Can the Current Thresholds for Synovial Cell Count and Neutrophil Percentage to Diagnose Prosthetic Joint Infection be Applied to Metal-on-Metal Rotating Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Synovial leukocyte count analysis is an important tool in the diagnosis of PJI. However, results can be poor if metallosis is present. The issue of metallosis was established for some rotating hinge knee arthroplasty designs. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center analysis that included 108 patients who had a single-design metal-on-metal rotating hinge knee arthroplasty who underwent revision surgery and had prior synovial fluid analysis performed. The diagnostic accuracy of leukocyte count and the percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophiles (% PMN) were investigated. RESULTS: Patients who had a PJI had a higher median leukocyte count and % PMN compared to aseptic revisions (7,905/µL (interquartile range (IQR) 2,419 to 37,400) and 85% (IQR 70.3 to 93.8) versus 450 (IQR 167 to 1,215) and 46% (IQR 28.5 to 67.4%), P < .001). The respective areas under the curves were 0.916 (95% confidence interval 0.862 to 0.970) for leukocyte count and 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.739 to 0.902) for % PMN. We calculated an optimal cut-off value of 1,200 leukocytes/µL (Sensitivity 94.5%/specificity 75.5%) and 63% PMN (Sensitivity 85.5%/specificity 73.6%) to define PJI. Established thresholds were less sensitive, but more specific. The "infection likely" scenario of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition was closest to the calculated thresholds. CONCLUSION: Currently used thresholds for leukocyte cell count and %PMN to define PJI were less sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of PJI in metal-on-metal RHK knees. Surgeons must consider lower cut-off values when evaluating such implants for PJI.

Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses.

Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty and the high revision burden in orthopedic oncology, the risk of PJI is likely to increase over the coming years. In this non-systematic review article, we present and discuss current management options and the associated results focusing on studies from the last 15 years and studies from dedicated centers or study groups. The indication, surgical details and results in controlling infection are presented for debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention (DAIR) procedure with an exchange of the modular components, single-stage implant exchange, two-stage exchanges and ablative procedures.

Evaluation of time to reimplantation as a risk factor in two-stage revision with static spacers for periprosthetic knee joint infection.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the time to reimplantation (TTR) during two-stage revision using static spacers with regard to treatment success and function in patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. METHODS: 163 patients (median age 72 years, 72 women) who underwent two-stage exchange for chronic knee PJI between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed (based on the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria). A cutoff TTR for increased risk of reinfection was identified using the maximally selected log-rank statistic. Infection control, aseptic revisions and overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Adjustment for confounding factors-the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)-was done with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: When TTR exceeded 94 days, the adjusted hazard of reinfection was increased 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4-5.7; p = 0.0036). The reinfection-free rate was 67% (95% CI 52-79%) after 2 years and 33% (95% CI 11-57%) after 5 years for a longer TTR compared to 89% (95% CI 81-94%) and 80% (95% CI 69-87%) at 2 and 5 years, respectively, for a shorter TTR. Adjusted overall survival and number of aseptic revisions did not differ between the longer TTR and shorter TTR groups. Maximum knee flexion was 90° (IQR 84-100) for a longer TTR and 95° (IQR 90-100) for a shorter TTR (p = 0.0431), with no difference between the groups in Oxford Knee Score. Baseline characteristics were similar (body mass index, age, previous surgeries, microorganisms) for the two groups, except that there was a higher CCI (median 4 vs. 3) and higher CRP (median 3.7 vs 2.6 mg/dl) in the longer TTR group. CONCLUSION: A long TTR is sometimes unavoidable in clinical practice, but surgeons should be aware of a potentially higher risk of reinfection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

What Is the Risk of Dislocation and Revision in Proximal Femoral Replacement with Dual-mobility Articulation After Two-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Hip Infection?

BACKGROUND: Dislocation is a major complication of revision THA after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The likelihood of dislocation can be particularly high if megaprosthetic proximal femoral replacement (PFR) has been performed during a second-stage reimplantation. Dual-mobility acetabular components are an established way of reducing the instability risk in revision THA; however, the likelihood of dislocation for dual-mobility reconstructions in the setting of a two-stage PFR has not been studied systematically, although patients with these reconstructions might be at an increased risk. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the risk of dislocation and revision for dislocation in patients who underwent PFR with a dual-mobility acetabular component as part of two-stage exchange for hip PJI? (2) What is the risk of all-cause implant revision and what other procedures were performed (apart from revision for a dislocation) in these patients? (3) What potential patient-related and procedure-related factors are associated with dislocation? METHODS: This was a retrospective study from a single academic center including procedures performed between 2010 and 2017. During the study period, 220 patients underwent two-stage revision for chronic hip PJI. Two-stage revision was the approach of choice for chronic infections, and we did not perform single-stage revisions for this indication during the study period. Thirty-three percent (73 of 220) of patients underwent second-stage reconstruction with a single-design, modular, megaprosthetic PFR because of femoral bone loss, using a cemented stem. A cemented dual-mobility cup was the approach of choice for acetabular reconstruction in the presence of a PFR; however, 4% (three of 73) were reconstructed with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty to salvage an infected saddle prosthesis, leaving 70 patients with a dual-mobility acetabular component and a PFR (84% [59 of 70]) or total femoral replacement (16% [11 of 70]). We used two similar designs of an unconstrained cemented dual-mobility cup during the study period. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 73 years (63 to 79 years), and 60% (42 of 70) of patients were women. The mean follow-up period was 50 ± 25 months with a minimum follow-up of 24 months for patients who did not undergo revision surgery or died (during the study period, 10% [seven of 70] died before 2 years). We recorded patient-related and surgery-related details from the electronic patient records and investigated all revision procedures performed until December 2021. Patients who underwent closed reduction for dislocation were included. Radiographic measurements of cup positioning were performed using supine AP radiographs obtained within the first 2 weeks after surgery using an established digital method. We calculated the risk for revision and dislocation using a competing-risk analysis with death as a competing event, providing 95% confidence intervals. Differences in dislocation and revision risks were assessed with Fine and Gray models providing subhazard ratios. All p values were two sided and the p value for significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The risk of dislocation (using a competing-risks survivorship estimator) was 17% (95% CI 9% to 32%) at 5 years, and the risk of revision for dislocation was 12% (95% CI 5% to 24%) at 5 years among patients treated with dual-mobility acetabular components as part of a two-stage revision for PJI of the hip. The risk of all-cause implant revision (using a competing-risk estimator, except for dislocation) was 20% (95% CI 12% to 33%) after 5 years. Twenty-three percent (16 of 70) of patients underwent revision surgery for reinfection and 3% (two of 70) of patients underwent stem exchange for a traumatic periprosthetic fracture. No patients underwent revision for aseptic loosening. We found no differences in patient-related and procedure-related factors or acetabular component positioning for patients with dislocation with the numbers available; however, patients with total femoral replacements had a higher likelihood of dislocation (subhazard ratio 3.9 [95% CI 1.1 to 13.3]; p = 0.03) and revision for a dislocation (subhazard ratio 4.4 [95% CI 1 to 18.5]; p = 0.04) than those who received PFR. CONCLUSION: Although dual-mobility bearings might be an intuitive potential choice to reduce the dislocation risk in revision THA, there is a considerable dislocation risk for PFR after two-stage surgery for PJI, particularly in patients with total femoral replacements. Although the use of an additional constraint might appear tempting, published results vary tremendously, and future studies should compare the performance of tripolar constrained implants to that of unconstrained dual-mobility cups in patients with PFR to reduce the risk of instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The Change of Serum Interleukin-6 Fails to Identify Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Who Have Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of persistent infection prior to second-stage reimplantation in 2-stage exchanges for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be challenging as there is no optimal diagnostic tool. This study investigates the usefulness of pre-reimplantation serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and its change between both stages to identify patients who have subsequent PJI. METHODS: There were 125 patients who underwent planned 2-stage exchange for chronic knee or hip PJI from a single center retrospectively identified. Patients were included if preoperative CRP and IL-6 were available for both stages. Subsequent PJI was defined as 2 positive microbiological cultures at reimplantation or subsequent surgery or death due to PJI during follow-up. RESULTS: Prior to reimplantation, the median serum CRP (total knee arthroplasties [TKAs]: 1.0 versus 0.5 mg/dL, P = .028; total hip arthroplasties [THAs]: 1.3 versus 0.5 mg/dL, P = .015) and median IL-6 (TKA: 8.0 versus 6.0 pg/mL, P = .052; THA: 7.0 versus 6.0 pg/mL, P = .239) were higher in patients who had subsequent PJI. The IL-6 and CRP values showed moderate sensitivity (TKA/CRP: 66.7%; THA/CRP: 58.8%; TKA/IL-6: 46.7%; THA/IL-6: 35.3%) and good specificity (TKA/CRP: 66.7%; THA/CRP: 81.0%; TKA/IL-6: 86.3%; THA/IL-6: 83.3%). The change in CRP and IL-6 between the stages did not differ between the groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum CRP and IL-6 show low to moderate sensitivity and good specificity in the diagnosis of subsequent PJI prior to reimplantation, which questions their usefulness as a rule-out test. Furthermore, the change in between stages does not appear to identify subsequent PJI.

Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection - Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships.

BACKGROUND: Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 32 patients (median age 67 years; range 15-93; 18 women) who underwent placement of a total femur spacer for chronic periprosthetic joint infection with massive femoral bone loss between 2010 and 2019 as part of a planned two-stage exchange. The median follow-up period amounted to 46 months (range, 1-149). Implant and limb survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Potential risk factors for failure were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 34% (11 of 32) of patients having a spacer-associated complication, and 25% underwent revision for this reason. After the first stage, 92% were considered infection-free. There were 84% of patients who underwent second-stage reimplantation of a total femoral arthroplasty using a modular megaprosthetic implant. Infection-free implant survival was 85% after 2 years and 53% after 5 years. There were 44% of patients who underwent amputation after a median time of 40 months (range, 2-110). Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured at first-stage surgery, while polymicrobial growth was most common at reinfection. CONCLUSION: Total femur spacers can lead to infection control in over 90% of cases with a reasonable complication rate for the spacer itself. However, the reinfection and subsequent amputation rate after second-stage megaprosthetic total femoral arthroplasty is around 50%.

Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection.

PURPOSE: Megaprosthetic distal femoral reconstruction (DFR) is a limb-salvage procedure to address bone loss following two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival of DFR compared to hinged total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that DFR was associated with a poorer survival. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 97 subjects who underwent two-stage revision of chronic knee PJI were included. Among these, 41 were DFR. The diagnosis of PJI was established using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Implant survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test as well as multivariate Cox regression at a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 59 (interquartile range (IQR) 45-78) months. Overall, 24% (23/97) of patients required revision surgery for infection. The infection-free survival of rotating hinge revision TKA was 93% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 86-100%) at five years compared to 50% (95% CI 34-66%) for DFR. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for reinfection were DFR reconstruction (HR 4.7 (95% CI 1-22), p = 0.048), length of megaprosthesis (HR 1.006 (95% CI 1.001-1.012), p = 0.032) and higher BMI (HR 1.066, 95% CI 1.018-1.116), p = 0.007). 10% (4/41) of patients undergoing DFR underwent amputation to treat recurrent infection. CONCLUSION: Megaprosthetic DFR as part of a two-stage exchange for PJI is a salvage treatment that has a high risk for reinfection compared to non-megaprosthetic TKA. Patients must therefore be counseled accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective observational study, Level IV.

Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Unsuspected positive cultures (UPCs) may be found at the time of planned aseptic revision surgery and have previously been associated with decreased implant survival. However, reported rates vary greatly, and potential risk factors are widely unknown. This study investigates the rate of UPCs, implant survival, as well as potential risk factors for UPCs and revision. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study on 434 cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA 277) and knee revision arthroplasty (TKA 157) performed between 2010 and 2017. Microbiology culture results, revision-free survival (RFS) and infection-free (IFS) survival, and the potential impact of UPCs as well as patient- or procedure-related risk factors were investigated at a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 41 months). RESULTS: A total of 37% of patients had a positive culture (160/434). 27% (119/434) had a solitary positive culture, and 9% (41/434) had ≥2 positive cultures of the same species. Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured. Overall, 32% (13/41) of patients with ≥2 positive cultures underwent revision for infection compared with 6% (17/274) of patients with negative cultures. RFS and IFS were reduced if ≥2 cultures were positive. Single positive cultures had no impact on RFS or IFS. Male sex, elevated serum C-reactive protein, and obesity were independently associated with finding ≥2 UPCs in revision THA. CONCLUSION: Appearance of ≥2 UPCs in aseptic revision leads to reduced RFS and IFS. Males, obese patients, and patients with elevated serum C-reactive protein planned for THA revision should be considered for extended diagnostics to rule out periprosthetic joint infection.

Total joint replacement of the hip and knee in patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a report of six joints.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a rare congenital condition that leads to severe joint contractures and deformities. As painful joint dysplasia and degeneration might develop over time, total joint replacement (TJR) can be a potential treatment option for these patients. The aim of this study is to investigate functional results, implant survivorship and potential complications in patients with AMC who undergo hip or knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified six TJR in three patients at a single centre performed between 2006 and 2019. The median patient age at surgery was 23 years and the median follow-up period was 69 (IQR 55-99) months. We analysed surgical technique, implant survivorship and complications as well as functional outcome determined by pain reported on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patient-reported outcome scores [Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip score (HHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS)], range of motion and ambulatory status. Depending on data distribution means with ranges and median with interquartile range were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test or Student's t test. The level of significance was defined at < 0.05. RESULTS: In hips, the mean range of motion in flexion/extension (52° vs. 85°, p = 0.014) and in rotation (28° vs. 68°, p = 0.02) as well as mean pain score on the NRS (8.5 vs. 0, p = 0.001), OHS (9 vs. 26, p = 0.031) and HHS (17 vs. 52, p = 0.007) significantly improved. In knees, mean range of motion (55° vs. 93°, p = 0.403), mean pain score on the NRS (0 vs. 7) and the OKS (2 vs. 21) also improved. While the ambulatory status did not change, the patients who were wheelchair dependent reported less problems with transfers to a bed or chair and the patient who ambulated reported an improved walking distance. One total knee arthroplasty (TKA) underwent revision for an acute, late infection 155 months following the initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TJR is a safe procedure in patients with AMC that effectively improves function and reduces pain irrespective of preoperative ambulatory status.

Synovial fluid pH is as specific as synovial leukocyte count but less sensitive for the diagnosis of chronic prosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid markers (synovial leukocyte count and differential) have been shown to be most accurate in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). An inverse correlation for synovial leukocyte count and synovial pH is known assuming that leukocyte metabolism causes synovial fluid acidosis. This study's purpose is to analyze the use of synovial pH as a potential diagnostic marker for PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 92 patients who presented with painful total joint arthroplasty (TJA) of the hip (THA; n = 25) or knee (TKA, n = 67) were prospectively investigated. In our cohort 33% (30/92) had PJI and 67% (62/92) were diagnosed non-infected based on the modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria of 2018. Receiver operating curves and the Youden's index were used to define an ideal cut-off value for synovial pH and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated using cross-tables. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated for synovial white blood cell (WBC) count (cut-off > 3000 leukocytes) and percentage of neutrophils (PMN%, cut-off > 80%). RESULTS: The median synovial pH level was significantly lower in the group with chronic PJI compared to implants with aseptic failure (7.09 vs. 7.27; p < 0.001). The calculated optimal cut-off value was 7.11 (AUC 0.771) with a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 89%. However, the sensitivity and specificity of synovial WBC count were 90% and 88% and for synovial PMN% 73% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Synovial pH may be a useful adjunct parameter in the diagnosis of chronic PJI after hip or knee arthroplasty, but showed low sensitivity in this preliminary cohort. Future studies with larger numbers are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2a, diagnostic study. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (Registration number: DRKS00021038).

Does Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Have an Effect on the Patients' Functional or Behavioral Outcome and Health-Related Quality of Life of the Affected Partners?

BACKGROUND: Spouses are the primary caregivers of patients living with osteoarthritis (OA). Little is known about how the quality of life (QoL) of OA patients' partners change after total joint replacement surgery (TJR). METHODS: Preoperative health status and 12-month postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared in 24 couples using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), knee or hip specific Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (OOS) and accelerometry for the assessment of habitual physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). Correlations between the changes in the patients' OOS subscales scores, habitual activity, and their partners' SF-36 scores were calculated. RESULTS: Following TJR the patients' OOS subscale scores showed positive changes (P < .001). The SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) score improved (P < .001), while the mental component summary (MCS) score as well as PA and SB remained unchanged (P ≥ .093). Their partners' PCS, MCS, and SB did not change (P ≥ .286), whereas the PA even decreased (P = .027). Correlation analyses showed positive results for the changes in the patients' OOS subscale pain and the changes in their partners' MCS (r = 0.355, P = .048) as well as the changes in the patients' OOS subscale activities of daily living and the changes in the PCS of their partners (r = 0.406, P = .027). In contrast to the results described above, changes in the patients' PA were negatively correlated with changes in their partners' PCS (r = -0.389, P = .033). CONCLUSION: TJR has a positive influence on QoL but not the habitual activity of OA patients. Their partners, on the other hand, show no changes in QoL and even a slight decrease in habitual activity.

Acute Renal Failure After the First Stage of a 2-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange using antibiotic-loaded spacers is a common approach in treating periprosthetic joint infections. Acute kidney injury (AKIN) can be a systemic complication of this procedure. This study investigates the prevalence of AKIN and identifies potential risk factors. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients undergoing 2-stage exchange using a spacer in 285 patients treated between 2010 and 2017. Risk factors were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric analyses and a multivariate, binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of patients (95/285) developed an AKIN postoperatively. Twenty-four percent (23/95) of these patients had an acute on chronic kidney failure with a previously impaired renal function. In multivariate analysis, a higher age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.034; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-1.068; P = .046) and a higher baseline creatinine level (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.237-3.052; P = .004) were risk factors for AKIN. Treatment with vancomycin in the spacer or systemically was not associated with AKIN while a high vancomycin blood level (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.913-3.992; P = .086) and fungal infections were (HR, 3.482; 95% CI, 0.968-12.521; P = .056). Furthermore, in univariate analysis, a higher median Charlson comorbidity index (4 vs 3, P = .007), a lower preoperative hemoglobin (10.9 vs 11.7 g/dL, P = .008), and a higher number of blood transfusions (1 vs 0, P = .004) were associated with AKIN. CONCLUSION: AKIN is common in patients undergoing 2-stage exchange. Associated patient factors, particularly in patients with chronic renal dysfunction, should be optimized. The general use of glycopeptide antibiotics was no risk factor for AKIN.

Staged reconstruction of unilateral neglected hip dislocation through total hip arthroplasty and subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful approach to treat unilateral symptomatic neglected hip dislocation (NHD). However, the extensive leg length discrepancy (LLD) can hereby only be partially corrected. In case of residual LLD of more than 2 cm, subsequent femoral lengthening can be considered. PATIENTS/MATERIAL/METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographs of five patients (age 38.1 (28-51) years) with unilateral NHD who underwent THA with (n = 3) or without (n = 2) subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) and secondary intramedullary femoral lengthening through a retrograde magnetically-driven lengthening nail (follow-up 18.4 (15-27) months). RESULTS: LLD was 51.0 (45-60) mm before and 37.0 (30-45) mm after THA. Delayed bone union at one SSO site healed after revision with autologous bone grafting and plate fixation. Subsequent lengthening led to leg length equalisation in all patients. Complete consolidation was documented in all lengthened segments. CONCLUSION: Staged reconstruction via THA and secondary femoral lengthening can successfully be used to reconstruct the hip joint and equalise LLD. The specific anatomical conditions have to be taken into consideration when planning treatment, and patients ought to be closely monitored.

Gastrocnemius Muscle Flaps for Soft Tissue Coverage in Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue deficiency in total knee arthroplasty infection is a potentially devastating complication. Gastrocnemius muscle flaps can be used to address this problem. We aim at reporting survival rates of these reconstructions and identify risk factors for failure. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of all flaps performed at a single center between 2006 and 2019 was performed. Clinical and microbiological results were assessed in 43 cases after a median follow-up period of 53 months (25%-75% interquartile range 18-79). Function was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score. We analyzed the infection-free survival and identified risk factors using survival comparison and (non-)parametric testing. RESULTS: Infection-free survival was 71% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. The rate of subsequent amputation was 16% with a mortality rate of 26% during follow-up. Four patients did not undergo reimplantation and 11 patients received an arthrodesis implant. There were no failures of the flap itself. The Charlson Comorbidity index was the only relevant risk factor for reinfection. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were most common organisms identified. Postoperative function was limited with a mean Oxford Knee Score of 20. CONCLUSION: Gastrocnemius flap coverage is a valid option for soft tissue reconstruction in periprosthetic infections to retain a functioning limb despite a high complication rate and the risk of subsequent amputation.

A single centre study of 41 cases on the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aims at investigating cup survival of porous tantalum revision cups and identifies risk factors for failure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients treated between 2010 and 2012. Main indications were aseptic loosening in 83% and two-stage exchange after periprosthetic joint infection in 17% of cases. Mean follow-up period was 72 months. Femoral megaprostheses were used in 13% of cases. Most defects were classified as Paprosky 3b (29%). Function was assessed using the Harris Hip score. RESULTS: Aseptic cup survivorship was 80% at 104 months (95% Confidence Interval 67.4-92.4). Overall implant survival was 73%. Major bone loss defects (Paprosky types 2c to 3b) were associated with a significantly higher rate of failure than minor defects (P = 0.002). There were eight cases of aseptic loosening (19.5%) and two of infection (4.9%). Previous surgeries, indication for acetabular revision, patient-related risk factors and use of megaprostheses did not significantly influence implant survival. The Harris Hip Score improved from a median of 40 (Interquartile range 31-45) to 82 (interquartile range 65-88) postoperative (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the use of porous tantalum metal implants in acetabular revision surgery achieves good to excellent short- term and mid-term functional results and an acceptable complication rate relative to the extent of defect and previous surgery. However, one should be aware of potential limitations of the implants in addressing large defects and discontinuity.

Two stage revision with a proximal femur replacement.

BACKGROUND: Despite very good prosthesis retention times, the growing numbers of primary implantations of hip endoprostheses are leading to increasing numbers of revision operations. Periprosthetic infection, particularly in revision implants, often leads to a massive loss of bone stock, so that in a two-stage exchange the only option left is implantation of a megaendoprosthesis. This retrospective study investigated the clinical and functional outcome for patients who received megaendoprostheses in the proximal femur in two-stage exchange procedures. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were treated between 1996 and 2014 (mean age 71 years, mean follow-up period 52 months). Microorganisms were isolated intraoperatively in 44 patients (89.9%). The reinfection rate was documented in patients who did not undergo any further revision surgery due to mechanical failure (primary) and in patients who had subsequent revisions after reimplantation and subsequent reinfection (secondary). RESULTS: The mean C-reactive protein level at the time of reimplantation was 1.25 mg/dL (range 0.5-3.4). The primary success rate with curative treatment for prosthetic joint infection was 92% (four of 49 patients). The secondary success rate with infection revision cases was 82% (three of 17 revision cases). The mean Harris hip score was 69 (range 36-94). The majority of patients needed different types of walking aid or even wheelchairs, and only 50% of the patients were able to walk outside. CONCLUSIONS: Reinfections occurred in only 8% of patients who underwent two-stage exchanges with a proximal femur replacement. When revision surgery for the proximal femur replacement was required for mechanical reasons, however, the associated reinfections increased the reinfection rate to 18%. Proximal femur replacement achieves a clear reduction in pain, maintenance of leg length, and restoration of limited mobility, and the procedure thus represents a clear alternative to the extensive Girdlestone procedure, which is even more immobilising, or mutilating amputation.

Silver-coated megaprostheses: review of the literature.

Periprosthetic infection remains one of the most serious complications following megaendoprostheses. Despite a large number of preventive measures that have been introduced in recent years, it has not been possible to further reduce the rate of periprosthetic infection. With regard to metallic modification of implants, silver in particular has been regarded as highly promising, since silver particles combine a high degree of antimicrobial activity with a low level of human toxicity. This review provides an overview of the history of the use of silver as an antimicrobial agent, its mechanism of action, and its clinical application in the field of megaendoprosthetics. The benefits of silver-coated prostheses could not be confirmed until now. However, a large number of retrospective studies suggest that the rate of periprosthetic infections could be reduced by using silver-coated megaprostheses.

Mouldable Collagen-Tricalciumphosphate Is a Safe Carrier for Local Antibiotics-Short-Term Results in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Improving local antibiotic delivery is a promising approach to improve infection control and potentially shorten systemic treatment in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study investigates the use of an antibiotic-loaded, mouldable collagen-tricalciumphosphate composite in treatment of hip PJI. METHODS: 124 application cases in 79 patients were included from a referral centre; systemic adverse infects, local complications, and infection control were analysed. RESULTS: In most cases, either vancomycin or meropenem were used. Pathogens were previously known in 82 (66%) cases with polymicrobial infection in 20 (25%) patients. There were no cases of hypercalcaemia. Acute kidney injure was present in 14 (11%) cases. Chronic kidney failure persisted in two cases. During a mean follow-up of 12 (SD 9.3; range 3-35) months, implant survival was achieved in 73 (92%) patients; revision due to PJI was performed in 19 cases. CONCLUSION: Mouldable collagen-tricalciumphosphate composite bone substitute as a local antibiotic carrier in revision hip arthroplasty appears to be a valid option for local antibiotic delivery without systemic complications. Implant survival of 92% supports the hypothesis that local antibiotic therapy is an important component in the treatment of PJI.

Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature.

The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012-2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as "long" ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed.

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Resistant Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections Using an Oral Linezolid-Based Antibiotic Regime.

BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance has been reported as an issue in the systemic treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Linezolid offers the advantages of high oral bioavailability and little resistance; however, efficacy in the treatment of PJI varies considerably, and studies reporting consistent surgical treatment are scarce. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of two-stage revisions performed between 2008 and 2017. We identified 111 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Oral linezolid was given for 28 days following 14 days of intravenous tailored antibiotics in resistant gram-positive PJI. A total of 64% of the patients had methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. The median follow-up was 43 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-57) months. RESULTS: 22% (24/111) of the patients underwent surgery for subsequent infection. The 5-year infection-free survival probability was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-85). A total of 5% of the patients (6/111) had the same organism at the time of reinfection. The patients with infections caused by other organisms than Coagulase-negative staphylococci tended to have a worse reinfection-free survivorship at five years (70% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the patients with obesity tended to have reduced reinfection-free survivorship at five years (69% vs. 84%, p = 0.08). Overall, 5% (6/111) of the patients had blood count abnormalities with no treatment discontinuations. CONCLUSION: Two-stage revision arthroplasty with systemic oral linezolid treatment for resistant gram-positive PJI results in an infection control of 77% at the mid-term.