in 76 (81.7%) eyes. Among the four optic disc types, the levels of agreement were relatively lower in the SS type (κ = 0.3863-0.5729) compared with the other three optic disc types (κ = 0.7898-0.8956) even though the unclassifiable and mixed optic disc types were excluded from the testing dataset. CONCLUSION: The GSAS classification formula can predict and quantify each component of different optic disc appearances in each eye and provide a novel parameter to describe glaucomatous optic disc characteristics.

[Influence on tear film after instillation of timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution examination by a tear film stability analysis system].

PURPOSE: Using a tear film stability analysis system (TSAS), we analyzed the tear film with regard to blurred vision after instillation of 0.5% timolol gel-forming solutions. METHODS: Tear film stability was recorded before and after instillation of timolol gel-forming solutions in 9 healthy volunteers (age: 30 +/- 5.6 years; mean +/- SD). Thermosetting gel (Rysmon TG), ion-activated gel (Timoptol XE), or conventional timolol solutions (Timoptol or TIMABAK which does not contain an antiseptic) was applied to only one eye at a time. The subject was administered a single instillation. After instillation, the subject closed his eyelid for one minute. TSAS was carried out immediately after the subject opened his eye. TSAS was also carried out 3 minutes, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after the subject had opened his eye. The grade of blurred vision after each test was evaluated in 5 levels. RESULTS: The tear film was remarkably unstable just after the opening of the eyelids following instillation of Rysmon TG or Timoptol XE. On the breakup map, the most unstable area of the cornea was the lower part after instillation of Rysmon TG, and the center, after instillation of Timoptol XE. In the breakup index (range 0-100), where the high portion showed stability, both gels were low (p < 0.05). Timoptol XE was lower than Rysmon TG (p < 0.05). For timolol gel forming solutions, the index 5 minutes after eye-opening was lower than before instillation. As compared with before instillation, blurred vision increase just after the opening of the eyelids following instillation of Rysmon TG or Timoptol XE, and blurred vision increased at 3 minutes after opening of the eyelids following instillation of Timoptol XE. CONCLUSION: It seems that the analysis by TSAS was useful to measure the effect on visual performance and the pharmacokinetics after the instillation of the gel-forming solutions.

Effect of Botulinum Toxin A Treatment on Eyelid Pressure in Eyes with Blepharospasm.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) on the eyelid pressure in patients with benign essential blepharospasm (BEB). METHODS: Twenty normal volunteers (10 men, 10 women; average age 59.7 ± 11.3 years) and 33 patients (12 men, 21 women; average age 61.1 ± 14.7 years) with BEB were studied. The upper and lower eyelid pressures were measured with a blepharo-tensiometer in the normal subjects (N group). The eyelid pressures and intraocular pressures (IOP) were measured before and after the BTX-A injections in the BEB patients (B group). RESULTS: The mean eyelid pressure in the N group was 31.0 ± 6.8 mmHg for the upper eyelid and 29.9 ± 6.5 mmHg for the lower eyelid (P > 0.05). The mean eyelid pressure in the B group before treatment was 35.3 ± 7.0 mmHg for the upper eyelid and 37.8 ± 6.6 mmHg for the lower eyelid. The eyelid pressure in the B group was significantly higher than in the N group for the upper and lower eyelids (both P < 0.001). The eyelid pressure was significantly decreased after BTX-A treatment for the upper (29.9 ± 7.5 mmHg) and the lower (32.8 ± 7.0 mmHg) eyelids (both P < 0.001). The mean IOP was 15.1 ± 2.9 mmHg before, and it significantly decreased to 14.5 ± 2.8 mmHg (P = 0.020) after the BTX-A injections. The IOP was significantly correlated with the lower eyelid pressure (P = 0.0435), but not with the upper eyelid pressure (P = 0.175). CONCLUSION: The eyelid pressure was higher in the patients with BEB. The eyelid pressure and the IOP were significantly reduced after the BTX-A injections. In addition, the IOPs were significantly correlated with the eyelid pressure of the lower eyelid.

Validating Variational Bayes Linear Regression Method With Multi-Central Datasets.

Purpose: To validate the prediction accuracy of variational Bayes linear regression (VBLR) with two datasets external to the training dataset. Method: The training dataset consisted of 7268 eyes of 4278 subjects from the University of Tokyo Hospital. The Japanese Archive of Multicentral Databases in Glaucoma (JAMDIG) dataset consisted of 271 eyes of 177 patients, and the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) dataset includes 248 eyes of 173 patients, which were used for validation. Prediction accuracy was compared between the VBLR and ordinary least squared linear regression (OLSLR). First, OLSLR and VBLR were carried out using total deviation (TD) values at each of the 52 test points from the second to fourth visual fields (VFs) (VF2-4) to 2nd to 10th VF (VF2-10) of each patient in JAMDIG and DIGS datasets, and the TD values of the 11th VF test were predicted every time. The predictive accuracy of each method was compared through the root mean squared error (RMSE) statistic. Results: OLSLR RMSEs with the JAMDIG and DIGS datasets were between 31 and 4.3 dB, and between 19.5 and 3.9 dB. On the other hand, VBLR RMSEs with JAMDIG and DIGS datasets were between 5.0 and 3.7, and between 4.6 and 3.6 dB. There was statistically significant difference between VBLR and OLSLR for both datasets at every series (VF2-4 to VF2-10) (P < 0.01 for all tests). However, there was no statistically significant difference in VBLR RMSEs between JAMDIG and DIGS datasets at any series of VFs (VF2-2 to VF2-10) (P > 0.05). Conclusions: VBLR outperformed OLSLR to predict future VF progression, and the VBLR has a potential to be a helpful tool at clinical settings.

Comparison of success rates in eye drop instillation between sitting position and supine position.

PURPOSE: To compare the success rates of eye drop instillation in the sitting position and supine position among Japanese patients with ocular diseases (cataract, glaucoma, or retinal and vitreous diseases). METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized in Okayama University Hospital for eye surgery were studied. Instillation procedures of each patient in both the sitting and supine positions were recorded using a video camera at the time of instillation. We defined "success" when one drop fell accurately onto the ocular surface at the first attempt. Instillation of two or more drops, drops delivered to a site other than the eye surface, and touching the eyelashes, eyelids, or conjunctiva with the tip of the eye drop bottle were regarded as "failure". We excluded patients with vision below counting finger. RESULTS: One-hundred and two patients (54 males and 58 females, aged 70.2 ± 12.3 years) with ocular disease who were hospitalized for surgery (cataract: 61.8%, glaucoma: 15.7%, retinal and vitreous diseases: 22.5%) were included in this prospective observational study. The mean duration of eye drop use was 3.1 ± 5.2 years. The success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly higher in the supine position than in the sitting position (64.7% vs. 50%, P = 0.0039). The mean age was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (74.0 ± 11.5 vs. 67.7 ± 12.4 years, P = 0.0085) for the sitting position, but not significantly different for the supine position (72.3 ± 12.9 vs. 70.1 ± 12.0 years, P = 0.3849). No significant differences in mean duration of drop use, mean corrected VA, and mean spherical equivalent refraction were observed between success and failure groups, for both sitting and supine positions. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly higher when applied in the supine position than in the sitting position.

Fixed combination of travoprost and timolol maleate reduces intraocular pressure in Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: analysis by prostaglandin analogue.

BACKGROUND: We have shown a decrease in mean intraocular pressure (IOP) by switching to travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) in subjects receiving prostaglandin analogue (PGA) monotherapy and requiring additional medication in a previous report. For analyzing factors affecting IOP reduction, baseline IOP and preceding PGA were selected as statistically and clinically significant factors. In this report, we examine IOP-lowering effect and adverse drug reactions by preceding PGA. METHODS: Patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received monotherapy with one of four PGAs (travoprost, latanoprost, tafluprost, or bimatoprost) for at least 3 months at 26 institutions and were determined to require additional medication by their primary physician were included. IOP reduction and adverse events were examined at 4, 8, and 12 weeks for each of four PGAs after switching to TTFC. RESULTS: In total, 157 patients who could be followed up for at least 4 weeks after switching to TTFC were included in the efficacy analysis. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and baseline IOP and PGA were found to be significant factors to IOP reduction. IOP reduction at week 12, adjusted with the regression model, was -3.5, -1.8, and -1.4 mmHg in the tafluprost, latanoprost, and travoprost groups, whereas it was -0.5 mmHg in the bimatoprost group. Along with differences in baseline IOP between groups, an IOP-lowering effect of >1 mmHg was noted in the tafluprost, latanoprost, and travoprost groups after the switch. IOP was maintained at 13.8-14.8 mmHg throughout the follow-up period. No serious adverse events or noteworthy issues were observed in any group after the switch. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant IOP-reducing effects of TTFC were observed in the latanoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost groups when switching from each PGA monotherapy, while there were some differences in effects between groups, with minimal safety concerns.