Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 11(4): 651-658, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32367493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of bilingualism compared to monolingualism on the clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We searched the databases: MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and LILACS, and searched by hand and in gray literature for studies published before September 2019. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Two reviewers independently searched for studies, extracted data, and performed the quality assessment. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this review. Data from meta-analyses suggest that bilingual individuals with Alzheimer's disease exhibit symptoms (694 participants; mean difference (MD) (4.05 years; 95% CI: 1.87-6.22 and are diagnosed later (1012 participants; MD 2.0 years; 95% CI: 0.08-3.92) than monolingual participants. CONCLUSION: Bilingualism may delay the manifestation of symptoms and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Further studies with more rigorous methodology are needed to improve the precision of the results.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Multilinguismo , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Humanos
2.
Int J Cardiol ; 227: 43-50, 2017 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27846461

RESUMO

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of editors as it is contains multiple serious errors in the data of its primary end-point that make its conclusions unreliable. For example, in Figure 4, the cardiovascular death rates cited from Fox 2008 and Swedberg 2010 are incorrect. K. Fox, et al. Lancet, 372 (2008), pp. 807­816; K. Swedberg et al. Lancet, 376 (2010), pp. 875­885.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA